page 726 |
Previous | 1 of 7 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
FEASIBILITY OF ZERO AROMATIC HYDROCARBON DISCHARGE FROM A STYRENE MONOMER FACILITY David E. Bruderly, Senior Engineer John D. Crane, Division Manager Jack D. Riggenbach, Senior Engineer Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. Gainesville, Florida 32604 INTRODUCTION Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. (ESE) investigated advanced wastewater management and treatment techniques for removing aromatic hydrocarbons from wastewaters generated by a styrene monomer plant in the Southwest. The wastewaters are contaminated with benzene, ethylbenzene, diethylbenzene, styrene and toluene and are currently treated in a dissolved-air flotation unit prior to being discharged. Work to eliminate aromatic discharges was executed in four phases: 1. In Phase 1, an in-plant wastewater survey was conducted to determine the major sources of hydraulic and organic loading and to evaluate the operation of the existing treatment system. 2. In Phase 2, potential treatment processes were screened by bench-scale laboratory tests. 3. Treatment efficiencies, costs and design criteria of promising unit processes were developed from onsite pilot plant studies during Phase 3. 4. Recommendations for storm water and process wastewater collection and treatment were developed in Phase 4. In-Plant Survey The wastewater survey revealed eight significant wastewater sources and further showed that a considerable portion of the wastewater now being treated consisted of storm water. These sources and the existing wastewater treatment system are shown in Figure 1. Present Treatment The present treatment system consists of continuous neutralization with sulfuric acid. Polyelectrolyte is then added to the neutralized wastes which are then pumped to the dissolved-air flotation (DAF) unit for oil and grease removal. Effluent from the DAF then passes through a surge tank where boiler blowdown is added prior to discharge to the river. A pH monitor in the river discharge stops flow to the river if the pH is not between 6.1 and 8.9 units. Bench and Pilot Studies for Hydrocarbon Removal Laboratory bench-scale investigations of activated carbon, biological stabilization, coagu- lation-flocculation, polymeric resin adsorption, solvent extraction and steam stripping were conducted on synthetic waste streams. Based on these investigations, field pilot tests for steam stripping, air stripping, solvent extraction and activated carbon adsorption were conducted. Results of the pilot investigations were favorable for each of these techniques. Steam stripping was selected as the most versatile and cost-effective hydrocarbon removal unit process. This is indicated in Table I which shows capital and operating costs for the processes investigated. 726
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC1977074 |
Title | Feasibility of zero aromatic hydrocarbon discharge from a styrene monomer facility |
Author |
Bruderly, David E. Crane, John D. Riggenbach, Jack D. |
Date of Original | 1977 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 32nd Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,26931 |
Extent of Original | p. 726-732 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-01 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 726 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | FEASIBILITY OF ZERO AROMATIC HYDROCARBON DISCHARGE FROM A STYRENE MONOMER FACILITY David E. Bruderly, Senior Engineer John D. Crane, Division Manager Jack D. Riggenbach, Senior Engineer Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. Gainesville, Florida 32604 INTRODUCTION Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. (ESE) investigated advanced wastewater management and treatment techniques for removing aromatic hydrocarbons from wastewaters generated by a styrene monomer plant in the Southwest. The wastewaters are contaminated with benzene, ethylbenzene, diethylbenzene, styrene and toluene and are currently treated in a dissolved-air flotation unit prior to being discharged. Work to eliminate aromatic discharges was executed in four phases: 1. In Phase 1, an in-plant wastewater survey was conducted to determine the major sources of hydraulic and organic loading and to evaluate the operation of the existing treatment system. 2. In Phase 2, potential treatment processes were screened by bench-scale laboratory tests. 3. Treatment efficiencies, costs and design criteria of promising unit processes were developed from onsite pilot plant studies during Phase 3. 4. Recommendations for storm water and process wastewater collection and treatment were developed in Phase 4. In-Plant Survey The wastewater survey revealed eight significant wastewater sources and further showed that a considerable portion of the wastewater now being treated consisted of storm water. These sources and the existing wastewater treatment system are shown in Figure 1. Present Treatment The present treatment system consists of continuous neutralization with sulfuric acid. Polyelectrolyte is then added to the neutralized wastes which are then pumped to the dissolved-air flotation (DAF) unit for oil and grease removal. Effluent from the DAF then passes through a surge tank where boiler blowdown is added prior to discharge to the river. A pH monitor in the river discharge stops flow to the river if the pH is not between 6.1 and 8.9 units. Bench and Pilot Studies for Hydrocarbon Removal Laboratory bench-scale investigations of activated carbon, biological stabilization, coagu- lation-flocculation, polymeric resin adsorption, solvent extraction and steam stripping were conducted on synthetic waste streams. Based on these investigations, field pilot tests for steam stripping, air stripping, solvent extraction and activated carbon adsorption were conducted. Results of the pilot investigations were favorable for each of these techniques. Steam stripping was selected as the most versatile and cost-effective hydrocarbon removal unit process. This is indicated in Table I which shows capital and operating costs for the processes investigated. 726 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 726