page 36 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Disposal of Tannery Wastes R. R. PARKER, Consulting Engineer Reid Crowther and Partners, Limited Toronto, Ontario, Canada INTRODUCTION In considering the treatment of tannery waste and the selection of the optimum method, one is immediately faced with a situation wherein the type of receiving medium, rather than the effluent, determines the method of treatment. This situation is not confined to the tanning industry but it appears to be particularly applicable to other industries as well. Frequently one is told that this or that treatment system has been found by its operator to be completely satisfactory. Undoubtedly it is, but no thought has been given to the fact that a method of treatment, or rather the resultant effluent quality acceptable in one area, would be judged as completely unacceptable in other places. There are basically five methods of disp sal for effluent after some form of treatment: 1) Municipal sewers; 2) Tide water; 3) Classified rivers; 4) Controlled fresh water streams or lakes; or 5) On the land. The permitted levels of contaminants for each of these methods of disposal vary greatly. NATURE OF TANNERY WASTE In present tannery practice, there are two principal tanning methods used: 1) Vegetable tanning and 2) Chrome tanning. Other methods are in use in some special instances, but for the purposes of this paper only these two systems, or a combination of them, will be considered. The term "vegetable" as applied to tanning is used in its broadest sense and includes all tanning operations wherein one uses extracts of wood, bark, or other plant parts, including some by-products from the paper industry. In chrome tanning the hide is tanned with a solution of an acid chromium sulfate. The chromium compound is reduced so that the chromium is present only in the trivalent form. In general, vegetable tanning is used for the production of sole leather and chrome tanning for upper leather, but combinations of the system are common. The preparation of the cattle hide for either process is essentially the same. Hides are first washed to remove manure, blood and salt from the curing process. Within the last few years the use of brine, rather than dry sodium chloride, for curing has increased. The brined hide is somewhat cleaner as most of the manure and blood has been removed in the brining operation, consequently the BOD of the wash effluent is somewhat lower. The chloride content is approximately the same, as frequently some dry salt is used to supplement the brine. The content of sodium chloride normally is 14 to 15 per cent of the hide weight, as received. After washing, the hides are immersed in a thin slurry of calcium hydroxide, - 36 -
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC196706 |
Title | Disposal of tannery wastes |
Author | Parker, R. R. |
Date of Original | 1967 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 22nd Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,14179 |
Extent of Original | p. 36-43 |
Series |
Engineering extension series no. 129 Engineering bulletin v. 52, no. 3 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-05-20 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 36 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Disposal of Tannery Wastes R. R. PARKER, Consulting Engineer Reid Crowther and Partners, Limited Toronto, Ontario, Canada INTRODUCTION In considering the treatment of tannery waste and the selection of the optimum method, one is immediately faced with a situation wherein the type of receiving medium, rather than the effluent, determines the method of treatment. This situation is not confined to the tanning industry but it appears to be particularly applicable to other industries as well. Frequently one is told that this or that treatment system has been found by its operator to be completely satisfactory. Undoubtedly it is, but no thought has been given to the fact that a method of treatment, or rather the resultant effluent quality acceptable in one area, would be judged as completely unacceptable in other places. There are basically five methods of disp sal for effluent after some form of treatment: 1) Municipal sewers; 2) Tide water; 3) Classified rivers; 4) Controlled fresh water streams or lakes; or 5) On the land. The permitted levels of contaminants for each of these methods of disposal vary greatly. NATURE OF TANNERY WASTE In present tannery practice, there are two principal tanning methods used: 1) Vegetable tanning and 2) Chrome tanning. Other methods are in use in some special instances, but for the purposes of this paper only these two systems, or a combination of them, will be considered. The term "vegetable" as applied to tanning is used in its broadest sense and includes all tanning operations wherein one uses extracts of wood, bark, or other plant parts, including some by-products from the paper industry. In chrome tanning the hide is tanned with a solution of an acid chromium sulfate. The chromium compound is reduced so that the chromium is present only in the trivalent form. In general, vegetable tanning is used for the production of sole leather and chrome tanning for upper leather, but combinations of the system are common. The preparation of the cattle hide for either process is essentially the same. Hides are first washed to remove manure, blood and salt from the curing process. Within the last few years the use of brine, rather than dry sodium chloride, for curing has increased. The brined hide is somewhat cleaner as most of the manure and blood has been removed in the brining operation, consequently the BOD of the wash effluent is somewhat lower. The chloride content is approximately the same, as frequently some dry salt is used to supplement the brine. The content of sodium chloride normally is 14 to 15 per cent of the hide weight, as received. After washing, the hides are immersed in a thin slurry of calcium hydroxide, - 36 - |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 36