Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 31, 1970) |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana July 31, 1970 To Incorporate or not to Incorporate: Federal Income Tax Implications by Floyd E. Gillis, Associate Professor of Economics, and Robert C. Suter, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics The decision as to whether to incorporate a farm business depends at least in part upon the rules regarding and the desire to minimize income taxes and thus the disposition of profits. When a farm business is operated as an individual proprietorship (or partnership) all profits are subject to the personal income tax. However, when that same business is incorporated, only the salary paid to the owner or manager is subject to the personal tax; the rest, typically referred to as reinvested earnings, is subject to the corporate income tax. When the personal tax rate is lower than the corporate tax rate, incorporation is not practical ; furthermore, if there are no earnings to be reinvested, incorporation of course makes no sense. Yet today most well-managed farms either have opportunities for expansion and/or debts that need retiring. Most farm operators can set up the records relative to their farm business so that all payments which accrue to owner or owners can be in the form of a salary or salaries. If these two ideas are not realistic, consider them as assumptions, for purposes of the following analyses. The first idea—the opportunity for expansion and/or debt retirement—"eliminates" the problem of a tax being levied on improperly accumulated surpluses. The second idea—owner payments in the form of salaries rather than profits—eliminates the problem of "double taxation" first on corporate profits and second on dividends to the owner or owners. Tax Rates: Personal versus Corporate Both personal and corporate income tax rates are graduated (the corporate rate more so). The personal rate graduation or (or rates) for 1969 numbered 24 and ranged from 15.0 to 70.0 per cent. The corporate rates for 1969 consisted of a 22.0 per cent normal tax (on all income) plus a 26.0 per cent surtax (on all income over $25,000) ; thus really two rates—22.0 and 48.0 per cent. A direct comparison of tax rates is not relevant, however. It is the additional tax along with the method of "disposing" of the income that is important. For example, a farmer with a $40,000 income in a direct comparison pays $560 less taxes if he pays them personally ($12,- 140) than if he pays them as a corporation ($12,700). See Table 1. Yet, if this same farmer incorporated, he could allocate his $40,000 income between himself in the form of salary and the corporation (as reinvested earnings) so as to save $4,038 in taxes. And, it's all perfectly legal. When to Incorporate There are two conditions under which incorporation saves federal income taxes: 1. Where the portion of corporate income which is retained or reinvested in the business is less than $25,000, and where (INC x TRP) is greater than TRS (INC x $SA) 4- .22 (INC x 7fRE). The two taxes—personal and corporate—are equal when (INC x TRP) = TRS (INC x %SA) + .22 (INC x %RE). INC = total income to the business or owner TRP = tax rate on that income when all income is personal income c/c SA = percentage of corporate income taken as salary % RE = percentage of corporate income retained or reinvested in business TRS = tax rate on that income which has been taken as salary.
Object Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 31, 1970) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ197007 |
Date of Original | 1970 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Farm produce--Indiana--Marketing Agriculture--Economic aspects--Indiana |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Economic & Marketing Information (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension) |
Rights | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 05/01/2015 |
Digitization Specifications | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-econ197007.tif |
Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 31, 1970) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ197007 |
Transcript | Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana July 31, 1970 To Incorporate or not to Incorporate: Federal Income Tax Implications by Floyd E. Gillis, Associate Professor of Economics, and Robert C. Suter, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics The decision as to whether to incorporate a farm business depends at least in part upon the rules regarding and the desire to minimize income taxes and thus the disposition of profits. When a farm business is operated as an individual proprietorship (or partnership) all profits are subject to the personal income tax. However, when that same business is incorporated, only the salary paid to the owner or manager is subject to the personal tax; the rest, typically referred to as reinvested earnings, is subject to the corporate income tax. When the personal tax rate is lower than the corporate tax rate, incorporation is not practical ; furthermore, if there are no earnings to be reinvested, incorporation of course makes no sense. Yet today most well-managed farms either have opportunities for expansion and/or debts that need retiring. Most farm operators can set up the records relative to their farm business so that all payments which accrue to owner or owners can be in the form of a salary or salaries. If these two ideas are not realistic, consider them as assumptions, for purposes of the following analyses. The first idea—the opportunity for expansion and/or debt retirement—"eliminates" the problem of a tax being levied on improperly accumulated surpluses. The second idea—owner payments in the form of salaries rather than profits—eliminates the problem of "double taxation" first on corporate profits and second on dividends to the owner or owners. Tax Rates: Personal versus Corporate Both personal and corporate income tax rates are graduated (the corporate rate more so). The personal rate graduation or (or rates) for 1969 numbered 24 and ranged from 15.0 to 70.0 per cent. The corporate rates for 1969 consisted of a 22.0 per cent normal tax (on all income) plus a 26.0 per cent surtax (on all income over $25,000) ; thus really two rates—22.0 and 48.0 per cent. A direct comparison of tax rates is not relevant, however. It is the additional tax along with the method of "disposing" of the income that is important. For example, a farmer with a $40,000 income in a direct comparison pays $560 less taxes if he pays them personally ($12,- 140) than if he pays them as a corporation ($12,700). See Table 1. Yet, if this same farmer incorporated, he could allocate his $40,000 income between himself in the form of salary and the corporation (as reinvested earnings) so as to save $4,038 in taxes. And, it's all perfectly legal. When to Incorporate There are two conditions under which incorporation saves federal income taxes: 1. Where the portion of corporate income which is retained or reinvested in the business is less than $25,000, and where (INC x TRP) is greater than TRS (INC x $SA) 4- .22 (INC x 7fRE). The two taxes—personal and corporate—are equal when (INC x TRP) = TRS (INC x %SA) + .22 (INC x %RE). INC = total income to the business or owner TRP = tax rate on that income when all income is personal income c/c SA = percentage of corporate income taken as salary % RE = percentage of corporate income retained or reinvested in business TRS = tax rate on that income which has been taken as salary. |
Tags
Add tags for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 31, 1970)
Comments
Post a Comment for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 31, 1970)