Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 32 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
VOL. LXIX INDIANAPOLIS, FEB. 7, 1914 NO. 6 The Advantages oLG-od Crop Rotation *-*^ Experiment Sta M X Years ago, when there were vast areas of cheap virgin soil which was rich in humus and in fertility, there was no occasion for the rotation of crops. The tendency then was, and is yet, to some extent, to rotate farms Instead of rotating crops. But the country could not continue such a system indefinitely. Vast areas of cheap Soil Management That is Conducive to Permanent Agriculture.—W. F. Purdue crop rotation is beneficial to the soil by way of helping to maintain fertility, and by improving the physical condition. Furthermore, it is the most ef- ing unfavorable season for one crop is often more or less favorable for another. It distributes the work more evenly throughout the year and en- fails to provide for maintaining the fertility of his soil; second, the conservatism of farmers with regard to trying a new method, or a method different from that followed by their fathers; third, the peculiar adaptation of certain sections to one particular crop, which is considered the "money crop;" fourth, the tendency to put off from year to virgin soil no longer exist, and worn- out soils have become so common as to attract the attention of all thoughtful people. That it j>ays to follow a definite system- of crop rotation was long since conclusively demonstrated by thousands of farmers and by our experiment stations. In most communities it is possible to compare the farm of a man who is following a rotation, with those of his neighbors round about who are following a haphazard method of cropping. Nearly all of our state experiment stations, at least those in the corn belt, have accurate records of the yield, quality and value of crops grown in rotation, as compared to the continuous growing of one or two crops, and the results of these experiments may be had free of charge by writing 'he experiment station in your own state and requesting them. Briefly stated, It may be said that fective means of combating weeds, which would otherwise deprive the soil of much of its fertility. Certain weeds thrive wonderfully where but one crop is raised. Cockle burrs are prominent where corn is grown year after year, or where corn and small grains are alternated without early fall plowing. Foxtail and smartweed thrive on lands where small grains have been grown continuously. Even as valuable as clover is, such weeds as plantain, daisy fleabane and wild carrots grow and take possession of fields that have been reseeded to clover continuously for many years. Rotation ls also an effective means of waging war upon insect pests and fungus diseases. The blights, smuts and rusts can largely be held In check by a chance of crops, while they will multiply and destroy crops if rotation is not followed. Rotation lessens the danger of crop loss, owing to the fact that an exceed- ables the farmer to utilize men and teams to better advantage. It furnishes a balanced ration for live stock and renders unnecessary the purchase of high-priced feeding stuffs. Reasons Why Rotation is Neglected. Taking everything into consideration, the benefits derived from crop rotation are so many and so great that one can not but wonder why it is not practiced more generally and more .systematically. No system of farming can be made permanent without It. The grain farmer as well as the live stock farmer should practice some system of rotation. Some of the factors which are most effective in preventing the general adoption of crop rotations are: First, the large percentage of tenant farmers, together with the prevalence of short term leases. Nor Is the tenant farmer as much to blame, or as short-sighted as the landlord who year the starting of a rotation, with the idea that it is less profitable at the present time, and merely a means for producing larger crops in the more or less distant future; fifth, the fact that when an attempt is made to follow a rotation there are difficulties to be overcome in the form of interference by drought, or excessive wet weather, freezing out of the clover crop, etc. The old Idea of a rotation was that the land needed rest. In the Southern cotton belt some farmers, seeing the havoc wrought by the continuous cultivation of cotton on the same land year after year, and depending simply on the use of commercial fertilizers to get the crop, adopted the plan of letting a field lie Idle each alternate year to rest lt, as they said. But Nature will not allow land to rest, for she scatters the seed of grass and weeds and the land ls as busy at work growing Continued on page 38.
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1914, v. 69, no. 06 (Feb. 7) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA6906 |
Date of Original | 1914 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 2011-04-19 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript | VOL. LXIX INDIANAPOLIS, FEB. 7, 1914 NO. 6 The Advantages oLG-od Crop Rotation *-*^ Experiment Sta M X Years ago, when there were vast areas of cheap virgin soil which was rich in humus and in fertility, there was no occasion for the rotation of crops. The tendency then was, and is yet, to some extent, to rotate farms Instead of rotating crops. But the country could not continue such a system indefinitely. Vast areas of cheap Soil Management That is Conducive to Permanent Agriculture.—W. F. Purdue crop rotation is beneficial to the soil by way of helping to maintain fertility, and by improving the physical condition. Furthermore, it is the most ef- ing unfavorable season for one crop is often more or less favorable for another. It distributes the work more evenly throughout the year and en- fails to provide for maintaining the fertility of his soil; second, the conservatism of farmers with regard to trying a new method, or a method different from that followed by their fathers; third, the peculiar adaptation of certain sections to one particular crop, which is considered the "money crop;" fourth, the tendency to put off from year to virgin soil no longer exist, and worn- out soils have become so common as to attract the attention of all thoughtful people. That it j>ays to follow a definite system- of crop rotation was long since conclusively demonstrated by thousands of farmers and by our experiment stations. In most communities it is possible to compare the farm of a man who is following a rotation, with those of his neighbors round about who are following a haphazard method of cropping. Nearly all of our state experiment stations, at least those in the corn belt, have accurate records of the yield, quality and value of crops grown in rotation, as compared to the continuous growing of one or two crops, and the results of these experiments may be had free of charge by writing 'he experiment station in your own state and requesting them. Briefly stated, It may be said that fective means of combating weeds, which would otherwise deprive the soil of much of its fertility. Certain weeds thrive wonderfully where but one crop is raised. Cockle burrs are prominent where corn is grown year after year, or where corn and small grains are alternated without early fall plowing. Foxtail and smartweed thrive on lands where small grains have been grown continuously. Even as valuable as clover is, such weeds as plantain, daisy fleabane and wild carrots grow and take possession of fields that have been reseeded to clover continuously for many years. Rotation ls also an effective means of waging war upon insect pests and fungus diseases. The blights, smuts and rusts can largely be held In check by a chance of crops, while they will multiply and destroy crops if rotation is not followed. Rotation lessens the danger of crop loss, owing to the fact that an exceed- ables the farmer to utilize men and teams to better advantage. It furnishes a balanced ration for live stock and renders unnecessary the purchase of high-priced feeding stuffs. Reasons Why Rotation is Neglected. Taking everything into consideration, the benefits derived from crop rotation are so many and so great that one can not but wonder why it is not practiced more generally and more .systematically. No system of farming can be made permanent without It. The grain farmer as well as the live stock farmer should practice some system of rotation. Some of the factors which are most effective in preventing the general adoption of crop rotations are: First, the large percentage of tenant farmers, together with the prevalence of short term leases. Nor Is the tenant farmer as much to blame, or as short-sighted as the landlord who year the starting of a rotation, with the idea that it is less profitable at the present time, and merely a means for producing larger crops in the more or less distant future; fifth, the fact that when an attempt is made to follow a rotation there are difficulties to be overcome in the form of interference by drought, or excessive wet weather, freezing out of the clover crop, etc. The old Idea of a rotation was that the land needed rest. In the Southern cotton belt some farmers, seeing the havoc wrought by the continuous cultivation of cotton on the same land year after year, and depending simply on the use of commercial fertilizers to get the crop, adopted the plan of letting a field lie Idle each alternate year to rest lt, as they said. But Nature will not allow land to rest, for she scatters the seed of grass and weeds and the land ls as busy at work growing Continued on page 38. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1