Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 32 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
VOL. LXVII INDIANAPOLIS, MARCH. 9, 1912. I'lofJUSUimiti- tt •'lll-ellio Rainfall and Production Dry and Wet Counties in 1911 CROP YIELDS WITH NORMAL RAINFALL. AXD IX DRY SEASONS. By comparing the rainfall -with the better methods of agriculture, we deduce some very impoitant facts. The map of Indiana by counties together with the precipitation during the year 1911, together with comparative corn l.roduction in years of normal rainfall and very dry seasons, is a most interesting matter for study. This is especially so when comparing methods e.f corn cultivation. By the courtesy of The National Weather Service, we Kive the map of Indiana showing the precipitation for 1911 by counties. Studying the Map. The reader by studying the map and the explanations given in the shaded scales at the bottom of it, will note the counties with normal rainfall, and those that were very dry. About 45 inches precipitation are reckoned normal for Indiana. It will be noticed that ten counties and parts of five others had less than 35 inches of precipitation, and were very dry. The short rainfall in them occurred from May to September, during the corn-growing season. While we have not the precise facts yet of corn-production by counties in 1911, we have the aggregate production for the State during that year, which was 154,781,- 000 bushels. Other Normal, aiul Dry Years. The year 1910 was a normal one in rainfall during the corn-growing season, and the moisture was well distributed, probably better than in man-. Velars before. As a result the eorn yield that year was 201,211!,000 bushels, ""omparing that year witli that of 1908, which was one of the driest in •"any years, we find that in the latter '**-r the corn production was only "-'1.000.000 bushels, while acreage of both years did not greatly differ, be- 'nB something . over 4,000,000 acres. These comparisons show the wonder- 11 influence of moisture on produc- "on and especially when this rainfall °mes in the growing season as it did 1910, the year of greatest corn "«« Indiana ever had. It should be ' q *n this connection that the meth- 8 of corn culture as well as more h r'f»l selection of seed in late years ■ieMhad * BOOd deal to do with the *lth " acre* and is having more to do tar f eVer>' year. Farmers have •talkU"y noted that so man>" barren hav S Per acre reduces the yield, and (ar . *WI thus prompted to more 'or , Se'p°tion of thoroughbred corn in CU|?, '"", t*a*e taken greater care 'n* st \i*non to 8<*c«"*e the ear-bear- r«ltiv.a.. Botn sood sep(1 an<J S°°<J great- One farmer In the dry part of Allen County who is very careful in selecting pure bred seed, last year had a yield of 59.2 bushels of corn per acre on his farm, while other farmers on the conserving the little moisture left below, it was held and and made available in solu ble effect on the fertility effecting plant growth. But for holding this film moisture at the roots of the corn plant of course his yield would have dropped down to 38 to 40 bushels of the neighboring farms around him, for the yield of the farmers on the t- villi10"* has mueh to do with •ield Per acre. Tak Some Noun! Examples. for instance the year 1911: Scale of shades -inches □ m l/b*t tban 35 35 to 40 40 to 45 45 to 50 more thaa 50 Precipitation in Indiana for the Year 1911. same quality of land in that dry section, grew only 38 to 41 bushels per acre. The first mentioned farmer with the large yield, where the rainfall was only about 31 inches only, was not only careful In his selection of seed corn, but was constant in his shallow cultivation of the growing corn when the rain almost ceased for weeks. He used a two row cultivator that stirred the soil surface for an inch or two only, and thus kept a dust mulch stopping off evaporation of the moisture which capillary action was drawing up from the subsoil. By thus I same quality of soil fell ten to twelve bushels per acre below his. Other Instances. We have similar facts from other counties as to the yield of corn where the rainfall was 30 to 35 inches only for the year, and equally dry as in Allen county during the corn-growing ■Mtson. In one of these a farmer who was both careful in seed selection anil in constant level cultivation in the dry period, nnd a yield of over 60 bushels per acre, while some of his neighbors under the same dry con. NO. 10 tions and on soil like his own, had only 32 to 3 4 bushels per acre, but who ■topped cultivation in the dry period, and Allowed thee moisture to evaporate and leave the plant without help in growth. These facts afford ample warnings in the dry seasons. When rain-fall is normal, growth ir.ees on well without these precautions, as was shown in the big crop of over 201,000,- 000 bushels of corn in 1910. As to the Minor Crops. As a rule wheat and oats reach maturity before the dry season begins, and precipitation bas less to do with the yield of these. But the minor crops which must have the summer and autumn season periods for growth and maturing, are seriously effected by drouth. This is especially so In in growing potatoes, which are becoming a profitable crop. While in deep soils level cultivation may be effective in holding the moisture, it has not been found so easy a proposition as with corn. The deep and lighter se.ils may permit deeper planting of potatoes, in which ease Instances of shallow cultivation have been report ed which greatly helped the yield. One farmer reported his experience In growing potatoes mulched with straw to take the place of the dust, mulch of corn, and he had a large yield of potatoes in a very dry season, when his neighbors all around him growing them in the usual way had almost entire failures. The Fruit Crops. There ar© many other minor crops that are seriously effected by very dry seasons, such as strawberries and other small fruits as well as the tree fruits. How to carrj- all these through d"ry seasons without serious failure has long been a problem. For the most part when irrigation is Impossible in the absence of sufficient water, mulching has been resorted to with success, but rarely on a largo scale of production. As we are confronted with these problems e-vei-y f.-w years. the map given and the facts stated In methods and comparative productions in normal and dry seasons, are well worth studying. Notes on Crop Production. Tlie average production of corn in Indiana on an area of a little over 4,- 000,000 acres in a five years' period, is 161,530,410 bushels. The average gross receipts per aero on corn at 4 0 bushels per acre is about the same so that on wheat at 20 bushels per aire, a.eording to tlie last five years prevailing market prices of both. During the last few years Irish potatoes have sold in the leading markets, at nearly double the acreage value of either corn or wheat, when the yield was 100 bushels per acre— only a good yield for a good potato grower, as many grow 125 bushels per acre. The great advantage in growing ceirn is that of maintaining live stock lev putting a part of it in the silo, stalks, blades, and all, for feeding, and returning the manure to the soil in order to keep up fertility. This is one reason why Indiana grows over
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1912, v. 67, no. 10 (Mar. 9) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA6710 |
Date of Original | 1912 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 2011-04-14 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript |
VOL. LXVII
INDIANAPOLIS, MARCH. 9, 1912.
I'lofJUSUimiti- tt
•'lll-ellio
Rainfall and Production
Dry and Wet Counties in
1911
CROP YIELDS WITH NORMAL
RAINFALL. AXD IX DRY
SEASONS.
By comparing the rainfall -with the
better methods of agriculture, we deduce some very impoitant facts. The
map of Indiana by counties together
with the precipitation during the year
1911, together with comparative corn
l.roduction in years of normal rainfall
and very dry seasons, is a most interesting matter for study. This is especially so when comparing methods
e.f corn cultivation. By the courtesy
of The National Weather Service, we
Kive the map of Indiana showing the
precipitation for 1911 by counties.
Studying the Map.
The reader by studying the
map and the explanations given in the
shaded scales at the bottom of it, will
note the counties with normal rainfall, and those that were very dry.
About 45 inches precipitation are
reckoned normal for Indiana. It will
be noticed that ten counties and parts
of five others had less than 35 inches
of precipitation, and were very dry.
The short rainfall in them occurred
from May to September, during the
corn-growing season. While we have
not the precise facts yet of corn-production by counties in 1911, we have
the aggregate production for the State
during that year, which was 154,781,-
000 bushels.
Other Normal, aiul Dry Years.
The year 1910 was a normal one in
rainfall during the corn-growing season, and the moisture was well distributed, probably better than in man-.
Velars before. As a result the eorn yield
that year was 201,211!,000 bushels,
""omparing that year witli that of
1908, which was one of the driest in
•"any years, we find that in the latter
'**-r the corn production was only
"-'1.000.000 bushels, while acreage of
both years did not greatly differ, be-
'nB something . over 4,000,000 acres.
These comparisons show the wonder-
11 influence of moisture on produc-
"on and especially when this rainfall
°mes in the growing season as it did
1910, the year of greatest corn
"«« Indiana ever had. It should be
' q *n this connection that the meth-
8 of corn culture as well as more
h r'f»l selection of seed in late years
■ieMhad * BOOd deal to do with the
*lth " acre* and is having more to do
tar f eVer>' year. Farmers have
•talkU"y noted that so man>" barren
hav S Per acre reduces the yield, and
(ar . *WI thus prompted to more
'or , Se'p°tion of thoroughbred corn
in CU|?, '"", t*a*e taken greater care
'n* st \i*non to 8<*c«"*e the ear-bear-
r«ltiv.a.. Botn sood sep(1 an |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1