Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 20 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
VOL. LXV INDIANAPOLIS, NOV. 12, 1910. NO. 46 Written for the Indiana Farmer SAND VETCH AS A SOIL BUILDER. By J. H. Haynes. Astonishing results from experimenting with sand vetch for restoring fertility to worn out land have been demonstrated in this vicinity in the last four years. Some three miles from town on the Wabash river is a farm that merited the name "starvation farm," so run down were its producing powers. Originally this farm was covered with forests of oak, poplar, walnut, etc., and after these were removed the land was very productive for some years. The soil is about equally divided into rich bottom land, yellow sandy knolls and level clay loam. The bottom land was very productive. The clay loam fairly so, but the sandy knolls produced but little, and in dry years nothing. The writer has been over this farm and is familiar with its failures of crops in the past. For 50 years it was farmed on the soil robbery system of selling the products and binning the corn stalks. The maximum yield on the bottom land was 40 bushels, on the other soils not over 20 bushels of corn. The best yields of wheat or oats never exceeded 10 luishels per acre. It changed owners much like the boy gets rid of a worthless knife, that is by a "sight unseen" process. Men would buy it presumably because it was offered cheap. When they examined their purchase they found that it was really dear, and hastened to get even by selling at first chance. Mr. W. C. Smith, president of the Canning Co., bought this farm in 1906, for the purpose of growing early truck for the factory thinking that on account of its sandy nature it might prove valuable, as such stuff is grown in the main before drouths can affect the crops. Sweet corn, peas, beets for very early and tomatoes and potatoes for later crops. People in general thought that he had bought a "gold brick," but events have disproved that. In the spring of 1906 he planted the sandy land in early peas; the season was so very dry that the crop only realized $10 per acre barely covering cost of seed. When the peas were off, about the 25th of June, he planted the fields in sweet corn, using commercial fertilizers to aid, but no good results came of this and his corn only brought him $15 per acre, another loss. Fortunately he planted the black land in late peas, and that saved him from financial loss that year, bringing $75 per acre. We rather infer that Mr. Smith was, to use a slang phrase, "up a stump" as to knowing what to do. In some way he got a bulletin from the TJ. S. Dept. of Agriculture on the growing and value of sand vetch. The word "sand" attracted his attention because he had a sand farm. The bulletin valued one acre of vetch plowed under for fertilizing purposes as worth from $20 to $40 expended in commercial fertilizers. This news encouraged him to the point that he ordered from his seedsman two bushels of vetch seed, enough to sow- two acres. This was sown in August, 1906, on a tract of the poorest sand land on the farm. I3y winter a heavy coat of green vetch covered the ground. It came through the winter all right, and by May the stems were four feet in length. In June it was cut for hay. He was so well impressed with its value that in the succeeding August he sowed 21 acres of his poorest sand, intending to follow it in 1908 with corn, and four acres of black land for pasture and hay. It made rapid growth that fall. The winter was severe but the vetch came out in fine condition. The spring was wet and late, so that the. yield was 150 bushels. On neighboring lands where crimson clover had been used the highest yield was 75 bushels per acre. On another^ farm of clay soil with gravelly soil, owned by Mr. Smith's brother, the vetch has proven equally as effective. This farm had been for 50 years a tenant farm and its fertility reduced to the starvation point. On a 50 acre tract vetch was sown and plowed under and planted in field corn. The yield was double that of any previous year. On this same farm a test was made of using vetch as a nitrogen Vetch Plants. by plowing time the coat of green vetch was so heavy as almost to defy an effort to turn it under, much of it being five feet long. The work was so tedious that it was not finished till the last of May. On June 3d and 4th he planted the corn. It came up nicely, but the usual drouth set in for a six week's duration. The corn drew slowly for a while but finally new life was infused into the young plant and, as if by magic, it grew rapidly, holding a dark greon color, while adjoining fields across the road were fired and dried up. Everybody passing along the public highway was surprised at the striking contrast between fields, and would stop and inquire of Smith what he had done for that field. These people had been for years accustomed to see corn three and four feet high on this field, while it was then eight to ten feet high. The six weeks of hot dry weather did not phase it, and at gathering time it yielded 72 bushels per acre, and that on land that had not in 20 years given over 20 bushels to the acre. In August, 1908, he sowed 30 acres which as usual grew rapidly. The next spring, 1909, 10 acres xvere planted in corn. Eight acres in potatoes and 12 acres in sxveet corn for the cannery. The result xvas that the field corn yielded 90 bushels per acre where formerly the crops xvere from 0 to 40 bushels per acre. The 12 acres sweet corn produced 4% tons to the acre and on one-and txvo- fifths acres of the potato ground 450 bushels of potatoes were dug, and on the poorer portions of this potato land fertilizer for alfalfa. Ten acres were planted in August, 1908. This fleld had been cropped for 60 years and xvas in a poor condition. The vetch was ploxved under in May, 1909. The ground was kept free from weeds by frequent stirring until the middle of June, and 20 pounds of alfalfa seed to the acre was sown. In fixe xveeks it xvas clipped and is noxv a flne field of alfalfa. Mr. Smith has 14 acres on his place procured the same way; his is on very sandy land. A visit to his place will amply repay any one. His fine fields of corn, fall vetch and alfalfa fields are a study xvorth taking up. Another year many tests will be made along these lines. We started out by saying "astonishing results." We close by changing the word to "wonderful" results on these exhausted soils. They clearly demonstrate that vetch is the great nitrogen and humus plant to reinvigorate our lands. The cost of seed is moro than for other kinds but the advan tages it has over them for enriching makes it far the cheapest. Three to four dollars xvill seed an acre, and in two years it wHl return cost of seed many times. When once started, Mr. Smith says it can be made to reseed itself easily. Fifty pounds are required to sow an acre. In sowing in corn a one-horse drill is used regulating the feed accordingly. Rye has many advocates, many hundreds of acres are sown, but if vetch will double the yields gix'en by rye It xvill soon become the one used for enriching the soil. SOME MISTAKES OF FARMERS IN CENTRAL INDIANA. Editors Indiana Parmer: They do not farm from the standpoint that the soil is a living thing. It is treated mechanically as though it could be thumped around and robbed and still made to yield well. Compare a natural, virgin soil with the average soil of today. The virgin soil after some of its wildness is worked out is about ideal for plant growth. If we had a normal amount of humus in the soil it would not run together and bake if worked down fine and drenched with rain. Many are now afraid to make a decent bed lest it get hard. They leave it open and even cloddy. Some springs xve have only light rains and such a bed does not get closed down as much as it should. Terry said to run a spade to the bottom of the bed when you think it good enough and take up a fill of dirt and throw it around you. If you can't find it by the clods or bunches of trash in it you may have the bed worked doxvn pretty well. If it breaks into "ashes" in plowing it may still need firming. Nature's seed bed is much closer than xve commonly make ours unless ours is puddled; then i£ gets hard, which is not true of the virgin bed. The humus is worked ox'er by bacteria. They cannot live without humus to feed upon. Without them the humus does not become plant food. With them a mild acid is formed which slowly dissolves the mineral food as the plant uses it. So without bacteria there is neither kind of plant food. For these friends to flourish they should have humus, warmth and moisture. They are dormant in a dry clod. So summer breaking is losing time if it i.s left high and lumpy so it dries out. It should be worked down enough to hold moisture at once. Many farmers in central Indiana feel the importance of feeding the soil but do not realize hoxv easily a crop is reduced by even one year's starving and robbing the soil. A friend had his clox-er killed on a twenty acre field, three years ago. So he was compelled to break his rotation and repeat it in corn, without a crop of clover to turn under. He said, to shoxv the difference, one could note that the first corn crop after clox'er made 65 bushels while this crop made 45. He felt sure that he had too much exhausted the humus by his second crop of corn without feeding the land with clover. Many farmers fail to notice such things. They are silent voices which we should read with care. The field said "I did my best, but you had robbed me of my dinner and I did not have the strength to grow a full crop." Some farmers' fields say, "you robbed me and tramped me in the mud and broke me xvet, and after such a bungle it was impossible for me to grow a profitable crop." E. H. Collins. . m » Wash and dry the plums, and prick each with a fork in two or three places. Weigh the fruit and for every three pounds allow three cupfuls of sugar, one cupful of vinegar, and one tablespoonful of mixed spices. Put the spices into a cheesecloth bag, and bring it, the sugar and xinegar, to a boil. Then turn in the plums and cook until they are tender. Put the plums In jara and turn syrup over them.
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1910, v. 65, no. 46 (Nov. 12) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA6546 |
Date of Original | 1910 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 2011-04-08 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript | VOL. LXV INDIANAPOLIS, NOV. 12, 1910. NO. 46 Written for the Indiana Farmer SAND VETCH AS A SOIL BUILDER. By J. H. Haynes. Astonishing results from experimenting with sand vetch for restoring fertility to worn out land have been demonstrated in this vicinity in the last four years. Some three miles from town on the Wabash river is a farm that merited the name "starvation farm," so run down were its producing powers. Originally this farm was covered with forests of oak, poplar, walnut, etc., and after these were removed the land was very productive for some years. The soil is about equally divided into rich bottom land, yellow sandy knolls and level clay loam. The bottom land was very productive. The clay loam fairly so, but the sandy knolls produced but little, and in dry years nothing. The writer has been over this farm and is familiar with its failures of crops in the past. For 50 years it was farmed on the soil robbery system of selling the products and binning the corn stalks. The maximum yield on the bottom land was 40 bushels, on the other soils not over 20 bushels of corn. The best yields of wheat or oats never exceeded 10 luishels per acre. It changed owners much like the boy gets rid of a worthless knife, that is by a "sight unseen" process. Men would buy it presumably because it was offered cheap. When they examined their purchase they found that it was really dear, and hastened to get even by selling at first chance. Mr. W. C. Smith, president of the Canning Co., bought this farm in 1906, for the purpose of growing early truck for the factory thinking that on account of its sandy nature it might prove valuable, as such stuff is grown in the main before drouths can affect the crops. Sweet corn, peas, beets for very early and tomatoes and potatoes for later crops. People in general thought that he had bought a "gold brick," but events have disproved that. In the spring of 1906 he planted the sandy land in early peas; the season was so very dry that the crop only realized $10 per acre barely covering cost of seed. When the peas were off, about the 25th of June, he planted the fields in sweet corn, using commercial fertilizers to aid, but no good results came of this and his corn only brought him $15 per acre, another loss. Fortunately he planted the black land in late peas, and that saved him from financial loss that year, bringing $75 per acre. We rather infer that Mr. Smith was, to use a slang phrase, "up a stump" as to knowing what to do. In some way he got a bulletin from the TJ. S. Dept. of Agriculture on the growing and value of sand vetch. The word "sand" attracted his attention because he had a sand farm. The bulletin valued one acre of vetch plowed under for fertilizing purposes as worth from $20 to $40 expended in commercial fertilizers. This news encouraged him to the point that he ordered from his seedsman two bushels of vetch seed, enough to sow- two acres. This was sown in August, 1906, on a tract of the poorest sand land on the farm. I3y winter a heavy coat of green vetch covered the ground. It came through the winter all right, and by May the stems were four feet in length. In June it was cut for hay. He was so well impressed with its value that in the succeeding August he sowed 21 acres of his poorest sand, intending to follow it in 1908 with corn, and four acres of black land for pasture and hay. It made rapid growth that fall. The winter was severe but the vetch came out in fine condition. The spring was wet and late, so that the. yield was 150 bushels. On neighboring lands where crimson clover had been used the highest yield was 75 bushels per acre. On another^ farm of clay soil with gravelly soil, owned by Mr. Smith's brother, the vetch has proven equally as effective. This farm had been for 50 years a tenant farm and its fertility reduced to the starvation point. On a 50 acre tract vetch was sown and plowed under and planted in field corn. The yield was double that of any previous year. On this same farm a test was made of using vetch as a nitrogen Vetch Plants. by plowing time the coat of green vetch was so heavy as almost to defy an effort to turn it under, much of it being five feet long. The work was so tedious that it was not finished till the last of May. On June 3d and 4th he planted the corn. It came up nicely, but the usual drouth set in for a six week's duration. The corn drew slowly for a while but finally new life was infused into the young plant and, as if by magic, it grew rapidly, holding a dark greon color, while adjoining fields across the road were fired and dried up. Everybody passing along the public highway was surprised at the striking contrast between fields, and would stop and inquire of Smith what he had done for that field. These people had been for years accustomed to see corn three and four feet high on this field, while it was then eight to ten feet high. The six weeks of hot dry weather did not phase it, and at gathering time it yielded 72 bushels per acre, and that on land that had not in 20 years given over 20 bushels to the acre. In August, 1908, he sowed 30 acres which as usual grew rapidly. The next spring, 1909, 10 acres xvere planted in corn. Eight acres in potatoes and 12 acres in sxveet corn for the cannery. The result xvas that the field corn yielded 90 bushels per acre where formerly the crops xvere from 0 to 40 bushels per acre. The 12 acres sweet corn produced 4% tons to the acre and on one-and txvo- fifths acres of the potato ground 450 bushels of potatoes were dug, and on the poorer portions of this potato land fertilizer for alfalfa. Ten acres were planted in August, 1908. This fleld had been cropped for 60 years and xvas in a poor condition. The vetch was ploxved under in May, 1909. The ground was kept free from weeds by frequent stirring until the middle of June, and 20 pounds of alfalfa seed to the acre was sown. In fixe xveeks it xvas clipped and is noxv a flne field of alfalfa. Mr. Smith has 14 acres on his place procured the same way; his is on very sandy land. A visit to his place will amply repay any one. His fine fields of corn, fall vetch and alfalfa fields are a study xvorth taking up. Another year many tests will be made along these lines. We started out by saying "astonishing results." We close by changing the word to "wonderful" results on these exhausted soils. They clearly demonstrate that vetch is the great nitrogen and humus plant to reinvigorate our lands. The cost of seed is moro than for other kinds but the advan tages it has over them for enriching makes it far the cheapest. Three to four dollars xvill seed an acre, and in two years it wHl return cost of seed many times. When once started, Mr. Smith says it can be made to reseed itself easily. Fifty pounds are required to sow an acre. In sowing in corn a one-horse drill is used regulating the feed accordingly. Rye has many advocates, many hundreds of acres are sown, but if vetch will double the yields gix'en by rye It xvill soon become the one used for enriching the soil. SOME MISTAKES OF FARMERS IN CENTRAL INDIANA. Editors Indiana Parmer: They do not farm from the standpoint that the soil is a living thing. It is treated mechanically as though it could be thumped around and robbed and still made to yield well. Compare a natural, virgin soil with the average soil of today. The virgin soil after some of its wildness is worked out is about ideal for plant growth. If we had a normal amount of humus in the soil it would not run together and bake if worked down fine and drenched with rain. Many are now afraid to make a decent bed lest it get hard. They leave it open and even cloddy. Some springs xve have only light rains and such a bed does not get closed down as much as it should. Terry said to run a spade to the bottom of the bed when you think it good enough and take up a fill of dirt and throw it around you. If you can't find it by the clods or bunches of trash in it you may have the bed worked doxvn pretty well. If it breaks into "ashes" in plowing it may still need firming. Nature's seed bed is much closer than xve commonly make ours unless ours is puddled; then i£ gets hard, which is not true of the virgin bed. The humus is worked ox'er by bacteria. They cannot live without humus to feed upon. Without them the humus does not become plant food. With them a mild acid is formed which slowly dissolves the mineral food as the plant uses it. So without bacteria there is neither kind of plant food. For these friends to flourish they should have humus, warmth and moisture. They are dormant in a dry clod. So summer breaking is losing time if it i.s left high and lumpy so it dries out. It should be worked down enough to hold moisture at once. Many farmers in central Indiana feel the importance of feeding the soil but do not realize hoxv easily a crop is reduced by even one year's starving and robbing the soil. A friend had his clox-er killed on a twenty acre field, three years ago. So he was compelled to break his rotation and repeat it in corn, without a crop of clover to turn under. He said, to shoxv the difference, one could note that the first corn crop after clox'er made 65 bushels while this crop made 45. He felt sure that he had too much exhausted the humus by his second crop of corn without feeding the land with clover. Many farmers fail to notice such things. They are silent voices which we should read with care. The field said "I did my best, but you had robbed me of my dinner and I did not have the strength to grow a full crop." Some farmers' fields say, "you robbed me and tramped me in the mud and broke me xvet, and after such a bungle it was impossible for me to grow a profitable crop." E. H. Collins. . m » Wash and dry the plums, and prick each with a fork in two or three places. Weigh the fruit and for every three pounds allow three cupfuls of sugar, one cupful of vinegar, and one tablespoonful of mixed spices. Put the spices into a cheesecloth bag, and bring it, the sugar and xinegar, to a boil. Then turn in the plums and cook until they are tender. Put the plums In jara and turn syrup over them. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1