Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 16 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
VOL. LXV INDIANAPOLIS, SEPT. 17, 1910. NO. 38 CUT YOUR WEEDS. Editors Indiana Farmer: It has been only in the last few years that we have seen the wild carrot or Lace Plant, but it is increasing so rapidly that it bids fair to outstrip the sweet clover and become a much worse pest. I never saw a weed gain as fast as this wild carrot all along the roads and I have seen fields practically covered with it. I can't see what farmers are thinking about, for in a few more years this weed and the sweet clover will almost take the country if not checked. The sweet clover was allowed to spread along the public highways until now it is everywhere and it will not be long until the wild carrot will be as bad. Can there not be some legislation on this subject. What looks worse than a highway with sweet clover as high as the fence on both sides and the commons of the towns and cities are just as bad. The seeds of the wjld carrot are so small and light that the wind can blow them a good way. So as long as it is allowed to seed it is bound to spread. While on the subject of weeds there is another thing that I wish to write nbout and that is, weeds around the house, in the front and in the back yard. Not long ago while driving through the country, I passed a log house (don't see very many any more) but I hardly looked at the house for the yard took my attention at once. There were shade trees in front and they were kept trimmed, the lawn was mowed and there were flowers, not too many but enough to make it look attractive, and I thought, whoever lives here is not living just for dollars and cents alone but believes in enjoying himself a little and giving his family pleasure also. After going only a mile or two I saw the top of a large brick house and I thought, now I will see something here, but when I got in front of the house I turned my head in disgust for this is what I saw: A large sloping lawn that could have been made beautiful with just a little work, but which was loaded with weeds and sprouts from the half decayed cherry and apple trees. These trees had broken limbs hanging down and dead snags here and there. The fence was hardly a fence, the front gate was nailed, though there was no need of a gate, as no one dared try to go up to the house that way for the weeds. The driveway at the side of the house back to the barn was almost choked up with old broken-down buggies and an old wornout wagon. But the house, was the most forlorn looking sight of any there. Window shades only in the lower windows and no curtains in any, and I wondered what the family thought about it if they were ever so bold as to sit on the front veranda. Now which of the two homes is the most attractive? If I had to live in one of the two under the same conditions, I would very quickly decide in favor of the log cabin. Some of you will say this is overdrawn, but it is not, it is a fact, and it is not only just once in a great while but you can see it quite often over the country. Farmers, do you know that the surroundings of your home are the first things that attract the eye of the Passerby? Whenever we see a home with a r.ice lawn .shade trees and flow ers we think or say. "What a pretty place" and never think of the house. I will venture to say that if there are any boys and girls in the brick house they will stay there only long enough to be able to make their own way in the world, when they will leave, and there will be no happy home comings either, after that, for things will never look good to them in this home. They were ashamed to have company, and if I were a young man or woman in the neighborhood I would hesitate about marrying one of them for fear that my father-in-law would soon have no farm and want me to take him to raise. I know some of you are saying, "I haven't had* time to keep my yard mowed or my fences up, or the old wagons, buggies and farming implements out of the front yard, but I know better. Other farmers do and what one can do another' can. Don't you know that it adds from $10 to $25 value per acre to your farm if it is kept up in proper manner, and if it is worth that much to the other fellow why not to you. I want to say that people passing through the country have a pretty low estimate of a farmer whose lawns, out-buildings and fences are in snail a condition. The cost of a lawn- mower is not much and a little work early in the spring, when you are not so very busy, will soon get it in such shape that it will take but little work during the summer to keep it in nice condition, and I am sure that the good woman of the house will be glad to put out a few flowers and help make it look more attractive. B.S. THE WATER SUPPLY. Bdltora Indiana Farmer: Although the rains in our section of the country have been especially numerous this season and there has not been the slightest mention of a scarcity of water, I am going to tell the readers of the Farmer about the water supply I have arranged for this season hoping it may be of some benefit to some one who may be situated just as we were. To begin with, about 20 years ago a representative of a large coal company came to our house one day and wanted to lease the farm in connection with a large number of neighboring farms, to prospect for coal. The farms being duly leased, prospecting began almost at once, and they began to drill the first hole about 700 feet from the house, and on the top of a little hill or swell in the land. But they were in bad luck or something for when they had reached a depth of slightly less than 100 feet the drill (a four inch core drill) was stopped one night to make some adjust- in the machinery and could not be started again. They worked for some time trying to lift the drill and finally brought powerful hyraulic machine lifts to try to raise it but only succeeded in pulling off the pipe down close to the bit. Well, they then went away and left it and we thot they had abandoned it. The hole was filled up, the temporary building and equipments fell into decay and finally moldered away and was destroyed, together until no trace of the work was visible. About ten years later two men came to the farm who claimed to be representatives of the coal company and asked permission to try to obtain the lost drill (the lease having expired several years be fore.) Obtaining the desired permission they secured board and lodging at a neighbor's house and began the slow process of trying to dig the drill out. I forgot to mention that, save about 10 feet, the drill was imbedded in almost solid rock. These fellows did very well until they got down a ways into this rock and then finally gave it up in disgust. We could see by their work they were novices, and after they had gone away, found out they were two jack-of-all trade men from a town not very far away, who had in some way found out that the old lost drill was a very fine diamond drill, containing eight diamonds and valued at about $900.00. They had readily conceived that the bit proper would in all probability not be damaged in the least and were confident of selling it for a good long price. But cutting a large hole thru 70 or 80 feet of hard rock proved too large an undertaking and we never heard from them again. So the hole again filled up and the lost drill was all but forgotten. But, in about six years, again came a man, and this time he was the real representative of the old coal company and he wanted permission to try to find the old lost' drill. He secured an expert and several assistants and began at once cutting a large four foot hole toward the coveted bit of steel and diamond. It was slow work but with a liberal use of dynamite the opening was slowly sunk to within a foot of the bottom of the old drill, before it could be removed. They found it in good condi- tin despite its many years of hibernation, and when they went away they left us one of the finest dug wells to be f4iund in the country a deep rock reservoir, with a fine, large vein of good water. We at once placed a wall from the rock to the top of the ground and the water now raised and stands to within two feet of the top. And now I am ready to explain my water supply. We found that this water level was about 16 feet above the ground at the house, and even more at the barn, and yet we had a small raise to come over to pipe it to either of these places. I decided that three- fourths inch galvanized iron pipe was the correct thing to use and a syphon the correct method to get it over. We placed the pipe just below the freeze line running straight from this wel Ito the barnlot (700 ft.), with a hydrant and tank. A y-joint runs on to the house and into the kitchen where a bib-cock turns it on and off. The joints were all tested, found good and tight, the pipe filled with water (the lower end being shut) a piece inserted in the well to a depth of 10 ft. and connected to the line with an elbow. When the lower end is opened the water is drawn thru a perfect siphon and we have a constant supply of splendid water for both house and barn use, and with no pumping, nothing to get out of order and nothing to do but turn it on and off. It is certainly much better than wind pumps or gasoline engines, and at much less cost but of course only in very rare cases are conditions such as were here. However when there Is an available water supply situated on a higher level than the house or barn or other place of discharge, even tho there are obstructions between, it can generally be siphoned over and a good constant wa ter system obtained very cheaply. For is not a bountiful supply of good water cheap at nearly any cost? J. B. S. Daviess Co. THE COUNTRY CHURCH PROBLEM. Editors Indiana Farmer: I want to thank you for the splendid knife which I received last week. I am certainly surprised at the splendid value you give. I enjoy reading the Farmer and am glad you have taken up the Country Church problem. I am hoping that many of the readers will enter into the discussion and some practical suggestions be given. I think it one of the most important rural problems and its solution will mean as much at least as any other one thing in the making of life in the country attractive and interesting as well as ideal. Having spent most of my life in the country, excepting two years in a college town, I have for some time seen that something should be done to make the country church of more influence and interest so that all the community might meet together more often. During the past two years I have felt very plainly that I *or one, am called to the building up of the rural church, and as a result I am greatly interested in any suggestion that any one may have to offer. I hope that from time to tima you will urge your readers to say what they think on the subject. During the coming winter I hope to make a thorough canvass of the community in which I live, and so nearly as I can, secure answers to a list of questions which I have in mind. I have never heard of such a thing being done, but I am inclined to think it is because no one ever felt that they could take the time. Here are a few of the questions I have in mind for those who do not attend church: Are you glad there is a church in your community? Give your reason, or reasons, for not attending. In what way do you think the country church can be ifftproved? If an earnest effort were made to make it a better church, one in which the Sabbath day services would help you feel rested after a week of toil, would you help in any way you could to make it such a church? Kindly think on these questions for a minute and before you forget it, send in your answer. What you suggest may work a transformation even in your home church. Try it. I am of the opinion that every country minister should take a good live farm paper, and thus keep posted on all subjects of interest to the farmers, As lt is, the average minister uses the little country church as a stepping stone to something better. There is ever before him the vision of a larger church in the city and all that goes with it. Possibly the above is a little strong, but any way it isn't altogether his fault; the average minister can hardly support his family on the small salary a rural church can pay, but that brings up another problem, the one which I believe will solve it all, but it would take too long. I am hoping some one will offer a far better solution. An Interested Reader. Hamilton Co.
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1910, v. 65, no. 38 (Sept. 17) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA6538 |
Date of Original | 1910 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 2011-04-08 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript | VOL. LXV INDIANAPOLIS, SEPT. 17, 1910. NO. 38 CUT YOUR WEEDS. Editors Indiana Farmer: It has been only in the last few years that we have seen the wild carrot or Lace Plant, but it is increasing so rapidly that it bids fair to outstrip the sweet clover and become a much worse pest. I never saw a weed gain as fast as this wild carrot all along the roads and I have seen fields practically covered with it. I can't see what farmers are thinking about, for in a few more years this weed and the sweet clover will almost take the country if not checked. The sweet clover was allowed to spread along the public highways until now it is everywhere and it will not be long until the wild carrot will be as bad. Can there not be some legislation on this subject. What looks worse than a highway with sweet clover as high as the fence on both sides and the commons of the towns and cities are just as bad. The seeds of the wjld carrot are so small and light that the wind can blow them a good way. So as long as it is allowed to seed it is bound to spread. While on the subject of weeds there is another thing that I wish to write nbout and that is, weeds around the house, in the front and in the back yard. Not long ago while driving through the country, I passed a log house (don't see very many any more) but I hardly looked at the house for the yard took my attention at once. There were shade trees in front and they were kept trimmed, the lawn was mowed and there were flowers, not too many but enough to make it look attractive, and I thought, whoever lives here is not living just for dollars and cents alone but believes in enjoying himself a little and giving his family pleasure also. After going only a mile or two I saw the top of a large brick house and I thought, now I will see something here, but when I got in front of the house I turned my head in disgust for this is what I saw: A large sloping lawn that could have been made beautiful with just a little work, but which was loaded with weeds and sprouts from the half decayed cherry and apple trees. These trees had broken limbs hanging down and dead snags here and there. The fence was hardly a fence, the front gate was nailed, though there was no need of a gate, as no one dared try to go up to the house that way for the weeds. The driveway at the side of the house back to the barn was almost choked up with old broken-down buggies and an old wornout wagon. But the house, was the most forlorn looking sight of any there. Window shades only in the lower windows and no curtains in any, and I wondered what the family thought about it if they were ever so bold as to sit on the front veranda. Now which of the two homes is the most attractive? If I had to live in one of the two under the same conditions, I would very quickly decide in favor of the log cabin. Some of you will say this is overdrawn, but it is not, it is a fact, and it is not only just once in a great while but you can see it quite often over the country. Farmers, do you know that the surroundings of your home are the first things that attract the eye of the Passerby? Whenever we see a home with a r.ice lawn .shade trees and flow ers we think or say. "What a pretty place" and never think of the house. I will venture to say that if there are any boys and girls in the brick house they will stay there only long enough to be able to make their own way in the world, when they will leave, and there will be no happy home comings either, after that, for things will never look good to them in this home. They were ashamed to have company, and if I were a young man or woman in the neighborhood I would hesitate about marrying one of them for fear that my father-in-law would soon have no farm and want me to take him to raise. I know some of you are saying, "I haven't had* time to keep my yard mowed or my fences up, or the old wagons, buggies and farming implements out of the front yard, but I know better. Other farmers do and what one can do another' can. Don't you know that it adds from $10 to $25 value per acre to your farm if it is kept up in proper manner, and if it is worth that much to the other fellow why not to you. I want to say that people passing through the country have a pretty low estimate of a farmer whose lawns, out-buildings and fences are in snail a condition. The cost of a lawn- mower is not much and a little work early in the spring, when you are not so very busy, will soon get it in such shape that it will take but little work during the summer to keep it in nice condition, and I am sure that the good woman of the house will be glad to put out a few flowers and help make it look more attractive. B.S. THE WATER SUPPLY. Bdltora Indiana Farmer: Although the rains in our section of the country have been especially numerous this season and there has not been the slightest mention of a scarcity of water, I am going to tell the readers of the Farmer about the water supply I have arranged for this season hoping it may be of some benefit to some one who may be situated just as we were. To begin with, about 20 years ago a representative of a large coal company came to our house one day and wanted to lease the farm in connection with a large number of neighboring farms, to prospect for coal. The farms being duly leased, prospecting began almost at once, and they began to drill the first hole about 700 feet from the house, and on the top of a little hill or swell in the land. But they were in bad luck or something for when they had reached a depth of slightly less than 100 feet the drill (a four inch core drill) was stopped one night to make some adjust- in the machinery and could not be started again. They worked for some time trying to lift the drill and finally brought powerful hyraulic machine lifts to try to raise it but only succeeded in pulling off the pipe down close to the bit. Well, they then went away and left it and we thot they had abandoned it. The hole was filled up, the temporary building and equipments fell into decay and finally moldered away and was destroyed, together until no trace of the work was visible. About ten years later two men came to the farm who claimed to be representatives of the coal company and asked permission to try to obtain the lost drill (the lease having expired several years be fore.) Obtaining the desired permission they secured board and lodging at a neighbor's house and began the slow process of trying to dig the drill out. I forgot to mention that, save about 10 feet, the drill was imbedded in almost solid rock. These fellows did very well until they got down a ways into this rock and then finally gave it up in disgust. We could see by their work they were novices, and after they had gone away, found out they were two jack-of-all trade men from a town not very far away, who had in some way found out that the old lost drill was a very fine diamond drill, containing eight diamonds and valued at about $900.00. They had readily conceived that the bit proper would in all probability not be damaged in the least and were confident of selling it for a good long price. But cutting a large hole thru 70 or 80 feet of hard rock proved too large an undertaking and we never heard from them again. So the hole again filled up and the lost drill was all but forgotten. But, in about six years, again came a man, and this time he was the real representative of the old coal company and he wanted permission to try to find the old lost' drill. He secured an expert and several assistants and began at once cutting a large four foot hole toward the coveted bit of steel and diamond. It was slow work but with a liberal use of dynamite the opening was slowly sunk to within a foot of the bottom of the old drill, before it could be removed. They found it in good condi- tin despite its many years of hibernation, and when they went away they left us one of the finest dug wells to be f4iund in the country a deep rock reservoir, with a fine, large vein of good water. We at once placed a wall from the rock to the top of the ground and the water now raised and stands to within two feet of the top. And now I am ready to explain my water supply. We found that this water level was about 16 feet above the ground at the house, and even more at the barn, and yet we had a small raise to come over to pipe it to either of these places. I decided that three- fourths inch galvanized iron pipe was the correct thing to use and a syphon the correct method to get it over. We placed the pipe just below the freeze line running straight from this wel Ito the barnlot (700 ft.), with a hydrant and tank. A y-joint runs on to the house and into the kitchen where a bib-cock turns it on and off. The joints were all tested, found good and tight, the pipe filled with water (the lower end being shut) a piece inserted in the well to a depth of 10 ft. and connected to the line with an elbow. When the lower end is opened the water is drawn thru a perfect siphon and we have a constant supply of splendid water for both house and barn use, and with no pumping, nothing to get out of order and nothing to do but turn it on and off. It is certainly much better than wind pumps or gasoline engines, and at much less cost but of course only in very rare cases are conditions such as were here. However when there Is an available water supply situated on a higher level than the house or barn or other place of discharge, even tho there are obstructions between, it can generally be siphoned over and a good constant wa ter system obtained very cheaply. For is not a bountiful supply of good water cheap at nearly any cost? J. B. S. Daviess Co. THE COUNTRY CHURCH PROBLEM. Editors Indiana Farmer: I want to thank you for the splendid knife which I received last week. I am certainly surprised at the splendid value you give. I enjoy reading the Farmer and am glad you have taken up the Country Church problem. I am hoping that many of the readers will enter into the discussion and some practical suggestions be given. I think it one of the most important rural problems and its solution will mean as much at least as any other one thing in the making of life in the country attractive and interesting as well as ideal. Having spent most of my life in the country, excepting two years in a college town, I have for some time seen that something should be done to make the country church of more influence and interest so that all the community might meet together more often. During the past two years I have felt very plainly that I *or one, am called to the building up of the rural church, and as a result I am greatly interested in any suggestion that any one may have to offer. I hope that from time to tima you will urge your readers to say what they think on the subject. During the coming winter I hope to make a thorough canvass of the community in which I live, and so nearly as I can, secure answers to a list of questions which I have in mind. I have never heard of such a thing being done, but I am inclined to think it is because no one ever felt that they could take the time. Here are a few of the questions I have in mind for those who do not attend church: Are you glad there is a church in your community? Give your reason, or reasons, for not attending. In what way do you think the country church can be ifftproved? If an earnest effort were made to make it a better church, one in which the Sabbath day services would help you feel rested after a week of toil, would you help in any way you could to make it such a church? Kindly think on these questions for a minute and before you forget it, send in your answer. What you suggest may work a transformation even in your home church. Try it. I am of the opinion that every country minister should take a good live farm paper, and thus keep posted on all subjects of interest to the farmers, As lt is, the average minister uses the little country church as a stepping stone to something better. There is ever before him the vision of a larger church in the city and all that goes with it. Possibly the above is a little strong, but any way it isn't altogether his fault; the average minister can hardly support his family on the small salary a rural church can pay, but that brings up another problem, the one which I believe will solve it all, but it would take too long. I am hoping some one will offer a far better solution. An Interested Reader. Hamilton Co. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1