Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 16 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
VOL. LXIV INDIANAPOLIS, JULY 10, 1909. NO. 27 To Open the Question. By Walter S. Smith. Editors Indiana Farmer: One of the largest land owners in Rush county, a man as widely known as any man in Indiana, a man who farms and reads our Indiana Farmer honored me the other day by asking me to open for discussion the following question: "Should a heavy growth of clover fallow be plowed under, or shoulil it be burned off?" He said his men wanted to burn it off, declaring they could do . work enough better in the breaking to justify the loss of fertility. He insisted that it be left on the ground and subjected to the action of the plow, and so it was done. Will men who know by experience tell which is the metter plan? As 1 am opening the debate, I will make the Tirst speech. 1. When stubble or vegetable matter of any sort is burned, we all know how great the cloud of smoke. This smoke is darkened by particles of carbon, not consumed. If smoke had no color except that of condensing steam, which always appears white, it would be no less loaded with carbon, but, fully burned, It would be carbonic dioxide, a gas of great value to vegetables. It enters their structure at the root in solution by water, and enters by the leaves in gaseous form. So incineration sets free the highly valuable carbon, and it blows away in the air, above the leaves; and so is a total loss in that vicinity. Plowed under, it is subjected to decay; which is the same as burning, but much slower. And when carbonic acid gas is produced under the ground, it is exactly where the vegetable roots want it, and they can take large portions of it while forming. And what escapes into the air approaches the leaf from the lower side, and there the plant may feast on it again. So by plowing matter under, we save this element as well as much nitrogen and phosphorus, that can enter the. plant only by the roots, in chemical combination and in solution in water. 2. Answering, in advance, the chief objection, that it collects under the plow beam in wads, and raises the plow out of the ground, I would suggest two or three ways in which that may be helped: (1) Use the disc harrow twice over the mass, as it lies in the spring. This will cut some of it, straighten some of it out and crowd some down into the ground where the rolling cutter can manage it. (2) Run through it before the plow with a common harrow. This will draw it out of tangle, so the plow can Pass thru it. (3) If the cutters .and the harrow teeth incline to drag it into wads, that means that it is loose from the ground. Then use a hay-rakfc. Get it up as we rake up hay, and cart it off the ground to the manure pile. It can be re turned by the spreader. 3. And finally, there are two kinds of breaking plows. One turns the surface over, and into the bottom of the furrows. This is called covering. This is not a bad way to turn it; but some object to that as a hindrance to the ascending of water by capillary action. I do not think there is much in this objection. But, to avoid it, use the other sort of plow. This plow lays the broken furrows on. edge instead of turning it over and the surface under; so the harrows will thoroly mix it. The soil is favored as to drouth and warmth of soil. I think it has no other care than to hitch to the mower and cut it. One-half mile north of- Dun- reith on Aunt Caroline Edgerton's farm she has four acres that are very promising, and as well set as any red clover that I know of. It is on a well drained piece of sugar tree, walnut ani poplar land that she says she thinks she has herself seen forty crops of corn grown on. I was interested to know how the land was prepared as I had seen it come up and grow during the dry fall last year when there was hard- I'n.iii-i Discrimination. By Wm. B. Life. Judging Horses in the Coliseum, Indiana State Fair. My view is that it should be plowed in and not burned off. s m s Experience With Alfalfa. Editors Indiana Farmer: I have been an interested observer of the efforts of some of our farmers to establish alfalfa as a forage crop In our county. Sometimes it has prom ised well, and then again men have given it up with one or two trials. Today I saw a small piece of ground that is well set, and promises a good crop. It is on Frank Bundy's farm, a half mile north of Spiceland, on first bottom sandy loam land. It has been cut regularly about three crops each season, for the last seven or eight years. It was established by Jason Newby, a farmer and at present a citizen of Kansas or Oklahoma. He farmed here for several years. I dug up a good thrifty bunch of this clover about three inches across, and found a. root about three-quarters of an inch in diameter, three inches under ground with six divisions, or separate stems or branches at the top of the ground. I don't think it will produce as heavy a crop this year as common, but it has carried a crop about equal to three crops of red clover, and from appearance I can't tell how much longer it may yield a paying crop, if the roots are generally established as firmly as the one I dug up. It has been pastured very little. I don't remember just what preparation the soil had, but nothing I suppose unusual. ly a green thing to be seen. It was broken up: clover sod in the spring of 1907, and sown to millet with the intention of taking off the crop of millet, and sowing it to alfalfa in the fall. But she was delayed in getting it drained and manured as she desired, and it laid over until last year and it was given a light coating of manure, disked and harrowed and thoroly prepared the the latter part of July or August last, and cross-sowed without any cultivation or inoculation of the soil or any following treatment. It was sowed and grew, in what looked to everyone that saw it literally dry dust, in a torrid sun. Of course she lost one crop, but it was owing to not getting to sow it after the millet was off. She said she had faith that any ground that would grow so good a crop of red clover as that ground did would grow alfalfa, and it certainly will. Remember it was sown without any nurse crop, in the middle Of the driest summer Indiana ever experienced. But unless you get a good stand I don't think it will pay to try to make a stand out of it any better than it would a poor stand of red clover. This ground by being a good clover sod and followed by the millet was not very foul. It slopes to the south ten feet in 400, so it had the full benefit of the sun. Henry Co. J. G. H. The season of 1909 will pass into history as the great rainy summer. Up to July 6th we had an excess of 3.8 inches at this station. Editors Indiana Farmer: I notice in your issue of May 29th, on the editorial page, a statement to the effect that two wardens of the Fish and Game Commission went to a farm house in Johnson county, and almost at the point of a revolver compelled the lady of the house to reveal the hiding place of a seine. Now those men were no better than highway robbers; they were outlaws in the fullest sense of the term, and ought to be dealt witli in the same way. 'We had a somewhat similar case in our neighborhood last fall. One of the residents had a seine concealed o n his premises and the Fish and Game officers were notified of ths1 fact laypersons living in town. It afterwards came out that the parties who gave this information had camped oh this man's premises for several weeks during the summer and used a seine constantly. By their betrayal of our neighbor, he had to pay between $75 and $100. Now the river winds around and thru this man's farm, yet he is prohibited from catching a mess of fish for his family table. The city sports may camp on his ground weeks at a time and catch fish from the same river and never be molested. I have lived on the banks of this river for thirty years, and I know what these summer chaps do. Of course the commission will say the farmer has the same chances as the city fellow if he will fish at the season given. But this is not so; the farmer has not that chance. It is his busy season, and he would lose his crops if he should take the time to fish. Another neighbor of mine was caught last winter fishing in the ice, by two officers of the commission. He had not caught a single fish, but it cost him $40 just the same. I know some of the officers appointed by that commission, and they are not fit to hold such positions; in fact they ought to be put to work on the stone-pile for some of their meanness. The law that will not allow a farmer to catch fish from a stream on his own land, and yet allows city sports to take them out by the wagon-load ought to be wiped off the statute books, and the men who made it put out of office. If the land-owners and tenants were allowed to fish and hunt all they want to, and the city sports restricted, our rivers, lakes and streams would; have plenty of fish all the time and the woods plenty of game. Wm. B. Life. Randolph Co. We never paid such prices for horse feed as this summer. Our last bill from the feed store had the following items: Corn, $1 per bushel; oats, 70c; hay, $1 for 100 pounds; straw 40c per 100 pounds. The expense for keeping the animal in feed at this rate i.s not far from $2.50 per week.
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1909, v. 64, no. 27 (July 10) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA6427 |
Date of Original | 1909 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 2011-03-23 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript | VOL. LXIV INDIANAPOLIS, JULY 10, 1909. NO. 27 To Open the Question. By Walter S. Smith. Editors Indiana Farmer: One of the largest land owners in Rush county, a man as widely known as any man in Indiana, a man who farms and reads our Indiana Farmer honored me the other day by asking me to open for discussion the following question: "Should a heavy growth of clover fallow be plowed under, or shoulil it be burned off?" He said his men wanted to burn it off, declaring they could do . work enough better in the breaking to justify the loss of fertility. He insisted that it be left on the ground and subjected to the action of the plow, and so it was done. Will men who know by experience tell which is the metter plan? As 1 am opening the debate, I will make the Tirst speech. 1. When stubble or vegetable matter of any sort is burned, we all know how great the cloud of smoke. This smoke is darkened by particles of carbon, not consumed. If smoke had no color except that of condensing steam, which always appears white, it would be no less loaded with carbon, but, fully burned, It would be carbonic dioxide, a gas of great value to vegetables. It enters their structure at the root in solution by water, and enters by the leaves in gaseous form. So incineration sets free the highly valuable carbon, and it blows away in the air, above the leaves; and so is a total loss in that vicinity. Plowed under, it is subjected to decay; which is the same as burning, but much slower. And when carbonic acid gas is produced under the ground, it is exactly where the vegetable roots want it, and they can take large portions of it while forming. And what escapes into the air approaches the leaf from the lower side, and there the plant may feast on it again. So by plowing matter under, we save this element as well as much nitrogen and phosphorus, that can enter the. plant only by the roots, in chemical combination and in solution in water. 2. Answering, in advance, the chief objection, that it collects under the plow beam in wads, and raises the plow out of the ground, I would suggest two or three ways in which that may be helped: (1) Use the disc harrow twice over the mass, as it lies in the spring. This will cut some of it, straighten some of it out and crowd some down into the ground where the rolling cutter can manage it. (2) Run through it before the plow with a common harrow. This will draw it out of tangle, so the plow can Pass thru it. (3) If the cutters .and the harrow teeth incline to drag it into wads, that means that it is loose from the ground. Then use a hay-rakfc. Get it up as we rake up hay, and cart it off the ground to the manure pile. It can be re turned by the spreader. 3. And finally, there are two kinds of breaking plows. One turns the surface over, and into the bottom of the furrows. This is called covering. This is not a bad way to turn it; but some object to that as a hindrance to the ascending of water by capillary action. I do not think there is much in this objection. But, to avoid it, use the other sort of plow. This plow lays the broken furrows on. edge instead of turning it over and the surface under; so the harrows will thoroly mix it. The soil is favored as to drouth and warmth of soil. I think it has no other care than to hitch to the mower and cut it. One-half mile north of- Dun- reith on Aunt Caroline Edgerton's farm she has four acres that are very promising, and as well set as any red clover that I know of. It is on a well drained piece of sugar tree, walnut ani poplar land that she says she thinks she has herself seen forty crops of corn grown on. I was interested to know how the land was prepared as I had seen it come up and grow during the dry fall last year when there was hard- I'n.iii-i Discrimination. By Wm. B. Life. Judging Horses in the Coliseum, Indiana State Fair. My view is that it should be plowed in and not burned off. s m s Experience With Alfalfa. Editors Indiana Farmer: I have been an interested observer of the efforts of some of our farmers to establish alfalfa as a forage crop In our county. Sometimes it has prom ised well, and then again men have given it up with one or two trials. Today I saw a small piece of ground that is well set, and promises a good crop. It is on Frank Bundy's farm, a half mile north of Spiceland, on first bottom sandy loam land. It has been cut regularly about three crops each season, for the last seven or eight years. It was established by Jason Newby, a farmer and at present a citizen of Kansas or Oklahoma. He farmed here for several years. I dug up a good thrifty bunch of this clover about three inches across, and found a. root about three-quarters of an inch in diameter, three inches under ground with six divisions, or separate stems or branches at the top of the ground. I don't think it will produce as heavy a crop this year as common, but it has carried a crop about equal to three crops of red clover, and from appearance I can't tell how much longer it may yield a paying crop, if the roots are generally established as firmly as the one I dug up. It has been pastured very little. I don't remember just what preparation the soil had, but nothing I suppose unusual. ly a green thing to be seen. It was broken up: clover sod in the spring of 1907, and sown to millet with the intention of taking off the crop of millet, and sowing it to alfalfa in the fall. But she was delayed in getting it drained and manured as she desired, and it laid over until last year and it was given a light coating of manure, disked and harrowed and thoroly prepared the the latter part of July or August last, and cross-sowed without any cultivation or inoculation of the soil or any following treatment. It was sowed and grew, in what looked to everyone that saw it literally dry dust, in a torrid sun. Of course she lost one crop, but it was owing to not getting to sow it after the millet was off. She said she had faith that any ground that would grow so good a crop of red clover as that ground did would grow alfalfa, and it certainly will. Remember it was sown without any nurse crop, in the middle Of the driest summer Indiana ever experienced. But unless you get a good stand I don't think it will pay to try to make a stand out of it any better than it would a poor stand of red clover. This ground by being a good clover sod and followed by the millet was not very foul. It slopes to the south ten feet in 400, so it had the full benefit of the sun. Henry Co. J. G. H. The season of 1909 will pass into history as the great rainy summer. Up to July 6th we had an excess of 3.8 inches at this station. Editors Indiana Farmer: I notice in your issue of May 29th, on the editorial page, a statement to the effect that two wardens of the Fish and Game Commission went to a farm house in Johnson county, and almost at the point of a revolver compelled the lady of the house to reveal the hiding place of a seine. Now those men were no better than highway robbers; they were outlaws in the fullest sense of the term, and ought to be dealt witli in the same way. 'We had a somewhat similar case in our neighborhood last fall. One of the residents had a seine concealed o n his premises and the Fish and Game officers were notified of ths1 fact laypersons living in town. It afterwards came out that the parties who gave this information had camped oh this man's premises for several weeks during the summer and used a seine constantly. By their betrayal of our neighbor, he had to pay between $75 and $100. Now the river winds around and thru this man's farm, yet he is prohibited from catching a mess of fish for his family table. The city sports may camp on his ground weeks at a time and catch fish from the same river and never be molested. I have lived on the banks of this river for thirty years, and I know what these summer chaps do. Of course the commission will say the farmer has the same chances as the city fellow if he will fish at the season given. But this is not so; the farmer has not that chance. It is his busy season, and he would lose his crops if he should take the time to fish. Another neighbor of mine was caught last winter fishing in the ice, by two officers of the commission. He had not caught a single fish, but it cost him $40 just the same. I know some of the officers appointed by that commission, and they are not fit to hold such positions; in fact they ought to be put to work on the stone-pile for some of their meanness. The law that will not allow a farmer to catch fish from a stream on his own land, and yet allows city sports to take them out by the wagon-load ought to be wiped off the statute books, and the men who made it put out of office. If the land-owners and tenants were allowed to fish and hunt all they want to, and the city sports restricted, our rivers, lakes and streams would; have plenty of fish all the time and the woods plenty of game. Wm. B. Life. Randolph Co. We never paid such prices for horse feed as this summer. Our last bill from the feed store had the following items: Corn, $1 per bushel; oats, 70c; hay, $1 for 100 pounds; straw 40c per 100 pounds. The expense for keeping the animal in feed at this rate i.s not far from $2.50 per week. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1