Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 20 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Garden. *® VOL. LX1V INDIANAPOLIS JAN, 16, 1C09. NO. 3 Barn Ventilation. Ml tors Indiana Farmer: The accompanying cut partially illustrates an effective, simple and economical system of stable ventilation. The object of mechanical ventilation is to provide an abundance of pure air, and to aerry away foul air. To do this, cir- i iiation must be established, and this circulation, to be effective, should be automatic, or self-acting, so that weather conditions, air currents, etc., will not interfere with the proper supply of fresh oir at all times. By this arrangement the fresli air supply is taken in through ducts, as indicated, and discharged at the proper point tor breathing .it once, before it has become foul or poison. As fast as the air is breathed it heroines foul, poison and cold and settles to the floor, where the foul air duct, or stack, carries it up and away, performing this service on account of its construction and location. By means of automatic valves or dampers in the ducts the supply and discharge of air is easily controlled under all conditions. Any scheme of ventilation to be fully successful must be planned and installed ?ccording to the conditions under which it it> to work, as a system operating satisfactorily in one barn, might be worthless in another. Therefore it is not so much in any system as it is in the manner of construction and installation with reference to plan, rud arrangement of building. In so many of the new-fangled theories of ventilation of stables, the fresh air is taken in at a point near the heels, or at least in the rear of the stock, where it is allowed to settle to the floor, pass over the foul matter there, and after passing the bieathing point, is allowed to escape, all of which is absolutely contrary to accepted principles of sanitary science. An improvement over such a scheme would be to have no mechanical ventilation at all. A part of the fresh air ducts here shown is obtained by simply closing up spaces between the mow joist, by which as many ducts can be provided as are re- ■ luired, and at such point as plan de- "anils. The foul air stacks are out of the way of storing hay and manipulating hay forks, etc. , V desirable feature of this idea of ventilation is the fact that it will work equally well in either rectangular, octagon, or circular styled buildings. To give the best service the materials of vent stacks and a part of the fresh air ducts should be made of metal, preferably ►.alvanized iron. The number and capacity of ducts and stacks would depend on conditions. The vent stacks should be located alternate with the air ducts, so as not to create indue currents over the stock. Always l*ar in mind that ventilation is of little lalue without plenty of light, and especially sunshine. Benton Steele, Architect. Pendleton, Ind. Favors Our Plan. sVBtors Indlsns Farmer: Your editorial on Good Roads and the Auto, in Farmer of December 2ti, is on I 'hat has done the subject justice nnd the Bureau extends to you its sincere thanks. I now wish to explain some of the propo sitions and problems the Bureau has brought out—or rather worked out—by I.ersonal investigation; that these may be made more simple and better understood by the readers of your excellent paper, the Secretary wishes to address them as a regular correspondent ,or individual. In the first place I must call your attention to one expression in your editorial that might be misleading to many of your readers; I refer to that part that states that as this movement was started by people in the city, it is a movement of "the ed on the highway, if you please, and this is the cause of the dissatisfaction among the taxpayers,—not taxpayers of the city, not the automobile manufacturer, or agency, or owner but the farmer, the man who pays 60 per cent of all taxes collected in the state; the man who is willing to pay $5 for a pair of shoes, or $25 for a suit of clothes, and who gives the merchant—if they prove to be not worth the money. The man who knows he has paid exorbitant sums for the building of roads and they have now Cross Section of Stable Showing Ventilation. automobile people, manufacturers, and owners, rather than the team driving farmers." I am in no way connected with any manufactory or agency; as for c wning oue—if they were selling at five dollars per dozen I might buy one toot of the horn and three whiffs of the smell, and would have, of course, thrown in a large chunk of the profanity which is the chief ingredient to their movement. I was for seventeen years in the gas and oil fields of Indiana and Ohio, and anyone who has ever been in that business can tell youthat there is noother business in the world that brings one iu such close contact with the road proposition; the jolts, the mud, the dust; the good, bad and indifferent: tlie passable semi-passable and prohibitory. It was these actual experiences that started my investigations on the road question I made the discovery that the taxpayers are paying into the county treasury ample sums for road purposes. Yet they have not got the roads to show for it; many of the taxpayers, farmers, have also investigated with the same result; then the investigation begins for the reasons. The first thought, of course, is "graft" which is so fashionable in our county offices throughout the state; but it was very soon shown that "all of the money for load purposes had lieen put on the roads." This was the report all farmers gave me who had made the investigation. This then is the text to the discontent of the present road system. "The money for road purposes has been put on the roads." The money has been dump- proven to be worth one-half the money they cost; this is the man who first asked nie to take an active interest and make further investigations for the cause and the remedy; this same fanner is the man who has stood by me and given me aid and encouragement for more than three years, in making these investigations, and the man who will furnish whatever remuneration I shall receive for my service. Now to the proof of my statement that onr improved roads represent only one- half the money they have cost; from the Office of Public Roads, U. S. Department of Agriculture, in an article on investigation and results, the writer makes this statement. "It costs as much to deliver a bushel of grain five miles to the railroad in Illinois as it costs to carry it 1,100 to Buffalo. In West Virginia in the tobacco region, it costs five times as much to deliver that product eight miles over mud roads as it costs to carry it over 400 miles to Richmond, Va." For Indiana we have estimates and tables prepared from careful tests, which in brief are as follows: Its 2.") cents to 30 cents per ton, per mile, to haul n load over our common earth roads: 17 cents to 20 cents per ton. per mile, over our very best gravel roads, as compared to hauling the same load over a good macadam road at a cost of 8 cents to 10 cents per ton per mile. Do we really have men so dense that they are willing to strangle this proposition, and (ontinue to pay an exorbitant road tax. and yet continue the dirt roads? As to keeping up and repairing of the roads, this is a very important and costly matter that is receiving but little attention, compared with what it really means to the taxpayers. This. Marion county, with 9 townships, pays $45,000 per year for keeping in repair the public highways, outside of incorporations. Other states have proven the great economy of having one man in each civil township, on a straight salary—usually $100 per month — to devote their entire time to this work. By this plan then, with the cost of material, let us say $10,000 per year, making the annual cost of repairs $20,800 or a saving to this county of S24.2O0. This may be too high an average from which to figure for the entire State, but it will certainly prove the fact that "one man working on roads 365 days in the year will keep the roads in far better repair than will 365 men working one day in the year." I am very much in favor of your plan of a double track; this has been a point I have always argued in favor of. The most of our public roadways, from fence to fence, have ample space for a double track, yet we continue to construct a narrow flimsy track, dump the gravel on top of the ridge which in a couple of years is worn out nnd must be resurfaced. Ves, the double track for real economy, comfort and convenience. I have seen this illustrated by the horses in the city that pass and repass the automobiles on the streets and pay no more attention to them than to the lamp posts; these same horses meeting an auto on one of onr country roads ou their narrow grades, where they seem to realize that both are pretty likely to get dumped into the ditch, do some stunts that would put the staid and stately equine from the farm to shame And well he may, for with so many of our narrow sharp graded roads, whether it be an automobile, horsemobile, or oxmobile, you better move over and hold tight or "The goblins 'ill git you, if you don't watch out." The double track plan has been worked in Ohio with perfect results. I have '1 from the township clerk of one township that in less than a year they will have a macadam track on every road in their township, which have cost them he says, approximately $1,700 per mile, on which the annual cost of repairs is but a trifle compared to the cost of the fruitless endeavor to repair the roads before the improvement. Yes, by all means, a double track; the first cost is no more, the repairing but an item of the cost of repairs on a single track. In conclusion, I wish in behalf of the Bureau, to thank you again for the space and comments you have given us and I trust many of your readers will write their suggestions to us, for we are, by no means, a one-sided proposition. J. C. Crabill, See. Indiana Bureau for Good Roads. 60 BUSHELS FOR 60 YEARS. Editors Indiana Farmer: In reply as to the eighty acre piece of land being farmed and producing 60 bus. of corn for 60 years or more. The land* is sandy loam. There is timber on the on the west and south sides of it The timber is black ash, water elm &c. The land lies ery low; yet doesn't overflow; water rises near top of ground, and is moist, yet not too wet to cultivate; don't freeze deep in winter. This land is just 100 miles due north of Indianapolis, and is owned hy James M. Meredith, who is farming it. H. H.
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1909, v. 64, no. 03 (Jan. 16) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA6403 |
Date of Original | 1909 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 2011-02-03 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript | Garden. *® VOL. LX1V INDIANAPOLIS JAN, 16, 1C09. NO. 3 Barn Ventilation. Ml tors Indiana Farmer: The accompanying cut partially illustrates an effective, simple and economical system of stable ventilation. The object of mechanical ventilation is to provide an abundance of pure air, and to aerry away foul air. To do this, cir- i iiation must be established, and this circulation, to be effective, should be automatic, or self-acting, so that weather conditions, air currents, etc., will not interfere with the proper supply of fresh oir at all times. By this arrangement the fresli air supply is taken in through ducts, as indicated, and discharged at the proper point tor breathing .it once, before it has become foul or poison. As fast as the air is breathed it heroines foul, poison and cold and settles to the floor, where the foul air duct, or stack, carries it up and away, performing this service on account of its construction and location. By means of automatic valves or dampers in the ducts the supply and discharge of air is easily controlled under all conditions. Any scheme of ventilation to be fully successful must be planned and installed ?ccording to the conditions under which it it> to work, as a system operating satisfactorily in one barn, might be worthless in another. Therefore it is not so much in any system as it is in the manner of construction and installation with reference to plan, rud arrangement of building. In so many of the new-fangled theories of ventilation of stables, the fresh air is taken in at a point near the heels, or at least in the rear of the stock, where it is allowed to settle to the floor, pass over the foul matter there, and after passing the bieathing point, is allowed to escape, all of which is absolutely contrary to accepted principles of sanitary science. An improvement over such a scheme would be to have no mechanical ventilation at all. A part of the fresh air ducts here shown is obtained by simply closing up spaces between the mow joist, by which as many ducts can be provided as are re- ■ luired, and at such point as plan de- "anils. The foul air stacks are out of the way of storing hay and manipulating hay forks, etc. , V desirable feature of this idea of ventilation is the fact that it will work equally well in either rectangular, octagon, or circular styled buildings. To give the best service the materials of vent stacks and a part of the fresh air ducts should be made of metal, preferably ►.alvanized iron. The number and capacity of ducts and stacks would depend on conditions. The vent stacks should be located alternate with the air ducts, so as not to create indue currents over the stock. Always l*ar in mind that ventilation is of little lalue without plenty of light, and especially sunshine. Benton Steele, Architect. Pendleton, Ind. Favors Our Plan. sVBtors Indlsns Farmer: Your editorial on Good Roads and the Auto, in Farmer of December 2ti, is on I 'hat has done the subject justice nnd the Bureau extends to you its sincere thanks. I now wish to explain some of the propo sitions and problems the Bureau has brought out—or rather worked out—by I.ersonal investigation; that these may be made more simple and better understood by the readers of your excellent paper, the Secretary wishes to address them as a regular correspondent ,or individual. In the first place I must call your attention to one expression in your editorial that might be misleading to many of your readers; I refer to that part that states that as this movement was started by people in the city, it is a movement of "the ed on the highway, if you please, and this is the cause of the dissatisfaction among the taxpayers,—not taxpayers of the city, not the automobile manufacturer, or agency, or owner but the farmer, the man who pays 60 per cent of all taxes collected in the state; the man who is willing to pay $5 for a pair of shoes, or $25 for a suit of clothes, and who gives the merchant—if they prove to be not worth the money. The man who knows he has paid exorbitant sums for the building of roads and they have now Cross Section of Stable Showing Ventilation. automobile people, manufacturers, and owners, rather than the team driving farmers." I am in no way connected with any manufactory or agency; as for c wning oue—if they were selling at five dollars per dozen I might buy one toot of the horn and three whiffs of the smell, and would have, of course, thrown in a large chunk of the profanity which is the chief ingredient to their movement. I was for seventeen years in the gas and oil fields of Indiana and Ohio, and anyone who has ever been in that business can tell youthat there is noother business in the world that brings one iu such close contact with the road proposition; the jolts, the mud, the dust; the good, bad and indifferent: tlie passable semi-passable and prohibitory. It was these actual experiences that started my investigations on the road question I made the discovery that the taxpayers are paying into the county treasury ample sums for road purposes. Yet they have not got the roads to show for it; many of the taxpayers, farmers, have also investigated with the same result; then the investigation begins for the reasons. The first thought, of course, is "graft" which is so fashionable in our county offices throughout the state; but it was very soon shown that "all of the money for load purposes had lieen put on the roads." This was the report all farmers gave me who had made the investigation. This then is the text to the discontent of the present road system. "The money for road purposes has been put on the roads." The money has been dump- proven to be worth one-half the money they cost; this is the man who first asked nie to take an active interest and make further investigations for the cause and the remedy; this same fanner is the man who has stood by me and given me aid and encouragement for more than three years, in making these investigations, and the man who will furnish whatever remuneration I shall receive for my service. Now to the proof of my statement that onr improved roads represent only one- half the money they have cost; from the Office of Public Roads, U. S. Department of Agriculture, in an article on investigation and results, the writer makes this statement. "It costs as much to deliver a bushel of grain five miles to the railroad in Illinois as it costs to carry it 1,100 to Buffalo. In West Virginia in the tobacco region, it costs five times as much to deliver that product eight miles over mud roads as it costs to carry it over 400 miles to Richmond, Va." For Indiana we have estimates and tables prepared from careful tests, which in brief are as follows: Its 2.") cents to 30 cents per ton, per mile, to haul n load over our common earth roads: 17 cents to 20 cents per ton. per mile, over our very best gravel roads, as compared to hauling the same load over a good macadam road at a cost of 8 cents to 10 cents per ton per mile. Do we really have men so dense that they are willing to strangle this proposition, and (ontinue to pay an exorbitant road tax. and yet continue the dirt roads? As to keeping up and repairing of the roads, this is a very important and costly matter that is receiving but little attention, compared with what it really means to the taxpayers. This. Marion county, with 9 townships, pays $45,000 per year for keeping in repair the public highways, outside of incorporations. Other states have proven the great economy of having one man in each civil township, on a straight salary—usually $100 per month — to devote their entire time to this work. By this plan then, with the cost of material, let us say $10,000 per year, making the annual cost of repairs $20,800 or a saving to this county of S24.2O0. This may be too high an average from which to figure for the entire State, but it will certainly prove the fact that "one man working on roads 365 days in the year will keep the roads in far better repair than will 365 men working one day in the year." I am very much in favor of your plan of a double track; this has been a point I have always argued in favor of. The most of our public roadways, from fence to fence, have ample space for a double track, yet we continue to construct a narrow flimsy track, dump the gravel on top of the ridge which in a couple of years is worn out nnd must be resurfaced. Ves, the double track for real economy, comfort and convenience. I have seen this illustrated by the horses in the city that pass and repass the automobiles on the streets and pay no more attention to them than to the lamp posts; these same horses meeting an auto on one of onr country roads ou their narrow grades, where they seem to realize that both are pretty likely to get dumped into the ditch, do some stunts that would put the staid and stately equine from the farm to shame And well he may, for with so many of our narrow sharp graded roads, whether it be an automobile, horsemobile, or oxmobile, you better move over and hold tight or "The goblins 'ill git you, if you don't watch out." The double track plan has been worked in Ohio with perfect results. I have '1 from the township clerk of one township that in less than a year they will have a macadam track on every road in their township, which have cost them he says, approximately $1,700 per mile, on which the annual cost of repairs is but a trifle compared to the cost of the fruitless endeavor to repair the roads before the improvement. Yes, by all means, a double track; the first cost is no more, the repairing but an item of the cost of repairs on a single track. In conclusion, I wish in behalf of the Bureau, to thank you again for the space and comments you have given us and I trust many of your readers will write their suggestions to us, for we are, by no means, a one-sided proposition. J. C. Crabill, See. Indiana Bureau for Good Roads. 60 BUSHELS FOR 60 YEARS. Editors Indiana Farmer: In reply as to the eighty acre piece of land being farmed and producing 60 bus. of corn for 60 years or more. The land* is sandy loam. There is timber on the on the west and south sides of it The timber is black ash, water elm &c. The land lies ery low; yet doesn't overflow; water rises near top of ground, and is moist, yet not too wet to cultivate; don't freeze deep in winter. This land is just 100 miles due north of Indianapolis, and is owned hy James M. Meredith, who is farming it. H. H. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1