Page 193 |
Previous | 1 of 16 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
INDIANA FARMER. Devoted to Agriculture* Horticultures'Ucchanics and the TJacful Art*. "■^^."ed^J^"''1! RICHMOND, MAY 1,1855. \m$lW&^ »&.*%. CULTURE OF THE SWEET POTATO. There is no other vegetable, if we except the Irish Potato, which deserve a more general cultivation and which better pays for the labor it requires, than the Sweet Potato, and yet how many farmers almost entirely neglect it. It is true that certain kinds of soils will not produce enough of this delicious vegetable to justify its cultivation, but there are hardly any farms where a spot cannot be found that will yield an ordinary crop. It requires but little more labor for its cultivation than the Irish Potato, and is certainly much more delicious, and is worth double as much in market. Let us take an example. Last year we planted a small patch of about 12 square rods, on which was set some 500 plants. These cost §1 00. The plowing, harrowing and ridging up might all have been done in half a day which would be worth $1 00 more. The setting out, and after culture could not have been worth more than §1 00. The digging would be worth 75cts., making in all only 83 75. There were at least 15 bushels of potatoes worth at the lowest rate as many dollars. Suppose the cost of cultivation was 85 00 which is certainly high enough, and we have a crop worth at least three times the cost of its cultivation. The kind of toil best adapted to the growth of the sweet potato is a yellow sandy or gravelly loam, though our common clay if not too wet and tenacious, will answer nearly as ve]\—a black loam should be avoided as the crop runs to vines. If not already deep and rich it should be made so by deep plowing and manuring with well rotted stable manure. It may be too rich but this is not common.— One plowing and harrowing, if the ground is in good condition, will answer. Then with two horses and a large plow throw it into ridges about three and a half feet from centre to centre. A good dexterous hand with a steady team, will, with but two furrows to the ridge, leave but little for the hoe to do previous to setting the plants. Leave the ridges a little rouo-h, they are none the worse of it, and it saves labor. Dont get long legged plants, but short spreading ones with good roots. Set them from 16 to 18 inches apart. It is best to set them just before a shower, but if this is not likely to come, proceed in this way : make a hole in the ridge with the hand into which place the plant taking care to put the fibrous roots as deep into the ridge as you can. Fill up with mellow earth and pour on near a pint of water, after this settles away, sprinkle on a little more fine dirt to keep the ground from baking. If the weather is very dry and hot they should be shaded with dock or other green leaves, and watered each morning and evening for a day or two.' Keep them clean with the hoe and plow; little hilling up is necessary, if the ridges hare been properly made. It will be seen that we plant in ridges, not hills. They are much the easiest made, will admit of more plants to a given amount of ground, and are easier tended. Moles can be caught by traps, or otherwise as well between ridges as hills. The Sweet Potato will stand a drouth better than any other crop. ■ «e» i CAN THE SOIL BE MADE TOO LOOSE AND POROUS! It is the prevailing, perhaps the universal opinion, that in order to realize the largest crop possible from a given amount of ground it must be completely pulverized, and by repeated plowing, made as loose and mellow as possible. This is doubtless a correct theory, and one which it would be well for us all more generally to act upon; and yet, we are fully convinced there are exceptions to the rule and perhaps more than the superficial observer will be ready to admit. Our own experience has been mostly confined to clay soils with which the great difficulty is to make and keep them in a sufficiently loose condition for the free circulation of air, and the easy penetration of the roots of plants. Yet even instances have fallen under our observation, where the ground was not sufficiently compact to retain moisture and allow the roots of the young plants to take a proper hold. If it is true that ground may be too hard to retain moisture in time of drouth, it is doubtless as true that it may be too loose and mellow.-— This is particularly the case when moles are bad. Who has not noticed that on a spot of
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1855, v. 04, no. 13 (May 1) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA0413 |
Date of Original | 1855 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 2010-10-01 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 193 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript | INDIANA FARMER. Devoted to Agriculture* Horticultures'Ucchanics and the TJacful Art*. "■^^."ed^J^"''1! RICHMOND, MAY 1,1855. \m$lW&^ »&.*%. CULTURE OF THE SWEET POTATO. There is no other vegetable, if we except the Irish Potato, which deserve a more general cultivation and which better pays for the labor it requires, than the Sweet Potato, and yet how many farmers almost entirely neglect it. It is true that certain kinds of soils will not produce enough of this delicious vegetable to justify its cultivation, but there are hardly any farms where a spot cannot be found that will yield an ordinary crop. It requires but little more labor for its cultivation than the Irish Potato, and is certainly much more delicious, and is worth double as much in market. Let us take an example. Last year we planted a small patch of about 12 square rods, on which was set some 500 plants. These cost §1 00. The plowing, harrowing and ridging up might all have been done in half a day which would be worth $1 00 more. The setting out, and after culture could not have been worth more than §1 00. The digging would be worth 75cts., making in all only 83 75. There were at least 15 bushels of potatoes worth at the lowest rate as many dollars. Suppose the cost of cultivation was 85 00 which is certainly high enough, and we have a crop worth at least three times the cost of its cultivation. The kind of toil best adapted to the growth of the sweet potato is a yellow sandy or gravelly loam, though our common clay if not too wet and tenacious, will answer nearly as ve]\—a black loam should be avoided as the crop runs to vines. If not already deep and rich it should be made so by deep plowing and manuring with well rotted stable manure. It may be too rich but this is not common.— One plowing and harrowing, if the ground is in good condition, will answer. Then with two horses and a large plow throw it into ridges about three and a half feet from centre to centre. A good dexterous hand with a steady team, will, with but two furrows to the ridge, leave but little for the hoe to do previous to setting the plants. Leave the ridges a little rouo-h, they are none the worse of it, and it saves labor. Dont get long legged plants, but short spreading ones with good roots. Set them from 16 to 18 inches apart. It is best to set them just before a shower, but if this is not likely to come, proceed in this way : make a hole in the ridge with the hand into which place the plant taking care to put the fibrous roots as deep into the ridge as you can. Fill up with mellow earth and pour on near a pint of water, after this settles away, sprinkle on a little more fine dirt to keep the ground from baking. If the weather is very dry and hot they should be shaded with dock or other green leaves, and watered each morning and evening for a day or two.' Keep them clean with the hoe and plow; little hilling up is necessary, if the ridges hare been properly made. It will be seen that we plant in ridges, not hills. They are much the easiest made, will admit of more plants to a given amount of ground, and are easier tended. Moles can be caught by traps, or otherwise as well between ridges as hills. The Sweet Potato will stand a drouth better than any other crop. ■ «e» i CAN THE SOIL BE MADE TOO LOOSE AND POROUS! It is the prevailing, perhaps the universal opinion, that in order to realize the largest crop possible from a given amount of ground it must be completely pulverized, and by repeated plowing, made as loose and mellow as possible. This is doubtless a correct theory, and one which it would be well for us all more generally to act upon; and yet, we are fully convinced there are exceptions to the rule and perhaps more than the superficial observer will be ready to admit. Our own experience has been mostly confined to clay soils with which the great difficulty is to make and keep them in a sufficiently loose condition for the free circulation of air, and the easy penetration of the roots of plants. Yet even instances have fallen under our observation, where the ground was not sufficiently compact to retain moisture and allow the roots of the young plants to take a proper hold. If it is true that ground may be too hard to retain moisture in time of drouth, it is doubtless as true that it may be too loose and mellow.-— This is particularly the case when moles are bad. Who has not noticed that on a spot of |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 193