Page 145 |
Previous | 1 of 16 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
INDIANA FARMER. VOL II.] Devoted to Agriculture, Horticulture, Mechanics and the Useful Arts. [NO. 10. »:•& •"•\«SSJ"'{ Editors.) RICHMOND, IND., JANUARY 15,1851. ("••»—-»• *,«•; \V. T. Dean Report froni ttie Census Bureau. , (Continued.) VALUE OF FARMING IMPLEMENTS AND MACHINE- M. For no stronger proof of the ingenuity and Activity of the American mind need we search, than that developed in tho readiness with which labor-saving expedients for carrying on the commonest operations in agriculture are discovered and applied. One hundred and fifty- one millions of dollars would appear to be at this time invested in implements and machinery for hiding and abridging the work of the hands in the cultivating the earth and preparing its produce for consumption. In most civilized countries ol the Old World, so great is the density of the population, and the prices of labor so low, as to create less necessity for such machines; and nowhere does the same amount: of ingenuity appear to have been exercised in their preparation as is evinced with ourraecha-' nics and husbandmen. ) In some porlions of the Old World, where' the necessity is felt and acknowledged by the intelligent, a predominating prejudice hot un-• frequently exists among others in the commu- nity against what is new, and prohibits the in-; Production of anything not stamped with the ! 'approval of their ancestors, nor covered with! the venerable moss of antiquity. Here, how-1 ever, no such sentiment influences the farmer to i ■reject a useful invention. j . No greater delight was enjoyed by foreigners I in London, during the Great Industrial Exhibi- I tion, than that by Americans on the trial of the reaping machines and the triumphant sue-! cess Of the American Reaper. Of the whole j -sum expended in articles of this character, N. • York has invested $22,G84,976; Pennsylvania! $14,722,531; Louisiana $11,666,938, (perhaps! to a great extent in machinery for crushin" su- i $ar cane;) Ohio, $12,750,585; Kentucky" $5; 169,037; Virginia, $7,021,772. DOMESTIC ANIMALS. When we consider the social condition of1 nations, long congregated and civilized; and1 necessarily existing under the impulses of util-! inarianism.it is not surprising thatmaii, whether possessing a permanent abode, orhavin" em- ' igrated to a distant land, should become attach- ; ed to those animals which have proffered to '' him their perfect obedience, sagacity, courage,' strength, velocity, milk, fleece, flesh, &c, and ' should regard them with admiration, gratitude,! and even affection. Such, doubtless, was the' case with most or the adventurers who first sought a new home on our shores, and brought with them those animals which would render1 them the most assistance and subserve the be.=t purposes for clothing and food. The first animals introduced into America from Europe were by Columbus, in his second j voyage, in 1493. He left Spain as admiral of .seventeen ships, bringing a collection of European trees, plants and seeds of various kinds, . a number of horses, a bull and several cows. j The first horses brought into any part of the territory at present embraced in the United I States were landed in Florida, byCabeza.de j Vaca, in 1527, forty-seven in number, all of i which perished or were otherwise killed. The j next importation was also brought to Florida, jby De Soto, in 1539, which consisted of a large I number of horses and swine, among which were | thirteen sows, the progeny of the latter soon af- i ter increasing to several hundreds. , The Portuguese took cattle and swine to New Foundland and Nova Scotia in the year 1553. I Thirty years after, they had multiplied so abun- idahtlythat Sir Richard Gilbert attempted to i land there to obtain supplies of cattle and hogs I for his crew, but was wrecked. I Swine and other domestic animals were brot' over 'to Acadia by M. L'Escarbot, a French ! lawyer, in 1604, the year that country was set- led. In 1608 the French extended their settlement into Canada, and soon after introduced various animals. In 1609, three ships from England landed at Jamestown, in Virginia, with many emigrants, and-the following domestic animals, namely, six mares, one horso, six hundred swine, five hundred domestic fowls, with a few sheep and : goats. Other animals had been previously introduced there. In 1611, Sir Thomas Gates brought over to the same settlement one hundred cows, besides other cattle. The year following Sir Ralph Lane imported some cows from the West Indies. In 1710, an edict was issued in Virginia prohibiting the killing of domestic animals of any kind on penalty of death to the principal, burning the hand and loss of the ears to the accessory, and twenty-four hours whipping to the concealer. As early as the year 1617, the swine had multiplied so rapidly in the colony that the people were obliged to palisade Jamestown to prevent being overrun by them. In 1627, the Indians near the settlement fed upon hogs, which had become wild, instead of game. Every family in Virginia al that time, who had not abundance of tame hogs and poultry, was considered very poor. In 1648, some of the settlers had a good stock of bees. In 1057, sheep and mares were forbidden to bo exported from tho provence By the year 1722, or before, sheep had somewhat multiplied, and bore pood fleeces. As early as 1029, the Plymouth colony'of Massachusetts possessed cattle, goats, poultry and swine. Hence it may be concluded that their importation followed soon after thc first
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1853, v. 02, no. 10 (Jan. 15) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA0210 |
Date of Original | 1853 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Indiana State Library |
Date Digitized | 2011-02-22 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 145 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript | INDIANA FARMER. VOL II.] Devoted to Agriculture, Horticulture, Mechanics and the Useful Arts. [NO. 10. »:•& •"•\«SSJ"'{ Editors.) RICHMOND, IND., JANUARY 15,1851. ("••»—-»• *,«•; \V. T. Dean Report froni ttie Census Bureau. , (Continued.) VALUE OF FARMING IMPLEMENTS AND MACHINE- M. For no stronger proof of the ingenuity and Activity of the American mind need we search, than that developed in tho readiness with which labor-saving expedients for carrying on the commonest operations in agriculture are discovered and applied. One hundred and fifty- one millions of dollars would appear to be at this time invested in implements and machinery for hiding and abridging the work of the hands in the cultivating the earth and preparing its produce for consumption. In most civilized countries ol the Old World, so great is the density of the population, and the prices of labor so low, as to create less necessity for such machines; and nowhere does the same amount: of ingenuity appear to have been exercised in their preparation as is evinced with ourraecha-' nics and husbandmen. ) In some porlions of the Old World, where' the necessity is felt and acknowledged by the intelligent, a predominating prejudice hot un-• frequently exists among others in the commu- nity against what is new, and prohibits the in-; Production of anything not stamped with the ! 'approval of their ancestors, nor covered with! the venerable moss of antiquity. Here, how-1 ever, no such sentiment influences the farmer to i ■reject a useful invention. j . No greater delight was enjoyed by foreigners I in London, during the Great Industrial Exhibi- I tion, than that by Americans on the trial of the reaping machines and the triumphant sue-! cess Of the American Reaper. Of the whole j -sum expended in articles of this character, N. • York has invested $22,G84,976; Pennsylvania! $14,722,531; Louisiana $11,666,938, (perhaps! to a great extent in machinery for crushin" su- i $ar cane;) Ohio, $12,750,585; Kentucky" $5; 169,037; Virginia, $7,021,772. DOMESTIC ANIMALS. When we consider the social condition of1 nations, long congregated and civilized; and1 necessarily existing under the impulses of util-! inarianism.it is not surprising thatmaii, whether possessing a permanent abode, orhavin" em- ' igrated to a distant land, should become attach- ; ed to those animals which have proffered to '' him their perfect obedience, sagacity, courage,' strength, velocity, milk, fleece, flesh, &c, and ' should regard them with admiration, gratitude,! and even affection. Such, doubtless, was the' case with most or the adventurers who first sought a new home on our shores, and brought with them those animals which would render1 them the most assistance and subserve the be.=t purposes for clothing and food. The first animals introduced into America from Europe were by Columbus, in his second j voyage, in 1493. He left Spain as admiral of .seventeen ships, bringing a collection of European trees, plants and seeds of various kinds, . a number of horses, a bull and several cows. j The first horses brought into any part of the territory at present embraced in the United I States were landed in Florida, byCabeza.de j Vaca, in 1527, forty-seven in number, all of i which perished or were otherwise killed. The j next importation was also brought to Florida, jby De Soto, in 1539, which consisted of a large I number of horses and swine, among which were | thirteen sows, the progeny of the latter soon af- i ter increasing to several hundreds. , The Portuguese took cattle and swine to New Foundland and Nova Scotia in the year 1553. I Thirty years after, they had multiplied so abun- idahtlythat Sir Richard Gilbert attempted to i land there to obtain supplies of cattle and hogs I for his crew, but was wrecked. I Swine and other domestic animals were brot' over 'to Acadia by M. L'Escarbot, a French ! lawyer, in 1604, the year that country was set- led. In 1608 the French extended their settlement into Canada, and soon after introduced various animals. In 1609, three ships from England landed at Jamestown, in Virginia, with many emigrants, and-the following domestic animals, namely, six mares, one horso, six hundred swine, five hundred domestic fowls, with a few sheep and : goats. Other animals had been previously introduced there. In 1611, Sir Thomas Gates brought over to the same settlement one hundred cows, besides other cattle. The year following Sir Ralph Lane imported some cows from the West Indies. In 1710, an edict was issued in Virginia prohibiting the killing of domestic animals of any kind on penalty of death to the principal, burning the hand and loss of the ears to the accessory, and twenty-four hours whipping to the concealer. As early as the year 1617, the swine had multiplied so rapidly in the colony that the people were obliged to palisade Jamestown to prevent being overrun by them. In 1627, the Indians near the settlement fed upon hogs, which had become wild, instead of game. Every family in Virginia al that time, who had not abundance of tame hogs and poultry, was considered very poor. In 1648, some of the settlers had a good stock of bees. In 1057, sheep and mares were forbidden to bo exported from tho provence By the year 1722, or before, sheep had somewhat multiplied, and bore pood fleeces. As early as 1029, the Plymouth colony'of Massachusetts possessed cattle, goats, poultry and swine. Hence it may be concluded that their importation followed soon after thc first |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 145