Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 16 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
VOL. XXIII. INDIANAPOLIS, IND., SATURDAY, AUG. 25,1888, NO. 34 BEEF MAEKET MONOPOLY. gow tbe Trade was Diverted to Chicago to tbe Hurt of Growers of Beef Cattle. There has been an increasing sense of danger for years among the thoughtful cattle-growers, at the rapid co ncentration of the cattle trade in Chicago. Hon. Robert Mitchell, of our State Board of Agriculture, and others have frequently referred to this danger in passing opinions respecting it, and the Indiana Farmer has before several times referred to it. Judge Jones, of Delaware, Ohio, has mentioned the matter in these columns, as well as have others at different times in the 'past few years. We have come into the possession of some facts bearing on this subject nhich disclose the methods of this concentration. Beginning somewhere about 1866 certain oi the trunk lines of railway out of Chicago entered into a combination, to refund to, certain shippers who afterwards come to be known as "eveners," §15 per car on cat- tlj carried from points west of Pittsburg, Silamanca, Dunkirk and Buffalo. Byoon- -ivance and manipulation certain favorites come to have a rebate ot about $40 per car on their own shipments. This part of the favoritism covered the years 1874 to 1ST? inclusive. Light began to break re- ■pecting the enormous drawbacks of these "-Tenors" when the trunk lines com- miiced charging back to the western connections their proportion of this refunding per tsar, as it was then we had war among the roads themselves. This charge by the trunk lines was put against the roads between Chicago, Indianapolis, Cincinnati and St. Louis and the points east already named, the trunk lines' western termini. Many of the roads resisted payment, and the shipping and trade was tten diverted to Chicago, and discriminations were made against all other points, and the "eveners" who had these draw- bx* arrangements confined their buying for shipment all to Chicago. This drove out all other buyers and shippers, for no one conld buy against the "eveners" who had practically a $40 -draw-back per car. This system gave such an impetus to the concentration that though it ceased some years ago, it concentrated trade, and packinghouses and capital at Chicago to the tart of cattle growing, and to it is due ■n part to-day the broken down prices iri' "ie beef market. Concentrate any trade wd business in the hands of a few, and at °ne point, and this is the inevitable result. A'showing the rapid and comparative concentration of the cattle trade, we give «-e following figures obtained from re- "■Me sources: Receipts at Chicago. Shipments from Chicago. ,,?"* No. cattle. No. Cattle. 920,843 698,534 1,096,745 797,724 1,033,151 703,402 1,083,063 _ 699.1C8 1,215,732 ' 726,903 1,382,477 880,614 1,498,550 938,712 1,582,530 921,009 1,873,941 ejoo^ss 1,817,518 71(1,8*1 1,905,518 744,193 . 1,963,900 704,875 -witt last year the receipt of cattle at »i t!50 reached 2,382,008 head. The rep's at St. Louis for the year 1885 was . 42 head, and last year was only a few ttauTd more- But -** 8hould *><> 8aId te f6 tw<> Principal cattle markets in ■**»* vln tWs "evenere" scheme of draw- •qnal 8an- stood very much more ou,. 'and the Bame is true relatively of ^•'competaUve points. tnitS°Vement has been mad" In tUe <*n,M ,*** Senate to look Into the <W7 the °°nc*ntratIon »nd break- In^., th9 b66f cattle trade through; an it j, to?tlng oommittee of that body and obtain*rh0pedthatsnch faolB may **- He, ijy M wiu °P«» the eyes of the pub- Q Put an end to the present danger 1S6 ■fle »J !-«. 1*1 *••<• I'M loV, tn of concentrated trade under the manipulations of capital at a single point, and where, if the "eveneis" have departed, a new form of "co-operation" wherein one does not bid against the other, may be as hurtful to cattle growers as the old scheme of plunder was. Written for the Inellana Farmer, Changes ln Local Flora. It has always been interesting to the writer to note the changes in local flora: to note the appeaiance and spreading of new plants.and the decline and extinction of many of the native plants which once grew abundantly in our woods, fields and meadows. As the country becomes more settled more and more land is brought under cultivation. One forest after another has disappeared, until at present most of our remaining woods is confined to hilly regions and low wet soils. But even these wet soils are themselves disappearing under the present drainage system. With the destruction of the forest many species of plants inhabiting them are destroyed. Even the mere thinning-out of forests, by taking out the more valuable and large trees, becomes injurious to such plants as live only in dense shades, and they gradually become extinct. Another class of plants on the decline, and -which indeed has already disappeared, are such as inhabit tho marshes, pools and wet soils generally. And tilling has become so universal the soils are all gradually brought into cultivation. Frequently such wet soils when covered by forests become dry merely by clearing off the trees and underbrush. The disappearance of plants which flourish only in such situations and which' are unable to adapt themselves to their new < surroundings naturally follows. Formerly plants with very showy flowers were abundant. Man in his efforts to preserve this class, too often only hastened their disappearance. . Transplanted from their natural habitat to the uncongenial soil and situations of the flower-gardens the more sensitive ones succumbed immediately ; some led a precarious existence for a few years and then become extinct, while a few—such as the panicled phlox, meadow sweet, coral-berry, orange lily, prickly pear and a few others—survived the change and may still te seen in old- fashioned gardens. There may be some doubt about THE TOTAL EXTINCTION of a species, but when no specimen of it has been seen for a number of years it is reasonable to conclude that it is extinct in that locality. Plants living in the water, or along the margin of small ponds, streams and ditches, are apt to come, and some according to variations in the seasons. In dry seasons when all the water evaporates from such places a number of species will also disappe ar. For several ye ars pas t the writer has kept a close watch on several ponds and streams and in that time has seen the disappearance and reappearance of several species peculiar to such situations, and the advent of plants never seen here before, but which grew more or less abundant in similar situations several miles distant. The appearance of such now species, and the reappearance of old ones, is undoubtedly due to water-bit ds frequenting such places and wading among the plants. The seed, and perhaps, in the case of small plants, entire plants become attacheeTto their feet and are carried to distant places. Even a few years effect great changes In the aspect of the flora occupying the cleared soils and cultivated grounds. New species-*o called adventive plants-most- ly weeds from other States and the Old World are constantly appearing. Among these are always some which fight tenaciously for the mastery of the soil and only too often do they succeed. It ls a well-known fact that all plants of any region are in a constant state of war with each other; each trying to occupy the space and exclude other species. ThoHe already woll established are apt to hold the ground against all new-comers, simply because they already occupy the space; the larger smother the smaller, the longest- lived supercede the shorter-lived, the most fruitful often displace Buch as are less fruitful. When a NEW SPECIES first appears in a locality it is often only a single individual which blooms and ripens its seed. The second year a number of the same kind can usually be found near the parent plant. With each succeeding year the number of plants increase, provided the surroundings are favorable,and, in the case of Old World weeds, they soon succeed in taking a good hold and in a short time become a feature of the landscape. The rapidity with which plants spread ls well illustrated by a small annual, about a foot high, which first appeared in this county in 1883. This plant was a species of croton {Oroton monanthogynum) a native of the prairies of Illinois and south- westward. In the above year a few specimens *v»eie seen along the gravelly soil ot a small isolated stream, away from the roads and railroads. The following year, in 1884, it had spread all through the little valley down to the White Water river, a distance of about one mile. Two years later it could be found ln almost all gravelly soils from one end of the county to the other. At present it is well established. A question might arise whether the above mentioned center of distribution was actually the first and only center, or if it did not spread from seveial places. A thorough search had failed to reveal any other locality hence the writer is inclined to believe that it was, although by the second or third year of the "exodus" it would be difficult or impossible to decide if the source was still the same. Another example of the appearance and spread of a new species, a weed, is that of the sweet white clover, {Melilotus alba). Previous to 1886 it had never been seen growing wild within-the limits of this oounty. In that year a few specimens were seen in three widely separated localities: one here in town,another along a railroad in the southern edge of the county, the third in the western part. Last year two additional localities were noticed, while the former had increased to large patches. This year it is abundant in many places and in a few instances it has displaced all other plants which formerly occupied tho soil. When the latter plant first made its appearance here the writer mused how long it would be until its congener, the yellow sweet clover, would also appear. As this plant is already established in several counties in this State it was only a question of time. It did not long delay coming. This year a number of specimens were found along a railroad just within the city limits. It was evidently brought in by the railroads. The railroads are undoubtedly the greatest factors in the DisTninnriojr of plants, and judging from the localities where such introduced plants grow within the limits of this county, much greater than birds and animals. It is rare that a new species is found far away from any railroad or large stream. The above mentioned croton was such an exception. Two species of plants found last summer about two miles east of this place, along a railroad, show how plants migiate by the trains. While on a botanical tramp and on a lookout for new Interlopers a plant was found close to the track which was new to the writer, and which was not described in the manuals of the eastern United States. After taking several specimens for future study and reference he had not proceeded more than 50 feet when a species of primrose (Oenothera sinuata) whose ancestors live in the "sandy fields of New Jersey to Georgia" was next found. The former plant proved to be (,'aura coc- cinca a native of the "plains from Arkansas to Wisconsin," and never before found east of the Mississippi rlver» So here we have two species growing side by side whose homes are more than a thousand miles apart. There is no doubt whatever that they were brought ln by the trains. It may be added that both species failed to reappear this year. Perhaps they were not fitted for their new homes: the soil and tho climate. A number of OTHKU SPECIES could be cited which appeared here during the past seven years. Among them the more prominent are such as the horse nettle, Canada thistle, apple of Peru, Norwegian potentilla, wheat thief, ox eye daisy, English plantain, cow herb, St. John's wort, etc. Most of these are from the Old World. The examples given above are sufficient to show the ever changing character of what may be called the I WEED FLORA. Judging from tbe character of the weeds which aie constantly arriving, and often displacing those which already occupy the soil, it is evident that any new immigrant having some advantage over his predecessor, or rival, will in the struggle for existence, crowd them out, to be in turn perhaps displaced by others still better fitted for the place. When will these mutations end? Will they keep on changing until the weeds of each country have been distributed, to all other countries, and all tbe weaker displaced by the stronger? Will the Old World weeds that have resisted extermination for ages remain tho victors ln the end, or will some of our own weeds develop advantages which will enable them to successfully struggle against all foreigners? In any case it is a bitter struggle for existence. II. Fayette Co. . ■» s Eow Natural Gaa Travels. A rubber ball, two inches smaller than the pipe, was placed in one end of a new natural gas main in McKeesport, and five pounds pressure suddenly turned on. The ball turned several sharp corners, passed through two T joints upsix feet to the top of the regulator and landed at the other end ot the main, a mile distant, in 45 seconds, actual time.—Brooklyn Eagle. ■ *» The prize awarded by a Champaign, 111., merchant for the highest corn grown in the county was taken by Charles Duncan, of Somer Township, who Bhowed a stalk fifteen feet and nine inches tall. Even better results were produced by the State University and Mrs. S. Chapman, of Urbana, but neither products were In competition. Mrs. Chapman showed a stalk sixteen feet three and one-quarter inches, and the University one sixteen feet three and one- half inches tall. Woman suffrage on liquor license has been defeated in the Massachusetts Senate hy a vote of eighteen to eighteen, the President giving the casting vote against it. On Monday a lad aged seven years set fire to two barns at Crawfordsville, in order, as he said, "to get to see the new horses run hitched to the hose cart."
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1888, v. 23, no. 34 (Aug. 25) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA2334 |
Date of Original | 1888 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 2010-12-06 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript |
VOL. XXIII.
INDIANAPOLIS, IND., SATURDAY, AUG. 25,1888,
NO. 34
BEEF MAEKET MONOPOLY.
gow tbe Trade was Diverted to Chicago
to tbe Hurt of Growers of Beef Cattle.
There has been an increasing sense of
danger for years among the thoughtful
cattle-growers, at the rapid co ncentration
of the cattle trade in Chicago. Hon. Robert Mitchell, of our State Board of Agriculture, and others have frequently referred
to this danger in passing opinions respecting it, and the Indiana Farmer has
before several times referred to it. Judge
Jones, of Delaware, Ohio, has mentioned
the matter in these columns, as well as
have others at different times in the 'past
few years. We have come into the possession of some facts bearing on this subject
nhich disclose the methods of this concentration.
Beginning somewhere about 1866 certain
oi the trunk lines of railway out of Chicago
entered into a combination, to refund to,
certain shippers who afterwards come to
be known as "eveners," §15 per car on cat-
tlj carried from points west of Pittsburg,
Silamanca, Dunkirk and Buffalo. Byoon-
-ivance and manipulation certain favorites come to have a rebate ot about $40 per
car on their own shipments. This part of
the favoritism covered the years 1874 to
1ST? inclusive. Light began to break re-
■pecting the enormous drawbacks of these
"-Tenors" when the trunk lines com-
miiced charging back to the western connections their proportion of this refunding per tsar, as it was then we had war
among the roads themselves. This charge
by the trunk lines was put against the
roads between Chicago, Indianapolis, Cincinnati and St. Louis and the points east
already named, the trunk lines' western
termini. Many of the roads resisted payment, and the shipping and trade was
tten diverted to Chicago, and discriminations were made against all other points,
and the "eveners" who had these draw-
bx* arrangements confined their buying
for shipment all to Chicago. This drove
out all other buyers and shippers, for no
one conld buy against the "eveners" who
had practically a $40 -draw-back per car.
This system gave such an impetus to the
concentration that though it ceased some
years ago, it concentrated trade, and packinghouses and capital at Chicago to the
tart of cattle growing, and to it is due
■n part to-day the broken down prices iri'
"ie beef market. Concentrate any trade
wd business in the hands of a few, and at
°ne point, and this is the inevitable result.
A'showing the rapid and comparative
concentration of the cattle trade, we give
«-e following figures obtained from re-
"■Me sources:
Receipts at Chicago. Shipments from Chicago.
,,?"* No. cattle. No. Cattle.
920,843 698,534
1,096,745 797,724
1,033,151 703,402
1,083,063 _ 699.1C8
1,215,732 ' 726,903
1,382,477 880,614
1,498,550 938,712
1,582,530 921,009
1,873,941 ejoo^ss
1,817,518 71(1,8*1
1,905,518 744,193
. 1,963,900 704,875
-witt last year the receipt of cattle at
»i t!50 reached 2,382,008 head. The rep's at St. Louis for the year 1885 was
. 42 head, and last year was only a few
ttauTd more- But -** 8hould *><> 8aId
te f6 tw<> Principal cattle markets in
■**»* vln tWs "evenere" scheme of draw-
•qnal 8an- stood very much more
ou,. 'and the Bame is true relatively of
^•'competaUve points.
tnitS°Vement has been mad" In tUe
<*n,M ,*** Senate to look Into the
|
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1