Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 16 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
VOL. XXVI. 7 INDIANAPOLIS, IND., DEC. 26,1891. NO. 52 The Necessity of Increased Intelligence Among Fanners. [Paper read by Rev. T, A. Goodwin, before Marion County Agricultural and Horticultural Society, Dec. 12,1891.] The topic assigned me is somewhat e- qtuvocal. I tmay intimate a sad deficiency in intelligence among farmers; a suggestion that I most emphatically resent. I prefer rather to treat it as meaning what the usage of the College avenue electric line means, no matter how full, there is always room for increase. This must be the meaning, or the man who suggested it is not posted as to the general intelll gence of the present farmers of Indiana. At the risk of being classed among old people by the juveniles of this meeting, I must however concede that farming and farmers are not now what they were when I first became acquainted with tbem in the days of the wooden mold-board, and the inevitable paddle that hung on the plow handle. We had SELF-MADE FARMERS In those days, but we had self-made hogs, and self-made horses as well, and in many respects they were all v .ry much alike. In whatever they excelled, it was by main strength and awkwardness. And it may be well to remark, in passing, that tho transition from the period of self made men and things to the present period was not made at a bound. It was an evolu tlon, not a revolution; and every step from the old order to the new order has been '-4_a__$^COntest6_U.'S«,.that what has teen gained is clearly the "survival of the fit test. The wooden mold-board gave way to the iron, only little by little. Was it not the universal mold-board, and had it not been So for ages? And was it not a vast improvement upon the crooked stick that Adam, the first agriculturist, used for breaking ground, with his wife in the lead? Why then discard it and accept in its stead that heavy implement which no ordinary mortal could swing around a stump? It was nearly 20 years before the iron mold-board got undisputed possession of the field. EquaUy stubborn was the resistance the ox-made for supremacy as a farm motor. To the horse was early conceded a qualified superiority for traveling purposes, and he was allowed a fair consideration for transportation purposes on the road, but for farm work THE OX CLAIMED THE PRE-EMINENCE and maintained it stubbornly for more than a quarter ol a century. Was not the first cost much less? And then at the end of a long and useful life his carcass after a few weeks of rest and feeding would bring more than first cost... en there was a difference in the cost of harness, even when shucks were used for collars and ropes for traces. Speed was no object, for it was before the day of] rapid transit, except when going for the doctor; and the difference in speed was if any thing in favor of the ox, especially when plowing among stumps, for in addition to the inconvenience of lifting the double-tree over tho stumps, the singletree was almost sure to take liberties with the horse's legs, that were likely to result in his becoming frisky and in increasing speed Justin time to strike a root and lift the plow on its beam's end, and then to rebound so that the handles would strike the plowman in his bread basket, causing him to wish there was nothing in the decalogue against emphatic speech. In the debating cluba of that period the ox always came out ahead when the question was the relative serviceableness of the ox or the horse, in farm work. I have said that we had SELF-MADE HOC)SI but they have gone to keep company with the wooden mold-board, but unlike the wooden mold _oard, there is not now to be found a single specimen stowed away in loft or garret, or in the museum of our State Board—not even a photo. They were born in the woods, they grew up in the woods and many of them died in the woods stubbornly refusing to be domesticated. They were lean, long and laDk, and often as tall as a calf. Their traveling qualities were so good that even after taking on enough fat for the market, a journey of a hundred miles to the slaughter house was no uncommon feat. Very little help they had from man in their bringing up. They were self-made in the most unqualified sense of that te _n. About all the help they had was to be penned up in the spring and have their ears slit, or cropped or forked or notched, and then they were turned out and told to root or die. They generally rooted, for there was no hog cholera In those days, and tho kidney worm seldom proved fatal. Gradually MAN-MADE HOGS supplanted them but it was a fierce and protracted struggle. So tender were these innovators, and they required so much nursing as to give rise to the question in the debating clubs "which is the gentleman, the farmer or the hog." It took more that a third of a century to suppress the self-made hog. In many respects the self-made horse did not differ materially from the self- made hog. Very early in the history of stock raising in Indiana, a law was obtained forbidding the running at large of stallions. It was ostensibly in the inter- eat of better stock but in reality it was to make a corner on stallions. Very much like the present law requiring every doctor to have a diploma is to.create a corner in doctoring; for it did not change the method of horse-raising one particle. These self-made horses were put at it early in life,and continued at it until the job was finished, unless sooner relieved by death. During colt hood they drew from their dams the very little nourishment these dams could furnish by plowing by day and grazing on short pasture by night, with sometimes a little corn or oats. Weaning time came with harvest time and the work of self-culture then began in earnest by BROWSING IN THE FENCE CORNER and around the stumps in the stubble field. From this they passed into the stalk field and the straw stack, from which they came out in the spring a mere skeleton, unless by succumbing to this regime they had demonstrated their unfitness to live. After three such winterings, they werecornered and there bridled for the first time. They were stunted, of course, but they were hardened and self- made. How persistently the traditions of the times resisted the notion of wintering colts in a stable on nutritious food, the present generation of farmers can hardly imagine. The self-made farmers of those days did not differ greatly from self-made other- things. In childhood they went barefooted and bareheaded and often barebacked, or at least bare-legged. In many instances their habitations were but little if any more comfortable than the stables for their horses. Indeed, as a rule, the frame barn preceded the frame house, both in point of time and of comforts. Of course many died in childhood under this self-making process, but they were the weakly children; THE HARDY ONES SURVIVED, to die of old age before they were 50. It is worthy of remark in this connection, that many farmers began to improve their hogs by better provisions for their development before they took any greater pains ln the development and rearing of their children. These men were farmer* because the thought was that if a man could do nothing else he could farm, for farming went by instinct—it just farmed itself. They sowed wheat broad cast, and when they could not borrow a harrow of some neigh bor, that was not a thorough self-made fanner, they covered it by dragging a minature brush heap over it. When harvest came, they thrust in their sickles and reaped, as men reaped 4,000 years before; when threshing time came they threshed, using a flail, unless they happened to have horses and colts enough to tramp out the grain. Then, unless they could borrow a windmill of some one, not a thoroughbred self made farmer, they separated chaff from wheat with a sheet; then stored the wheat in a section of a hollow* sycamore tree, bottomed with clapboards rolled into the covered space between the two cabins, which served also as a receptacle for hoes and plows and bridles, and the sheep skin that served for a saddle. As to intellectual development they had none. They read NOTHING BUT POOR RICHARD'S ALMANAC and that only when they wanted to know when tho sign was right to plant potatoes or kill hogs, or set bens, or make soap. They went to mill and sometimes to meetings, but always to general musters and elections. That such farmers were the dupes of demagogues goes without the saying. A section of those times, with their self made farmers and their self made hogs and self made horses and their self made almost everything else, would draw a larger crowd now than Barnum's "Greatest Show on Earth." As the change from that condition of ■__T*g_ ■_> ♦.._ present waa not the work of magic, nor the result of some social or economic upheaval, it may be interesting to note the agencies that have contributed to it. In a general way the school house and the meeting house have played an important part, but there have been specific agencies whose work has been bo silent and unostentatious as to escape the notice of the busy world. Most efficient of these has been THE AGRICULTURAL PRESS. The central thought ot the self-made farmer was that book farming was a fraud and he persistently refused to read anything that purported to give instructions on methods. But as early as GO years ago sporadic copies of the Genesee Farmer found their way into farm houses with good effect, but it took from 10 to 15 bushels of corn to buy it, and pay the postage for a year of 12 numbers. This, with the popular aversion to scientific farming, as its instructions were called in derision, caused but a limited circulation. A little more than 50 years ago an enterprising firm started the Indiana Farmer, in Indianapolis. It was sickly from the beginning for want of that essential to vitality,a cash patronage.When at the point of death the versatile Henry Ward Beecher was employed to edit it. His wit and humor, more than his knowledge of farming gave it a new lease of life for a few years, but when he left, it died, or at least went into a state of suspended animation; but the germ of an agricultural paper remained, out of which, in time, sprang the THE PRESENT INDIANA FARMER, one of the best agricultural papers in America, if not the very best, and to whose influence more than to any other one agency, the transition from the period of self-made farmers and self-made horses and hogs, and self-made every thing else, to the present high state of culture Is due. Cotemporaneous with the agricultural press, and so hand in hand with it, that it that it would be as difficult to give either a front rank, as to say to which if a well balanced dual head of the home is most credit due, is the agricultural society with its exhibitions of farm productions. Only those who were in at the beginning and who have noted results, can estimate the fruits of this force. Their beginnings were small. Almost simultaneously the FIRST PAIRS IN THE STATE were held In Wayne and In Franklin counties, In the _0_. I well remember the latter. Two Shorthorn bulls were there, and half dozen cows and heifers, no hogs, no sheep, no horses, but a specimen of the new variety of potatoes the Neshannock, and some potatoes raised from potato seed brought from Ireland, and a few large beets and pumpkins constituted the exhibit. No gate fees, for there were no gates. The exhibiton was on the unin- closed public square of the town. No premiums were offered but very artistic diplomas were given for the best exhibit. A year later the experiment was tried in Indianapolis, with premiums, the sum of $180 being distributed, fifty dollars cf which had been voted by couuty commissioners. These efforts were too exhaustive to be repeated soon, and several years elapsed before there was another exhibition of agricultural products in the State. But they came at last and then came the State Fair. Men laugh at tbat insignificant beginning which, for a short time, went itinerating around the State, but in it were undeveloped potencies which have told on the agricultural interests of the State. Men went to those out of curiosity who had been self-sufficient in their methods, but the next week they they drove fifty miles for what they bad called, in derision, a patent hog, or a patent bull or buck, and the stock of the country began to change from the self- made to the man-Improved, until to-day the farms of ,_, . INDIANA CAN PRODUCE ANIMALS EQUAL TO THE BEST. County and district societies followed, and local emulation led to local improvements in farm implements, farming methods and farm products, from the big pumpkin to the big bullock, and from the fat pig to the fast horse. But more and greater than all these: The self-made farmer, out of sheer curiosity and for a family holiday, took his wife and children. These rubbed against other wives and children, and the horizon of their lives was enlarged, and now aspirations seized them, which took in more than improved hogs or fast horses. They felt a divinity within that spoke of higher attainments than the mere cultivation of better breeds of animals, or the use of improved implements, and they clamored for mental food. Then came, into their homes more agricultural literature, and literature that was not purely, agricultural, so that he who points to the better horses and better cattle, and better hogs, and better sheep and better poultry as the achievements of our agricultural papers, and agricultural fairs takes altogether too low a view of what has been accomplished. THE GREATEST TROPHIES OP THESE YEARS are found in the better homes and in the better mental development of the farmers of Indiana, and their families. But what next? That car may seem comfortably full, but there is room for an increase. _S ay more, there is a pressing necessity for an Increase of intelligence among fanners, as farmers, and not that that better informed boy shall hie away to the city because he knows tco much to be a farmer. Farming may never be ranked as one of the learned professions. It is entitled to a higher rank, and one in which the best mental culture can find employment and enjoyment. Heretofore the tendency has been for the farmer boy to light out from the farm to become a Horace Greeley in the city, as soon as he attains that turning point in life, when he knows more than his father. The result is an army of starvelings, who go about the city in seedy clothes, begging for a crumb from the public crib, or wishing some body would give them something to do, by which they could maintan the semblance of a codfish aristocracy—a city life with Jts belonging?. It should bring Co.aie._o* on vag. 18.
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1891, v. 26, no. 52 (Dec. 26) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA2652 |
Date of Original | 1891 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 2011-01-21 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript | VOL. XXVI. 7 INDIANAPOLIS, IND., DEC. 26,1891. NO. 52 The Necessity of Increased Intelligence Among Fanners. [Paper read by Rev. T, A. Goodwin, before Marion County Agricultural and Horticultural Society, Dec. 12,1891.] The topic assigned me is somewhat e- qtuvocal. I tmay intimate a sad deficiency in intelligence among farmers; a suggestion that I most emphatically resent. I prefer rather to treat it as meaning what the usage of the College avenue electric line means, no matter how full, there is always room for increase. This must be the meaning, or the man who suggested it is not posted as to the general intelll gence of the present farmers of Indiana. At the risk of being classed among old people by the juveniles of this meeting, I must however concede that farming and farmers are not now what they were when I first became acquainted with tbem in the days of the wooden mold-board, and the inevitable paddle that hung on the plow handle. We had SELF-MADE FARMERS In those days, but we had self-made hogs, and self-made horses as well, and in many respects they were all v .ry much alike. In whatever they excelled, it was by main strength and awkwardness. And it may be well to remark, in passing, that tho transition from the period of self made men and things to the present period was not made at a bound. It was an evolu tlon, not a revolution; and every step from the old order to the new order has been '-4_a__$^COntest6_U.'S«,.that what has teen gained is clearly the "survival of the fit test. The wooden mold-board gave way to the iron, only little by little. Was it not the universal mold-board, and had it not been So for ages? And was it not a vast improvement upon the crooked stick that Adam, the first agriculturist, used for breaking ground, with his wife in the lead? Why then discard it and accept in its stead that heavy implement which no ordinary mortal could swing around a stump? It was nearly 20 years before the iron mold-board got undisputed possession of the field. EquaUy stubborn was the resistance the ox-made for supremacy as a farm motor. To the horse was early conceded a qualified superiority for traveling purposes, and he was allowed a fair consideration for transportation purposes on the road, but for farm work THE OX CLAIMED THE PRE-EMINENCE and maintained it stubbornly for more than a quarter ol a century. Was not the first cost much less? And then at the end of a long and useful life his carcass after a few weeks of rest and feeding would bring more than first cost... en there was a difference in the cost of harness, even when shucks were used for collars and ropes for traces. Speed was no object, for it was before the day of] rapid transit, except when going for the doctor; and the difference in speed was if any thing in favor of the ox, especially when plowing among stumps, for in addition to the inconvenience of lifting the double-tree over tho stumps, the singletree was almost sure to take liberties with the horse's legs, that were likely to result in his becoming frisky and in increasing speed Justin time to strike a root and lift the plow on its beam's end, and then to rebound so that the handles would strike the plowman in his bread basket, causing him to wish there was nothing in the decalogue against emphatic speech. In the debating cluba of that period the ox always came out ahead when the question was the relative serviceableness of the ox or the horse, in farm work. I have said that we had SELF-MADE HOC)SI but they have gone to keep company with the wooden mold-board, but unlike the wooden mold _oard, there is not now to be found a single specimen stowed away in loft or garret, or in the museum of our State Board—not even a photo. They were born in the woods, they grew up in the woods and many of them died in the woods stubbornly refusing to be domesticated. They were lean, long and laDk, and often as tall as a calf. Their traveling qualities were so good that even after taking on enough fat for the market, a journey of a hundred miles to the slaughter house was no uncommon feat. Very little help they had from man in their bringing up. They were self-made in the most unqualified sense of that te _n. About all the help they had was to be penned up in the spring and have their ears slit, or cropped or forked or notched, and then they were turned out and told to root or die. They generally rooted, for there was no hog cholera In those days, and tho kidney worm seldom proved fatal. Gradually MAN-MADE HOGS supplanted them but it was a fierce and protracted struggle. So tender were these innovators, and they required so much nursing as to give rise to the question in the debating clubs "which is the gentleman, the farmer or the hog." It took more that a third of a century to suppress the self-made hog. In many respects the self-made horse did not differ materially from the self- made hog. Very early in the history of stock raising in Indiana, a law was obtained forbidding the running at large of stallions. It was ostensibly in the inter- eat of better stock but in reality it was to make a corner on stallions. Very much like the present law requiring every doctor to have a diploma is to.create a corner in doctoring; for it did not change the method of horse-raising one particle. These self-made horses were put at it early in life,and continued at it until the job was finished, unless sooner relieved by death. During colt hood they drew from their dams the very little nourishment these dams could furnish by plowing by day and grazing on short pasture by night, with sometimes a little corn or oats. Weaning time came with harvest time and the work of self-culture then began in earnest by BROWSING IN THE FENCE CORNER and around the stumps in the stubble field. From this they passed into the stalk field and the straw stack, from which they came out in the spring a mere skeleton, unless by succumbing to this regime they had demonstrated their unfitness to live. After three such winterings, they werecornered and there bridled for the first time. They were stunted, of course, but they were hardened and self- made. How persistently the traditions of the times resisted the notion of wintering colts in a stable on nutritious food, the present generation of farmers can hardly imagine. The self-made farmers of those days did not differ greatly from self-made other- things. In childhood they went barefooted and bareheaded and often barebacked, or at least bare-legged. In many instances their habitations were but little if any more comfortable than the stables for their horses. Indeed, as a rule, the frame barn preceded the frame house, both in point of time and of comforts. Of course many died in childhood under this self-making process, but they were the weakly children; THE HARDY ONES SURVIVED, to die of old age before they were 50. It is worthy of remark in this connection, that many farmers began to improve their hogs by better provisions for their development before they took any greater pains ln the development and rearing of their children. These men were farmer* because the thought was that if a man could do nothing else he could farm, for farming went by instinct—it just farmed itself. They sowed wheat broad cast, and when they could not borrow a harrow of some neigh bor, that was not a thorough self-made fanner, they covered it by dragging a minature brush heap over it. When harvest came, they thrust in their sickles and reaped, as men reaped 4,000 years before; when threshing time came they threshed, using a flail, unless they happened to have horses and colts enough to tramp out the grain. Then, unless they could borrow a windmill of some one, not a thoroughbred self made farmer, they separated chaff from wheat with a sheet; then stored the wheat in a section of a hollow* sycamore tree, bottomed with clapboards rolled into the covered space between the two cabins, which served also as a receptacle for hoes and plows and bridles, and the sheep skin that served for a saddle. As to intellectual development they had none. They read NOTHING BUT POOR RICHARD'S ALMANAC and that only when they wanted to know when tho sign was right to plant potatoes or kill hogs, or set bens, or make soap. They went to mill and sometimes to meetings, but always to general musters and elections. That such farmers were the dupes of demagogues goes without the saying. A section of those times, with their self made farmers and their self made hogs and self made horses and their self made almost everything else, would draw a larger crowd now than Barnum's "Greatest Show on Earth." As the change from that condition of ■__T*g_ ■_> ♦.._ present waa not the work of magic, nor the result of some social or economic upheaval, it may be interesting to note the agencies that have contributed to it. In a general way the school house and the meeting house have played an important part, but there have been specific agencies whose work has been bo silent and unostentatious as to escape the notice of the busy world. Most efficient of these has been THE AGRICULTURAL PRESS. The central thought ot the self-made farmer was that book farming was a fraud and he persistently refused to read anything that purported to give instructions on methods. But as early as GO years ago sporadic copies of the Genesee Farmer found their way into farm houses with good effect, but it took from 10 to 15 bushels of corn to buy it, and pay the postage for a year of 12 numbers. This, with the popular aversion to scientific farming, as its instructions were called in derision, caused but a limited circulation. A little more than 50 years ago an enterprising firm started the Indiana Farmer, in Indianapolis. It was sickly from the beginning for want of that essential to vitality,a cash patronage.When at the point of death the versatile Henry Ward Beecher was employed to edit it. His wit and humor, more than his knowledge of farming gave it a new lease of life for a few years, but when he left, it died, or at least went into a state of suspended animation; but the germ of an agricultural paper remained, out of which, in time, sprang the THE PRESENT INDIANA FARMER, one of the best agricultural papers in America, if not the very best, and to whose influence more than to any other one agency, the transition from the period of self-made farmers and self-made horses and hogs, and self-made every thing else, to the present high state of culture Is due. Cotemporaneous with the agricultural press, and so hand in hand with it, that it that it would be as difficult to give either a front rank, as to say to which if a well balanced dual head of the home is most credit due, is the agricultural society with its exhibitions of farm productions. Only those who were in at the beginning and who have noted results, can estimate the fruits of this force. Their beginnings were small. Almost simultaneously the FIRST PAIRS IN THE STATE were held In Wayne and In Franklin counties, In the _0_. I well remember the latter. Two Shorthorn bulls were there, and half dozen cows and heifers, no hogs, no sheep, no horses, but a specimen of the new variety of potatoes the Neshannock, and some potatoes raised from potato seed brought from Ireland, and a few large beets and pumpkins constituted the exhibit. No gate fees, for there were no gates. The exhibiton was on the unin- closed public square of the town. No premiums were offered but very artistic diplomas were given for the best exhibit. A year later the experiment was tried in Indianapolis, with premiums, the sum of $180 being distributed, fifty dollars cf which had been voted by couuty commissioners. These efforts were too exhaustive to be repeated soon, and several years elapsed before there was another exhibition of agricultural products in the State. But they came at last and then came the State Fair. Men laugh at tbat insignificant beginning which, for a short time, went itinerating around the State, but in it were undeveloped potencies which have told on the agricultural interests of the State. Men went to those out of curiosity who had been self-sufficient in their methods, but the next week they they drove fifty miles for what they bad called, in derision, a patent hog, or a patent bull or buck, and the stock of the country began to change from the self- made to the man-Improved, until to-day the farms of ,_, . INDIANA CAN PRODUCE ANIMALS EQUAL TO THE BEST. County and district societies followed, and local emulation led to local improvements in farm implements, farming methods and farm products, from the big pumpkin to the big bullock, and from the fat pig to the fast horse. But more and greater than all these: The self-made farmer, out of sheer curiosity and for a family holiday, took his wife and children. These rubbed against other wives and children, and the horizon of their lives was enlarged, and now aspirations seized them, which took in more than improved hogs or fast horses. They felt a divinity within that spoke of higher attainments than the mere cultivation of better breeds of animals, or the use of improved implements, and they clamored for mental food. Then came, into their homes more agricultural literature, and literature that was not purely, agricultural, so that he who points to the better horses and better cattle, and better hogs, and better sheep and better poultry as the achievements of our agricultural papers, and agricultural fairs takes altogether too low a view of what has been accomplished. THE GREATEST TROPHIES OP THESE YEARS are found in the better homes and in the better mental development of the farmers of Indiana, and their families. But what next? That car may seem comfortably full, but there is room for an increase. _S ay more, there is a pressing necessity for an Increase of intelligence among fanners, as farmers, and not that that better informed boy shall hie away to the city because he knows tco much to be a farmer. Farming may never be ranked as one of the learned professions. It is entitled to a higher rank, and one in which the best mental culture can find employment and enjoyment. Heretofore the tendency has been for the farmer boy to light out from the farm to become a Horace Greeley in the city, as soon as he attains that turning point in life, when he knows more than his father. The result is an army of starvelings, who go about the city in seedy clothes, begging for a crumb from the public crib, or wishing some body would give them something to do, by which they could maintan the semblance of a codfish aristocracy—a city life with Jts belonging?. It should bring Co.aie._o* on vag. 18. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1