Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 18 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
VOL. XIX. INDIANAPOLIS, IND., SATURDAY/MARCH e, 1884. NO. 10. Written lor the Indiana Tanner. THE NATIONAL CAPITAL. What ls Being* Done for the Farmer at AVashlngton. BUI*} Before Congress -American Pork- Farm Statistics. The agricultural Interests have received a large share of the time and attention ol Congress during the past week. In addition to the pleuro-pneumonia bill, which, after almost two weeks of debate In the Hou.e, was Anally passed by that body on the 21st, there have been bills introduced both iu the House and Senate, and reported favorably from committees of both those bodies, which have for their object the welfare and protection of agriculturists and their interests: THE PLEURO-PNEUMONIA BILL passed the House, In the* shape it came from the committee on agriculture, with the exception of one clause. The portion of the original bill stricken out is that section whtehf provided for declaring any State or Territory in which contagious diseases among cattle exist, and which fails to take proper measures for the extirpation of such diseases,, in quarantine;~J___*.he debate on the bill a great deal of opposition was matiifested by representatives from different sections on account of local interests. The strikingout of the fourth section of the bill, giving the President of the united States power to declare quarantine against any State or Territory in which contagious diseases of cattle exist, brought to the support of the bill those who objected to that section, and secured its passage by a vote of 155 to 128. IN THE SENATE, Mr. Plumb, from the committee on agriculture and forestry, reported favorably the bill creating the Department of Agriculture an executive department. IN THE HOUSE, Mr. Denster introduced abill providing 'or the appointment of a commission for examination into the preservation and cultivation of woods and forests adjoining the sources of the navigable rivers, for the purpose of preserving the same and increasing their growth by planting along Jhe courses of the rivers where the land is timberless. The object of the bill is to pre- \ent the destruction of the woods, on the ground that such destruction of the forests °mS(? the land to become arid and unprofitable deserts. Mr. Ellis also introduced in "ie House a joint resolution setting forth the prevalence of diseases among the swine ot the United States, and providing for an examination as to the causes of those diseases, to determine the best means for their eradication and cure. The last clause of the resolution reads as follows; "That until euch investigation can be had and rigid regulations provided so as to guard against "»> exportation of infected meats, it would o« unwise and impolitic to inaugurate retaliatory measures against any friendly h27.elfor simply endeavoring to guard the wealth and well-being of its citizens." SWINE DISEASE COMMISSION. The Commissioner of Agrieulture has Mbmuted to the President the report of *ue commission appointed to examine the lntr. .v,nduitry ofthe United States and rioLi,*:., alIegations relative to the un- rZil"!f ulness of pork products. The re- inH ,?*? tbat ""»numberof hogs raised annually _ about ^(jqq^ijoq from whleh )s ™ae a total of cured meats, lard, and tv,i^produetsof 4.725,000,000 pounds. It W ?ut tbe Practicability of microscopic tha of SUCD products, and says that 0 examination made by them shows our pork equal if not superior to that of France or Germany. In closing their report the commissioners say, "While we believe that no legitimate ground exists for the restrictions imposed in some foreign countries on the importation of American pork, we are satisfied that microscopic inspection of all pork for export can tie s^f. cured at the packing houses, if such inspection should be demanded." The Legislature of Ohio a few days ago presented to Congress a memorial praying for the passage of a law providing for the inspection, by Government inspectors, of all pork products designed for exportation from the United States, and Senator Logan, of Illinois, introduced in the Senate on Monday last a bill providing for the appointment of Inspectors in each customs district of the United States where such inspectors would be needed, whose duty should be to inspect all dressed beef, pork and pork products intended for exportation, and to brand such articles with an inspector's brand,"to show that they had been so inspected. STATISTICS. The report of the Statistician of the Department of Agriculture for the month of February gives some veryinterestingstatements of facts in regard to agricultural matters. The report shows that the largest increase of farm animals during the past year has been ot stock cattle. The nuniber of cows is steadily increasing with increase of population, and is largest in the rapidly growing Western States. The increase of horses and mules has also been very large, while the number of sheep has slightly decreased in the older States, which is attributed to the decline in the value of sheep and wool. The increase In the number of horses during the year has been 331,- 572; mules, 43,747; milk cows, 36*1,521; oxen and other cattle, 1,000,024; swine, 930,- 807. Sheep decreased in numbers in some of the States, but the enlargement of the tlocks in the territories has more than made up the deficiency, and the number' has increased over a million in the past year. Not only have the numbers of farm animals increased during the year, but their values have also increased, except that of sheep and swine. The average value of-horses last year was $370 59, while this year it is placed at $74 64. Mules which last year were rated at an average value of §79 69, are now rated at 884 22. Milk cows have increased in value from §30 21 to §31 37; and pxen from §21 80 to §23 52. The average value of sheep has decreased from §2 53 to §2 37, and swine from §6 75 to §5 57. The effect of the reduction of the tariff on wool is referred to as a cause of discouragement to the wool-growing interests, and it is stated that the belief that from favorable legislation prices may rally has alone kept this discouragem en ffirom assuming the phase of a panic and causing the slaughter of sheep for the pelts and tallow. In some places there has been a dispersion of flocks. Sheep have been sold by the thousand in Wisconsin, and In Missouri and other States, and the decline in value has caused a great decrease ih numbers. ■ ■ ' . The report shows that in Indiana the total number of horses was equal to that of last year; mules have increased in number two per cent; milk cows have increased one per cent; oxen one per cent ;sheep have also increased in number in Indiana by two per cent. The average prices in Indiana for the month of January were, for horses under one year old, §35 68; between one and two years, $54 68; between two and three years old, §75 30; over three years old, §98 25; mules averaged §110 for over three years old, and §81 58 between two and three years; milk cows, §35; oxen, three years old, §40 73; two years old, §20 17; one year old, §18 27; under one year, §10 62; sheep, over one year old, §3 14; under one year old, §2 15. ■ The total number of sheep killed by dogs in Indiana in 1883, according to the report, was 12,829. jjf' AGRICULTURE ASR OTHER INDUSTRIES. 1'The report devotes considerable space to Showing the advantages accruing to agriculture from the other industries. It shows that the condition of the agricultural classes is benefited by the introduction of other industries In their midst. It says: "Commerce, mining, manufactures, anything bringing population'to be fed, aid agriculture, itlon idlers may purchase a surplus, but they would give no production in return. Paupers introduced might consume a surplus, without aiding agriculture. Professional workers, necessary evils, made necessary by ignorance, weakness and vice, also consume without producing. Traders are convenient, saving time and loss from lack of mercantile experience, yet they sre only in a constructive sense producers. Commerce handles millions, with few helpers, and therefore fails to furnish population and make markets, except in a very limited degree. Miners, mechanics, and especially artisans and operatives engaged In productive occupations, are vastly more beneficial to agriculture for two reasons: 1. They augment the numbers to be fed and increase agricultural values. 2. They make something themselves, which farmers need, and reduce the prices of commodities hitherto brought from a distance at unnecessary cost. In Arkansas the number of manufacturing counties is one, with 73 other counties, and the average value of land per acre is §616. In Indiana there are seven manufacturing counties and 85otlier counties, and the average value of land per acre is §3111, while in Ohio, with 12 manu- facturirig counties and 76 other counties, the average value of land is §45 97, which shows the influence of home manufactures upon the value of the farmer's possessions. A further comparison shows that the value of land in the manufacturing counties of Indiana is §49 21 per acre, while in the counties exclusively agricultural land is only worth §29 66. The annual income of the farmer in Indiana, where there is but 42 per cent of the population engaged in agricultural pursuits, is §394, while in the State of Virginia, with 77 per cent of her population farmers, the annual income of the farmer is only §160, and in Massachusetts, with but 18 per cent in agriculture, the farmer's annual income is §457." WAGES OP FARM LABORERS. On the subject of wages of farm laborers the report says: "The question has been askecf, 'Is there increase of wages as the non-agricultural population increases?' There nas been an increase with the growth of manufacturing and other non-agricultural population, as shown by investigation. The Western district, which is agricultural, with Cincinnati, Dayton, Springfield and other manufacturing towns,averages §24 75. The Eastern district has a larger agricultural element and thereforealoweraverage, which is §22 65. Kentucky furnishes a fine contrast with Ohio. A river dividing, one State with four-tenths in agriculture, the other with five-eight and most of the remainder commercial and professional rather than industrial,' the average has been—Ohio, §24 65; Kentucky, §18 20. - Washington, D. C, Mar. 1. THE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE. ' Ita Mission and Needs. [Paper read before the State Board ot Agriculture at Ita January meetlDg, by Prof. W. C. Latta, 6. Purdue University.] [CONCLUDED.] II. Seed* ofthe Atrrlraltural College. I fear I have already dwelt too long on the obstacles to agricultural education,and therefore hasten to consider wttys and means for meeting and overcoming these obstacles. If these colleges of agriculture are comparatively unknown, they must be brought to public notice. If their charater and purpose are misunderstood, these misunderstandings must be cleared up. If these colleges have made mistakes, these mistakes must lie corrected. If they have not been adequately supported they must have support.' If they have not been well attended, they must have more students. If there is a common belief that farmers do not need an education, and that college - training makes a man too fine for the farm, ' this false and pernicious belief must be up- ; rootetj. Here ls a world of worktobedone; but I think all will agree with me that it - is nearly all preliminary to, and hence, no '.'-'. part of, thelegitimatework ofthe agricult-. ural college. More than this, from the very: nature of the difficulties to be overcome,_ the college is powerless to meet them. > This preliminary work must be done, but '■■?" how shall it be done? In other words, in _' view of the many hindrances to agricult-' ural education, what are, to-day, the press-. ingneedsof the agricultural college? ' ' ■ ' .;„' 1. CO-OPERATION OP AGRICULTURAL SOCIH*- TIES. The first great need is the active, united, ; unwavering support and co-operation of • the various State and National agricultural •■' associations. At the present time "these .■...-. societies are generally friendlv in their attitude toward the agricultural colleges; ', but I surmise they might be more actively , helpful in pushing this new education to "•. the front. With the backing of the various. . agricultural societies of the country, these colleges are bound to succeed. Without this backing, they are as certainly bound to fail. ,' I believe that most of these societiesalready ' • feel the responsibility resting upon them, * and are desirous to assist the agricultural1 v colleges . in their arduous work. I will - therefore suggest several ways in which,-. these associations can be greatly helpful, f; HOW TO AID THESE COLLEGES, f ' - Of the many ways of co-operating with " . thesecolleges'thofollowingareheresuggest- : ed: First: These associations can render as-!, sistancein becoming thoroughlyacquaint- x ed with the work of these colleges, and in ■'■'.-' making practical suggestions for increasing their cniciency. In some States,commi .tees of the State agricultural and horticultural societies and theStateGrange,meetannually in joint session with the trustees of the ng- . ricultural college, to consider the work and. '* needs of the institution, and todevise plans... for organized, co-operative effort in promoting the great agricultural interests of the State. Would it.not be well forthe various farmers' organizations to follow the' . above example in all the States where there; • is a farmers'college? '. * ' ■ Second: The various agriculturalsocl- "f eties of whatever name can do a great work,.- through their organization and by indi-- - vidua! effort, ineducatingpublicsentiment ../ In favor of agricultural education. Will f the agricultural societies of Indiana take hold of this work with a will, and help_to; dispel the false notion now so prevalent? , Third: These societies can be useful in .*- bringing the colleges before the farmers. I know of no better way of accomplishing. ;' this, than by holding farmers' institutes at which the professors of the agricultural' colleges may address the farmers on Ja- milar, practical and scientific topics re-. \, Iating to agriculture. Indeed, I suggest nothing new in this, as these institutes - have been organized and maintained in se v- , eral States with most gratifying results. And I firmly believe that live farmers' in- ' stitutes will do more towards filling -the -> halls of our agricultural colleges with the - right kind of students—those of the Indus-.' trial classes—than any other. means that v maybeadopted. But these colleges, with the limited funds at their command, cannot in-, cur the expense of sending their professors over the country to do this missionary - work. Cannot the State Board of Agricult- : ure take the initiative in securing State aid to defray the expense of an"annual series of four to six thoroughly, organized, well ' equipped, and successfully carried out farmers'institutes? Fourth: The various country, district, and State farmers' Organizations can be very helpful in securing students for the 'agricultural college. They can do this in two ways, viz: by individual work on the '\ part ofthe members, and by organized ef- '. fort. Who does not know a young man that expects to enter college soon? Is it a hard thing to say to such an one "We >* have an agricultural college in our State that affords a plain practical education at a very reasonable cost to its students; here CONCLUDED ON NINTH PAOE.
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1884, v. 19, no. 10 (Mar. 8) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA1910 |
Date of Original | 1884 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 2010-11-10 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript | VOL. XIX. INDIANAPOLIS, IND., SATURDAY/MARCH e, 1884. NO. 10. Written lor the Indiana Tanner. THE NATIONAL CAPITAL. What ls Being* Done for the Farmer at AVashlngton. BUI*} Before Congress -American Pork- Farm Statistics. The agricultural Interests have received a large share of the time and attention ol Congress during the past week. In addition to the pleuro-pneumonia bill, which, after almost two weeks of debate In the Hou.e, was Anally passed by that body on the 21st, there have been bills introduced both iu the House and Senate, and reported favorably from committees of both those bodies, which have for their object the welfare and protection of agriculturists and their interests: THE PLEURO-PNEUMONIA BILL passed the House, In the* shape it came from the committee on agriculture, with the exception of one clause. The portion of the original bill stricken out is that section whtehf provided for declaring any State or Territory in which contagious diseases among cattle exist, and which fails to take proper measures for the extirpation of such diseases,, in quarantine;~J___*.he debate on the bill a great deal of opposition was matiifested by representatives from different sections on account of local interests. The strikingout of the fourth section of the bill, giving the President of the united States power to declare quarantine against any State or Territory in which contagious diseases of cattle exist, brought to the support of the bill those who objected to that section, and secured its passage by a vote of 155 to 128. IN THE SENATE, Mr. Plumb, from the committee on agriculture and forestry, reported favorably the bill creating the Department of Agriculture an executive department. IN THE HOUSE, Mr. Denster introduced abill providing 'or the appointment of a commission for examination into the preservation and cultivation of woods and forests adjoining the sources of the navigable rivers, for the purpose of preserving the same and increasing their growth by planting along Jhe courses of the rivers where the land is timberless. The object of the bill is to pre- \ent the destruction of the woods, on the ground that such destruction of the forests °mS(? the land to become arid and unprofitable deserts. Mr. Ellis also introduced in "ie House a joint resolution setting forth the prevalence of diseases among the swine ot the United States, and providing for an examination as to the causes of those diseases, to determine the best means for their eradication and cure. The last clause of the resolution reads as follows; "That until euch investigation can be had and rigid regulations provided so as to guard against "»> exportation of infected meats, it would o« unwise and impolitic to inaugurate retaliatory measures against any friendly h27.elfor simply endeavoring to guard the wealth and well-being of its citizens." SWINE DISEASE COMMISSION. The Commissioner of Agrieulture has Mbmuted to the President the report of *ue commission appointed to examine the lntr. .v,nduitry ofthe United States and rioLi,*:., alIegations relative to the un- rZil"!f ulness of pork products. The re- inH ,?*? tbat ""»numberof hogs raised annually _ about ^(jqq^ijoq from whleh )s ™ae a total of cured meats, lard, and tv,i^produetsof 4.725,000,000 pounds. It W ?ut tbe Practicability of microscopic tha of SUCD products, and says that 0 examination made by them shows our pork equal if not superior to that of France or Germany. In closing their report the commissioners say, "While we believe that no legitimate ground exists for the restrictions imposed in some foreign countries on the importation of American pork, we are satisfied that microscopic inspection of all pork for export can tie s^f. cured at the packing houses, if such inspection should be demanded." The Legislature of Ohio a few days ago presented to Congress a memorial praying for the passage of a law providing for the inspection, by Government inspectors, of all pork products designed for exportation from the United States, and Senator Logan, of Illinois, introduced in the Senate on Monday last a bill providing for the appointment of Inspectors in each customs district of the United States where such inspectors would be needed, whose duty should be to inspect all dressed beef, pork and pork products intended for exportation, and to brand such articles with an inspector's brand,"to show that they had been so inspected. STATISTICS. The report of the Statistician of the Department of Agriculture for the month of February gives some veryinterestingstatements of facts in regard to agricultural matters. The report shows that the largest increase of farm animals during the past year has been ot stock cattle. The nuniber of cows is steadily increasing with increase of population, and is largest in the rapidly growing Western States. The increase of horses and mules has also been very large, while the number of sheep has slightly decreased in the older States, which is attributed to the decline in the value of sheep and wool. The increase In the number of horses during the year has been 331,- 572; mules, 43,747; milk cows, 36*1,521; oxen and other cattle, 1,000,024; swine, 930,- 807. Sheep decreased in numbers in some of the States, but the enlargement of the tlocks in the territories has more than made up the deficiency, and the number' has increased over a million in the past year. Not only have the numbers of farm animals increased during the year, but their values have also increased, except that of sheep and swine. The average value of-horses last year was $370 59, while this year it is placed at $74 64. Mules which last year were rated at an average value of §79 69, are now rated at 884 22. Milk cows have increased in value from §30 21 to §31 37; and pxen from §21 80 to §23 52. The average value of sheep has decreased from §2 53 to §2 37, and swine from §6 75 to §5 57. The effect of the reduction of the tariff on wool is referred to as a cause of discouragement to the wool-growing interests, and it is stated that the belief that from favorable legislation prices may rally has alone kept this discouragem en ffirom assuming the phase of a panic and causing the slaughter of sheep for the pelts and tallow. In some places there has been a dispersion of flocks. Sheep have been sold by the thousand in Wisconsin, and In Missouri and other States, and the decline in value has caused a great decrease ih numbers. ■ ■ ' . The report shows that in Indiana the total number of horses was equal to that of last year; mules have increased in number two per cent; milk cows have increased one per cent; oxen one per cent ;sheep have also increased in number in Indiana by two per cent. The average prices in Indiana for the month of January were, for horses under one year old, §35 68; between one and two years, $54 68; between two and three years old, §75 30; over three years old, §98 25; mules averaged §110 for over three years old, and §81 58 between two and three years; milk cows, §35; oxen, three years old, §40 73; two years old, §20 17; one year old, §18 27; under one year, §10 62; sheep, over one year old, §3 14; under one year old, §2 15. ■ The total number of sheep killed by dogs in Indiana in 1883, according to the report, was 12,829. jjf' AGRICULTURE ASR OTHER INDUSTRIES. 1'The report devotes considerable space to Showing the advantages accruing to agriculture from the other industries. It shows that the condition of the agricultural classes is benefited by the introduction of other industries In their midst. It says: "Commerce, mining, manufactures, anything bringing population'to be fed, aid agriculture, itlon idlers may purchase a surplus, but they would give no production in return. Paupers introduced might consume a surplus, without aiding agriculture. Professional workers, necessary evils, made necessary by ignorance, weakness and vice, also consume without producing. Traders are convenient, saving time and loss from lack of mercantile experience, yet they sre only in a constructive sense producers. Commerce handles millions, with few helpers, and therefore fails to furnish population and make markets, except in a very limited degree. Miners, mechanics, and especially artisans and operatives engaged In productive occupations, are vastly more beneficial to agriculture for two reasons: 1. They augment the numbers to be fed and increase agricultural values. 2. They make something themselves, which farmers need, and reduce the prices of commodities hitherto brought from a distance at unnecessary cost. In Arkansas the number of manufacturing counties is one, with 73 other counties, and the average value of land per acre is §616. In Indiana there are seven manufacturing counties and 85otlier counties, and the average value of land per acre is §3111, while in Ohio, with 12 manu- facturirig counties and 76 other counties, the average value of land is §45 97, which shows the influence of home manufactures upon the value of the farmer's possessions. A further comparison shows that the value of land in the manufacturing counties of Indiana is §49 21 per acre, while in the counties exclusively agricultural land is only worth §29 66. The annual income of the farmer in Indiana, where there is but 42 per cent of the population engaged in agricultural pursuits, is §394, while in the State of Virginia, with 77 per cent of her population farmers, the annual income of the farmer is only §160, and in Massachusetts, with but 18 per cent in agriculture, the farmer's annual income is §457." WAGES OP FARM LABORERS. On the subject of wages of farm laborers the report says: "The question has been askecf, 'Is there increase of wages as the non-agricultural population increases?' There nas been an increase with the growth of manufacturing and other non-agricultural population, as shown by investigation. The Western district, which is agricultural, with Cincinnati, Dayton, Springfield and other manufacturing towns,averages §24 75. The Eastern district has a larger agricultural element and thereforealoweraverage, which is §22 65. Kentucky furnishes a fine contrast with Ohio. A river dividing, one State with four-tenths in agriculture, the other with five-eight and most of the remainder commercial and professional rather than industrial,' the average has been—Ohio, §24 65; Kentucky, §18 20. - Washington, D. C, Mar. 1. THE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE. ' Ita Mission and Needs. [Paper read before the State Board ot Agriculture at Ita January meetlDg, by Prof. W. C. Latta, 6. Purdue University.] [CONCLUDED.] II. Seed* ofthe Atrrlraltural College. I fear I have already dwelt too long on the obstacles to agricultural education,and therefore hasten to consider wttys and means for meeting and overcoming these obstacles. If these colleges of agriculture are comparatively unknown, they must be brought to public notice. If their charater and purpose are misunderstood, these misunderstandings must be cleared up. If these colleges have made mistakes, these mistakes must lie corrected. If they have not been adequately supported they must have support.' If they have not been well attended, they must have more students. If there is a common belief that farmers do not need an education, and that college - training makes a man too fine for the farm, ' this false and pernicious belief must be up- ; rootetj. Here ls a world of worktobedone; but I think all will agree with me that it - is nearly all preliminary to, and hence, no '.'-'. part of, thelegitimatework ofthe agricult-. ural college. More than this, from the very: nature of the difficulties to be overcome,_ the college is powerless to meet them. > This preliminary work must be done, but '■■?" how shall it be done? In other words, in _' view of the many hindrances to agricult-' ural education, what are, to-day, the press-. ingneedsof the agricultural college? ' ' ■ ' .;„' 1. CO-OPERATION OP AGRICULTURAL SOCIH*- TIES. The first great need is the active, united, ; unwavering support and co-operation of • the various State and National agricultural •■' associations. At the present time "these .■...-. societies are generally friendlv in their attitude toward the agricultural colleges; ', but I surmise they might be more actively , helpful in pushing this new education to "•. the front. With the backing of the various. . agricultural societies of the country, these colleges are bound to succeed. Without this backing, they are as certainly bound to fail. ,' I believe that most of these societiesalready ' • feel the responsibility resting upon them, * and are desirous to assist the agricultural1 v colleges . in their arduous work. I will - therefore suggest several ways in which,-. these associations can be greatly helpful, f; HOW TO AID THESE COLLEGES, f ' - Of the many ways of co-operating with " . thesecolleges'thofollowingareheresuggest- : ed: First: These associations can render as-!, sistancein becoming thoroughlyacquaint- x ed with the work of these colleges, and in ■'■'.-' making practical suggestions for increasing their cniciency. In some States,commi .tees of the State agricultural and horticultural societies and theStateGrange,meetannually in joint session with the trustees of the ng- . ricultural college, to consider the work and. '* needs of the institution, and todevise plans... for organized, co-operative effort in promoting the great agricultural interests of the State. Would it.not be well forthe various farmers' organizations to follow the' . above example in all the States where there; • is a farmers'college? '. * ' ■ Second: The various agriculturalsocl- "f eties of whatever name can do a great work,.- through their organization and by indi-- - vidua! effort, ineducatingpublicsentiment ../ In favor of agricultural education. Will f the agricultural societies of Indiana take hold of this work with a will, and help_to; dispel the false notion now so prevalent? , Third: These societies can be useful in .*- bringing the colleges before the farmers. I know of no better way of accomplishing. ;' this, than by holding farmers' institutes at which the professors of the agricultural' colleges may address the farmers on Ja- milar, practical and scientific topics re-. \, Iating to agriculture. Indeed, I suggest nothing new in this, as these institutes - have been organized and maintained in se v- , eral States with most gratifying results. And I firmly believe that live farmers' in- ' stitutes will do more towards filling -the -> halls of our agricultural colleges with the - right kind of students—those of the Indus-.' trial classes—than any other. means that v maybeadopted. But these colleges, with the limited funds at their command, cannot in-, cur the expense of sending their professors over the country to do this missionary - work. Cannot the State Board of Agricult- : ure take the initiative in securing State aid to defray the expense of an"annual series of four to six thoroughly, organized, well ' equipped, and successfully carried out farmers'institutes? Fourth: The various country, district, and State farmers' Organizations can be very helpful in securing students for the 'agricultural college. They can do this in two ways, viz: by individual work on the '\ part ofthe members, and by organized ef- '. fort. Who does not know a young man that expects to enter college soon? Is it a hard thing to say to such an one "We >* have an agricultural college in our State that affords a plain practical education at a very reasonable cost to its students; here CONCLUDED ON NINTH PAOE. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1