Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
VGI.. XIV. INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA,. JANUARY 25, 1879. FOR SALE. FOB SALE—Fine Chester White pins, 7 weeks old, either sex, at $5 each. J. A. ECKHART, Butler, DeKalb county, Ind. FOB SALE—Whitney sewing machine needles, all sizes, at 30 cents per dozen. Send order to INDIANA FARMER COMPANY. • tf FOR SALE-Cholce Partrldtre Cochin breeding chickens at prices that defy competition. Eggs in season. D. St. KINNEY, Rushville. Ind. FOR SALE—Can spare a few choice pairs or trios of Dart Brahmas at from $1 to ft per pair, 15 to |7 per trio. WILLIAM R. ZIKE, Jlorrlstown.Ind. FOR BALE—25 of the beet Chester White pigs I ever saw, weigh from 100 to _S lbs, at $10 for choice, or |15 a pair • Address, _. B. MOODY, Eminence, Kentucky. FOB SALE—The Farm Register and Account Book. Complete method. of keeping farm accounts. Prices! each. Address INDIANA FARMER COMPANY, Indianapolis. TTiOR SALE—A pnre English Ferret, white in color, JL. and warranted to be a tine hunter, for particulars, assdress, 1, L. OASPER, corner New York Stand Massachusetts avenue, Indiaoapolis. POR SALE— Short-borns—Fletcher s young Marys, Phylis. Agathas. Brides, Gems, etc. Bulls and heifers, choicely bred. . Correspondence solicited. E. C. THOMPSON, Lock Box 1, Edingburg, Ind. EOR SALE—Cheap for cash', or would trade for two good driving horses, a fine large black station, six years old, well-broken, single nr double. This horse has a fine pedigree. Call on, or address, MALONE * SHORTRIDGE, Union Stock-yards, Indianapolis, Ind. FOR SALE—Farm or 160 acres 1 mile from Kokomo, at *)30 per acre. With fl.no>). mprovement the farm is worth tm per acre. It will require t2,0CO cash, balance on time at 6 per cent. Poor men need not apply. This is capable of being made one of the best nsrms in tbe State of Indiana fur a home. T. A. GOODWIN, 29 Thorpe Block, IndlanapoUs, Ind. WASTED.. t» 1 % ■r v *m "\I7 A-*TED—To exchange spiing mattresses and , W lounges for country produce. If o. 45 Massachusetts Avenue, Indianapolis. "TXT-A-NTEB-To exchange Partridge Cochin cocker- YV els for Golden Sebright Bantams.- J. G. KINGSBURY, Indiana Farmer office. WANTED—To exchange a 160acre farm in Southern Illinois for a 40 acre farm tn Central Indiana. J. G. KINGSBURY, Indiana Farmer office. WANTED—An agent In every township to sell Western WlldsbyJ. H. Beadle, and Ridpath's " .Popular Historyof the United States. Apply at once 'to J. M. OLCOTT, 36 East Market street.Indianapolis. "WTANTED—Immediately, six sober, honest and T V industrious men, to work on tbe farm for one- half of the crop, and board themselves. Land, usual farming implements usedhera. teams and feed for same, also a house for the hands to live In furnished by the owner. Address C. C. BELL, Brazoniat Tex. ~\Tf ANTED—All who suffer with any manner of „ t V lung disease to lay their prejudices aside and try Mrs. Rohrer's New Remedy for the lungs. It will cure when all other remedies fail. Sold by druggists.-Prepared by Mrs. E. Rohrer & Co., 347 and 349 So^*»H,_MMWUruSt^JnrtUn»niJ_ts-.Ind. Acents ^wanted.... -.•.-.- •_&.*. ;-,._.,,- ■,r^L^J__i_-.~-~^--~^- lis-ea WANTED-^Invalids suffering from any disease of the stomach, bowels,'urinary or female organs and the sympathetic affections, to address the undersigned for a private circular. Ninety-five per cent, of all cases treated have positively been cured. W. __. MORGAN. M. D,, Lebanon. Ind. SIISC ELLANEOVS. s M. GOODE—Dentist, over 80 North Pennsylva- t nia street. Prices reduced to suit times. G C. BURGESS, Dentist. Office in room 4 Va- m Jen's Exchange Block, N. Pennsylvania St. Ihave some good farms for sale, an d desire calls and correspondence from parties in quest of them. G, "W. ALEXANDER, 36 East Market St. BEAL ESTATE ADVERTISER tells all about the Blue Grass Valley of Middle Tennessee. Price 25 cents a year. Published bv E. M. COCK- RILL. Real Estate Agent. Gallatin. Tenn. LOANS. fTIO LOAN—Money on farm and city propertv, and -il and at a low ratt? of interest. G. G. HOI-MAN, 70 East Market street. LOAN—Six per cent, loans |made on long tim e on real-estate security at 6 per cent, interest. Special arrangements for those wisning loans In from 6 to 12 months at lower rates. A. W. PRATHER, State Agents. Agents wanted in every county in the State. Office 72 E. Market street, Indianapolis, Ind. ^|ke NO. 4. comes in an element in the calculation that as yet we have made no provision for, and that is the cost of the sheep together with the interest and taxes. To satisfy the conditions of the question this must also come through the sheep out of the land. The 60 acres of pasture at five head per acre, would carry 300 sheep, which at $2 75 per head would cost $825. Interest and taxes on this at 10 per cent, would be $82 50, which added to the $350 (interest and tax on land) would make $432 50, which the sheep must proluce in order to get out of debt. We might stop here a while and inquire something in regard to the division of our farm and its products. We have agreed that 60 acres of pasture would carry the 300-sheep through the summer, but will our grain and hay winter them. From the meadow we have 80,000 pounds of hay; of the corn we have 28,- 000 pounds; of oats we have 9,- 600, or a total of 117,600 pounds of grain and hay. Our 300 sheep weigh 30,000 pounds; now the books lay it down as a rule that a sheep to be kept in a thriving condition will consume three pounds of dry feed to the 100 pounds of live weight, so that our 300 sheep will require 900 pounds of feed per day. This divided into 117,600 our whole number of pounds, would give us 130$ days, leaving 19J in which they would have to live on corn-fodder and oat-straw, which they could well do provided the forage was properly distributed through the winter, so that we find our division as , nearly covered as we could pos- Percheron-Xornuan Stallion -AUWCE-OT, Weleht 1,*OT -Pounds., Important ftsmt ffra»M by JC W. Dunham, Wayne, DnPag-e Co., III., Augr. 1878. sibly gueSS at it. NOW for results: we have already seen that Do Sheep Pay? The following is arr address read before the Sheep Growers' Association at their recent-meeting, by B. F. Magee, of Benton county: - ' ' : Gentlemen of tbe Associatlori: I Always Breed Your Mare to a Good Stallion. Editors Indiana Farmer: With the superior females bred as above, oneV is generally sure to obtain good offsprings, and such as will pay handsomely for raising; but when the mare is somewhat indifferent in form, stamina or action, the owner may be in a little doubt as to paying a higher price than ordinary^ for the services of a first- . rate male. But this is just the time in ■ Which he should not hesitate at all; for the superior sire is likely to give a superior colt, however indifferent the dam may be. This is particularly the case H With the Percheron-Norman stallion, as ., he has been so well and uniformly bred for centuries past that he has acquired ' greatprepotency, and his produce is much > surer of proving satisfactory than when . got by a more modern animal of whose ■ i ancient breeding he knows nothing. ¥■ Joined to this long line of superior } breeding for ages past, the Percheron- 4 Norman unites in himself all those qual- I ities which make him the best large farm, \ road and cart horse in existence. There > is nothing superfluous in his make-up, .; and whatever size he may be, from 16 to \J8 hands, or less or more, all his bones, I flesh, muscles and sinews are justly and \ harmoniously united, to give him ^strength, action and endurance for all £prts of work to which he may be put. lAdde_ to these is his kind temper, never flinching or balking at a load, his good weeding and easy keeping qualities. The N {Johsurnption of food by a Percheron- jporman is probably less than that of any Other breed of horses, in proportion to tt-e work lie does. 4 Then as to the colts, so hardy and so easily kept, they can be raised at a less cost offood than other breeds, and be ptitto light work a year or two younger; iq consequence of which, when ready foi* market they may be sold at a considerable profit over-the rearing of the foals of. the ordinary horse now generally kept by the farmers. C. G. attempt to enlighten yuu u^OT'SujH.ui^: ject connected with your calling. When I look around upon your friendly faces I see the-marks of wisdom and intelligence, and were it not that I hope to profit by your friendly criticisms, I should be loth indeed to undertake the task before me. But no violent, vindictive or churlish man ever keeps sheep. And from this I know you will be charitable towards my ignorance, and will treat my blunders with leniency and due consideration. And although I may not be able to advance a single new thought nor present an old one in a light that would be pleasing to you, nor yet germain to the subject, I flatter myself that you will take up the subject and give it such a thorough ventilation, and make the proposition so plain that the wayfaring man, though fool, need not err therein. Question—"Will it pay to keep sheep, for wool alone, on land worth $35 per acre?" I never could see just why the question should be stated in that way, nor just why anybody in this country should keep sheep that way. But so it is stated, and so we will try to discuss it. It must be clear to every one who has given the subject a moment's thought, that no answer can be given to the question that will be satisfactory to all persons in all places. The ever varying circumstances, soil, and its productiveness and the adaptability of the place to the sheep, and the man to the place -would require as many answers as there are men who make the experiment. From this you see my task is no easy one. Indeed, it was long before I could get the consent of my mind to undertake it at all. Had I not had the generous help of practical shepherds from different States and different parts of our own State, I should not have undertaken it. While I had some data in regard to cost of wintering sheep, I had very little in regard to cost of pasturing; and I was aware that the success of the enterprise depended upon the cost of summering as well as wintering. I began to cast about in my mind to see if I could call up any experience of my own that would settle it, but to my annoyance I could find nothing. I had long pastured a few sheep of my own, and some, too, for others, and charged them so much per head by the month, but this proved nothing; and not having tho advantage of a scientific education I came to the conclusion I never could settle it in that way, and so concluded to borrow from the experience of others. With this object in view I inquired of all I could see, and wrote to those I could not wee, and altogether addressed these two questions to 25 different sheep 1. What is it worth per head by the month to pasture a sheep weighing 100 pounds? s ' " ■ " ■ '• . v 2. How many sheep, Weighing 100 pounds each, will an acre of good pas- •irrough some of the answers were not powerfully instructive they were very amusing and I felt richly repaid for the trouble of asking them. But so far as helping me out of my difficulty was concerned, the resultwasnot very flattering. That you may have a more lively appreciation of the difficulties under which I have labored I will sketch a*~few of the answers. The range on the first question being all the way from 10 cents per head a month to 25 cents, and on the second question 2 head per acre up to 15. Answers, which of themselves, are sufficient to confuse the oldest man in the world. And to show you, too, that these answers come from practical sheep men, I will mention a few names. Some of them are familiar to you. S. R. Quick, of Bartholomew county, an acre will carry 6 sheep and it is worth 20 cents a head. J. A. Johnson, of Warren county, 31-3. Wm. Burns, of White county, says 8. H. H. Crow, of Putnam, says but 2 head, and that it is worth 15 cents. No wonder he thinks land is too high. Mr. Crawford, of Warren county, says 12 head, and that it is worth 10 cents. He could keep sheep profitably, at that rate, on land worth 4>75. T. S. Miller, of Illinois, the great Hereford cattle man, finds great difficulty in answering the question from the fact that his sheep so soon grow beyond the hundred pounds that he can't tell much about it; but that Cotswolds are the greatest sheep in the world. While Mr. Crow thinks that Merinoes are the only sheep that can profitably be kept on $35 land. T. W. W. Sunman, of Ripley county, says that an acre of good pasture wdl carry five grade, or common sheep, through the summer, which corresponds exactly -with my own opinion. But you see from this that all the quantities entering into the discussion of this problem, are not fixed and known; but like all questions, that are questions at all, there are some known quantities, and from these we shall proceed to make our deductions. In the first place then, we will say that we hava 100 acres of land, worth $35 per acre, or $3,500. Allowing 10 percent, for interest and taxes and we have $350, which must be made out of the land in some way, in order to make the debit and credit sides of our ledger to balance. If a man should rent his land for less than that, of course, the more land he should have, the worse he would be off. If he should farm it, his crops should be sufficiently large-and sufficiently well disposed of to meet all the expenses of cultivation and the ten per cent. over. But our question demands that this ten per cent, shall be made through sheep, anything more than this ten per cent, might be chargeable to profit, while anything- less should surely be charged to loss. Now, if the profit must be made off the sheep, it follows that the more sheep the land will carry, the more profit there will be, and right here is where the whole question hinges. It would make no difference at all what the land might i,e worth, provided it was sufficiently productive to carry a sufficient number of sheep; of course, we shall place no limit to the point, up to which land may be made to produce, but we have deemed something near an average as best adapted to the discussion of our question — .~ .«« ^..--_-._^*^_. vrs _-,_ ..uv^uuu, "« ." —« »,__.., ovr as. ..c Ilia V c allilUt* st UUU i*irt;_satisfactory to all men in all bargain we will have to "grin and en-J 'ris^plesasareconsuiuea uy-s-w^ our 300 sheep are in debt$432 60, and in an ordinary way, if the sheep's fleece would not pay the debt we would take his carcass to make up the deficit. But the conditions of our question will not allow us to do that, so if we have made a bad We shall say 50 bushels of corn per acre, This may be large for some localities, and indeed, to take the last four years in my own locality, it is too large by half, but to take the four preceding the last and the estimate would be much too low. We shall say 30 bushels of oats per acre, which ,is as much too low as the corn is too high, and for meadow we shall say two tons per acre, and if anybody complains at that, we want to remind them that with us, grass is the only crop that has never been known to fail; but now! comes the tug of war, and that is to settle what it would take to constitute a good average pasturage; and it seems so strange to me that among all the books I have ever read about the cost of keep-1 ing horses, cattle, hogs, or sheep, I have never read a single line in regard to cost of pasturage. Strange, isn't it, that the most important item in all our farm products should never be mentioned in any of our farm literature? While every other item of food and forage has been carefully analyzed by our most skilful scientific men and its exact value ascertained, on the subject of pasture we are left to guess and grope our way in the dark. The fact is, I have never heard of but a single instance where an experiment had been made to test the value of pasture, and that was made by a gentleman of this association in regard to the value of pasture for sheep. AH honor to that gentleman, we say. How then shall we settle the question? Partly by borrowing from the experience, orrathertheopinions of others, and partly by induction, and we shall notice the latter method first by supposing that the 100 acres chosen in the onset were all in pasture and that the pasture was available for seven months in the year. Now, I have pastured sheep for others at 10 to 15 cents a head per month, but mostly for 10 cents, and never thought I charged too much. Now, for convenience, we will suppose that an acre of pasture will actually carry five sheep through the summer, and that We get 10 cents a head per month for pasturing somebody else's sheep, and don't you see that we just get $3 50 per acre, or the 10 per cent, that we allowed for interest and taxes, and we would only need to make the land carry two more sheep to the acre, or add on four more cents per head to make a pretty good investment in land for sheep pasture. But we may have occasion to refer to this again before we are done. Now for the opinions of practical sheep men, I have already given a few of them, and you might take all the practical shepherds in the State, or different States, and ask them how many sheep an acre of good pasture would carry through the summer, and perhaps, five would be an average of the flrst 50 men you should ask, and for the sake of avoiding fractions and convenience, otherwise I shall assume that that is just the number. We now have our premises partly laid down, and the next thing is to so divide our hundred acres up into pasture, meadow, oats and corn, as not to have too much of one and too little of another, and for convenience, I shall divide it this way, 60 acres of pasture, 20 of meadow, 10 of oats and 10 of corn. Others might divide differently, but no mattert in any case,the pasture should be so partitioned that the sheep could be changed from one part to another every two weeks. But her lain fronr our wool-buyers the'average price paid for wool the last five years, andalso the average weight of fleece during that time, and I find that the average price paid (for all grades) during the last five years is less than 27 cents; I have the exact figures at home, but they are not absolutely necessary to our present purpose, and while the weight of fleeces have been steadily improving the last two or three years it has scarcely yet got above four pounds, and this too includes all that the country produces; the heavier Merinos, Leicesters, Cotswolds, and all. If there is any mistake about this, the wool-buyers bave made it, and not your humble servant. But as we have had our 300 sheep on hands a good while, we think a good deal of them and we would like to think they are a little better than common, and that they will surely shear five pounds a piece, and we can't get the consent of our minds to put it down at less than that. And while the average price for wool this year has been less than 23 cents, we certainly think ours is worth 25, and we shall put it down at that. Now what have we? Five pounds of wool at 25 cents, is $1 25 for each sheep, or just $375 for the whole, which leaves us just $57 50 in debt. Now, gentlemen, I think I see a very broad smile upon your friendly faces at the announcement of this result, and you say, " 'twill never do." Well, my premises may have all been wrong, but my reasoning is certainly correct. But you say that the land would certainly have kept more sheep. Well, if I was pasturing sheep for some other man I should be flad to have him think so. But you see have made no allowance for waste land, stumps and trees, and logs and sloughs, and sour grass. Where is the hundred acres of land that has not some of these upon it? But you say I might have used a little more economy in feeding. . True I have made no arrangement for feeding of turnips, bran, shorts or oil cake for the simple reason that as sheep are usually kept these things are never thought of. My calculations are based upon the usual methods of keeping sheep. But you say I have made no calculation for the increase of.the flock. That is true, for the simple reason that I started with fully as many as I thought the land would carry, and there would be no room for more without selling some we have on hand. But the question contemplates selling the wool only, and not the sheep. But you say I started with sheep weighing 100 pounds, and that they ought to gain 25 pounds apiece. That might do for the first year, but hbw about the second; you see I have made no allowance for loss by old age, dogs and disease. But suppose we try another method of settling this question. We have already found what our hundred acres of land would yield in pasture, meadow, corn and oats, and except the pasture,we very nearly know the market value of each. Now let us suppose that we get our sheep pastured for the small sum of 10 cents a head per month, and for the seven months it would cost us $210; our hay is worth $5 a ton, and we have 40 tons of it, $200; our 500 bushels of corn is worth 25 cents a bushel, or $125; our 300 bushels of oats is worth 20 cents a bushel, or $00. Making a grand total of $595, which our sheep has cost us. But our wool only brought us $375, leaving a deficit of $220, which is worse and worse. Besides in this calculation yon see I have not counted the corn-fo.i.ler and oat-straw worth anything, wl;ii.; in the other they were to keep our 300 sheep 19_ days. Now, gentlemen, I am just as much surprised at the result as any of you can be. When I began writing this paper I had for two weeks given the subject my best thoughts while, going about my work on the farm, but had not put a single idea on paper, so that I had not the least idea how my calculations should end. Indeed I most earnestly wanted them to come out in favor of the affirmative of this question; but so far as I can see now the only way to make it pay to keep sheep on $35 land, would be to sow it aU down in pasture, charge 20 cents a head per month, and then keep somebody else's sheep. But before taking my seat it may be proper for me to state that the foregoing calculations are based upon the assumption that sheep are kept alone or to the exclusion of other stock. This in my judgment would be very poor economy as we have fully demonstrated. But there is no necessity, in this country, of keeping sheep that way. A mixed husbandry is not only the most profitable, but most surely successful, and if I ever am so fortunate as to own a farm worth $100 per acre, I shall always keep a few sheep, becauselthink that like the ' birds they always pay their way, and though we may not realize a big per cent, in actual cash profit, yet there are a thousand ways in which they do pay. They are the best scavengers in the world to rid a place of foul weeds and briars. They make the best manure of any animal, and for my part I don't see how any farmer can afford to raise a family without the help of the social and civilizing influence of the sheep. Any farmer who keeps other stoek can keep sheep— from 10 to 15, or even 500, (according to the size of the farm.)—without missing their keep, because they will live well on what other stock leaves. Take for examples some of the gentlemen before referred to, Mr. Wm. Burns, of White county^ who keeps 30 to CO thoroughbred Cotswolds, and Mr. J. A. Johnston, of Warren county, who keeps 700 grade, or common sheep. Both own very largo thoroughbred Short-horns, but not hear enough stock of all kinds to keep their pastures grazed down, so that their sheep live nearly the whole year around on the pastures alone. In these cases and most every other case, where a few sheep are kept in connection with other stock, it would make little difference whether the land was worth $35 or $75 per acre, all what you get off them would be clear gain, whether wo count the wool alone, or wool and mutton together. Besides we might take all the conditions of the question just as we have in the foregoing demonstration and add the profits of mutton to what we realized on wool and make it pay largely. Let us say that our 300 sheep are all ewes. Then we should add on $200 for six thoroughbred Cotswold bucks, and then we should get 200 lambs, worth just as much as the old sheep, or perhaps more, which would enable us to sell 200 old sheep for mutton. Now let us see how we come out: We were in debt, interest and tax on land, $350; interest and tax on ewes, $82 50; interest and tax on bucks, $20, or on all $452 50. The 200 ewes we have to sell weighed 100 pounds, and we paid $2 75 apiece for them; but now they weigh 125 pounds apiece and worth three cents per pound, or $750 for the whole; which added to $375 for the wool makes 1,125, which less $-152 50 debt, leaves us a clear gain of $672 50, or more than 15J per cent, (clear gain) on our investment. Who wouldn't keep sheep? as this is 25J per cent, on cost of every tiling. What branch of husbandry pays so well as this? But there is another reason why I shall keep sheep. In these times that have tried farmers pockets as well as their souls, there has been less shrinkage in the value of sheep and wool than any other product of the farm; horses have decreased in value 150 per cent.; cattle over 400 per cent.; hogs over 500; corn, 300; wheat, 100; sheep less than 100; while in the last five years the shrinkage in wool has been less than 12 per cent. _— « -■ *- Ohio to Australia. The idea of shipping breeding swine to Australia will strike our readers as something new under the sun, but the following from D. M. Magie & Co., of Oxford, O., will convince them that it is being done. These gentlemen write us: We have sold in four years business 1,542 swine for breeders exclusively, and have shipped stock to five different foreign countries within the last two years. Six swine we Bhipped to Australia, went through all right; they arrived there in fine condition. Mr. Woodhouse tells us so, and he writes that he is exceedingly well pleased with them, and that the people there in Australia never saw «uch fine swine. He makes special mention of their heavy hams and deep sides. They were five weeks on the road from here to Australia; one week from here to California, and four weeks from Han Francisco to Australia. They add: Our herds are healthy and doing fine. We have the best lot of brood sows we ever owned, and they are in pig by_boars that are very superior hi form, finish, and breeding. » _m « All human virtues incrpane and strengthen by the experience of them.
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1879, v. 14, no. 04 (Jan. 25) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA1404 |
Date of Original | 1879 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 2010-10-26 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript | VGI.. XIV. INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA,. JANUARY 25, 1879. FOR SALE. FOB SALE—Fine Chester White pins, 7 weeks old, either sex, at $5 each. J. A. ECKHART, Butler, DeKalb county, Ind. FOB SALE—Whitney sewing machine needles, all sizes, at 30 cents per dozen. Send order to INDIANA FARMER COMPANY. • tf FOR SALE-Cholce Partrldtre Cochin breeding chickens at prices that defy competition. Eggs in season. D. St. KINNEY, Rushville. Ind. FOR SALE—Can spare a few choice pairs or trios of Dart Brahmas at from $1 to ft per pair, 15 to |7 per trio. WILLIAM R. ZIKE, Jlorrlstown.Ind. FOR BALE—25 of the beet Chester White pigs I ever saw, weigh from 100 to _S lbs, at $10 for choice, or |15 a pair • Address, _. B. MOODY, Eminence, Kentucky. FOB SALE—The Farm Register and Account Book. Complete method. of keeping farm accounts. Prices! each. Address INDIANA FARMER COMPANY, Indianapolis. TTiOR SALE—A pnre English Ferret, white in color, JL. and warranted to be a tine hunter, for particulars, assdress, 1, L. OASPER, corner New York Stand Massachusetts avenue, Indiaoapolis. POR SALE— Short-borns—Fletcher s young Marys, Phylis. Agathas. Brides, Gems, etc. Bulls and heifers, choicely bred. . Correspondence solicited. E. C. THOMPSON, Lock Box 1, Edingburg, Ind. EOR SALE—Cheap for cash', or would trade for two good driving horses, a fine large black station, six years old, well-broken, single nr double. This horse has a fine pedigree. Call on, or address, MALONE * SHORTRIDGE, Union Stock-yards, Indianapolis, Ind. FOR SALE—Farm or 160 acres 1 mile from Kokomo, at *)30 per acre. With fl.no>). mprovement the farm is worth tm per acre. It will require t2,0CO cash, balance on time at 6 per cent. Poor men need not apply. This is capable of being made one of the best nsrms in tbe State of Indiana fur a home. T. A. GOODWIN, 29 Thorpe Block, IndlanapoUs, Ind. WASTED.. t» 1 % ■r v *m "\I7 A-*TED—To exchange spiing mattresses and , W lounges for country produce. If o. 45 Massachusetts Avenue, Indianapolis. "TXT-A-NTEB-To exchange Partridge Cochin cocker- YV els for Golden Sebright Bantams.- J. G. KINGSBURY, Indiana Farmer office. WANTED—To exchange a 160acre farm in Southern Illinois for a 40 acre farm tn Central Indiana. J. G. KINGSBURY, Indiana Farmer office. WANTED—An agent In every township to sell Western WlldsbyJ. H. Beadle, and Ridpath's " .Popular Historyof the United States. Apply at once 'to J. M. OLCOTT, 36 East Market street.Indianapolis. "WTANTED—Immediately, six sober, honest and T V industrious men, to work on tbe farm for one- half of the crop, and board themselves. Land, usual farming implements usedhera. teams and feed for same, also a house for the hands to live In furnished by the owner. Address C. C. BELL, Brazoniat Tex. ~\Tf ANTED—All who suffer with any manner of „ t V lung disease to lay their prejudices aside and try Mrs. Rohrer's New Remedy for the lungs. It will cure when all other remedies fail. Sold by druggists.-Prepared by Mrs. E. Rohrer & Co., 347 and 349 So^*»H,_MMWUruSt^JnrtUn»niJ_ts-.Ind. Acents ^wanted.... -.•.-.- •_&.*. ;-,._.,,- ■,r^L^J__i_-.~-~^--~^- lis-ea WANTED-^Invalids suffering from any disease of the stomach, bowels,'urinary or female organs and the sympathetic affections, to address the undersigned for a private circular. Ninety-five per cent, of all cases treated have positively been cured. W. __. MORGAN. M. D,, Lebanon. Ind. SIISC ELLANEOVS. s M. GOODE—Dentist, over 80 North Pennsylva- t nia street. Prices reduced to suit times. G C. BURGESS, Dentist. Office in room 4 Va- m Jen's Exchange Block, N. Pennsylvania St. Ihave some good farms for sale, an d desire calls and correspondence from parties in quest of them. G, "W. ALEXANDER, 36 East Market St. BEAL ESTATE ADVERTISER tells all about the Blue Grass Valley of Middle Tennessee. Price 25 cents a year. Published bv E. M. COCK- RILL. Real Estate Agent. Gallatin. Tenn. LOANS. fTIO LOAN—Money on farm and city propertv, and -il and at a low ratt? of interest. G. G. HOI-MAN, 70 East Market street. LOAN—Six per cent, loans |made on long tim e on real-estate security at 6 per cent, interest. Special arrangements for those wisning loans In from 6 to 12 months at lower rates. A. W. PRATHER, State Agents. Agents wanted in every county in the State. Office 72 E. Market street, Indianapolis, Ind. ^|ke NO. 4. comes in an element in the calculation that as yet we have made no provision for, and that is the cost of the sheep together with the interest and taxes. To satisfy the conditions of the question this must also come through the sheep out of the land. The 60 acres of pasture at five head per acre, would carry 300 sheep, which at $2 75 per head would cost $825. Interest and taxes on this at 10 per cent, would be $82 50, which added to the $350 (interest and tax on land) would make $432 50, which the sheep must proluce in order to get out of debt. We might stop here a while and inquire something in regard to the division of our farm and its products. We have agreed that 60 acres of pasture would carry the 300-sheep through the summer, but will our grain and hay winter them. From the meadow we have 80,000 pounds of hay; of the corn we have 28,- 000 pounds; of oats we have 9,- 600, or a total of 117,600 pounds of grain and hay. Our 300 sheep weigh 30,000 pounds; now the books lay it down as a rule that a sheep to be kept in a thriving condition will consume three pounds of dry feed to the 100 pounds of live weight, so that our 300 sheep will require 900 pounds of feed per day. This divided into 117,600 our whole number of pounds, would give us 130$ days, leaving 19J in which they would have to live on corn-fodder and oat-straw, which they could well do provided the forage was properly distributed through the winter, so that we find our division as , nearly covered as we could pos- Percheron-Xornuan Stallion -AUWCE-OT, Weleht 1,*OT -Pounds., Important ftsmt ffra»M by JC W. Dunham, Wayne, DnPag-e Co., III., Augr. 1878. sibly gueSS at it. NOW for results: we have already seen that Do Sheep Pay? The following is arr address read before the Sheep Growers' Association at their recent-meeting, by B. F. Magee, of Benton county: - ' ' : Gentlemen of tbe Associatlori: I Always Breed Your Mare to a Good Stallion. Editors Indiana Farmer: With the superior females bred as above, oneV is generally sure to obtain good offsprings, and such as will pay handsomely for raising; but when the mare is somewhat indifferent in form, stamina or action, the owner may be in a little doubt as to paying a higher price than ordinary^ for the services of a first- . rate male. But this is just the time in ■ Which he should not hesitate at all; for the superior sire is likely to give a superior colt, however indifferent the dam may be. This is particularly the case H With the Percheron-Norman stallion, as ., he has been so well and uniformly bred for centuries past that he has acquired ' greatprepotency, and his produce is much > surer of proving satisfactory than when . got by a more modern animal of whose ■ i ancient breeding he knows nothing. ¥■ Joined to this long line of superior } breeding for ages past, the Percheron- 4 Norman unites in himself all those qual- I ities which make him the best large farm, \ road and cart horse in existence. There > is nothing superfluous in his make-up, .; and whatever size he may be, from 16 to \J8 hands, or less or more, all his bones, I flesh, muscles and sinews are justly and \ harmoniously united, to give him ^strength, action and endurance for all £prts of work to which he may be put. lAdde_ to these is his kind temper, never flinching or balking at a load, his good weeding and easy keeping qualities. The N {Johsurnption of food by a Percheron- jporman is probably less than that of any Other breed of horses, in proportion to tt-e work lie does. 4 Then as to the colts, so hardy and so easily kept, they can be raised at a less cost offood than other breeds, and be ptitto light work a year or two younger; iq consequence of which, when ready foi* market they may be sold at a considerable profit over-the rearing of the foals of. the ordinary horse now generally kept by the farmers. C. G. attempt to enlighten yuu u^OT'SujH.ui^: ject connected with your calling. When I look around upon your friendly faces I see the-marks of wisdom and intelligence, and were it not that I hope to profit by your friendly criticisms, I should be loth indeed to undertake the task before me. But no violent, vindictive or churlish man ever keeps sheep. And from this I know you will be charitable towards my ignorance, and will treat my blunders with leniency and due consideration. And although I may not be able to advance a single new thought nor present an old one in a light that would be pleasing to you, nor yet germain to the subject, I flatter myself that you will take up the subject and give it such a thorough ventilation, and make the proposition so plain that the wayfaring man, though fool, need not err therein. Question—"Will it pay to keep sheep, for wool alone, on land worth $35 per acre?" I never could see just why the question should be stated in that way, nor just why anybody in this country should keep sheep that way. But so it is stated, and so we will try to discuss it. It must be clear to every one who has given the subject a moment's thought, that no answer can be given to the question that will be satisfactory to all persons in all places. The ever varying circumstances, soil, and its productiveness and the adaptability of the place to the sheep, and the man to the place -would require as many answers as there are men who make the experiment. From this you see my task is no easy one. Indeed, it was long before I could get the consent of my mind to undertake it at all. Had I not had the generous help of practical shepherds from different States and different parts of our own State, I should not have undertaken it. While I had some data in regard to cost of wintering sheep, I had very little in regard to cost of pasturing; and I was aware that the success of the enterprise depended upon the cost of summering as well as wintering. I began to cast about in my mind to see if I could call up any experience of my own that would settle it, but to my annoyance I could find nothing. I had long pastured a few sheep of my own, and some, too, for others, and charged them so much per head by the month, but this proved nothing; and not having tho advantage of a scientific education I came to the conclusion I never could settle it in that way, and so concluded to borrow from the experience of others. With this object in view I inquired of all I could see, and wrote to those I could not wee, and altogether addressed these two questions to 25 different sheep 1. What is it worth per head by the month to pasture a sheep weighing 100 pounds? s ' " ■ " ■ '• . v 2. How many sheep, Weighing 100 pounds each, will an acre of good pas- •irrough some of the answers were not powerfully instructive they were very amusing and I felt richly repaid for the trouble of asking them. But so far as helping me out of my difficulty was concerned, the resultwasnot very flattering. That you may have a more lively appreciation of the difficulties under which I have labored I will sketch a*~few of the answers. The range on the first question being all the way from 10 cents per head a month to 25 cents, and on the second question 2 head per acre up to 15. Answers, which of themselves, are sufficient to confuse the oldest man in the world. And to show you, too, that these answers come from practical sheep men, I will mention a few names. Some of them are familiar to you. S. R. Quick, of Bartholomew county, an acre will carry 6 sheep and it is worth 20 cents a head. J. A. Johnson, of Warren county, 31-3. Wm. Burns, of White county, says 8. H. H. Crow, of Putnam, says but 2 head, and that it is worth 15 cents. No wonder he thinks land is too high. Mr. Crawford, of Warren county, says 12 head, and that it is worth 10 cents. He could keep sheep profitably, at that rate, on land worth 4>75. T. S. Miller, of Illinois, the great Hereford cattle man, finds great difficulty in answering the question from the fact that his sheep so soon grow beyond the hundred pounds that he can't tell much about it; but that Cotswolds are the greatest sheep in the world. While Mr. Crow thinks that Merinoes are the only sheep that can profitably be kept on $35 land. T. W. W. Sunman, of Ripley county, says that an acre of good pasture wdl carry five grade, or common sheep, through the summer, which corresponds exactly -with my own opinion. But you see from this that all the quantities entering into the discussion of this problem, are not fixed and known; but like all questions, that are questions at all, there are some known quantities, and from these we shall proceed to make our deductions. In the first place then, we will say that we hava 100 acres of land, worth $35 per acre, or $3,500. Allowing 10 percent, for interest and taxes and we have $350, which must be made out of the land in some way, in order to make the debit and credit sides of our ledger to balance. If a man should rent his land for less than that, of course, the more land he should have, the worse he would be off. If he should farm it, his crops should be sufficiently large-and sufficiently well disposed of to meet all the expenses of cultivation and the ten per cent. over. But our question demands that this ten per cent, shall be made through sheep, anything more than this ten per cent, might be chargeable to profit, while anything- less should surely be charged to loss. Now, if the profit must be made off the sheep, it follows that the more sheep the land will carry, the more profit there will be, and right here is where the whole question hinges. It would make no difference at all what the land might i,e worth, provided it was sufficiently productive to carry a sufficient number of sheep; of course, we shall place no limit to the point, up to which land may be made to produce, but we have deemed something near an average as best adapted to the discussion of our question — .~ .«« ^..--_-._^*^_. vrs _-,_ ..uv^uuu, "« ." —« »,__.., ovr as. ..c Ilia V c allilUt* st UUU i*irt;_satisfactory to all men in all bargain we will have to "grin and en-J 'ris^plesasareconsuiuea uy-s-w^ our 300 sheep are in debt$432 60, and in an ordinary way, if the sheep's fleece would not pay the debt we would take his carcass to make up the deficit. But the conditions of our question will not allow us to do that, so if we have made a bad We shall say 50 bushels of corn per acre, This may be large for some localities, and indeed, to take the last four years in my own locality, it is too large by half, but to take the four preceding the last and the estimate would be much too low. We shall say 30 bushels of oats per acre, which ,is as much too low as the corn is too high, and for meadow we shall say two tons per acre, and if anybody complains at that, we want to remind them that with us, grass is the only crop that has never been known to fail; but now! comes the tug of war, and that is to settle what it would take to constitute a good average pasturage; and it seems so strange to me that among all the books I have ever read about the cost of keep-1 ing horses, cattle, hogs, or sheep, I have never read a single line in regard to cost of pasturage. Strange, isn't it, that the most important item in all our farm products should never be mentioned in any of our farm literature? While every other item of food and forage has been carefully analyzed by our most skilful scientific men and its exact value ascertained, on the subject of pasture we are left to guess and grope our way in the dark. The fact is, I have never heard of but a single instance where an experiment had been made to test the value of pasture, and that was made by a gentleman of this association in regard to the value of pasture for sheep. AH honor to that gentleman, we say. How then shall we settle the question? Partly by borrowing from the experience, orrathertheopinions of others, and partly by induction, and we shall notice the latter method first by supposing that the 100 acres chosen in the onset were all in pasture and that the pasture was available for seven months in the year. Now, I have pastured sheep for others at 10 to 15 cents a head per month, but mostly for 10 cents, and never thought I charged too much. Now, for convenience, we will suppose that an acre of pasture will actually carry five sheep through the summer, and that We get 10 cents a head per month for pasturing somebody else's sheep, and don't you see that we just get $3 50 per acre, or the 10 per cent, that we allowed for interest and taxes, and we would only need to make the land carry two more sheep to the acre, or add on four more cents per head to make a pretty good investment in land for sheep pasture. But we may have occasion to refer to this again before we are done. Now for the opinions of practical sheep men, I have already given a few of them, and you might take all the practical shepherds in the State, or different States, and ask them how many sheep an acre of good pasture would carry through the summer, and perhaps, five would be an average of the flrst 50 men you should ask, and for the sake of avoiding fractions and convenience, otherwise I shall assume that that is just the number. We now have our premises partly laid down, and the next thing is to so divide our hundred acres up into pasture, meadow, oats and corn, as not to have too much of one and too little of another, and for convenience, I shall divide it this way, 60 acres of pasture, 20 of meadow, 10 of oats and 10 of corn. Others might divide differently, but no mattert in any case,the pasture should be so partitioned that the sheep could be changed from one part to another every two weeks. But her lain fronr our wool-buyers the'average price paid for wool the last five years, andalso the average weight of fleece during that time, and I find that the average price paid (for all grades) during the last five years is less than 27 cents; I have the exact figures at home, but they are not absolutely necessary to our present purpose, and while the weight of fleeces have been steadily improving the last two or three years it has scarcely yet got above four pounds, and this too includes all that the country produces; the heavier Merinos, Leicesters, Cotswolds, and all. If there is any mistake about this, the wool-buyers bave made it, and not your humble servant. But as we have had our 300 sheep on hands a good while, we think a good deal of them and we would like to think they are a little better than common, and that they will surely shear five pounds a piece, and we can't get the consent of our minds to put it down at less than that. And while the average price for wool this year has been less than 23 cents, we certainly think ours is worth 25, and we shall put it down at that. Now what have we? Five pounds of wool at 25 cents, is $1 25 for each sheep, or just $375 for the whole, which leaves us just $57 50 in debt. Now, gentlemen, I think I see a very broad smile upon your friendly faces at the announcement of this result, and you say, " 'twill never do." Well, my premises may have all been wrong, but my reasoning is certainly correct. But you say that the land would certainly have kept more sheep. Well, if I was pasturing sheep for some other man I should be flad to have him think so. But you see have made no allowance for waste land, stumps and trees, and logs and sloughs, and sour grass. Where is the hundred acres of land that has not some of these upon it? But you say I might have used a little more economy in feeding. . True I have made no arrangement for feeding of turnips, bran, shorts or oil cake for the simple reason that as sheep are usually kept these things are never thought of. My calculations are based upon the usual methods of keeping sheep. But you say I have made no calculation for the increase of.the flock. That is true, for the simple reason that I started with fully as many as I thought the land would carry, and there would be no room for more without selling some we have on hand. But the question contemplates selling the wool only, and not the sheep. But you say I started with sheep weighing 100 pounds, and that they ought to gain 25 pounds apiece. That might do for the first year, but hbw about the second; you see I have made no allowance for loss by old age, dogs and disease. But suppose we try another method of settling this question. We have already found what our hundred acres of land would yield in pasture, meadow, corn and oats, and except the pasture,we very nearly know the market value of each. Now let us suppose that we get our sheep pastured for the small sum of 10 cents a head per month, and for the seven months it would cost us $210; our hay is worth $5 a ton, and we have 40 tons of it, $200; our 500 bushels of corn is worth 25 cents a bushel, or $125; our 300 bushels of oats is worth 20 cents a bushel, or $00. Making a grand total of $595, which our sheep has cost us. But our wool only brought us $375, leaving a deficit of $220, which is worse and worse. Besides in this calculation yon see I have not counted the corn-fo.i.ler and oat-straw worth anything, wl;ii.; in the other they were to keep our 300 sheep 19_ days. Now, gentlemen, I am just as much surprised at the result as any of you can be. When I began writing this paper I had for two weeks given the subject my best thoughts while, going about my work on the farm, but had not put a single idea on paper, so that I had not the least idea how my calculations should end. Indeed I most earnestly wanted them to come out in favor of the affirmative of this question; but so far as I can see now the only way to make it pay to keep sheep on $35 land, would be to sow it aU down in pasture, charge 20 cents a head per month, and then keep somebody else's sheep. But before taking my seat it may be proper for me to state that the foregoing calculations are based upon the assumption that sheep are kept alone or to the exclusion of other stock. This in my judgment would be very poor economy as we have fully demonstrated. But there is no necessity, in this country, of keeping sheep that way. A mixed husbandry is not only the most profitable, but most surely successful, and if I ever am so fortunate as to own a farm worth $100 per acre, I shall always keep a few sheep, becauselthink that like the ' birds they always pay their way, and though we may not realize a big per cent, in actual cash profit, yet there are a thousand ways in which they do pay. They are the best scavengers in the world to rid a place of foul weeds and briars. They make the best manure of any animal, and for my part I don't see how any farmer can afford to raise a family without the help of the social and civilizing influence of the sheep. Any farmer who keeps other stoek can keep sheep— from 10 to 15, or even 500, (according to the size of the farm.)—without missing their keep, because they will live well on what other stock leaves. Take for examples some of the gentlemen before referred to, Mr. Wm. Burns, of White county^ who keeps 30 to CO thoroughbred Cotswolds, and Mr. J. A. Johnston, of Warren county, who keeps 700 grade, or common sheep. Both own very largo thoroughbred Short-horns, but not hear enough stock of all kinds to keep their pastures grazed down, so that their sheep live nearly the whole year around on the pastures alone. In these cases and most every other case, where a few sheep are kept in connection with other stock, it would make little difference whether the land was worth $35 or $75 per acre, all what you get off them would be clear gain, whether wo count the wool alone, or wool and mutton together. Besides we might take all the conditions of the question just as we have in the foregoing demonstration and add the profits of mutton to what we realized on wool and make it pay largely. Let us say that our 300 sheep are all ewes. Then we should add on $200 for six thoroughbred Cotswold bucks, and then we should get 200 lambs, worth just as much as the old sheep, or perhaps more, which would enable us to sell 200 old sheep for mutton. Now let us see how we come out: We were in debt, interest and tax on land, $350; interest and tax on ewes, $82 50; interest and tax on bucks, $20, or on all $452 50. The 200 ewes we have to sell weighed 100 pounds, and we paid $2 75 apiece for them; but now they weigh 125 pounds apiece and worth three cents per pound, or $750 for the whole; which added to $375 for the wool makes 1,125, which less $-152 50 debt, leaves us a clear gain of $672 50, or more than 15J per cent, (clear gain) on our investment. Who wouldn't keep sheep? as this is 25J per cent, on cost of every tiling. What branch of husbandry pays so well as this? But there is another reason why I shall keep sheep. In these times that have tried farmers pockets as well as their souls, there has been less shrinkage in the value of sheep and wool than any other product of the farm; horses have decreased in value 150 per cent.; cattle over 400 per cent.; hogs over 500; corn, 300; wheat, 100; sheep less than 100; while in the last five years the shrinkage in wool has been less than 12 per cent. _— « -■ *- Ohio to Australia. The idea of shipping breeding swine to Australia will strike our readers as something new under the sun, but the following from D. M. Magie & Co., of Oxford, O., will convince them that it is being done. These gentlemen write us: We have sold in four years business 1,542 swine for breeders exclusively, and have shipped stock to five different foreign countries within the last two years. Six swine we Bhipped to Australia, went through all right; they arrived there in fine condition. Mr. Woodhouse tells us so, and he writes that he is exceedingly well pleased with them, and that the people there in Australia never saw «uch fine swine. He makes special mention of their heavy hams and deep sides. They were five weeks on the road from here to Australia; one week from here to California, and four weeks from Han Francisco to Australia. They add: Our herds are healthy and doing fine. We have the best lot of brood sows we ever owned, and they are in pig by_boars that are very superior hi form, finish, and breeding. » _m « All human virtues incrpane and strengthen by the experience of them. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1