page 543 |
Previous | 1 of 3 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Spearheading the Ohio Valley Interstate Mine Drainage Control LARRY COOK Chairman, Coal Industry Advisory Committee to ORSANCO Executive Vice President, Ohio Reclamation Association Columbus, Ohio It is doubtful whether any other pollutant offers as many problems as that of acid mine drainage, and laboratory results have so far offered only a guide to its control in actual practice. The basic reason for this is that acid mine drainage is not a simple dilute solution of pure acid. Its quality has been affected by all of the soluble materials with which it has come in contact under conditions which do not offer the opportunity for positive control. Even the acids picked up are not simple solutions. They are formed by the oxidation of the pyrites into any one of a series of iron sulphate or aluminum sulphate salts. When these acid salts or a combination of them are dissolved in the water which passes through the mine, they are subject to further action by other materials with which the water has come in contact. The result, which we call by the simple term acid mine drainage, is actually a complex and variable mixture of dissolved and suspended materials, in which actions and reactions have occurred and in which actions and reactions may continue to take place. Although laboratory efforts are still being made to find a simple and positive solution to the problem, most of our activities the past few years have been directed to the development of practical control measures which would serve to prevent the production of the acid. In January 1960, upon recommendation of its Engineering Committee, the Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission approved certain measures for the control of acid mine drainage from coal mining and related operations with the adoption of Resolution 5-60. They were accepted by the Coal Industry Advisory Committee on behalf of the industry. Such measures were recommended in January 1960 by the ORSANCO Engineering Committee which is comprised of the executive engineer officers of the pollution-control agencies of the states signatory to the ORSANCO Compact, approved by the Commission, and accepted by the committees representing the coal mining industry in the Ohio River basin, on the surface it would seem logical to expect that they would be in general practice today. On the other hand, a complete understanding of the conditions we are facing may cause you to wonder how we have attained the degree of compliance which is in effect today. Coal mining is itself variable and complex, and these measures, which are general in principle, are variable and complex in application to each specific operation. They cannot be considered as separate from the operation, but must be considered as a day-to-day part of the mining process, whether the operation be large or small, whether it is an underground mine, a strip mine, or an auger mine, and regardless of the terrain, the equipment used, or the geologic conditions encountered. Let us take a look at these control measures contained in ORSANCO Resolution 5-60. - 543 -
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC196244 |
Title | Spearheading the Ohio Valley inter-state mine drainage control |
Author | Cook, Larry |
Date of Original | 1962 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the seventeenth Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/engext&CISOPTR=9369&REC=18 |
Extent of Original | p. 543-545 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-05-18 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 543 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Spearheading the Ohio Valley Interstate Mine Drainage Control LARRY COOK Chairman, Coal Industry Advisory Committee to ORSANCO Executive Vice President, Ohio Reclamation Association Columbus, Ohio It is doubtful whether any other pollutant offers as many problems as that of acid mine drainage, and laboratory results have so far offered only a guide to its control in actual practice. The basic reason for this is that acid mine drainage is not a simple dilute solution of pure acid. Its quality has been affected by all of the soluble materials with which it has come in contact under conditions which do not offer the opportunity for positive control. Even the acids picked up are not simple solutions. They are formed by the oxidation of the pyrites into any one of a series of iron sulphate or aluminum sulphate salts. When these acid salts or a combination of them are dissolved in the water which passes through the mine, they are subject to further action by other materials with which the water has come in contact. The result, which we call by the simple term acid mine drainage, is actually a complex and variable mixture of dissolved and suspended materials, in which actions and reactions have occurred and in which actions and reactions may continue to take place. Although laboratory efforts are still being made to find a simple and positive solution to the problem, most of our activities the past few years have been directed to the development of practical control measures which would serve to prevent the production of the acid. In January 1960, upon recommendation of its Engineering Committee, the Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission approved certain measures for the control of acid mine drainage from coal mining and related operations with the adoption of Resolution 5-60. They were accepted by the Coal Industry Advisory Committee on behalf of the industry. Such measures were recommended in January 1960 by the ORSANCO Engineering Committee which is comprised of the executive engineer officers of the pollution-control agencies of the states signatory to the ORSANCO Compact, approved by the Commission, and accepted by the committees representing the coal mining industry in the Ohio River basin, on the surface it would seem logical to expect that they would be in general practice today. On the other hand, a complete understanding of the conditions we are facing may cause you to wonder how we have attained the degree of compliance which is in effect today. Coal mining is itself variable and complex, and these measures, which are general in principle, are variable and complex in application to each specific operation. They cannot be considered as separate from the operation, but must be considered as a day-to-day part of the mining process, whether the operation be large or small, whether it is an underground mine, a strip mine, or an auger mine, and regardless of the terrain, the equipment used, or the geologic conditions encountered. Let us take a look at these control measures contained in ORSANCO Resolution 5-60. - 543 - |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 543