page373 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Effects of Pollution on Natural Associations of Water Beetles! FRANK N. YOUNG, Associate Professor of Zoology Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana Individual species of water beetles are extremely variable in their reactions to pollution, either organic or industrial, and simple presence or absence of species cannot generally be used to indicate contamination. Some groups, however, such as the members of the family Elmidae, are extremely sensitive to even mild pollution and quickly disappear from streams which receive even moderate amounts of industrial wastes (1). Others, such as the larger Hydrophilidae and some Dytiscidae (4) may appear in small numbers in grossly polluted waters but their occurrence in many cases seems to be correlated with the presence of unpolluted situations nearby from which they migrate. The most striking effects of pollution is in the changes in species composition and frequencies in the natural associations of*beetles which normally occur in streams, empoundments or other natural situations. Since changes in diversity of species and frequency can be determined roughly without laboriously identifying all of the species present, it may be possible to work out relatively simple methods of assaying the effects of toxic pollutants and for measuring recovery from pollution by sampling the beetle populations. Water beetles have a number of advantages and disadvantages as indicators: They are abundant and diverse which allows many combinations of species in different habitats. At the same time, this, together with the superficial similarity of many forms makes it difficult to determine them with accuracy without undue effort. They occur in zones of streams, lakes, and ponds which are readily accessible to sampling by simple wire strainers, dip nets, or quantitative sampling devices, Figure 1. Conversely, they do not usually occur in deeper water or on the bottom (except for larvae and adults of certain Elmidae and Dryopidae) so that their use in large rivers is limited. As already mentioned, some species of aquatic beetles are very sensitive to pollution, and their presence may be used to indicate the purity of reservoir sources and other waters. Other species are less sensitive, particularly to organic pollution, and may actually increase in moderately polluted streams. Many adult beetles occupy situations in which the larvae do not occur, and the adult association may be restored rapidly by migration after a disturbance. A relatively few species, however, migrate so freely during the warmer months that their occurrence in small numbers in any situation is indicative only of the presence of a reflecting surface on which the beetles landed. For example, freshly tarred roads or recently waxed cartops serve as well as water. The greatest disadvantage is that in winter the beetles are inactive and difficult to detect or trap. In Indiana, however, they can usually be successfully collected from mid-March through late November or even December. 1 Contribution No, 688 from the Zoological Laboratories of Indiana University, aided by grant RG6411 from the U.S. Public Health Service and grants G-9, G-2708. and G-9229 from the National Science Foundation. - 373
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC196042 |
Title | Effects of pollution on natural associations of water beetles |
Author | Young, Frank N. |
Date of Original | 1960 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the fifteenth Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/engext&CISOPTR=7908&REC=7 |
Extent of Original | p. 373-380 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-04 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page373 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Effects of Pollution on Natural Associations of Water Beetles! FRANK N. YOUNG, Associate Professor of Zoology Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana Individual species of water beetles are extremely variable in their reactions to pollution, either organic or industrial, and simple presence or absence of species cannot generally be used to indicate contamination. Some groups, however, such as the members of the family Elmidae, are extremely sensitive to even mild pollution and quickly disappear from streams which receive even moderate amounts of industrial wastes (1). Others, such as the larger Hydrophilidae and some Dytiscidae (4) may appear in small numbers in grossly polluted waters but their occurrence in many cases seems to be correlated with the presence of unpolluted situations nearby from which they migrate. The most striking effects of pollution is in the changes in species composition and frequencies in the natural associations of*beetles which normally occur in streams, empoundments or other natural situations. Since changes in diversity of species and frequency can be determined roughly without laboriously identifying all of the species present, it may be possible to work out relatively simple methods of assaying the effects of toxic pollutants and for measuring recovery from pollution by sampling the beetle populations. Water beetles have a number of advantages and disadvantages as indicators: They are abundant and diverse which allows many combinations of species in different habitats. At the same time, this, together with the superficial similarity of many forms makes it difficult to determine them with accuracy without undue effort. They occur in zones of streams, lakes, and ponds which are readily accessible to sampling by simple wire strainers, dip nets, or quantitative sampling devices, Figure 1. Conversely, they do not usually occur in deeper water or on the bottom (except for larvae and adults of certain Elmidae and Dryopidae) so that their use in large rivers is limited. As already mentioned, some species of aquatic beetles are very sensitive to pollution, and their presence may be used to indicate the purity of reservoir sources and other waters. Other species are less sensitive, particularly to organic pollution, and may actually increase in moderately polluted streams. Many adult beetles occupy situations in which the larvae do not occur, and the adult association may be restored rapidly by migration after a disturbance. A relatively few species, however, migrate so freely during the warmer months that their occurrence in small numbers in any situation is indicative only of the presence of a reflecting surface on which the beetles landed. For example, freshly tarred roads or recently waxed cartops serve as well as water. The greatest disadvantage is that in winter the beetles are inactive and difficult to detect or trap. In Indiana, however, they can usually be successfully collected from mid-March through late November or even December. 1 Contribution No, 688 from the Zoological Laboratories of Indiana University, aided by grant RG6411 from the U.S. Public Health Service and grants G-9, G-2708. and G-9229 from the National Science Foundation. - 373 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page373