page 327 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
36 SELENIUM REMOVAL FROM PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTEWATER Yakup Nurdogan, Senior Process Engineer Robert P. Schroeder, Engineering Supervisor Bechtel Environmental, Incorporated San Francisco, California 94119 Charlie L. Meyer, Senior Research Engineer Shell Development Company Houston, Texas 77001 INTRODUCTION Selenium is an essential trace element for animals and humans, but it can cause toxicity at elevated levels in dietary intake. Parts of the San Francisco Bay estuary, including Suisun Bay, San Pablo Bay, and the Carquinez Strait, have been classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as impaired due to the impact of selenium on waterfowl.1 As a result of this classification, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) amended the NPDES permits for the six refineries discharging into the estuary to include specific permit limits on total selenium. Each refinery was given a mass discharge limit for total selenium based on the refinery's average annual flow and an effluent concentration of 50 ppb.2 The effluent concentration limit was based on a 5 ppb EPA water quality criterion for selenium and a dilution ratio of 10:1 for deep water discharges. Each of the six refineries has been working independently to develop treatment processes to reduce the selenium in their effluent.2"7 Most of the work has been done by the four refineries owned by Shell, Unocal, Chevron, and Exxon. Table I summarizes the findings of studies conducted by or for these refineries.8 The best results were obtained by the ferric chloride treatment of biotreated stripped sour water (SSW) and final effluent at the Shell Martinez Manufacturing Complex (MMC). The efficiency of selenium removal was greater than 95% in laboratory studies and 90% in the pilot study. Both bench- and pilot- scale tests demonstrated that the selenium concentration could be lowered to less than 50 ppb using a ferric chloride dosage of 50 ppm as Fe. This paper will summarize the results of the bench- and pilot- scale iron adsorption/coprecipitation tests conducted on the Shell MMC wastewater using ferric chloride reagent. The study was conducted by Bechtel Environmental, Inc. (BEI) of San Francisco, California, with oversight by Shell's Westhollow Research Center (WRC) in Houston, Texas.6,7 Merrill et al.9 explained the mechanism of iron adsorption/coprecipitation for removing selenium from the ash pond effluent of a coal-fired power plant. Ferric iron (e.g., as FeCl3), when added to water, produces a ferric hydroxide precipitate. If the reaction occurs at pH levels around 6, the precipitate can remove selenium from water by adsorbing or coprecipitating the oxyanion forms (e.g., selenate and selenite). Competition from sulfate, which is present in significant amounts in refinery effluent, significantly reduces the effectiveness of the process for selenate removal, but selenite can still be removed. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bench-Scale Setup A "gang" stirrer with six paddles was used to conduct one-liter "jar" tests. These jar tests were conducted on the wastewater samples from sour water stripper (SWS) bottoms, dissolved air flotation (DAF) unit effluent, corrugated plate interceptor (CPI) effluent, and biotreater effluent. Most of the tests were designed to determine the efficiency of iron adsorption/coprecipitation as a method of selenium removal. The tests were conducted according to a standardized procedure described in an earlier report.6 49th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1994 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 327
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199436 |
Title | Selenium removal from petroleum refinery wastewater |
Author |
Nurdogan, Yakup Schroeder, Robert P. Meyer, Charles L. |
Date of Original | 1994 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 49th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,44602 |
Extent of Original | p. 327-336 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-12-10 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 327 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 36 SELENIUM REMOVAL FROM PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTEWATER Yakup Nurdogan, Senior Process Engineer Robert P. Schroeder, Engineering Supervisor Bechtel Environmental, Incorporated San Francisco, California 94119 Charlie L. Meyer, Senior Research Engineer Shell Development Company Houston, Texas 77001 INTRODUCTION Selenium is an essential trace element for animals and humans, but it can cause toxicity at elevated levels in dietary intake. Parts of the San Francisco Bay estuary, including Suisun Bay, San Pablo Bay, and the Carquinez Strait, have been classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as impaired due to the impact of selenium on waterfowl.1 As a result of this classification, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) amended the NPDES permits for the six refineries discharging into the estuary to include specific permit limits on total selenium. Each refinery was given a mass discharge limit for total selenium based on the refinery's average annual flow and an effluent concentration of 50 ppb.2 The effluent concentration limit was based on a 5 ppb EPA water quality criterion for selenium and a dilution ratio of 10:1 for deep water discharges. Each of the six refineries has been working independently to develop treatment processes to reduce the selenium in their effluent.2"7 Most of the work has been done by the four refineries owned by Shell, Unocal, Chevron, and Exxon. Table I summarizes the findings of studies conducted by or for these refineries.8 The best results were obtained by the ferric chloride treatment of biotreated stripped sour water (SSW) and final effluent at the Shell Martinez Manufacturing Complex (MMC). The efficiency of selenium removal was greater than 95% in laboratory studies and 90% in the pilot study. Both bench- and pilot- scale tests demonstrated that the selenium concentration could be lowered to less than 50 ppb using a ferric chloride dosage of 50 ppm as Fe. This paper will summarize the results of the bench- and pilot- scale iron adsorption/coprecipitation tests conducted on the Shell MMC wastewater using ferric chloride reagent. The study was conducted by Bechtel Environmental, Inc. (BEI) of San Francisco, California, with oversight by Shell's Westhollow Research Center (WRC) in Houston, Texas.6,7 Merrill et al.9 explained the mechanism of iron adsorption/coprecipitation for removing selenium from the ash pond effluent of a coal-fired power plant. Ferric iron (e.g., as FeCl3), when added to water, produces a ferric hydroxide precipitate. If the reaction occurs at pH levels around 6, the precipitate can remove selenium from water by adsorbing or coprecipitating the oxyanion forms (e.g., selenate and selenite). Competition from sulfate, which is present in significant amounts in refinery effluent, significantly reduces the effectiveness of the process for selenate removal, but selenite can still be removed. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bench-Scale Setup A "gang" stirrer with six paddles was used to conduct one-liter "jar" tests. These jar tests were conducted on the wastewater samples from sour water stripper (SWS) bottoms, dissolved air flotation (DAF) unit effluent, corrugated plate interceptor (CPI) effluent, and biotreater effluent. Most of the tests were designed to determine the efficiency of iron adsorption/coprecipitation as a method of selenium removal. The tests were conducted according to a standardized procedure described in an earlier report.6 49th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1994 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 327 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 327