page 61 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
8 MOLECULAR TOOLS FOR MONITORING BIOREMEDIATION POTENTIAL ON CONTAMINATED SOILS Moo Hoon Kim, Senior Researcher Energy & Environment Lab Materials & Devices Center Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology Suwon, Korea Lenore S. Clesceri, Associate Professor Dept. of Biology and Environmental Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, New York 12180 INTRODUCTION Cleaning up contaminated soils and sediments is one of the most difficult problems found at hazardous waste sites. No current technologies are adequate to handle soil cleanup, usually because of cost involved or the unsuitability of the technology to the site environment. Soils at industrial sites are contaminated with wide mixtures of pollutants. Isolation of DNA from contaminated soil has become a very useful tool to study functions in microbial systems. In the next several years, this procedure will be very important when the DNA probes are available to see any enzymatic activities. In this research, the bioremediation potential of contaminated soils, the effectiveness of relationship between lysozyme and SDS treatment and DNA yield by UV method and recovery from agarose gel electrophoresis were studied and will be presented. BACKGROUND Microbial cell wall polysaccharide is made up of two kinds of sugar: N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) and N-acetylmuramate (NAM). NAM and NAG are derivatives of glucosamine in which the amino group is acetylated. In bacterial cell walls, NAM and NAG are joined by glucosidic linkages between C-l of the sugar of NAM and C-4 of the sugar of the NAG. Thus the cell wall polysaccharide is an altering polymer of NAM and NAG joined by B (1-4) glycosidic linkages. Lysozyme, a glycosidase, hydrolizes the glycosidic bonds between C-l of the NAM and C-4 of the NAG. The other glycosidic bond between C-l of NAG and C-4 of the NAM is not cleaved. Lysozyme is a relatively small enzyme (14.6 kd). The one from egg white, a rich source, is a single polypeptide chain of 129 residues. The gram-positive cell wall has been found to be more susceptible to lysis with lysozyme than gram-negative wall. Augmenting the lysis mixtures with detergent (SDS) improves the lysis of gram-positive as well as gram-negative cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS Modified direct DNA extraction and purification method (M/H method) from Ogram et al. (1987) has some disadvantages such as: (1) needs a lot of time, (2) requires a large sample size so that cannot do the experiment with small sample size, (3) is laborious. Therefore, the rapid method (E/E method) was tested to overcome larger sample size and save time. 51st Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1996. Ann Arbor Press. Inc.. Chelsea. Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 61
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199608 |
Title | Molecular tools for monitoring bioremediation potential on contaminated soils |
Author |
Kim, Moo Hoon Clesceri, Lenore S. |
Date of Original | 1996 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 51st Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,46351 |
Extent of Original | p. 61-68 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-10-27 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 61 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 8 MOLECULAR TOOLS FOR MONITORING BIOREMEDIATION POTENTIAL ON CONTAMINATED SOILS Moo Hoon Kim, Senior Researcher Energy & Environment Lab Materials & Devices Center Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology Suwon, Korea Lenore S. Clesceri, Associate Professor Dept. of Biology and Environmental Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, New York 12180 INTRODUCTION Cleaning up contaminated soils and sediments is one of the most difficult problems found at hazardous waste sites. No current technologies are adequate to handle soil cleanup, usually because of cost involved or the unsuitability of the technology to the site environment. Soils at industrial sites are contaminated with wide mixtures of pollutants. Isolation of DNA from contaminated soil has become a very useful tool to study functions in microbial systems. In the next several years, this procedure will be very important when the DNA probes are available to see any enzymatic activities. In this research, the bioremediation potential of contaminated soils, the effectiveness of relationship between lysozyme and SDS treatment and DNA yield by UV method and recovery from agarose gel electrophoresis were studied and will be presented. BACKGROUND Microbial cell wall polysaccharide is made up of two kinds of sugar: N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) and N-acetylmuramate (NAM). NAM and NAG are derivatives of glucosamine in which the amino group is acetylated. In bacterial cell walls, NAM and NAG are joined by glucosidic linkages between C-l of the sugar of NAM and C-4 of the sugar of the NAG. Thus the cell wall polysaccharide is an altering polymer of NAM and NAG joined by B (1-4) glycosidic linkages. Lysozyme, a glycosidase, hydrolizes the glycosidic bonds between C-l of the NAM and C-4 of the NAG. The other glycosidic bond between C-l of NAG and C-4 of the NAM is not cleaved. Lysozyme is a relatively small enzyme (14.6 kd). The one from egg white, a rich source, is a single polypeptide chain of 129 residues. The gram-positive cell wall has been found to be more susceptible to lysis with lysozyme than gram-negative wall. Augmenting the lysis mixtures with detergent (SDS) improves the lysis of gram-positive as well as gram-negative cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS Modified direct DNA extraction and purification method (M/H method) from Ogram et al. (1987) has some disadvantages such as: (1) needs a lot of time, (2) requires a large sample size so that cannot do the experiment with small sample size, (3) is laborious. Therefore, the rapid method (E/E method) was tested to overcome larger sample size and save time. 51st Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1996. Ann Arbor Press. Inc.. Chelsea. Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 61 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 61