page 159 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
18 DISINFECTION OF INFECTIOUS MEDICAL WASTE USING HIGH ENERGY ELECTRONS Brian Rolingson, Graduate Research Assistant Thomas D. Waite, Professor Bhagyashree R. Kundalkar, Professor Charles N. Kurucz, Professor University of Miami, Department of Civil Engineering Coral Gables, Florida, 33124 INTRODUCTION The definition of medical waste, its treatment and disposal were not major problems in the mind of the public throughout the United States prior to 1987. Medical waste incineration systems were relatively easy to permit, most landfill owners and operators did not find hospital waste objectionable, and offsite disposal costs were reasonable and competitive in most parts of the country.1-2 Also, the regulations covering medical waste management and disposal were minimal and not very stringent. In the summers of 1987 and 1988, medical waste dominated the media and public attention. There seemed to be daily accounts of medical debris washing up on public beaches and broken containers of medical waste showing up in trash dumpsters and alleyways. On a national level, the net immediate effect of the flurry of regulatory activities was a rapid and substantial increase in medical waste volumes coupled with a simultaneous decrease of viable, cost-effective treatment and disposal options. This caused rapid and substantial increases in medical waste disposal costs. The most common method of disposal chosen is incineration, with approximately 3,700 medical waste incinerators (MWIs) currently in operation throughout the United States.1-4 While incineration is a very effective method of rendering the waste noninfectious, it results in the production of air pollutants which include dioxin, hydrogen chloride, lead, cadmium, and mercury. Recently issued federal regulations require the retrofitting of these incinerators to prevent the release of pollutants to the surrounding atmosphere. This situation will increase the operating costs for medical waste incinerators, and this in turn will encourage research and development efforts to find better, more cost-effective methods for treating and disposing of medical waste.5-6 IDENTIFYING MEDICAL WASTE The identification of medical waste is a troublesome issue because there is no consensus about which wastes should be managed as infectious. It is essential to define what is meant by "medical waste." At present there is not even agreement on the terminology that should be used for this type of waste. Various terms are being used more or less synonymously with medical waste, including biohazardous waste, biological waste, infectious waste, hospital waste, medical hazardous waste, infective waste, microbiological waste, pathological waste, and red bag waste.1,7 The following is a list of definitions as supplied by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Florida State Regulations (1993), Public Health General Provisions and Environmental Control Sections. Solid waste is a catch term used by the EPA to define all solid, liquid, and gaseous waste. Chemical, hazardous, infectious, and medical wastes are subcategories of solid waste that can threaten human health or the environment because they are potentially harmful. The Florida State Regulations (1993) define biomedical waste as any solid waste or liquid waste that may present the threat of infection to humans. The term includes, but is not limited to. 51st Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1996, Ann Arbor Press, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Primed in U.S.A. 159
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199618 |
Title | Disinfection of infectious medical waste using high energy electrons |
Author |
Rolingson, Brian Waite, Thomas D. Kundalkar, Bhagyashree R. Kurucz, Charles N. |
Date of Original | 1996 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 51st Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,46351 |
Extent of Original | p. 159-166 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-10-27 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 159 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 18 DISINFECTION OF INFECTIOUS MEDICAL WASTE USING HIGH ENERGY ELECTRONS Brian Rolingson, Graduate Research Assistant Thomas D. Waite, Professor Bhagyashree R. Kundalkar, Professor Charles N. Kurucz, Professor University of Miami, Department of Civil Engineering Coral Gables, Florida, 33124 INTRODUCTION The definition of medical waste, its treatment and disposal were not major problems in the mind of the public throughout the United States prior to 1987. Medical waste incineration systems were relatively easy to permit, most landfill owners and operators did not find hospital waste objectionable, and offsite disposal costs were reasonable and competitive in most parts of the country.1-2 Also, the regulations covering medical waste management and disposal were minimal and not very stringent. In the summers of 1987 and 1988, medical waste dominated the media and public attention. There seemed to be daily accounts of medical debris washing up on public beaches and broken containers of medical waste showing up in trash dumpsters and alleyways. On a national level, the net immediate effect of the flurry of regulatory activities was a rapid and substantial increase in medical waste volumes coupled with a simultaneous decrease of viable, cost-effective treatment and disposal options. This caused rapid and substantial increases in medical waste disposal costs. The most common method of disposal chosen is incineration, with approximately 3,700 medical waste incinerators (MWIs) currently in operation throughout the United States.1-4 While incineration is a very effective method of rendering the waste noninfectious, it results in the production of air pollutants which include dioxin, hydrogen chloride, lead, cadmium, and mercury. Recently issued federal regulations require the retrofitting of these incinerators to prevent the release of pollutants to the surrounding atmosphere. This situation will increase the operating costs for medical waste incinerators, and this in turn will encourage research and development efforts to find better, more cost-effective methods for treating and disposing of medical waste.5-6 IDENTIFYING MEDICAL WASTE The identification of medical waste is a troublesome issue because there is no consensus about which wastes should be managed as infectious. It is essential to define what is meant by "medical waste." At present there is not even agreement on the terminology that should be used for this type of waste. Various terms are being used more or less synonymously with medical waste, including biohazardous waste, biological waste, infectious waste, hospital waste, medical hazardous waste, infective waste, microbiological waste, pathological waste, and red bag waste.1,7 The following is a list of definitions as supplied by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Florida State Regulations (1993), Public Health General Provisions and Environmental Control Sections. Solid waste is a catch term used by the EPA to define all solid, liquid, and gaseous waste. Chemical, hazardous, infectious, and medical wastes are subcategories of solid waste that can threaten human health or the environment because they are potentially harmful. The Florida State Regulations (1993) define biomedical waste as any solid waste or liquid waste that may present the threat of infection to humans. The term includes, but is not limited to. 51st Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1996, Ann Arbor Press, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Primed in U.S.A. 159 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 159