page 393 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
41 BIODEGRADABILITY ENHANCEMENT OF NON-IONIC SURFACTANTS USING OXIDATIVE PRETREATMENT: LABORATORY STUDIES AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS Mehmet Kitis, Graduate Research Assistant Department of Environmental Systems Engineering Clemson University Clemson, South Carolina 29634 Craig D. Adams, Mathes Professor/Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, Missouri 65409 Glen T. Daigger, Professor and Head Department of Environmental Systems Engineering Clemson University Clemson, South Carolina 29634 INTRODUCTION Surface active agents (surfactants) consist of a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic portion, and are used for a wide range of industrial and domestic purposes. Non-ionic surfactants typically use an ethylene oxide (EO) chain as their hydrophilic portion. These "ethoxylated surfactants" may have a variety of hydrophobic functionalities such as polypropylene oxide (PO), alkylphenols, or linear primary- or secondary-alcohols. Non-ionic surfactants have several advantages over anionic and cationic surfactants including their stability over a wide pH range and their ability to maintain their surfactant properties in soft or hard waters. In the 1980s, ethoxylated (non-ionic) surfactants comprised more than 30% of the total worldwide surfactant use.1 Two major classes of non-ionic surfactants used by industry include the ethylene oxide/propy- lene oxide (EO/PO) block copolymers and the alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEs) (Figure 1). Both EO/PO block copolymers and (to a lesser degree) APEs are known to be biorecalcitrant, that is, resistant to biomineralization.2-6 In the EO/PO block copolymers, the polypropylene glycol (PPG) portion of the molecule imparts both the requisite hydrophobic portion of the surfactant, as well as the biorecalcitrance to the molecule.6 Biodegradation studies of APEs have shown that initial biodegradation proceeds via EO-chain shortening, thereby decreasing the aqueous solubility and increasing the APEs biorecalcitrance.7-8 This phenomena results in the characteristic partial biodegradability often observed for APEs.9 Elimination of APEs during wastewater treatment is incomplete, resulting in release of metabolites that may be toxic to aquatic organisms, have enhanced resistance to biodegradation, and have the ability to bioaccumulate in microorganisms.10 Due to their biorefractory nature, these surfactants are not treatable in conventional aerobic biological treatment processes and can, in fact, inhibit the operation of these processes if their toxicity is sufficient. Because it may not always be feasible to use biologically labile surfactants, there is a need to identify and develop economical integrated treatment technologies that provide significant mineralization and detoxification of these industrial surfactants. In this research, the use of an integrated chemical/biological treatment process was investigated for the removal of selected EO/PO block copolymers, PPG, and APEs. Chemical oxidation was accomplished using Fenton's reagent (hydrogen peroxide/ferrous iron; H,02/[Fe(II)]) to enhance the biodegradability of surfactants (and PPG). 51st Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1996. Ann Arbor Press, Inc., Chelsea. Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 393
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199641 |
Title | Biodegradability enhancement of non-ionic surfactants using oxidative pretreatment : laboratory studies and economic analysis |
Author |
Kitis, Mehmet Adams, Craig D. Daigger, Glen T. |
Date of Original | 1996 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 51st Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,46351 |
Extent of Original | p. 393-404 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-10-27 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 393 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 41 BIODEGRADABILITY ENHANCEMENT OF NON-IONIC SURFACTANTS USING OXIDATIVE PRETREATMENT: LABORATORY STUDIES AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS Mehmet Kitis, Graduate Research Assistant Department of Environmental Systems Engineering Clemson University Clemson, South Carolina 29634 Craig D. Adams, Mathes Professor/Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, Missouri 65409 Glen T. Daigger, Professor and Head Department of Environmental Systems Engineering Clemson University Clemson, South Carolina 29634 INTRODUCTION Surface active agents (surfactants) consist of a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic portion, and are used for a wide range of industrial and domestic purposes. Non-ionic surfactants typically use an ethylene oxide (EO) chain as their hydrophilic portion. These "ethoxylated surfactants" may have a variety of hydrophobic functionalities such as polypropylene oxide (PO), alkylphenols, or linear primary- or secondary-alcohols. Non-ionic surfactants have several advantages over anionic and cationic surfactants including their stability over a wide pH range and their ability to maintain their surfactant properties in soft or hard waters. In the 1980s, ethoxylated (non-ionic) surfactants comprised more than 30% of the total worldwide surfactant use.1 Two major classes of non-ionic surfactants used by industry include the ethylene oxide/propy- lene oxide (EO/PO) block copolymers and the alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEs) (Figure 1). Both EO/PO block copolymers and (to a lesser degree) APEs are known to be biorecalcitrant, that is, resistant to biomineralization.2-6 In the EO/PO block copolymers, the polypropylene glycol (PPG) portion of the molecule imparts both the requisite hydrophobic portion of the surfactant, as well as the biorecalcitrance to the molecule.6 Biodegradation studies of APEs have shown that initial biodegradation proceeds via EO-chain shortening, thereby decreasing the aqueous solubility and increasing the APEs biorecalcitrance.7-8 This phenomena results in the characteristic partial biodegradability often observed for APEs.9 Elimination of APEs during wastewater treatment is incomplete, resulting in release of metabolites that may be toxic to aquatic organisms, have enhanced resistance to biodegradation, and have the ability to bioaccumulate in microorganisms.10 Due to their biorefractory nature, these surfactants are not treatable in conventional aerobic biological treatment processes and can, in fact, inhibit the operation of these processes if their toxicity is sufficient. Because it may not always be feasible to use biologically labile surfactants, there is a need to identify and develop economical integrated treatment technologies that provide significant mineralization and detoxification of these industrial surfactants. In this research, the use of an integrated chemical/biological treatment process was investigated for the removal of selected EO/PO block copolymers, PPG, and APEs. Chemical oxidation was accomplished using Fenton's reagent (hydrogen peroxide/ferrous iron; H,02/[Fe(II)]) to enhance the biodegradability of surfactants (and PPG). 51st Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1996. Ann Arbor Press, Inc., Chelsea. Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 393 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 393