page 107 |
Previous | 1 of 6 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
12 AIR MODELING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO SAMPLING FOR LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AIRBORNE RELEASES Michelle Morgenstern, Project Engineer ERM Program Management Company Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544 Kirby Hueske, Toxicologist Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission Austin, Texas 78731 INTRODUCTION The Environmental Restoration Program for Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear weapons complex facilities faces challenges ranging from well-defined cleanups of specific contaminated sites to broader questions of the effects on the environment and human health of forty years of laboratory operations. Efforts in the latter category were accelerated by the promulgation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1970, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 which require the DOE nuclear weapon complex facilities to comply with the same standards applied to industry. The DOE responded to the new regulatory requirements by the implementation of the Comprehensive Environmental Assessment and Response Program (CEARP), designed to bring Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) into compliance with RCRA and CERCLA.1^ A particularly striking example of the effect of these regulatory requirements is the new scrutiny focused on airborne radioactive releases from DOE laboratories and the cumulative effect of past releases. This paper describes our efforts to assess the effect of these airborne releases at one DOE laboratory using air modeling based on historical data. Among the facilities affected by these developments is Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. LANL is located on several mesas above the Rio Grande, encompassing 42 square miles of land approximately 30 miles northwest of Santa Fe in north central New Mexico. LANL was established in 1943 for Project Y of the Manhattan Project to develop the world's first nuclear weapon. Currently, LANL is operated by the University of California for the Department of Energy. LANL continues to conduct research in a variety of military and civilian areas.5 RCRA, as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) in 1984, requires all facilities which involve the treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste to obtain a RCRA/HSWA waste facility permit. LANL complied with CEARP by initiating a process of identifying potential release sites associated with LANL operations prior to filing a RCRA/HSWA permit application. In the process of preparing the RCRA/HSWA waste facility permit application to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), a total of 603 Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) were identified as part of the requirements of the HSWA Module VIII permit requirements.6 The HSWA Module VIII permit requires LANL to determine whether there have been any releases of hazardous waste or hazardous constituents from SWMUs at the facility dating from the 1940s by performing a RCRA Facility Investigation to address known or suspected releases from specified SWMUs to affected media (i.e., soil, groundwater, surface water, and air). Work plans for the RCRA facility investigations must be submitted to the U.S. EPA for evaluation. The permit also requires LANL to take corrective actions for such releases. 50th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1995. Ann Arbor Press. Inc., Chelsea. Michigan 48118. Primed in U.S.A. 107
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199512 |
Title | Air modeling as an alternative to sampling for low-level radioactive airborne releases |
Author |
Morgenstern, Michelle Hueske, Kirby |
Date of Original | 1995 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 50th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,45474 |
Extent of Original | p. 107-112 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-11-24 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 107 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 12 AIR MODELING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO SAMPLING FOR LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AIRBORNE RELEASES Michelle Morgenstern, Project Engineer ERM Program Management Company Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544 Kirby Hueske, Toxicologist Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission Austin, Texas 78731 INTRODUCTION The Environmental Restoration Program for Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear weapons complex facilities faces challenges ranging from well-defined cleanups of specific contaminated sites to broader questions of the effects on the environment and human health of forty years of laboratory operations. Efforts in the latter category were accelerated by the promulgation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1970, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 which require the DOE nuclear weapon complex facilities to comply with the same standards applied to industry. The DOE responded to the new regulatory requirements by the implementation of the Comprehensive Environmental Assessment and Response Program (CEARP), designed to bring Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) into compliance with RCRA and CERCLA.1^ A particularly striking example of the effect of these regulatory requirements is the new scrutiny focused on airborne radioactive releases from DOE laboratories and the cumulative effect of past releases. This paper describes our efforts to assess the effect of these airborne releases at one DOE laboratory using air modeling based on historical data. Among the facilities affected by these developments is Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. LANL is located on several mesas above the Rio Grande, encompassing 42 square miles of land approximately 30 miles northwest of Santa Fe in north central New Mexico. LANL was established in 1943 for Project Y of the Manhattan Project to develop the world's first nuclear weapon. Currently, LANL is operated by the University of California for the Department of Energy. LANL continues to conduct research in a variety of military and civilian areas.5 RCRA, as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) in 1984, requires all facilities which involve the treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste to obtain a RCRA/HSWA waste facility permit. LANL complied with CEARP by initiating a process of identifying potential release sites associated with LANL operations prior to filing a RCRA/HSWA permit application. In the process of preparing the RCRA/HSWA waste facility permit application to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), a total of 603 Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) were identified as part of the requirements of the HSWA Module VIII permit requirements.6 The HSWA Module VIII permit requires LANL to determine whether there have been any releases of hazardous waste or hazardous constituents from SWMUs at the facility dating from the 1940s by performing a RCRA Facility Investigation to address known or suspected releases from specified SWMUs to affected media (i.e., soil, groundwater, surface water, and air). Work plans for the RCRA facility investigations must be submitted to the U.S. EPA for evaluation. The permit also requires LANL to take corrective actions for such releases. 50th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1995. Ann Arbor Press. Inc., Chelsea. Michigan 48118. Primed in U.S.A. 107 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 107