page 627 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
67 REMEDIATION OF OIL/GAS DRILLING WASTES: LABORATORY AND FIELD VALIDATION EMPLOYING THE TI/USA FLY ASH STABILIZATION PROCESS T. Rick Irvin, Associate Professor Institute for Environmental Studies Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 Ben E. Files, Manager of Operations Trent Lassigne, Field Engineer Integrated Technical Services, Inc. Turner Industries, LTD, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808 INTRODUCTION Recent national attention has been focused on management of nonhazardous oil field wastes (NOW) located at active oil and gas production facilities as well as inactive/abandoned drilling facilities. NOW material, which contaminates pits, ponds, and lagoons at oil and gas drilling locations throughout the US, has received renewed regulatory interest in recent years due to concerns regarding environmental effects of several NOW components.1 Traditionally, NOW material has three target components which must be managed for successful closure of a nonhazardous waste-contaminated site: 1. petroleum hydrocarbons —NOW materials commonly contain an oil and grease content ranging from greater than 3% to over 20% oil and grease by weight. Traditional remediation standards for this contaminant can require reduction of the oil and grease content to less than 3%; recently-adopted state requirements for NOW management however often require hydrocarbon content to be less than 1% by weight. 2. metals —NOW sludges commonly contain high levels of barium at concentrations exceeding 80,000 ppm.1 The spectra of additional toxic metals found at high levels in NOW pit material vary depending on the location from which the material originated. Toxic metals commonly found as contaminants in NOW material include: -mercury -chromium -lead -arsenic -cadmium -barium 3. pH —acidity and alkalinity of NOW waste are often a problem due to contamination with materials which decrease the pH to values as low as 1.4. Under the 1980 amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Congress issued a specific, temporary exemption from RCRA regulation to "drilling fluids, produced waters, and other wastes associated with the exploration, development, or production of crude oil or natural gas or geothermal energy."2 Review of these exemptions in 1987 by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found that EPA may consider undertaking cooperative efforts with States to review and improve the design, implementation, and enforcement of existing State and Federal programs to manage oil and gas wastes. At that time, EPA justification for review of NOW regulations and environmental management practices was based in part on observations that: 1. then available NOW management practices varied in their environmental performance and efficacy, and 2. environmental damage from NOW discharge could occur even where NOW material was managed in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations. Conventional treatment methods for NOW material, summarized in Table I, can be subdivided according to whether they permit onsite and off site treatment. Containerization of NOW sludges and 49th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1994 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 627
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199467 |
Title | Remediation of oil/gas drilling wastes : laboratory and field validation employing the ti/usa fly ash stabilization process |
Author |
Irvin, T. Rick Files, Ben E. Lassigne, Trent |
Date of Original | 1994 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 49th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,44602 |
Extent of Original | p. 627-634 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-12-10 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 627 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 67 REMEDIATION OF OIL/GAS DRILLING WASTES: LABORATORY AND FIELD VALIDATION EMPLOYING THE TI/USA FLY ASH STABILIZATION PROCESS T. Rick Irvin, Associate Professor Institute for Environmental Studies Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 Ben E. Files, Manager of Operations Trent Lassigne, Field Engineer Integrated Technical Services, Inc. Turner Industries, LTD, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808 INTRODUCTION Recent national attention has been focused on management of nonhazardous oil field wastes (NOW) located at active oil and gas production facilities as well as inactive/abandoned drilling facilities. NOW material, which contaminates pits, ponds, and lagoons at oil and gas drilling locations throughout the US, has received renewed regulatory interest in recent years due to concerns regarding environmental effects of several NOW components.1 Traditionally, NOW material has three target components which must be managed for successful closure of a nonhazardous waste-contaminated site: 1. petroleum hydrocarbons —NOW materials commonly contain an oil and grease content ranging from greater than 3% to over 20% oil and grease by weight. Traditional remediation standards for this contaminant can require reduction of the oil and grease content to less than 3%; recently-adopted state requirements for NOW management however often require hydrocarbon content to be less than 1% by weight. 2. metals —NOW sludges commonly contain high levels of barium at concentrations exceeding 80,000 ppm.1 The spectra of additional toxic metals found at high levels in NOW pit material vary depending on the location from which the material originated. Toxic metals commonly found as contaminants in NOW material include: -mercury -chromium -lead -arsenic -cadmium -barium 3. pH —acidity and alkalinity of NOW waste are often a problem due to contamination with materials which decrease the pH to values as low as 1.4. Under the 1980 amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Congress issued a specific, temporary exemption from RCRA regulation to "drilling fluids, produced waters, and other wastes associated with the exploration, development, or production of crude oil or natural gas or geothermal energy."2 Review of these exemptions in 1987 by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found that EPA may consider undertaking cooperative efforts with States to review and improve the design, implementation, and enforcement of existing State and Federal programs to manage oil and gas wastes. At that time, EPA justification for review of NOW regulations and environmental management practices was based in part on observations that: 1. then available NOW management practices varied in their environmental performance and efficacy, and 2. environmental damage from NOW discharge could occur even where NOW material was managed in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations. Conventional treatment methods for NOW material, summarized in Table I, can be subdivided according to whether they permit onsite and off site treatment. Containerization of NOW sludges and 49th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1994 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 627 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 627