page 135 |
Previous | 1 of 14 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
16 CASE HISTORY: GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION USING SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS. REMOVAL OF VOLATILE AND SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS AT A SUPERFUND SITE IN NORTHWEST INDIANA Diane R. Martini, Project Scientist Mark J. Knight, Senior Project Manager Ariadne Lytwyn, Project Geologist James L. Kilby, Manager, Remedial Projects Monsanto Agriculture Company St. Louis, Missouri 63617 INTRODUCTION Remediation is ongoing at a Superfund site in Indiana where hazardous wastes, including a combination of oily wastes and solvents known collectively as light, non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL), were disposed during the early 1970s. Remedial activities include a soil-bentonite slurry wall, LNAPL recovery, groundwater treatment, and a separate surface water treatment system. Construction was completed in 1991 and the systems began operating in February 1992. Groundwater treatment consists of LNAPL separation, followed by permanganate oxidation and chemical coagulation to remove iron, then by biological treatment to remove organic chemicals using Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBRs). Results from the first year of operation indicate >99% removal of Volatile Organic Compounds and Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, and >90% removal of Semivolatile Organic Compounds from site groundwater. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) removal has averaged 92%. Nitrification was not observed during the first year of operation. Site groundwater is salty, with a Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) content of 5000 mg/L. This salt did not appear to inhibit the SBR system. The following discussion addresses removal of BETX compounds, chlorinated solvents, polynu- clear aromatic hydrocarbons and phthalates. BACKGROUND During the 1970s, the site was used for disposal of construction debris, liquid chemical wastes, and some solidified chemical waste materials. Operations at the site were centered around drum recycling. Some drummed materials were disposed, but only when the drum could not be easily salvaged. As a result, the site contains a wide variety of free-phase chemicals including oily wastes and solvents which combine to form a light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) phase which has been contained and is being recovered. A soil-bentonite slurry wall defines the boundaries of the site and prevents offsite migration of contaminants as illustrated in Figure 1. The area within the slurry wall is known as the exclusion zone. The slurry wall and associated LNAPL recovery and treatment systems are known as the Interim Site Remedy (or 1SR). The Final Site Remedy (or FSR) will commence after ISR operations are completed as determined by the termination of LNAPL recovery. Recovered LNAPL at the site has been shown to contain low levels of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), as well as chlorinated solvents and petroleum distillates. PROCESS DESCRIPTION The Groundwater Treatment System first uses physical-chemical processes to recover LNAPL and remove iron and other scaling agents from site groundwater, then uses biological treatment to remove organic constituents. Treated water is returned to the exclusion zone via an infiltration gallery to facilitate additional flushing of contaminants from site soils. The design flow capacity for the system 49th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1994 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 135
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199416 |
Title | Case history, groundwater remediation using sequencing batch reactors : removal of volatile and semivolatile compounds at a superfund site in northwest Indiana |
Author |
Martini, Diane R. Knight, Mark J. Lytwyn, Ariadne Kilby, James L. |
Date of Original | 1994 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 49th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,44602 |
Extent of Original | p. 135-148 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-12-10 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 135 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 16 CASE HISTORY: GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION USING SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS. REMOVAL OF VOLATILE AND SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS AT A SUPERFUND SITE IN NORTHWEST INDIANA Diane R. Martini, Project Scientist Mark J. Knight, Senior Project Manager Ariadne Lytwyn, Project Geologist James L. Kilby, Manager, Remedial Projects Monsanto Agriculture Company St. Louis, Missouri 63617 INTRODUCTION Remediation is ongoing at a Superfund site in Indiana where hazardous wastes, including a combination of oily wastes and solvents known collectively as light, non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL), were disposed during the early 1970s. Remedial activities include a soil-bentonite slurry wall, LNAPL recovery, groundwater treatment, and a separate surface water treatment system. Construction was completed in 1991 and the systems began operating in February 1992. Groundwater treatment consists of LNAPL separation, followed by permanganate oxidation and chemical coagulation to remove iron, then by biological treatment to remove organic chemicals using Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBRs). Results from the first year of operation indicate >99% removal of Volatile Organic Compounds and Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, and >90% removal of Semivolatile Organic Compounds from site groundwater. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) removal has averaged 92%. Nitrification was not observed during the first year of operation. Site groundwater is salty, with a Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) content of 5000 mg/L. This salt did not appear to inhibit the SBR system. The following discussion addresses removal of BETX compounds, chlorinated solvents, polynu- clear aromatic hydrocarbons and phthalates. BACKGROUND During the 1970s, the site was used for disposal of construction debris, liquid chemical wastes, and some solidified chemical waste materials. Operations at the site were centered around drum recycling. Some drummed materials were disposed, but only when the drum could not be easily salvaged. As a result, the site contains a wide variety of free-phase chemicals including oily wastes and solvents which combine to form a light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) phase which has been contained and is being recovered. A soil-bentonite slurry wall defines the boundaries of the site and prevents offsite migration of contaminants as illustrated in Figure 1. The area within the slurry wall is known as the exclusion zone. The slurry wall and associated LNAPL recovery and treatment systems are known as the Interim Site Remedy (or 1SR). The Final Site Remedy (or FSR) will commence after ISR operations are completed as determined by the termination of LNAPL recovery. Recovered LNAPL at the site has been shown to contain low levels of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), as well as chlorinated solvents and petroleum distillates. PROCESS DESCRIPTION The Groundwater Treatment System first uses physical-chemical processes to recover LNAPL and remove iron and other scaling agents from site groundwater, then uses biological treatment to remove organic constituents. Treated water is returned to the exclusion zone via an infiltration gallery to facilitate additional flushing of contaminants from site soils. The design flow capacity for the system 49th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1994 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 135 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 135