page 45 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Section Three SITE REMEDIATION A. BIOREMEDIATION AND SITE CLOSURE 7 IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON-CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER AND SOIL BY COMBINATION OF AIR SPARGING AND SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION Samuel S. Hu, Project Engineer Scott L. Lumsden, Project Hydrogeologist Delta Environmental Consultants, Incorporated Farmington Hills, Michigan 48331 INTRODUCTION In-situ remediation and treatment of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated groundwater and soil at a former petroleum product bulk storage tank site in Michigan are being conducted using in-situ groundwater air sparging (AS), soil vapor extraction (SVE), soil vapor treatment (SVT), and air injection (AI) processes. To a certain degree, AS/SVE/AI groundwater and soil remediation processes are being researched in environmental laboratories and implemented at many petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated sites.1,2'3'4,5 In this paper, we present implementation of an AS/SVE/SVT/AI groundwater and soil remediation system at a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated site after an introduction of site geology, hydrogeology, and extent of petroleum hydrocarbon plumes in groundwater and soil. We also present background biodegradation Phase 1 and Phase 2 results, pilot-scale AS/SVE/AI tests, system design, construction, operation and maintenance, system performance monitoring, and site remediation progress monitoring. BACKGROUND Site Remediation Criteria in Michigan Remediation of a contaminated site in Michigan falls under the domain of Michigan Public Act 307, 1982, as amended. Upon definition of the nature of the release, Act 307 has established compound-specific remediation criteria, for which closure goals are set for the site. There are currently three types of clean-up criteria in Michigan for site remedial actions.6 Type A criteria have been established based on laboratory analytical method detection limits (MDL), defined by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). These criteria are solely based on the specified compound analytical methods, and do not take into account achievable cleanup possibilities. Type B remedial criteria have been developed using currently available toxicological and other related data and calculated according to the algorithm set forth in the specific rules. These criteria are also solely based on remediation-related scientific data and there are no considerations with regard to achievable possibilities of site remediation. Type C remedial criteria, however, are site-specific remedial criteria. There are no concentration levels specified in these criteria. These criteria are individually based on site-specific cleanup possibilities and future land use recommendations. 49th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1994 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 45
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199407 |
Title | In-situ bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated groundwater and soil by combination of air sparging and soil vapor extraction |
Author |
Hu, Samuel S. Lumsden, Scott L. |
Date of Original | 1994 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 49th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,44602 |
Extent of Original | p. 45-56 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-10-29 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 45 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Section Three SITE REMEDIATION A. BIOREMEDIATION AND SITE CLOSURE 7 IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON-CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER AND SOIL BY COMBINATION OF AIR SPARGING AND SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION Samuel S. Hu, Project Engineer Scott L. Lumsden, Project Hydrogeologist Delta Environmental Consultants, Incorporated Farmington Hills, Michigan 48331 INTRODUCTION In-situ remediation and treatment of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated groundwater and soil at a former petroleum product bulk storage tank site in Michigan are being conducted using in-situ groundwater air sparging (AS), soil vapor extraction (SVE), soil vapor treatment (SVT), and air injection (AI) processes. To a certain degree, AS/SVE/AI groundwater and soil remediation processes are being researched in environmental laboratories and implemented at many petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated sites.1,2'3'4,5 In this paper, we present implementation of an AS/SVE/SVT/AI groundwater and soil remediation system at a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated site after an introduction of site geology, hydrogeology, and extent of petroleum hydrocarbon plumes in groundwater and soil. We also present background biodegradation Phase 1 and Phase 2 results, pilot-scale AS/SVE/AI tests, system design, construction, operation and maintenance, system performance monitoring, and site remediation progress monitoring. BACKGROUND Site Remediation Criteria in Michigan Remediation of a contaminated site in Michigan falls under the domain of Michigan Public Act 307, 1982, as amended. Upon definition of the nature of the release, Act 307 has established compound-specific remediation criteria, for which closure goals are set for the site. There are currently three types of clean-up criteria in Michigan for site remedial actions.6 Type A criteria have been established based on laboratory analytical method detection limits (MDL), defined by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). These criteria are solely based on the specified compound analytical methods, and do not take into account achievable cleanup possibilities. Type B remedial criteria have been developed using currently available toxicological and other related data and calculated according to the algorithm set forth in the specific rules. These criteria are also solely based on remediation-related scientific data and there are no considerations with regard to achievable possibilities of site remediation. Type C remedial criteria, however, are site-specific remedial criteria. There are no concentration levels specified in these criteria. These criteria are individually based on site-specific cleanup possibilities and future land use recommendations. 49th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1994 Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 45 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 45