page 765 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Section Six INDUSTRIAL WASTES C. FOOD PROCESSING 78 DESIGNING A SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR SYSTEM FOR THE TREATMENT OF HIGH STRENGTH MEAT PROCESSING WASTEWATER Kenneth A. Mikkelson, Manager of Process Engineering Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc. Rockford, Illinois 61130 Kenneth W. Lowery, Chief Operator F.B. Purnell Sausage Co. Simpsonville, Kentucky HISTORY OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT AT F.B. PURNELL SAUSAGE CO. Like many food processors, the F.B. Purnell Sausage Co. employed a flow-through activated sludge system followed by a polishing lagoon for treatment of process and other wastewater. Due to widely varying flows and highly variable organic loading rates, the flow-through system often was unable to produce the required effluent quality. Under such hydraulic and organic loading conditions, Purnell Sausage Co. was not able to meet its effluent discharge permit. In many states, the government has set guidelines whereby the best technology available must be used to meet the goal of zero discharge of pollutants. While the State of Kentucky has not yet imposed such strict discharge limitations, Purnell wanted to ensure that, with the installation of a new wastewater treatment system, the company would have the ability to meet more stringent discharge limitations in the future. SELECTION OF A TREATMENT SYSTEM After investigating several wastewater treatment systems, Purnell's consulting engineer, A.W. Goodman & Associates of New Albany, Indiana, decided on a three-step process. The wastewater treatment system was installed with dissolved air flotation for removal of blood and for grease recovery; and a sequencing batch reactor system for BOD, suspended solids and nitrification. In anticipation of future, more restrictive discharge requirements, Goodman & Associates also recommended the installation of a tertiary sand filter. The SBR process was chosen for several reasons, including: • It requires a minimum amount of land for installation. • Capital costs are significantly less than a flow-through activated sludge system. • It is controlled by microprocessor and requires considerably less operator attention than a comparably sized flow-through activated sludge system. • Its flexibility enables it to be operated for today's discharge requirements and future, more stringent requirements usually without the addition of equipment or additional reactors. The sequencing batch reactor is an activated sludge process in which all treatment steps, including clarification, take place in a single reactor. In a flow-through activated sludge system, the waste flows continuously through a series of basins composed of a minimum of aeration and secondary clarification (Figure 1). Discharge is continuous. In the SBR process, the influent also feeds continuously, but in batches to each SBR reactor (Figure 2). For example, in a two reactor system, 100% of the influent flows to each reactor 50% of the time- 47th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 765
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199278 |
Title | Designing a sequencing batch reactor system for the treatment of high strength meat processing wastewater |
Author |
Mikkelson, Kenneth A. Lowery, Kenneth W. |
Date of Original | 1992 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 47th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,43678 |
Extent of Original | p. 765-774 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-12-10 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 765 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Section Six INDUSTRIAL WASTES C. FOOD PROCESSING 78 DESIGNING A SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR SYSTEM FOR THE TREATMENT OF HIGH STRENGTH MEAT PROCESSING WASTEWATER Kenneth A. Mikkelson, Manager of Process Engineering Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc. Rockford, Illinois 61130 Kenneth W. Lowery, Chief Operator F.B. Purnell Sausage Co. Simpsonville, Kentucky HISTORY OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT AT F.B. PURNELL SAUSAGE CO. Like many food processors, the F.B. Purnell Sausage Co. employed a flow-through activated sludge system followed by a polishing lagoon for treatment of process and other wastewater. Due to widely varying flows and highly variable organic loading rates, the flow-through system often was unable to produce the required effluent quality. Under such hydraulic and organic loading conditions, Purnell Sausage Co. was not able to meet its effluent discharge permit. In many states, the government has set guidelines whereby the best technology available must be used to meet the goal of zero discharge of pollutants. While the State of Kentucky has not yet imposed such strict discharge limitations, Purnell wanted to ensure that, with the installation of a new wastewater treatment system, the company would have the ability to meet more stringent discharge limitations in the future. SELECTION OF A TREATMENT SYSTEM After investigating several wastewater treatment systems, Purnell's consulting engineer, A.W. Goodman & Associates of New Albany, Indiana, decided on a three-step process. The wastewater treatment system was installed with dissolved air flotation for removal of blood and for grease recovery; and a sequencing batch reactor system for BOD, suspended solids and nitrification. In anticipation of future, more restrictive discharge requirements, Goodman & Associates also recommended the installation of a tertiary sand filter. The SBR process was chosen for several reasons, including: • It requires a minimum amount of land for installation. • Capital costs are significantly less than a flow-through activated sludge system. • It is controlled by microprocessor and requires considerably less operator attention than a comparably sized flow-through activated sludge system. • Its flexibility enables it to be operated for today's discharge requirements and future, more stringent requirements usually without the addition of equipment or additional reactors. The sequencing batch reactor is an activated sludge process in which all treatment steps, including clarification, take place in a single reactor. In a flow-through activated sludge system, the waste flows continuously through a series of basins composed of a minimum of aeration and secondary clarification (Figure 1). Discharge is continuous. In the SBR process, the influent also feeds continuously, but in batches to each SBR reactor (Figure 2). For example, in a two reactor system, 100% of the influent flows to each reactor 50% of the time- 47th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 765 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 765