page 545 |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
59 INDUSTRIAL WASTE SLUDGE POND VERTICAL EXPANSION Larry D. Lydick, Regional Engineer-Geosynthetics National Seal Company Aurora, Illinois 60504 David Powell, Sales Engineer Fluid Systems, Inc. Cincinnati, Ohio 45246 INTRODUCTION Many industrial facilities, such as chemical petrochemical, power generation, and wastewater treatment plants across the U.S. produce by-products known as sludge. This sludge is typically disposed into ponds, lagoons, or landfill cells. Quite frequently, these disposal facilities are located on the manufacturer's property. Many of these disposal facilities are rapidly approaching capacity. In order to continue to operate efficiently, these facilities must provide added capacity, in a short period of time. In today's environmentally conscious society, alternatives to land disposal are a priority. However, up to this point, many manufacturing methods do not permit by-product free processes. Therefore, until technology and economics dictate otherwise, sludge disposal facilities need to be designed and constructed as effectively as possible. PROBLEM The chemical company mentioned above disposes of its sludge in their own disposal facility. This facility was performing adequately, however it was nearing capacity. Approximately one month of disposal capacity remained. A quick, yet sound, economical, and long lasting solution to the problem was needed. POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS The company had several possible solutions to their disposal capacity problem. The solutions evaluated were: Permit a New Site Permitting a new site is an option which allows a company to utilize the most current technology for the lining system providing maximum environmental protection. And it affords potential for maximum available capacity the drawbacks are many. The permitting process for new sites is lengthy. It can take a year or more to site, design and approve a disposal facility. The expenses incurred for the permitting process are often prohibitive. Finally, it requires land which may be better suited for other use. Chemical Stabilization Using chemicals to stabilize sludge is often only marginally effective. It does allow for expansion of a current cell without expanding its footprint leaving other valuable land for other use. Permit modification is normally all that is required for this method. But again there are some disadvantages. Chemical stabilization is only effective for the top 15-20 feet. This company's average pond depth was 45 feet with 54 feet being the maximum depth. A chemical design must, also, be carried out to assure compatibility of the sludge with the additives to be used. This process is quite expensive in comparison to other alternatives. 47th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 545
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199259 |
Title | Industrial waste sludge pond vertical expansion |
Author |
Lydick, Larry D. Powell, David |
Date of Original | 1992 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 47th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,43678 |
Extent of Original | p. 545-548 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-12-10 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 545 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 59 INDUSTRIAL WASTE SLUDGE POND VERTICAL EXPANSION Larry D. Lydick, Regional Engineer-Geosynthetics National Seal Company Aurora, Illinois 60504 David Powell, Sales Engineer Fluid Systems, Inc. Cincinnati, Ohio 45246 INTRODUCTION Many industrial facilities, such as chemical petrochemical, power generation, and wastewater treatment plants across the U.S. produce by-products known as sludge. This sludge is typically disposed into ponds, lagoons, or landfill cells. Quite frequently, these disposal facilities are located on the manufacturer's property. Many of these disposal facilities are rapidly approaching capacity. In order to continue to operate efficiently, these facilities must provide added capacity, in a short period of time. In today's environmentally conscious society, alternatives to land disposal are a priority. However, up to this point, many manufacturing methods do not permit by-product free processes. Therefore, until technology and economics dictate otherwise, sludge disposal facilities need to be designed and constructed as effectively as possible. PROBLEM The chemical company mentioned above disposes of its sludge in their own disposal facility. This facility was performing adequately, however it was nearing capacity. Approximately one month of disposal capacity remained. A quick, yet sound, economical, and long lasting solution to the problem was needed. POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS The company had several possible solutions to their disposal capacity problem. The solutions evaluated were: Permit a New Site Permitting a new site is an option which allows a company to utilize the most current technology for the lining system providing maximum environmental protection. And it affords potential for maximum available capacity the drawbacks are many. The permitting process for new sites is lengthy. It can take a year or more to site, design and approve a disposal facility. The expenses incurred for the permitting process are often prohibitive. Finally, it requires land which may be better suited for other use. Chemical Stabilization Using chemicals to stabilize sludge is often only marginally effective. It does allow for expansion of a current cell without expanding its footprint leaving other valuable land for other use. Permit modification is normally all that is required for this method. But again there are some disadvantages. Chemical stabilization is only effective for the top 15-20 feet. This company's average pond depth was 45 feet with 54 feet being the maximum depth. A chemical design must, also, be carried out to assure compatibility of the sludge with the additives to be used. This process is quite expensive in comparison to other alternatives. 47th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 545 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 545