page 49 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
7 A NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY GUIDELINES BASED ON BIOAVAILABILITY IN NATURAL WATERS: CASE STUDY "ZINC" Ralph J. Magliette, Chemical Engineer D. McKinney, Chemical Engineering Technician E. S. Venkataramani, Research Fellow S. Bacher, Director, Developmental Technology Merck & Co., Inc Rahway, NJ 07065-0900 F. G. Doherty, Manager, Aquatic Toxicology Syracuse Research Corporation Syracuse, NY 13210 INTRODUCTION The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has formulated surface water quality criteria to protect aquatic life from toxic concentrations of 14 metals. Many states have adopted these criteria, carte blanche, with little modification to represent site/state-specific conditions. This despite that under Section 303 of the Clean Water Act, state-specific surface water quality standards were to be implemented by each state. The 1987 Clean Water Act Amendments required the EPA and the states to emphasize the attainment of water quality standards and designated water uses, especially for toxic pollutants in all freshwater systems. As a result there has been increased emphasis on establishing NPDES permit limits for metals (including zinc) based upon state water quality standards. Many states adopted the EPA criteria for metals. These water quality criteria for metals have been developed from laboratory data, generated by the EPA at the Environmental Research Laboratory in Duluth, Minnesota. Several publications from Mount and Norberg (1984)1 and Norberg and Mount (1985)2 for effluent testing provided the basis for the testing protocols and discharge limits. The procedures and scope of aquatic toxicity evaluations were formalized in two documents, namely the EPA "Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine Organisms" (1985)3 and the Quality Criteria for Water (1986)4. The aim was to conduct aquatic toxicity tests under controlled conditions using synthesized reconstituted water which is essentially free of suspended solids and organic constituents that could interact with the metals being tested. Use of the laboratory-based water quality criteria to establish surface water quality standards, and the subsequent application of these standards to calculate water quality-based limits for NPDES permits results, in some cases, in permit limits that are so low as to be technically unachievable. The criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for zinc is 47 mcg/L. Surface water data that has been collected and analyzed have indicated that EPA criteria for zinc are exceeded in many natural surface waters. Faust and Ally (1983)5 have found zinc (3-2000 mcg/L) in drinking water. Brown, et al. (1983)6 has found that most U.S. soil contain between 10-300 mg/L zinc. These references indicate that exceeding the EPA CCC for zinc by a several fold factor does not appear to affect the ecosystem health of the particular surface water under evaluation. The discrepancy between the toxic effects of zinc in laboratory tests on daphnia and fathead minnows as reported in the literature and seen in surface waters is due in large part due to differences in the physical and chemical forms of zinc in the two environments. When viewed in the context of toxicity of a metal to aquatic organisms, the bioavailable fraction of the metal induces the adverse response. Zinc complexes which are in a non- bioavailable form will not contribute to the toxicity to aquatic life and are irrelevant in the protection of an aquatic ecosystem as long as the aquatic community is healthy. The laboratory tests that are used by the EPA to develop the aquatic life criteria typically contain the substance being tested in a bioavailable form. This approach is used to minimize the uncertainty in 47th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 49
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199207 |
Title | Need for environmental quality guidelines based on bioavailability in natural waters : case study "zinc" |
Author |
Magliette, Ralph J. McKinney, D. Venkataramani, E. S. Bacher, S. Doherty, F. G. |
Date of Original | 1992 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 47th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,43678 |
Extent of Original | p. 49-60 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-12-10 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 49 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 7 A NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY GUIDELINES BASED ON BIOAVAILABILITY IN NATURAL WATERS: CASE STUDY "ZINC" Ralph J. Magliette, Chemical Engineer D. McKinney, Chemical Engineering Technician E. S. Venkataramani, Research Fellow S. Bacher, Director, Developmental Technology Merck & Co., Inc Rahway, NJ 07065-0900 F. G. Doherty, Manager, Aquatic Toxicology Syracuse Research Corporation Syracuse, NY 13210 INTRODUCTION The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has formulated surface water quality criteria to protect aquatic life from toxic concentrations of 14 metals. Many states have adopted these criteria, carte blanche, with little modification to represent site/state-specific conditions. This despite that under Section 303 of the Clean Water Act, state-specific surface water quality standards were to be implemented by each state. The 1987 Clean Water Act Amendments required the EPA and the states to emphasize the attainment of water quality standards and designated water uses, especially for toxic pollutants in all freshwater systems. As a result there has been increased emphasis on establishing NPDES permit limits for metals (including zinc) based upon state water quality standards. Many states adopted the EPA criteria for metals. These water quality criteria for metals have been developed from laboratory data, generated by the EPA at the Environmental Research Laboratory in Duluth, Minnesota. Several publications from Mount and Norberg (1984)1 and Norberg and Mount (1985)2 for effluent testing provided the basis for the testing protocols and discharge limits. The procedures and scope of aquatic toxicity evaluations were formalized in two documents, namely the EPA "Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine Organisms" (1985)3 and the Quality Criteria for Water (1986)4. The aim was to conduct aquatic toxicity tests under controlled conditions using synthesized reconstituted water which is essentially free of suspended solids and organic constituents that could interact with the metals being tested. Use of the laboratory-based water quality criteria to establish surface water quality standards, and the subsequent application of these standards to calculate water quality-based limits for NPDES permits results, in some cases, in permit limits that are so low as to be technically unachievable. The criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for zinc is 47 mcg/L. Surface water data that has been collected and analyzed have indicated that EPA criteria for zinc are exceeded in many natural surface waters. Faust and Ally (1983)5 have found zinc (3-2000 mcg/L) in drinking water. Brown, et al. (1983)6 has found that most U.S. soil contain between 10-300 mg/L zinc. These references indicate that exceeding the EPA CCC for zinc by a several fold factor does not appear to affect the ecosystem health of the particular surface water under evaluation. The discrepancy between the toxic effects of zinc in laboratory tests on daphnia and fathead minnows as reported in the literature and seen in surface waters is due in large part due to differences in the physical and chemical forms of zinc in the two environments. When viewed in the context of toxicity of a metal to aquatic organisms, the bioavailable fraction of the metal induces the adverse response. Zinc complexes which are in a non- bioavailable form will not contribute to the toxicity to aquatic life and are irrelevant in the protection of an aquatic ecosystem as long as the aquatic community is healthy. The laboratory tests that are used by the EPA to develop the aquatic life criteria typically contain the substance being tested in a bioavailable form. This approach is used to minimize the uncertainty in 47th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 49 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 49