page 563 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
58 TREATMENT OF METAL-CONTAINING WASTEWATERS BY CARBON ADSORPTION OF METAL-CHELATE COMPLEXES Margaret A. Shay, Project Engineer Heritage Remediation/Engineering, Inc. Indianapolis, Indiana 46241 James E. Etzel, Professor Emeritus School of Civil Engineering Department of Environmental Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 INTRODUCTION Heavy metals are present in many industrial wastewaters. In 1983, an estimated 7.9 billion gallons of heavy metal bearing wastewaters were generated in the United States.1 Heavy metals which are present in industrial wastewater above defined legal limits must be removed before discharge to a receiving stream or a publicly owned treatment works. The most common technique for removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater is by precipitation as the hydroxide or sulfide salt. This method is used by approximately 75% of the electroplating facilities treating heavy metal bearing wastewaters.1 Most facilities use hydroxide as the precipitant. Disadvantages include solubility constraints of the heavy metal hydroxides, difficulty with stabilizing heavy metal hydroxide sludge to make it non-leachable, ineffective removal of mixed heavy metals due to differing minimum hydroxide solubilities, and interferences associated with complexing agents such as EDTA. To eliminate difficulties associated with complexing agents, this project investigated the feasibility of a process which utilized chelating agents in the removal of heavy metals. Heavy metal ions were removed from wastewater by adsorption of heavy metal-chelating agent complexes onto activated carbon. In this process, chelating agents which might be present in the wastewater would enhance removal of heavy metals, rather than interfere. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS Column tests were run to determine whether chelated heavy metals could be removed from solution by adsorption onto activated carbon. Fifty-milliliter burets were filled to the 25-mL mark with activated carbon, for a total carbon height of approximately 12 inches. The test heavy metal solution was run through the column at a selected contact time. The test solutions were prepared within 24 hours of running the experiment from a stock solution of heavy metal sulfate (Cu, Ni, or Zn) that was diluted with deionized (DI) water to the desired metal concentration. The concentration was checked by atomic adsorption spectroscopy (AAS). Chelating agent was added in a given molar ratio to the test heavy metal solution and the mixture stirred until the chelating agent dissolved. Time was allowed for the reactions between the heavy metal and the chelating agent to occur before the experiments were run. The solution was then passed through the carbon column at a pre-selected flow rate, regulated by adjusting the buret stopcock. All the studies reported were conducted at room temperature (20° to 23°C). No attempt was made to investigate the effect of temperature on the removal of heavy metals. The effluent from the column was collected in fractions and analyzed for heavy metals by AAS, employing Standard Methods Part 300.2 The heavy metals analyses were done immediately following the test to minimize errors due to evaporation or wall adsorption. If it was necessary to store the samples, a small amount of concentrated HNOj was added.2 46th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 563
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199158 |
Title | Treatment of metal-containing wastewaters by carbon adsorption of metal-chelate complexes |
Author |
Shay, Margaret A. Etzel, James E. |
Date of Original | 1991 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 46th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,42649 |
Extent of Original | p. 563-570 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-11-24 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 563 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 58 TREATMENT OF METAL-CONTAINING WASTEWATERS BY CARBON ADSORPTION OF METAL-CHELATE COMPLEXES Margaret A. Shay, Project Engineer Heritage Remediation/Engineering, Inc. Indianapolis, Indiana 46241 James E. Etzel, Professor Emeritus School of Civil Engineering Department of Environmental Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 INTRODUCTION Heavy metals are present in many industrial wastewaters. In 1983, an estimated 7.9 billion gallons of heavy metal bearing wastewaters were generated in the United States.1 Heavy metals which are present in industrial wastewater above defined legal limits must be removed before discharge to a receiving stream or a publicly owned treatment works. The most common technique for removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater is by precipitation as the hydroxide or sulfide salt. This method is used by approximately 75% of the electroplating facilities treating heavy metal bearing wastewaters.1 Most facilities use hydroxide as the precipitant. Disadvantages include solubility constraints of the heavy metal hydroxides, difficulty with stabilizing heavy metal hydroxide sludge to make it non-leachable, ineffective removal of mixed heavy metals due to differing minimum hydroxide solubilities, and interferences associated with complexing agents such as EDTA. To eliminate difficulties associated with complexing agents, this project investigated the feasibility of a process which utilized chelating agents in the removal of heavy metals. Heavy metal ions were removed from wastewater by adsorption of heavy metal-chelating agent complexes onto activated carbon. In this process, chelating agents which might be present in the wastewater would enhance removal of heavy metals, rather than interfere. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS Column tests were run to determine whether chelated heavy metals could be removed from solution by adsorption onto activated carbon. Fifty-milliliter burets were filled to the 25-mL mark with activated carbon, for a total carbon height of approximately 12 inches. The test heavy metal solution was run through the column at a selected contact time. The test solutions were prepared within 24 hours of running the experiment from a stock solution of heavy metal sulfate (Cu, Ni, or Zn) that was diluted with deionized (DI) water to the desired metal concentration. The concentration was checked by atomic adsorption spectroscopy (AAS). Chelating agent was added in a given molar ratio to the test heavy metal solution and the mixture stirred until the chelating agent dissolved. Time was allowed for the reactions between the heavy metal and the chelating agent to occur before the experiments were run. The solution was then passed through the carbon column at a pre-selected flow rate, regulated by adjusting the buret stopcock. All the studies reported were conducted at room temperature (20° to 23°C). No attempt was made to investigate the effect of temperature on the removal of heavy metals. The effluent from the column was collected in fractions and analyzed for heavy metals by AAS, employing Standard Methods Part 300.2 The heavy metals analyses were done immediately following the test to minimize errors due to evaporation or wall adsorption. If it was necessary to store the samples, a small amount of concentrated HNOj was added.2 46th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 563 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 563