page 141 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Section Two INDUSTRIAL WASTES A. GENERAL 15 A MATHEMATICAL MODELING APPROACH TO SIZING DIVERSION BASINS FOR INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES Alison M. Martin, Senior Engineer Tommy Martin, Associate Engineer James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. Metairie, Louisiana 70002 INTRODUCTION Industrial organic chemical manufacturing facilities, particularly those that use batch production processes, produce wastewater of very high variability in both organic loading and flow. Typically, an industrial wastewater treatment plant uses an upstream equalization basin to help dampen flow rates and organic loads. This is particularly important in the case of biological treatment (such as activated sludge or fixed-film bioreactors), because these systems can be very sensitive to organic shock loadings. Generally, an on-line equalization basin is designed primarily for flow equalization. Organic load dampening is a result of this flow equalization. Many facilities have determined, however, that a separate basin is also necessary to divert high organic load flows for subsequent controlled return to the equalization basin. This diversion and retention of high organic load flows results in a reduction or "shaving" of peak organic loads. Additionally, many plants manufacture chemicals that are toxic to biosystems even at relatively low loadings; a separate, off-line storage basin (or diversion basin) may be required so that potentially toxic streams can be slowly bled back into the treatment system. In the design of a new biological wastewater treatment system, a trade off exists between the sizes of the aeration, equalization, and diversion basins. The size and operating costs of the aeration basin are minimized if organic peaking can be held relatively low. However, the corresponding sizes of the diversion and equalization basins will be larger. A careful economic analysis of different alternatives in tank sizing is important in any new design in order to optimize capacity and reduce cost. Traditionally, sizing of biological unit processes and equalization basins for flow dampening is a fairly straightforward procedure. However, the sizing of an off-line diversion basin is a technique that is still rather "black box". A computer model has been developed that rapidly calculates the diversion basin size required for a set of flow and organic concentration data with user input system constraints. This model takes the guesswork out of the sizing procedure and can be used to check diversion basin sizes determined by other methods. BACKGROUND Typical design of equalization basins for municipal facilities is based on flow equalization. Determination of equalization basin size, using historical diurnal flow rates, is a straightforward procedure. The use of schematic mass diagrams is the classical sanitary engineering method for sizing these basins.1 Wastewater generated at industrial facilities, however, cannot be easily characterized due to high variability in flows and organic loadings. Therefore, sizing of equalization basins for these facilities may be based on flow, organic loading, or both parameters. When both parameters are used, the resulting more conservative design (larger basin) is selected. For industrial facility equalization basin sizing based on organic loading, more recent methods have been developed. A new biological treatment facility at the Tennessee Eastman Company plant in Kingsport, Tennessee, utilized a peaking factor method for the sizing of diversion and equalization 46th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 141
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199115 |
Title | Mathematical modeling approach to sizing diversion basins for industrial facilities |
Author |
Martin, Alison M. Martin, Tommy Montgomery, James M. |
Date of Original | 1991 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 46th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,42649 |
Extent of Original | p. 141-152 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-11-24 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 141 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Section Two INDUSTRIAL WASTES A. GENERAL 15 A MATHEMATICAL MODELING APPROACH TO SIZING DIVERSION BASINS FOR INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES Alison M. Martin, Senior Engineer Tommy Martin, Associate Engineer James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. Metairie, Louisiana 70002 INTRODUCTION Industrial organic chemical manufacturing facilities, particularly those that use batch production processes, produce wastewater of very high variability in both organic loading and flow. Typically, an industrial wastewater treatment plant uses an upstream equalization basin to help dampen flow rates and organic loads. This is particularly important in the case of biological treatment (such as activated sludge or fixed-film bioreactors), because these systems can be very sensitive to organic shock loadings. Generally, an on-line equalization basin is designed primarily for flow equalization. Organic load dampening is a result of this flow equalization. Many facilities have determined, however, that a separate basin is also necessary to divert high organic load flows for subsequent controlled return to the equalization basin. This diversion and retention of high organic load flows results in a reduction or "shaving" of peak organic loads. Additionally, many plants manufacture chemicals that are toxic to biosystems even at relatively low loadings; a separate, off-line storage basin (or diversion basin) may be required so that potentially toxic streams can be slowly bled back into the treatment system. In the design of a new biological wastewater treatment system, a trade off exists between the sizes of the aeration, equalization, and diversion basins. The size and operating costs of the aeration basin are minimized if organic peaking can be held relatively low. However, the corresponding sizes of the diversion and equalization basins will be larger. A careful economic analysis of different alternatives in tank sizing is important in any new design in order to optimize capacity and reduce cost. Traditionally, sizing of biological unit processes and equalization basins for flow dampening is a fairly straightforward procedure. However, the sizing of an off-line diversion basin is a technique that is still rather "black box". A computer model has been developed that rapidly calculates the diversion basin size required for a set of flow and organic concentration data with user input system constraints. This model takes the guesswork out of the sizing procedure and can be used to check diversion basin sizes determined by other methods. BACKGROUND Typical design of equalization basins for municipal facilities is based on flow equalization. Determination of equalization basin size, using historical diurnal flow rates, is a straightforward procedure. The use of schematic mass diagrams is the classical sanitary engineering method for sizing these basins.1 Wastewater generated at industrial facilities, however, cannot be easily characterized due to high variability in flows and organic loadings. Therefore, sizing of equalization basins for these facilities may be based on flow, organic loading, or both parameters. When both parameters are used, the resulting more conservative design (larger basin) is selected. For industrial facility equalization basin sizing based on organic loading, more recent methods have been developed. A new biological treatment facility at the Tennessee Eastman Company plant in Kingsport, Tennessee, utilized a peaking factor method for the sizing of diversion and equalization 46th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 141 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 141