page 131 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
14 EVALUATING TRANSPORT OF ORGANIC CHEMICALS IN SOIL RESULTING FROM UNDERGROUND FUEL TANK LEAKS Dar-Yuan Lee, Assistant Professor, National Taiwan University Taiwan Republic of China A. C. Chang, Professor University of California, Riverside Riverside, California 92521 INTRODUCTION Leaking underground fuel storage tanks (LUFT) contaminate the surrounding soil with potentially harmful organic chemicals which, migrating through the vadose zone, may be a threat to the groundwater quality. Approximately 78% of the nation's 3 million underground storage tanks are used to store petroleum fuel products.1,2 A survey of underground fuel storage tanks conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found leaks in 35% of those tested.3 The gasoline storage tanks accounted for the majority of the leaking underground storage tanks in California.4 Once a leak is detected, the situation must be appraised whether the LUFT is causing or will cause groundwater pollution. A decision can then be made on the appropriate cleanup or remedial actions. Petroleum-based fuels are complex mixtures of hydrocarbons. For example, gasoline is a mixture of over 200 petroleum-derived chemicals and several synthetic performance enhancement additives. The transport behavior of these petroleum hydrocarbons in soils is not well understood. Tracking the movement of escaped petroleum fuel through both the unsaturated zone and the saturated zone are difficult,5 because the chemical's possible reactions with various phases in the soil are complex and experimental data is inadequate. The solute transport in the presence of a nonaqueous phase organic liquid (NAPL) phase, such as the gasoline leaking out of a storage tank, requires further articulation as the ordinary solute transport equations are derived only for chemicals partitioned between an aqueous liquid and a solid phase.6 In this paper, we illustrate the limitations in using the current solute transport modeling approaches to estimate mobility of selected petroleum fuel components of gasoline in soils. General Approaches of Estimating the Movement of Fuel Components in Soil Many solute transport models have been developed to simulate the movement of organic compounds in the unsaturated zone. These models considered, however, only the migration of a single solute in an aqueous phase which is absent of other reacting components. In the case of a LUFT, there exists, in addition to the aqueous phase, a NAPL which consists of a large number of petroleum- related hydrocarbons. Because of the added nonaqueous phase, the solute transport process involves two immiscible liquid phases and is more complicated to describe mathematically than that of the traditional single-solute aqueous phase-only system. There are two complications. First, one must consider the mass flow of the nonaqueous liquid phase (gasoline in this case) as well as the aqueous liquid phase (water) in the soil matrix. Second, the extent to which an organic chemical present in the NAPL may partition into the air and the water phases. With more phases acting as the vehicles of transport, chemicals often move at a more rapid rate than what occurs in the aqueous phase alone.5 Two approaches have been suggested to describe the transport of hydrocarbons of the petroleum fuel in the vadose zone. One approach assumes the fuel constituents are dissolved in water and are transported by advection flow of water and the presence of a NAPL phase may be ignored. The second approach considers that the fuel constituents are partitioned between a water phase and a NAPL phase and they are transported by two streams of immiscible flows.8 This approach is realistic, but the governing equation is mathematically complicated and many parameters in the equation are 46th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 131
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199114 |
Title | Evaluating transport of organic chemicals in soil resulting from underground fuel tank leaks |
Author |
Lee, Dar-Yuan Chang, A. C. |
Date of Original | 1991 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 46th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,42649 |
Extent of Original | p. 131-140 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-11-24 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 131 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 14 EVALUATING TRANSPORT OF ORGANIC CHEMICALS IN SOIL RESULTING FROM UNDERGROUND FUEL TANK LEAKS Dar-Yuan Lee, Assistant Professor, National Taiwan University Taiwan Republic of China A. C. Chang, Professor University of California, Riverside Riverside, California 92521 INTRODUCTION Leaking underground fuel storage tanks (LUFT) contaminate the surrounding soil with potentially harmful organic chemicals which, migrating through the vadose zone, may be a threat to the groundwater quality. Approximately 78% of the nation's 3 million underground storage tanks are used to store petroleum fuel products.1,2 A survey of underground fuel storage tanks conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found leaks in 35% of those tested.3 The gasoline storage tanks accounted for the majority of the leaking underground storage tanks in California.4 Once a leak is detected, the situation must be appraised whether the LUFT is causing or will cause groundwater pollution. A decision can then be made on the appropriate cleanup or remedial actions. Petroleum-based fuels are complex mixtures of hydrocarbons. For example, gasoline is a mixture of over 200 petroleum-derived chemicals and several synthetic performance enhancement additives. The transport behavior of these petroleum hydrocarbons in soils is not well understood. Tracking the movement of escaped petroleum fuel through both the unsaturated zone and the saturated zone are difficult,5 because the chemical's possible reactions with various phases in the soil are complex and experimental data is inadequate. The solute transport in the presence of a nonaqueous phase organic liquid (NAPL) phase, such as the gasoline leaking out of a storage tank, requires further articulation as the ordinary solute transport equations are derived only for chemicals partitioned between an aqueous liquid and a solid phase.6 In this paper, we illustrate the limitations in using the current solute transport modeling approaches to estimate mobility of selected petroleum fuel components of gasoline in soils. General Approaches of Estimating the Movement of Fuel Components in Soil Many solute transport models have been developed to simulate the movement of organic compounds in the unsaturated zone. These models considered, however, only the migration of a single solute in an aqueous phase which is absent of other reacting components. In the case of a LUFT, there exists, in addition to the aqueous phase, a NAPL which consists of a large number of petroleum- related hydrocarbons. Because of the added nonaqueous phase, the solute transport process involves two immiscible liquid phases and is more complicated to describe mathematically than that of the traditional single-solute aqueous phase-only system. There are two complications. First, one must consider the mass flow of the nonaqueous liquid phase (gasoline in this case) as well as the aqueous liquid phase (water) in the soil matrix. Second, the extent to which an organic chemical present in the NAPL may partition into the air and the water phases. With more phases acting as the vehicles of transport, chemicals often move at a more rapid rate than what occurs in the aqueous phase alone.5 Two approaches have been suggested to describe the transport of hydrocarbons of the petroleum fuel in the vadose zone. One approach assumes the fuel constituents are dissolved in water and are transported by advection flow of water and the presence of a NAPL phase may be ignored. The second approach considers that the fuel constituents are partitioned between a water phase and a NAPL phase and they are transported by two streams of immiscible flows.8 This approach is realistic, but the governing equation is mathematically complicated and many parameters in the equation are 46th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 131 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 131