page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Section One REMEDIATION 1 EPA'S APPROACH TO DEVELOPMENT OF LDR STANDARDS FOR CONTAMINATED SOIL AND DEBRIS Mackenzie L. Davis, Associate Professor Michigan State University East Lansing, MI Gene P. Chou, Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY HISTORY The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) directed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) for RCRA characteristic and listed hazardous wastes based on Best Demonstrated Available Technologies (BDAT). In May 1990, EPA completed promulgating regulations for the final Third of the original list of these wastes. The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) which continues the program begun in 1980 by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CER- CLA) mandates that contaminated soil and debris (CSD) be treated to meet all Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Regulations (ARARs). For LDRs to be ARARs, a CERCLA response action must constitute placement of a restricted RCRA hazardous waste. LDRs are generally applicable to contaminated soil and debris generated from corrective actions and closures at RCRA regulated land disposal sites, remedial and removal actions at CERCLA (Superfund) regulated land disposal sites and private cleanups. EPA has determined that contaminated soil and debris are generally more difficult to treat uniformly than more homogeneous RCRA industrial wastes and that LDRs for listed wastes are not relevant and appropriate for soil and debris contaminated with non-RCRA hazardous wastes'. When the LDRs apply, compliance will involve either meeting the BDAT treatment standards (hereafter referred to as "standards"), other LDR restrictions (soft hammers), or satisfying the requirements of one of the other alternate LDR compliance options (e.g., Treatability Variance, Equivalent Treatment Method Petition). A Treatability Variance does not remove the requirement to treat restricted contaminated soil and debris. Rather, under a treatability variance, alternate treatment levels are established based on data from actual treatment of contaminated soil or best management practices for contaminated debris. Existing treatment data have been used to develop interim guidance treatment levels1,2 as a basis for granting treatability variances. This interim guidance is intended to be used until EPA can collect sufficient data on treatment technologies to establish standards. DEFINITIONS EPA has used several definitions of soil and debris in the preamble language of the LDR rules for the First, Second and Third wastes.3,4,5 Definitions were also developed for and discussed in several CERCLA guidance documents, e.g., Superfund LDR Guides #6A and #6B,1,2 the Technology Screening Guide for Treatment of CERCLA Soils and Sludges6 and the Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under CERCLA, Interim Final.7 These definitions were developed for clarification of regulations and guidance. None are regulatory definitions. EPA has used these definitions as a guide to develop definitions for forthcoming regulations. EPA's preliminary regulatory definitions for soil, contaminated soil, debris, and contaminated debris are 46th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A.
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199101 |
Title | EPA's approach to development of LDR standards for contaminated soil and debris |
Author |
Davis, Mackenzie L. Chou, Gene P. |
Date of Original | 1991 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 46th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,42649 |
Extent of Original | p. 1-10 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-11-24 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 1 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Section One REMEDIATION 1 EPA'S APPROACH TO DEVELOPMENT OF LDR STANDARDS FOR CONTAMINATED SOIL AND DEBRIS Mackenzie L. Davis, Associate Professor Michigan State University East Lansing, MI Gene P. Chou, Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY HISTORY The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) directed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) for RCRA characteristic and listed hazardous wastes based on Best Demonstrated Available Technologies (BDAT). In May 1990, EPA completed promulgating regulations for the final Third of the original list of these wastes. The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) which continues the program begun in 1980 by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CER- CLA) mandates that contaminated soil and debris (CSD) be treated to meet all Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Regulations (ARARs). For LDRs to be ARARs, a CERCLA response action must constitute placement of a restricted RCRA hazardous waste. LDRs are generally applicable to contaminated soil and debris generated from corrective actions and closures at RCRA regulated land disposal sites, remedial and removal actions at CERCLA (Superfund) regulated land disposal sites and private cleanups. EPA has determined that contaminated soil and debris are generally more difficult to treat uniformly than more homogeneous RCRA industrial wastes and that LDRs for listed wastes are not relevant and appropriate for soil and debris contaminated with non-RCRA hazardous wastes'. When the LDRs apply, compliance will involve either meeting the BDAT treatment standards (hereafter referred to as "standards"), other LDR restrictions (soft hammers), or satisfying the requirements of one of the other alternate LDR compliance options (e.g., Treatability Variance, Equivalent Treatment Method Petition). A Treatability Variance does not remove the requirement to treat restricted contaminated soil and debris. Rather, under a treatability variance, alternate treatment levels are established based on data from actual treatment of contaminated soil or best management practices for contaminated debris. Existing treatment data have been used to develop interim guidance treatment levels1,2 as a basis for granting treatability variances. This interim guidance is intended to be used until EPA can collect sufficient data on treatment technologies to establish standards. DEFINITIONS EPA has used several definitions of soil and debris in the preamble language of the LDR rules for the First, Second and Third wastes.3,4,5 Definitions were also developed for and discussed in several CERCLA guidance documents, e.g., Superfund LDR Guides #6A and #6B,1,2 the Technology Screening Guide for Treatment of CERCLA Soils and Sludges6 and the Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under CERCLA, Interim Final.7 These definitions were developed for clarification of regulations and guidance. None are regulatory definitions. EPA has used these definitions as a guide to develop definitions for forthcoming regulations. EPA's preliminary regulatory definitions for soil, contaminated soil, debris, and contaminated debris are 46th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1992 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 1