page 705 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
82 MANAGING SOLID RESIDUES FROM A TREATMENT PROCESS FOR PRIORITY METALS Douglas T. Merrill, Managing Engineer Brown and Caldwell Consultants Pleasant Hill, California 94523 Mary E. McLearn, Senior Project Manager Electric Power Research Institute Palo Alto, California 94303 Iron adsorption/coprecipitation is an economical process that, under the appropriate conditions, can remove dissolved and particulate priority metals to the extremely low concentrations now being required by regulatory agencies.'•2'3,4 Treatment involves adding an iron salt such as ferric chloride to the water, unless the water contains sufficient dissolved iron already. An amorphous iron oxyhydrox- ide precipitate then forms, as shown in Equation 1. FeCl3 + 3H20 *-Fe(OH)3 \ +3H++3CL (1) The metals are trapped within (coprecipitated) and adsorbed onto the precipitate, which then settles out, leaving a purified effluent. Removals are pH-dependent, with anionic species, (for example, arsenic and selenium) removed best at pH 6 or below and cationic species (for example, zinc, cadmium, and nickel) best removed at pH 7 and above. The technology's metal-removal effectiveness is due in part to iron oxyhydroxide's large adsorptive surface. The literature reports specific surface values of approximately 200 to 800 m2/gr.' However, such large-surface solids are a challenge to concentrate, because they release water grudgingly. In our studies, underflow solids concentrations from sedimentation tanks were 1 to 2% at best. We have used gravity thickening to increase solids concentrations to 5 to 8%, but concentrations of 1 to 3% were more typical. Solids concentrations for cakes produced by pressure filtration varied widely. We have produced cakes with concentrations as high as 40% solids and as low as 6% solids. This paper summarizes what we have learned about management of iron oxyhydroxide sludges from 12 years of bench- and pilot-scale testing. The paper covers: • Methods for predicting solids production • Solids thickening techniques • Solids dewatering and drying procedures • Results of hazardous waste toxicity evaluations • Effects of sludge leachate on clay landfill liners and the effects of the liners on leachate composition • Reuse of iron oxyhydroxide solids ESTIMATING SOLIDS PRODUCTION In this paper, we define solids production as the quantity of solids (free water excluded) generated by waste treatment operations. Total solids production includes native wastewater solids, solids generated by chemical precipitation, bound water* associated with hydroxide sludges, and sludge conditioners. The solids produced are discharged in the waste sludge and in the process effluent. If solids separators are performing adequately, solids production is approximately the weight of solids (free water excluded) that the sludge management system must process and dispose of. Equation 2 is a simplified formula for estimating approximate solids production: Pp = [S+H(l+A)] [1+CJ (2) 45th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1991 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. ♦Bound water is defined here as water that is not released from the solids at the temperature of the standard moisture analysis (105° C ) but is released upon heating at 550° C. Bound water is counted as a solid in the standard moisture analysis. 705
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199082 |
Title | Managing solid residues from a treatment process for priority metals |
Author |
Merrill, Douglas T. McLearn, Mary E. |
Date of Original | 1990 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 45th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,41605 |
Extent of Original | p. 705-714 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-08-20 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 705 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 82 MANAGING SOLID RESIDUES FROM A TREATMENT PROCESS FOR PRIORITY METALS Douglas T. Merrill, Managing Engineer Brown and Caldwell Consultants Pleasant Hill, California 94523 Mary E. McLearn, Senior Project Manager Electric Power Research Institute Palo Alto, California 94303 Iron adsorption/coprecipitation is an economical process that, under the appropriate conditions, can remove dissolved and particulate priority metals to the extremely low concentrations now being required by regulatory agencies.'•2'3,4 Treatment involves adding an iron salt such as ferric chloride to the water, unless the water contains sufficient dissolved iron already. An amorphous iron oxyhydrox- ide precipitate then forms, as shown in Equation 1. FeCl3 + 3H20 *-Fe(OH)3 \ +3H++3CL (1) The metals are trapped within (coprecipitated) and adsorbed onto the precipitate, which then settles out, leaving a purified effluent. Removals are pH-dependent, with anionic species, (for example, arsenic and selenium) removed best at pH 6 or below and cationic species (for example, zinc, cadmium, and nickel) best removed at pH 7 and above. The technology's metal-removal effectiveness is due in part to iron oxyhydroxide's large adsorptive surface. The literature reports specific surface values of approximately 200 to 800 m2/gr.' However, such large-surface solids are a challenge to concentrate, because they release water grudgingly. In our studies, underflow solids concentrations from sedimentation tanks were 1 to 2% at best. We have used gravity thickening to increase solids concentrations to 5 to 8%, but concentrations of 1 to 3% were more typical. Solids concentrations for cakes produced by pressure filtration varied widely. We have produced cakes with concentrations as high as 40% solids and as low as 6% solids. This paper summarizes what we have learned about management of iron oxyhydroxide sludges from 12 years of bench- and pilot-scale testing. The paper covers: • Methods for predicting solids production • Solids thickening techniques • Solids dewatering and drying procedures • Results of hazardous waste toxicity evaluations • Effects of sludge leachate on clay landfill liners and the effects of the liners on leachate composition • Reuse of iron oxyhydroxide solids ESTIMATING SOLIDS PRODUCTION In this paper, we define solids production as the quantity of solids (free water excluded) generated by waste treatment operations. Total solids production includes native wastewater solids, solids generated by chemical precipitation, bound water* associated with hydroxide sludges, and sludge conditioners. The solids produced are discharged in the waste sludge and in the process effluent. If solids separators are performing adequately, solids production is approximately the weight of solids (free water excluded) that the sludge management system must process and dispose of. Equation 2 is a simplified formula for estimating approximate solids production: Pp = [S+H(l+A)] [1+CJ (2) 45th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1991 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. ♦Bound water is defined here as water that is not released from the solids at the temperature of the standard moisture analysis (105° C ) but is released upon heating at 550° C. Bound water is counted as a solid in the standard moisture analysis. 705 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 705