page 73 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
8 PERMEABLE BARRIERS: A NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR TREATMENT OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER Bruce M. Thomson Stephen P. Shelton Department of Civil Engineering University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 Edward Smith U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Urbana,IL 61820 INTRODUCTION Restoration of aquifier systems which have become contaminated with toxic or hazardous compounds is one of the most challenging problems currently facing environmental engineers and scientists. Conventional aquifer restoration alternatives can be broken into four categories: 1. Contaminant of the aquifier contaminants. 2. Removal of mobile pollutants, followed by surface treatment of contaminated water or recovery of free product, and subsequent disposal or reuse of treated water. 3. Removal of contaminated soil, followed by treatment and/or disposal. 4. In situ stabilization of aquifer contaminants. Frequently a combination of these methods is used to maximize the performance of the treatment process. These alternatives are briefly described below. Contaminant of groundwater pollutants is the most immediate concern following determination of a contamination problem. It can be achieved either through the use of a physical barrier such as a grout curtain, slurry cutoff wall or sheet piles, or by creation of a hydraulic barrier resulting from a combination of pumping and injection wells. Containment technology is reviewed by Spooner, et al.1, and Kelly.2 Removal of mobile contaminants from the aquifer system is achieved by directing pollutant migration toward wells or trenches from which it can be recovered or removed. Variations of this process include free product recovery of petroleum products floating on a water table, vacuum extraction of volatile organic compounds, and pump-and-treat processes for soluble constituents. These processes are limited to volatile, liquid, or soluble pollutants; insoluble compounds remain attached to soil particles in the aquifer or vadose zone. Bouwer, et al. , Wagner, et al.4, and Guswa et al.5 have prepared reviews ot processes for management and treatment of groundwater contamination problems involving mobile contaminants. In situ stabilization of hazardous wastes is a relatively new treatment process which shows considerable promise as an alternative to conventional pump and treat methods. Its principal application to date has been in groundwater systems which are contaminated with biodegradable organic materials. In situ treatment is accomplished by stimulating the growth of naturally occurring soil microorganisms by introducing essential nutrients (e.g. nitrogen and phosphorous) and appropriate electron acceptors (e.g. oxygen or hydrogen perioxide) required for the organism's growth. Lee, et al.6, Wilson, et al.7, Borden, et al.8, and Amdurer, et al.9 have prepared reports and reviews of in situ biological waste stabilization technology, while Sims, et al. discussed in place remediation of contaminated soils. In situ technology is limited to applications in which the contaminants are degradable. Although conventional groundwater restoration problems, when properly designed and implemented, are generally effective, they have numerous problems associated which include: 45th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1991 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 73
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199008 |
Title | Permeable barriers : a new alternative for treatment of contaminated groundwater |
Author |
Thomson, Bruce Shelton, Stephen P., 1948- Smith, Edward |
Date of Original | 1990 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 45th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,41605 |
Extent of Original | p. 73-80 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-08-18 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 73 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 8 PERMEABLE BARRIERS: A NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR TREATMENT OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER Bruce M. Thomson Stephen P. Shelton Department of Civil Engineering University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 Edward Smith U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Urbana,IL 61820 INTRODUCTION Restoration of aquifier systems which have become contaminated with toxic or hazardous compounds is one of the most challenging problems currently facing environmental engineers and scientists. Conventional aquifer restoration alternatives can be broken into four categories: 1. Contaminant of the aquifier contaminants. 2. Removal of mobile pollutants, followed by surface treatment of contaminated water or recovery of free product, and subsequent disposal or reuse of treated water. 3. Removal of contaminated soil, followed by treatment and/or disposal. 4. In situ stabilization of aquifer contaminants. Frequently a combination of these methods is used to maximize the performance of the treatment process. These alternatives are briefly described below. Contaminant of groundwater pollutants is the most immediate concern following determination of a contamination problem. It can be achieved either through the use of a physical barrier such as a grout curtain, slurry cutoff wall or sheet piles, or by creation of a hydraulic barrier resulting from a combination of pumping and injection wells. Containment technology is reviewed by Spooner, et al.1, and Kelly.2 Removal of mobile contaminants from the aquifer system is achieved by directing pollutant migration toward wells or trenches from which it can be recovered or removed. Variations of this process include free product recovery of petroleum products floating on a water table, vacuum extraction of volatile organic compounds, and pump-and-treat processes for soluble constituents. These processes are limited to volatile, liquid, or soluble pollutants; insoluble compounds remain attached to soil particles in the aquifer or vadose zone. Bouwer, et al. , Wagner, et al.4, and Guswa et al.5 have prepared reviews ot processes for management and treatment of groundwater contamination problems involving mobile contaminants. In situ stabilization of hazardous wastes is a relatively new treatment process which shows considerable promise as an alternative to conventional pump and treat methods. Its principal application to date has been in groundwater systems which are contaminated with biodegradable organic materials. In situ treatment is accomplished by stimulating the growth of naturally occurring soil microorganisms by introducing essential nutrients (e.g. nitrogen and phosphorous) and appropriate electron acceptors (e.g. oxygen or hydrogen perioxide) required for the organism's growth. Lee, et al.6, Wilson, et al.7, Borden, et al.8, and Amdurer, et al.9 have prepared reports and reviews of in situ biological waste stabilization technology, while Sims, et al. discussed in place remediation of contaminated soils. In situ technology is limited to applications in which the contaminants are degradable. Although conventional groundwater restoration problems, when properly designed and implemented, are generally effective, they have numerous problems associated which include: 45th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1991 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 73 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 73