page 573 |
Previous | 1 of 6 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
66 SEMIVOLATILES SCREENING AT CERCLA SITES Roy O. Ball, Principal Mary Jo Anzia, Project Engineer Environmental Resources Management North Central, Inc. Deerfield, Illinois 60015 INTRODUCTION The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) require the investigation and subsequent cleanup of hazardous waste sites listed on the National Priorities List (Superfund sites). The history of Superfund site activities is frequently uncertain. In addition, disposal and/or discharge records for Superfund sites are often inaccurate and incomplete. Thus, the nature and extent of contamination is unknown and is usually highly variable over short distances. As a result, thorough investigations of the soil and ground water at Superfund sites are generally required as part of the site Remedial Investigation (Rl). The collection and analysis of investigative soil samples utilizing the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) protocol, which is required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for Superfund sites, is tedious and expensive. The soil investigation can be accelerated by conducting a soil screening program to delineate areas of suspected contamination, as well as areas of little or no contamination. By implementing a screening program, the number of soil samples required for CLP analyses can be significantly reduced. Generally accepted soil screening methods exist for volatile organic compounds (HNu headspace technique), metals (plasma AA), PCBs (Clor-N-SoilrM), asbestos containing materials and petroleum hydrocarbons (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons). However, a literature review did not identify any generally accepted soil screening tools for semivolatile organic compounds. This paper presents a discussion of the theory and use of fluorescence as an indicator of soil contamination due to the presence of fluoresceable semivolatile organic compounds. THEORY OF FLUORESCENCE Fluorescence is the process in which radiation is emitted by molecules or atoms that have been excited by absorption of radiation.1 Energy levels of an atom can be represented by a series of horizontal lines. The difference in energy between energy levels is represented by the vertical distance between two lines. If level N represents the ground state, or the state in which the atom is normally found, by absorption of light of frequency >>r.N, the atom is raised to level F and, if no other energy levels exist between N and F, can return to N only by reemission of light of the same frequency (i-vn)- This type of fluorescent emission in which the wavelengths of the emission and absorption lines coincide is called resonance radiation.2 Several levels (C,D, etc.) can exist between N and F. Under these conditions, other transitions can occur, which result in the emission of frequencies smaller than i>FN. The empirical law stating that the wavelength of light emitted by a fluorescent material is longer (lower energy) than that of the radiation used (to excite the fluorescence was formulated by Stokes3. Atoms and molecules that fluoresce have well-defined excitation and emission spectra. If an organic compound is fluorescent, its emission band corresponds to the same electric transition as its absorption band of the greatest wavelength (i.e., its first absorption band).4 There is an approximate mirror-image relationship between the shape of the absorption spectrum and the shape of the fluorescence spectrum.5 In general, the fluorescence yield is independent of the wavelength of the exciting light.6 The quantum efficiency of a molecule is the ratio of the total emitted light to the total absorbed light. Therefore, the quantum efficiency is also independent of the wavelength of the exciting light. If the exciting light used is of a wavelength that is different from that of the absorption peak, a smaller portion of the light will be absorbed and proportionally less light will be emitted-illustrating the constancy of the quantum efficiency. However, the shape and location of the emission spectrum will not change.7 45th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1991 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 573
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199066 |
Title | Semivolatiles screening at CERCLA sites |
Author |
Ball, Roy O. Anzia, Mary Jo |
Date of Original | 1990 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 45th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,41605 |
Extent of Original | p. 573-578 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-08-20 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 573 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 66 SEMIVOLATILES SCREENING AT CERCLA SITES Roy O. Ball, Principal Mary Jo Anzia, Project Engineer Environmental Resources Management North Central, Inc. Deerfield, Illinois 60015 INTRODUCTION The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) require the investigation and subsequent cleanup of hazardous waste sites listed on the National Priorities List (Superfund sites). The history of Superfund site activities is frequently uncertain. In addition, disposal and/or discharge records for Superfund sites are often inaccurate and incomplete. Thus, the nature and extent of contamination is unknown and is usually highly variable over short distances. As a result, thorough investigations of the soil and ground water at Superfund sites are generally required as part of the site Remedial Investigation (Rl). The collection and analysis of investigative soil samples utilizing the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) protocol, which is required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for Superfund sites, is tedious and expensive. The soil investigation can be accelerated by conducting a soil screening program to delineate areas of suspected contamination, as well as areas of little or no contamination. By implementing a screening program, the number of soil samples required for CLP analyses can be significantly reduced. Generally accepted soil screening methods exist for volatile organic compounds (HNu headspace technique), metals (plasma AA), PCBs (Clor-N-SoilrM), asbestos containing materials and petroleum hydrocarbons (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons). However, a literature review did not identify any generally accepted soil screening tools for semivolatile organic compounds. This paper presents a discussion of the theory and use of fluorescence as an indicator of soil contamination due to the presence of fluoresceable semivolatile organic compounds. THEORY OF FLUORESCENCE Fluorescence is the process in which radiation is emitted by molecules or atoms that have been excited by absorption of radiation.1 Energy levels of an atom can be represented by a series of horizontal lines. The difference in energy between energy levels is represented by the vertical distance between two lines. If level N represents the ground state, or the state in which the atom is normally found, by absorption of light of frequency >>r.N, the atom is raised to level F and, if no other energy levels exist between N and F, can return to N only by reemission of light of the same frequency (i-vn)- This type of fluorescent emission in which the wavelengths of the emission and absorption lines coincide is called resonance radiation.2 Several levels (C,D, etc.) can exist between N and F. Under these conditions, other transitions can occur, which result in the emission of frequencies smaller than i>FN. The empirical law stating that the wavelength of light emitted by a fluorescent material is longer (lower energy) than that of the radiation used (to excite the fluorescence was formulated by Stokes3. Atoms and molecules that fluoresce have well-defined excitation and emission spectra. If an organic compound is fluorescent, its emission band corresponds to the same electric transition as its absorption band of the greatest wavelength (i.e., its first absorption band).4 There is an approximate mirror-image relationship between the shape of the absorption spectrum and the shape of the fluorescence spectrum.5 In general, the fluorescence yield is independent of the wavelength of the exciting light.6 The quantum efficiency of a molecule is the ratio of the total emitted light to the total absorbed light. Therefore, the quantum efficiency is also independent of the wavelength of the exciting light. If the exciting light used is of a wavelength that is different from that of the absorption peak, a smaller portion of the light will be absorbed and proportionally less light will be emitted-illustrating the constancy of the quantum efficiency. However, the shape and location of the emission spectrum will not change.7 45th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1991 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 573 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 573