page 547 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Section Seven NEW EQUIPMENT APPLICATION 63 MEMBRANE AIR STRIPPING: OPERATING PROBLEMS AND COST ANALYSIS Sylvia E. Schwarz, Graduate Research Assistant Michael J. Semmens, Professor Civil and Mineral Engineering Department University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 Karl J. Froelich, Technical Manager Hoechst Celanese Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 INTRODUCTION Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) traditionally have been removed from water by packed tower air stripping. Substantial literature is available concerning this method.'2,3 In packed tower air stripping, VOC laden water flows down from the top of a tower packed with small ceramic, metal or plastic packing material. Air flows counter-currently from the bottom of the tower. As the water flows around the packing elements, it is broken into small streams and droplets thus creating a large surface area. VOCs transfer easily from the water phase into the air phase and are carried out the top of the tower. The efficiency of this method of treatment depends on the value of the Henry's constant, H, for the compound to be stripped, the air to water ratio, and the specific surface area for mass transfer provided by the packing. Microporous hollow fiber membranes recently have been investigated as an alternative to packed tower air stripping.4 These fibers are made of non-wetting microporous polypropylene with pores covering 40 percent of their surface area. Because the pores cover so much of the fiber surface area, and because the liquid phase will not wet the pores, gases may transfer from one side of the membrane through the pores to the other side with negligible membrane resistance. In addition the fibers provide a very high surface area for mass transfer.5 In laboratory-scale air stripping studies using microporous hollow fiber membranes it was shown that overall mass transfer coefficients (KLa values) for VOC removal were 3 to 7 times higher than those commonly observed in packed tower air strippers.5 In addition the mass transfer rate was observed to be liquid film diffusion controlled. Zander et al.6 compared the VOC removal performance of a small commercial hollow fiber membrane module with a pilot-scale air stripping tower. The membrane system compared favorably for the six compounds studied. It was shown that equivalent removals could be achieved in the membrane module at lower air flow rates. The study was of short term duration however, and did not address aspects of long-term fiber usage such as fouling of membrane surfaces. Zander et al.6 also observed that some compounds were removed more poorly than they should be based on theoretical predictions. These poor removals corresponded to conditions when the stripping constant, R (= QgH/Qw) was less than 2. The authors speculated that the high packing density of the fibers in the commercially-made modules may have led to air flow channeling and poor flow characteristics on the shell side of the module. An important advantage of the hollow fiber membrane modules is that they are smaller than packed towers and can be mounted either vertically or horizontally. If mounted horizontally, the need to pump water 30 feet to the top of a tower is eliminated. Water pressure drops across a single module are therefore much lower than those required of packed towers. However, very large air pressure 45th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1991 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 547
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199063 |
Title | Membrane air stripping : operating problems and cost analysis |
Author |
Schwarz, Sylvia E. Semmens, M. J. Froelich, Karl J. |
Date of Original | 1990 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 45th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,41605 |
Extent of Original | p. 547-556 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-08-20 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 547 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Section Seven NEW EQUIPMENT APPLICATION 63 MEMBRANE AIR STRIPPING: OPERATING PROBLEMS AND COST ANALYSIS Sylvia E. Schwarz, Graduate Research Assistant Michael J. Semmens, Professor Civil and Mineral Engineering Department University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 Karl J. Froelich, Technical Manager Hoechst Celanese Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 INTRODUCTION Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) traditionally have been removed from water by packed tower air stripping. Substantial literature is available concerning this method.'2,3 In packed tower air stripping, VOC laden water flows down from the top of a tower packed with small ceramic, metal or plastic packing material. Air flows counter-currently from the bottom of the tower. As the water flows around the packing elements, it is broken into small streams and droplets thus creating a large surface area. VOCs transfer easily from the water phase into the air phase and are carried out the top of the tower. The efficiency of this method of treatment depends on the value of the Henry's constant, H, for the compound to be stripped, the air to water ratio, and the specific surface area for mass transfer provided by the packing. Microporous hollow fiber membranes recently have been investigated as an alternative to packed tower air stripping.4 These fibers are made of non-wetting microporous polypropylene with pores covering 40 percent of their surface area. Because the pores cover so much of the fiber surface area, and because the liquid phase will not wet the pores, gases may transfer from one side of the membrane through the pores to the other side with negligible membrane resistance. In addition the fibers provide a very high surface area for mass transfer.5 In laboratory-scale air stripping studies using microporous hollow fiber membranes it was shown that overall mass transfer coefficients (KLa values) for VOC removal were 3 to 7 times higher than those commonly observed in packed tower air strippers.5 In addition the mass transfer rate was observed to be liquid film diffusion controlled. Zander et al.6 compared the VOC removal performance of a small commercial hollow fiber membrane module with a pilot-scale air stripping tower. The membrane system compared favorably for the six compounds studied. It was shown that equivalent removals could be achieved in the membrane module at lower air flow rates. The study was of short term duration however, and did not address aspects of long-term fiber usage such as fouling of membrane surfaces. Zander et al.6 also observed that some compounds were removed more poorly than they should be based on theoretical predictions. These poor removals corresponded to conditions when the stripping constant, R (= QgH/Qw) was less than 2. The authors speculated that the high packing density of the fibers in the commercially-made modules may have led to air flow channeling and poor flow characteristics on the shell side of the module. An important advantage of the hollow fiber membrane modules is that they are smaller than packed towers and can be mounted either vertically or horizontally. If mounted horizontally, the need to pump water 30 feet to the top of a tower is eliminated. Water pressure drops across a single module are therefore much lower than those required of packed towers. However, very large air pressure 45th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1991 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 547 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 547