page 503 |
Previous | 1 of 9 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Water Quality Criteria W. W. TOWNE JOHN W. WISEMAN Basin Engineer, and Assistant Basin Engineer Ohio-Tennessee Drainage Basins Public Health Service Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Cincinnati, Ohio It is not the purpose of this paper to present a compendium of limiting concentrations of those substances which might be classified as water pollutants. Rather, the authors will endeavor to present some aspects of water quality criteria as related to water pollution control programs, together with some problems associated with their development and application. Also, an attempt will be made to present some of the philosophies relating to water pollution control in general, and to water quality criteria in particular. Water quality criteria are being used extensively by both the regulatory agencies and the contributors of pollution. Much of the recent water pollution control legislation requires the establishment of criteria by regulatory agencies; use is made of criteria in administering water pollution control programs; criteria are used in evaluating the economics of sewage and waste treatment; and they are used as guides to define pollution and to measure compliance with regulations. It is certain that everyone engaged in almost any phase of waste treatment or stream sanitation is aware of the difficulties encountered when trying to reach agreement on a specific criterion. For example, should the minimum dissolved oxygen content be four or five parts per million? Or should the maximum permissible pH be 8.5 or 9.3? That much thought and effort still remain to be expended, is further borne out by the very fact that often the only uniformity among many water quality criteria is the lack of uniformity. It might be well to pause here for a moment and try to define what is meant by the word "criteria." Every one has listened to discussions and read papers in which the words "standards," "criteria," and "objectives" have been used extensively in defining a water quality. In many instances they have been used synonymously, particularly "standard" and "criteria." Probably because the word "standard" may smack of 503
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC195442 |
Title | Water quality criteria |
Author |
Towne, W. W. Wiseman, John W. |
Date of Original | 1954 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the ninth Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/engext&CISOPTR=3516&REC=13 |
Extent of Original | p. 503-511 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2008-09-22 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 503 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Water Quality Criteria W. W. TOWNE JOHN W. WISEMAN Basin Engineer, and Assistant Basin Engineer Ohio-Tennessee Drainage Basins Public Health Service Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Cincinnati, Ohio It is not the purpose of this paper to present a compendium of limiting concentrations of those substances which might be classified as water pollutants. Rather, the authors will endeavor to present some aspects of water quality criteria as related to water pollution control programs, together with some problems associated with their development and application. Also, an attempt will be made to present some of the philosophies relating to water pollution control in general, and to water quality criteria in particular. Water quality criteria are being used extensively by both the regulatory agencies and the contributors of pollution. Much of the recent water pollution control legislation requires the establishment of criteria by regulatory agencies; use is made of criteria in administering water pollution control programs; criteria are used in evaluating the economics of sewage and waste treatment; and they are used as guides to define pollution and to measure compliance with regulations. It is certain that everyone engaged in almost any phase of waste treatment or stream sanitation is aware of the difficulties encountered when trying to reach agreement on a specific criterion. For example, should the minimum dissolved oxygen content be four or five parts per million? Or should the maximum permissible pH be 8.5 or 9.3? That much thought and effort still remain to be expended, is further borne out by the very fact that often the only uniformity among many water quality criteria is the lack of uniformity. It might be well to pause here for a moment and try to define what is meant by the word "criteria." Every one has listened to discussions and read papers in which the words "standards," "criteria," and "objectives" have been used extensively in defining a water quality. In many instances they have been used synonymously, particularly "standard" and "criteria." Probably because the word "standard" may smack of 503 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 503