page 295 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
34 METHODS FOR UPGRADING AND RETROFITTING INDUSTRIAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANTS: AN OVERVIEW AND CASE HISTORIES Sam E. Shelby, Jr., Principal Carl E. Adams, Jr., Principal The ADVENT Group, Inc. Brentwood, Tennessee 37027 INTRODUCTION With increasingly stringent wastewater discharge regulations in the United States, particularly for the organic chemicals industry, and a new emphasis on control of effluent toxicity, many industries are faced with upgrading and retrofitting activated sludge plants. These upgrades may involve increased removals of specific organics (i.e., phenol), improved winter performance, and reduced effluent aquatic toxicity. This paper presents methods available to upgrade such systems, rationale for process selection, and several case histories demonstrating these methods. BACKGROUND Most activated sludge systems encountered in industry today consist of a single-stage complete mix aeration basin with final clarification system. The activated sludge system is often preceded by equalization and pH control and, perhaps, TSS and oil and grease removal. Figure 1 schematically presents the components of such a system. Single stage systems were selected in the past due to capital cost effectiveness, resistance to shock loads, and operational ease. However, problems encountered, especially with long detention time systems treating high-strength industrial wastes include the following: • Poor winter kinetic performance for BOD and ammonia-nitrogen removal due to basin cooling (especially with surface aerators); • The lack of selectivity or specificity for removal of priority pollutants and other toxic, but degradable organics; • Development of poor settling sludge; and • The presence of effluent aquatic toxicity in some cases. Poor dissolved oxygen control has also been observed in such systems. In order to upgrade these systems to accommodate plant expansions or more stringent effluent limits, considerations should AERATION BASIN AL COMPLETE M'X BASIN SURFACE AERATORS LONG SLUDGE AGE LOW F/M RATW FINAL CLARIFIER EQUALIZATION/ — NEUTRALIZATION ^ =4<=. RETURN SLUDGE - WASTE SLUDGE Figure 1. Typical industrial activated sludge system. 45th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1991 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 295
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199034 |
Title | Methods for upgrading and retrofitting industrial activated sludge plants : an overview and case histories |
Author |
Shelby, Samuel E. Adams, Carl E. (Carl Erving), 1943- |
Date of Original | 1990 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 45th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,41605 |
Extent of Original | p. 295-302 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-08-18 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 295 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 34 METHODS FOR UPGRADING AND RETROFITTING INDUSTRIAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANTS: AN OVERVIEW AND CASE HISTORIES Sam E. Shelby, Jr., Principal Carl E. Adams, Jr., Principal The ADVENT Group, Inc. Brentwood, Tennessee 37027 INTRODUCTION With increasingly stringent wastewater discharge regulations in the United States, particularly for the organic chemicals industry, and a new emphasis on control of effluent toxicity, many industries are faced with upgrading and retrofitting activated sludge plants. These upgrades may involve increased removals of specific organics (i.e., phenol), improved winter performance, and reduced effluent aquatic toxicity. This paper presents methods available to upgrade such systems, rationale for process selection, and several case histories demonstrating these methods. BACKGROUND Most activated sludge systems encountered in industry today consist of a single-stage complete mix aeration basin with final clarification system. The activated sludge system is often preceded by equalization and pH control and, perhaps, TSS and oil and grease removal. Figure 1 schematically presents the components of such a system. Single stage systems were selected in the past due to capital cost effectiveness, resistance to shock loads, and operational ease. However, problems encountered, especially with long detention time systems treating high-strength industrial wastes include the following: • Poor winter kinetic performance for BOD and ammonia-nitrogen removal due to basin cooling (especially with surface aerators); • The lack of selectivity or specificity for removal of priority pollutants and other toxic, but degradable organics; • Development of poor settling sludge; and • The presence of effluent aquatic toxicity in some cases. Poor dissolved oxygen control has also been observed in such systems. In order to upgrade these systems to accommodate plant expansions or more stringent effluent limits, considerations should AERATION BASIN AL COMPLETE M'X BASIN SURFACE AERATORS LONG SLUDGE AGE LOW F/M RATW FINAL CLARIFIER EQUALIZATION/ — NEUTRALIZATION ^ =4<=. RETURN SLUDGE - WASTE SLUDGE Figure 1. Typical industrial activated sludge system. 45th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1991 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 295 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 295