page 169 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
20 EVALUATION OF DISCHARGES FROM A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY TO A POTW Joseph M. Wong, Project Manager Brown and Caldwell Consultants Walnut Creek, California 94596 Antoinette M. Bertolero, Deputy Director of Public Works Department City of Benicia, California 94510 INTRODUCTION Since 1980, hazardous waste disposal has become an increasingly critical problem in the United States. More and more publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) are being asked to help solve industrial and hazardous waste disposal problems. These problems may range from disposal of contaminated groundwater from a leaking gas station storage tank to acceptance of effluent from a centralized waste treatment facility1. One of the better known examples is the discharge of treated groundwater from the Stringfellow hazardous waste disposal facility, a Superfund site, to two wastewater treatment plants operated by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County in southern California. From December 1985 through the end of 1988, nearly 26 million gallons of water from the Stringfellow site was treated and discharged to these POTWs2. A POTW may accept wastes from these facilities for many good reasons. For example, disposal to a POTW may be the best technical solution to an environmental problem, because a POTW generally can provide a large dilution ratio for the waste. A POTW also has the resources to tackle treatment reliability problems. In some cases, the POTW board and management may feel a public responsibility to help to solve hazardous waste treatment problems. They are willing to accept the risk to fulfill a public obligation. In other cases, a POTW may accept these wastes for a fee that will defray some of the rising costs of operation and maintenance (O&M). Before accepting these wastes, however, a POTW should conduct a careful evaluation of the impact the discharge may have on the facilities both technically and legally. This paper presents a summary of such an evaluation. The proposed discharge was to a POTW in California. It consisted of treated groundwater, landfill leachate and impounded wastewater from a hazardous waste disposal facility. This evaluation focused primarily on the technical aspects. BACKGROUND International Technology (IT) Corporation's Panoche facility, located approximately two miles northeast of the City of Benicia in an unincorporated area of Solano County, California, is a Class 1 hazardous waste disposal facility with a land area of approximately 240 acres. The facility began operation in 1968 to receive, treat, and dispose of hazardous industrial solid and liquid wastes in evaporation ponds and landfills. IT purchased the facility in 1975 and continued to receive hazardous wastes for disposal until December 1986. IT voluntarily stopped receiving solids at the facility in July 1986 and ceased receiving all wastes in December 1986 to comply with an order from the California Department of Health Services (CDHS) related to drum burial areas at the facility. Using the authority established by the California Toxic Pits Cleanup Act (TPCA), the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) required IT to close its evaporation ponds. These ponds contained several million gallons of water contaminated with various pollutants. IT used the ponds to evaporate landfill leachate and groundwater recovered from the site. Pond closure will involve dewatering the ponds and finding other means to dispose of the leachate and groundwater that will continue to be generated. 45th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1991 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 169
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC199020 |
Title | Evaluation of discharges from a hazardous waste facility to a POTW |
Author |
Wong, Joseph M. Bertolero, Antoinette M. |
Date of Original | 1990 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 45th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,41605 |
Extent of Original | p. 169-178 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-08-18 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 169 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 20 EVALUATION OF DISCHARGES FROM A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY TO A POTW Joseph M. Wong, Project Manager Brown and Caldwell Consultants Walnut Creek, California 94596 Antoinette M. Bertolero, Deputy Director of Public Works Department City of Benicia, California 94510 INTRODUCTION Since 1980, hazardous waste disposal has become an increasingly critical problem in the United States. More and more publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) are being asked to help solve industrial and hazardous waste disposal problems. These problems may range from disposal of contaminated groundwater from a leaking gas station storage tank to acceptance of effluent from a centralized waste treatment facility1. One of the better known examples is the discharge of treated groundwater from the Stringfellow hazardous waste disposal facility, a Superfund site, to two wastewater treatment plants operated by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County in southern California. From December 1985 through the end of 1988, nearly 26 million gallons of water from the Stringfellow site was treated and discharged to these POTWs2. A POTW may accept wastes from these facilities for many good reasons. For example, disposal to a POTW may be the best technical solution to an environmental problem, because a POTW generally can provide a large dilution ratio for the waste. A POTW also has the resources to tackle treatment reliability problems. In some cases, the POTW board and management may feel a public responsibility to help to solve hazardous waste treatment problems. They are willing to accept the risk to fulfill a public obligation. In other cases, a POTW may accept these wastes for a fee that will defray some of the rising costs of operation and maintenance (O&M). Before accepting these wastes, however, a POTW should conduct a careful evaluation of the impact the discharge may have on the facilities both technically and legally. This paper presents a summary of such an evaluation. The proposed discharge was to a POTW in California. It consisted of treated groundwater, landfill leachate and impounded wastewater from a hazardous waste disposal facility. This evaluation focused primarily on the technical aspects. BACKGROUND International Technology (IT) Corporation's Panoche facility, located approximately two miles northeast of the City of Benicia in an unincorporated area of Solano County, California, is a Class 1 hazardous waste disposal facility with a land area of approximately 240 acres. The facility began operation in 1968 to receive, treat, and dispose of hazardous industrial solid and liquid wastes in evaporation ponds and landfills. IT purchased the facility in 1975 and continued to receive hazardous wastes for disposal until December 1986. IT voluntarily stopped receiving solids at the facility in July 1986 and ceased receiving all wastes in December 1986 to comply with an order from the California Department of Health Services (CDHS) related to drum burial areas at the facility. Using the authority established by the California Toxic Pits Cleanup Act (TPCA), the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) required IT to close its evaporation ponds. These ponds contained several million gallons of water contaminated with various pollutants. IT used the ponds to evaporate landfill leachate and groundwater recovered from the site. Pond closure will involve dewatering the ponds and finding other means to dispose of the leachate and groundwater that will continue to be generated. 45th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1991 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 169 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 169