page 475 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
50 A COMPARISON OF COUPLED UPFLOW AND COUPLED DOWNFLOW FLUID BED REACTORS TREATING SYNFUEL WASTEWATER Charles D. Turner, Professor Michael J. Koehmstedt, Graduate Research Assistant Department of Civil Engineering John R. Gallagher, Research Microbiologist Energy and Mineral Research Center University of North Dakota Grand Forks, North Dakota 58202 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents a comparison of downflow and upflow coupled biological fluid bed reactor research that has been conducted at the University of North Dakota (UND) using Great Plains Gasification Plant (GPGP) wastewater. A coupled downflow bench scale unit,1 a coupled upflow bench scale unit2 and a coupled downflow process development unit3 have been operated over a three year span. These units have demonstrated that both upflow and downflow coupled biological processes can be highly effective in removing biodegradable organics and nitrogen. Synfuel conversion processes produce wastewater from product gas cleanup and auxiliary operations. These wastewaters typically contain high concentrations of ammonia and organics. In addition, they generally contain priority pollutants such as phenol and cyanide. The most commonly chosen process for such wastewater, activated sludge, is not well suited to the treatment of synfuel wastewaters if nitrogen must be removed. Activated sludge is a suspended growth process that requires clarifiers and high mean cell residence times to maintain a nitrifying population. Oxygen is required for both organic and ammonia oxidation and an additional carbon source must be supplied for the anoxic removal of nitrate. Coupled biological fluidized bed reactors are well suited to treatment of synfuels wastewaters containing high concentrations of ammonia and organics. The process converts ammonia to nitrite and nitrate in an oxic reactor. The nitrate and nitrite are subsequently converted to nitrogen gas in an anoxic reactor. The organics present in the feed wastewater are used as a carbon and energy source in the anoxic reactor. BACKGROUND North Dakota is home of the United States largest coal to methane conversion facility. The plant converts 14,000 tons of lignite into 124 million standard cubic feet of gas per day. This plant, the Great Plains Gasification Plant (GPGP), is located north of Beulah, North Dakota. This region is underlain with large quantities of strippable lignite coal. The wastewater used in this research was produced at GPGP using Indian Head Lignite.4 This coal has an energy content of 7200 btu per pound, a moisture content of 35% and a low sulfur content of approximately 1%.5 The Energy and Mineral Research Center (EMRC) has conducted research on the treatability of synfuel wastewaters produced using GPGP, KILnGAS, BGC/Lurgi and the UND-EMRC gasifiers. Table I shows several representative parameters such as ammonia and chemical oxygen demand (COD) for these wastewaters. These values represent wastewater that has been pretreated using solvent extraction and ammonia stripping. Solvent extracted and ammonia stripped wastewater is termed stripped gas liquor (SGL). 44th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1990 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 475
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198950 |
Title | Comparison of coupled upflow and coupled downflow fluid bed reactors treating Synfuel wastewater |
Author |
Turner, Charles D. Koehmstedt, Michael J. Gallagher, John R. |
Date of Original | 1989 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 44th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,40757 |
Extent of Original | p. 475-484 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-08-20 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 475 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 50 A COMPARISON OF COUPLED UPFLOW AND COUPLED DOWNFLOW FLUID BED REACTORS TREATING SYNFUEL WASTEWATER Charles D. Turner, Professor Michael J. Koehmstedt, Graduate Research Assistant Department of Civil Engineering John R. Gallagher, Research Microbiologist Energy and Mineral Research Center University of North Dakota Grand Forks, North Dakota 58202 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents a comparison of downflow and upflow coupled biological fluid bed reactor research that has been conducted at the University of North Dakota (UND) using Great Plains Gasification Plant (GPGP) wastewater. A coupled downflow bench scale unit,1 a coupled upflow bench scale unit2 and a coupled downflow process development unit3 have been operated over a three year span. These units have demonstrated that both upflow and downflow coupled biological processes can be highly effective in removing biodegradable organics and nitrogen. Synfuel conversion processes produce wastewater from product gas cleanup and auxiliary operations. These wastewaters typically contain high concentrations of ammonia and organics. In addition, they generally contain priority pollutants such as phenol and cyanide. The most commonly chosen process for such wastewater, activated sludge, is not well suited to the treatment of synfuel wastewaters if nitrogen must be removed. Activated sludge is a suspended growth process that requires clarifiers and high mean cell residence times to maintain a nitrifying population. Oxygen is required for both organic and ammonia oxidation and an additional carbon source must be supplied for the anoxic removal of nitrate. Coupled biological fluidized bed reactors are well suited to treatment of synfuels wastewaters containing high concentrations of ammonia and organics. The process converts ammonia to nitrite and nitrate in an oxic reactor. The nitrate and nitrite are subsequently converted to nitrogen gas in an anoxic reactor. The organics present in the feed wastewater are used as a carbon and energy source in the anoxic reactor. BACKGROUND North Dakota is home of the United States largest coal to methane conversion facility. The plant converts 14,000 tons of lignite into 124 million standard cubic feet of gas per day. This plant, the Great Plains Gasification Plant (GPGP), is located north of Beulah, North Dakota. This region is underlain with large quantities of strippable lignite coal. The wastewater used in this research was produced at GPGP using Indian Head Lignite.4 This coal has an energy content of 7200 btu per pound, a moisture content of 35% and a low sulfur content of approximately 1%.5 The Energy and Mineral Research Center (EMRC) has conducted research on the treatability of synfuel wastewaters produced using GPGP, KILnGAS, BGC/Lurgi and the UND-EMRC gasifiers. Table I shows several representative parameters such as ammonia and chemical oxygen demand (COD) for these wastewaters. These values represent wastewater that has been pretreated using solvent extraction and ammonia stripping. Solvent extracted and ammonia stripped wastewater is termed stripped gas liquor (SGL). 44th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1990 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 475 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 475