page 551 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
63 ANAEROBIC TREATMENT OF APPLE POMACE AND WASTEWATER Thomas E. White, Research Associate David J. Malecki, Research Technician William J. Jewell, Professor Agricultural Engineering Department Cornell University Ithaca, New York 14853 INTRODUCTION Apple pomace is the waste solids resulting from the production of apple juice or cider. The estimated disposal cost of the 1.5 million tons of pomace generated in the U.S. each year exceeds $10 million. Because of the negative impact of these costs, an alternative approach for pomace disposal — anaerobic digestion — has been proposed by several researchers.1-3 Follow-up studies3'4 have demonstrated that pomace is composed of readily biodegradable materials, easily digested at high efficiencies, and a significant resource for biogas production. An economic feasibility analysis of the anaerobic process indicated that the payback period for a facility that totally eliminated pomace would be less than five years.4 In addition to pomace, many processors must discharge large quantities of wastewater generated during apple processing operations. Effluent limitation guidelines for these streams (point source discharge) generally require best conventional control technology.5 Currently, most large processors employ aerobic processes for pre- or final treatment requirements. Because of the high operational cost of these systems, however, there is considerable interest in anaerobic pretreatment of wastewater or combined pomace-wastewater digestion. Possible benefits of these alternatives include recovery of the wastewater energy and reduced cost for effluent polishing. A major question which remains to be answered with respect to anaerobic digestion of pomace concerns the potential for use of phase-separated systems. Such systems could potentially exploit the tendency of pomace to rapidly acidify and thereby improve hydrolysis rates of the pomace solids.6 Furthermore, phase separation, if achievable, greatly increases the options available for apple waste treatment with regard to reactor design and energy savings. However, little is known regarding the kinetics of the solubilization process for complex substrates. An endeavor of this study was to expand the understanding of this area. Specific research objectives were: • Contrast the kinetics and efficiencies of phase-separated pomace digestion systems with conventional digestion; • Investigate the potential of combined pomace-apple wastewater treatment with phase- separated digesters; and • Identify options for pomace and apple wastewater treatment which optimize treatment efficiencies and energy recovery. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS Conventional apple juice manufacturing processes lose about 23% of the juice and sugar present in apples, but recent trends in the industry towards high efficiency presses have resulted in pomace with less sugar and higher solids concentrations. The physical and chemical properties of apple pomace and apple processing wastewater are given in Table I. Review of these data indicate that ensiled apple pomace is generally greater than 20% total solids and approximately 16% carbohydrate on a wet basis. As shown by the protein fraction and total Kjeldahl nitrogen values, the amount of nitrogen in pomace is limited to approximately 1% of the dry weight. The most important factor having an impact on wastewater quality for juice manufacturers is quality of the raw fruit.7 For other products, the type of peeling operation employed, water use, and 43rd Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1989 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 551
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198863 |
Title | Anaerobic treatment of apple pomace and wastewater |
Author |
White, Thomas E. Malecki, David J. Jewell, William J. |
Date of Original | 1988 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 43rd Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,39828 |
Extent of Original | p. 551-560 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-08-14 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 551 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 63 ANAEROBIC TREATMENT OF APPLE POMACE AND WASTEWATER Thomas E. White, Research Associate David J. Malecki, Research Technician William J. Jewell, Professor Agricultural Engineering Department Cornell University Ithaca, New York 14853 INTRODUCTION Apple pomace is the waste solids resulting from the production of apple juice or cider. The estimated disposal cost of the 1.5 million tons of pomace generated in the U.S. each year exceeds $10 million. Because of the negative impact of these costs, an alternative approach for pomace disposal — anaerobic digestion — has been proposed by several researchers.1-3 Follow-up studies3'4 have demonstrated that pomace is composed of readily biodegradable materials, easily digested at high efficiencies, and a significant resource for biogas production. An economic feasibility analysis of the anaerobic process indicated that the payback period for a facility that totally eliminated pomace would be less than five years.4 In addition to pomace, many processors must discharge large quantities of wastewater generated during apple processing operations. Effluent limitation guidelines for these streams (point source discharge) generally require best conventional control technology.5 Currently, most large processors employ aerobic processes for pre- or final treatment requirements. Because of the high operational cost of these systems, however, there is considerable interest in anaerobic pretreatment of wastewater or combined pomace-wastewater digestion. Possible benefits of these alternatives include recovery of the wastewater energy and reduced cost for effluent polishing. A major question which remains to be answered with respect to anaerobic digestion of pomace concerns the potential for use of phase-separated systems. Such systems could potentially exploit the tendency of pomace to rapidly acidify and thereby improve hydrolysis rates of the pomace solids.6 Furthermore, phase separation, if achievable, greatly increases the options available for apple waste treatment with regard to reactor design and energy savings. However, little is known regarding the kinetics of the solubilization process for complex substrates. An endeavor of this study was to expand the understanding of this area. Specific research objectives were: • Contrast the kinetics and efficiencies of phase-separated pomace digestion systems with conventional digestion; • Investigate the potential of combined pomace-apple wastewater treatment with phase- separated digesters; and • Identify options for pomace and apple wastewater treatment which optimize treatment efficiencies and energy recovery. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS Conventional apple juice manufacturing processes lose about 23% of the juice and sugar present in apples, but recent trends in the industry towards high efficiency presses have resulted in pomace with less sugar and higher solids concentrations. The physical and chemical properties of apple pomace and apple processing wastewater are given in Table I. Review of these data indicate that ensiled apple pomace is generally greater than 20% total solids and approximately 16% carbohydrate on a wet basis. As shown by the protein fraction and total Kjeldahl nitrogen values, the amount of nitrogen in pomace is limited to approximately 1% of the dry weight. The most important factor having an impact on wastewater quality for juice manufacturers is quality of the raw fruit.7 For other products, the type of peeling operation employed, water use, and 43rd Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1989 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 551 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 551