page 267 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
33 PRINCIPLES OF ORGANISM SELECTION FOR THE DEGRADATION OF GLYPHOSATE IN A SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR D. V. S. Murthy, Doctoral Student Robert L. Irvine, Professor and Director Center for Bioengineering and Pollution Control University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 Lawrence E. Hallas, Sr. Research Specialist Monsanto Agriculture Company St. Louis, Missouri 63141 INTRODUCTION Glyphosate (N-phosphono-methyl glycine) is the active ingredient of the herbicide Roundup™ manufactured by Monsanto Agriculture Company. U.S. EPA pesticide effluent guidelines require glyphosate removal from waste streams before they are discharged. In this work, bench scale Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBRs) were used to study the biodegradation of glyphosate in wastes generated at Monsanto's manufacturing facilities. Studies done show that glyphosate degrading activity (GDA) is related to the presence of other microbial groups including nitrifiers, dentrifiers and ammonifiers. Thus, selection of the right organism consortium is central for optimizing GDA. At a kinetic level, reactions competing with and inhibiting glyphosate removal have to be suppressed by suitable manipulation of reactor operation and process conditions. Examples of the concepts discussed above, and the results obtained are presented in this paper. MATERIALS AND METHODS Details of the laboratory scale SBRs used in this study, and the development of the operating strategies for GDA, have been described in detail elsewhere.1 A brief description of the experimental set up and the process variables is presented here. The SBR is a periodic process with each reactor in the system going through five discrete periods in time as shown in Figure 1. The waste stream is introduced into the reactor containing the biomass during FILL, with or without aeration. Reactions for substrate removal initiated during FILL are completed during REACT. Clarification occurs in the same vessel during SETTLE, and the treated effluent is withdrawn during DRAW. The IDLE phase completes the cycle till the reactor is ready to receive the wastewater again. Further details of SBR systems and their operation can be found in the literature.2-4 The laboratory SBRs used in this study (called SBRs A and B) were 3L reactors with a FILL volume of 1.5L, and were operated according to the cycles shown in Table I. Mixed liquor wasted out of these reactors was used in special batch studies described in a later section. Feed to the reactors consisted of waste from an industrial field site, with glyphosate as the target compound of degradation. Structures of glyphosate and other related compounds in the feed are given in Table II. The main product of glyphosate degradation in these mixed culture, mixed substrate systems is aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), which has little herbicidal activity.5 Microorganisms which cleave the C-P bond of glyphosate to yield other products have also been isolated.6-7 Glyphosate degradation by these microorganisms, however, only occurs in the absence of inorganic phosphate. Since glyphosate containing wastes contain substantial amounts of phosphate, these organisms are not important for the wastestreams described herein. Besides the compounds listed in Table II, the reactor feed contained a number of other organics, including soft carbon sources like formate and acetate. The concentrated feed from the industrial field site, was identified as the centrifuge spent wash (CSW), and this was suitably diluted to yield the required glyphosate concentration in the feed. The following analyses were conducted according to procedures outlined below: 43rd Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1989 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 267
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198833 |
Title | Principles of organism selection for the degradation of glyphosate in a sequencing batch reactor |
Author |
Murthy, D. V. S. Irvine, Robert L. Hallas, Lawrence E. |
Date of Original | 1988 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 43rd Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,39828 |
Extent of Original | p. 267-274 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-08-13 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 267 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 33 PRINCIPLES OF ORGANISM SELECTION FOR THE DEGRADATION OF GLYPHOSATE IN A SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR D. V. S. Murthy, Doctoral Student Robert L. Irvine, Professor and Director Center for Bioengineering and Pollution Control University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 Lawrence E. Hallas, Sr. Research Specialist Monsanto Agriculture Company St. Louis, Missouri 63141 INTRODUCTION Glyphosate (N-phosphono-methyl glycine) is the active ingredient of the herbicide Roundup™ manufactured by Monsanto Agriculture Company. U.S. EPA pesticide effluent guidelines require glyphosate removal from waste streams before they are discharged. In this work, bench scale Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBRs) were used to study the biodegradation of glyphosate in wastes generated at Monsanto's manufacturing facilities. Studies done show that glyphosate degrading activity (GDA) is related to the presence of other microbial groups including nitrifiers, dentrifiers and ammonifiers. Thus, selection of the right organism consortium is central for optimizing GDA. At a kinetic level, reactions competing with and inhibiting glyphosate removal have to be suppressed by suitable manipulation of reactor operation and process conditions. Examples of the concepts discussed above, and the results obtained are presented in this paper. MATERIALS AND METHODS Details of the laboratory scale SBRs used in this study, and the development of the operating strategies for GDA, have been described in detail elsewhere.1 A brief description of the experimental set up and the process variables is presented here. The SBR is a periodic process with each reactor in the system going through five discrete periods in time as shown in Figure 1. The waste stream is introduced into the reactor containing the biomass during FILL, with or without aeration. Reactions for substrate removal initiated during FILL are completed during REACT. Clarification occurs in the same vessel during SETTLE, and the treated effluent is withdrawn during DRAW. The IDLE phase completes the cycle till the reactor is ready to receive the wastewater again. Further details of SBR systems and their operation can be found in the literature.2-4 The laboratory SBRs used in this study (called SBRs A and B) were 3L reactors with a FILL volume of 1.5L, and were operated according to the cycles shown in Table I. Mixed liquor wasted out of these reactors was used in special batch studies described in a later section. Feed to the reactors consisted of waste from an industrial field site, with glyphosate as the target compound of degradation. Structures of glyphosate and other related compounds in the feed are given in Table II. The main product of glyphosate degradation in these mixed culture, mixed substrate systems is aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), which has little herbicidal activity.5 Microorganisms which cleave the C-P bond of glyphosate to yield other products have also been isolated.6-7 Glyphosate degradation by these microorganisms, however, only occurs in the absence of inorganic phosphate. Since glyphosate containing wastes contain substantial amounts of phosphate, these organisms are not important for the wastestreams described herein. Besides the compounds listed in Table II, the reactor feed contained a number of other organics, including soft carbon sources like formate and acetate. The concentrated feed from the industrial field site, was identified as the centrifuge spent wash (CSW), and this was suitably diluted to yield the required glyphosate concentration in the feed. The following analyses were conducted according to procedures outlined below: 43rd Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1989 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 267 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 267