page 525 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
61 ANAEROBIC TREATMENT OF WINERY WASTEWATERS J. Kevin Farmer, Managing Engineer O'Brien & Gere Engineers, Inc. Syracuse, New York 13221 A. A. Friedman, Professor Department of Civil Engineering Syracuse University Syracuse, New York 13244-1190 Wallace C. Hazen, Plant Engineer Canandaigua Wine Company, Inc. Canandaigua, New York 14424 INTRODUCTION Canandaigua Wine Company, Inc. (CWC1) produces a variety of wines and wine products at its Canandaigua, New York winery. Winery wastewaters are treated on-site with an extended aeration treatment system prior to discharge to the City of Canandaigua's Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW). During the last few years, expanded winery activities have resulted in overloading of the pretreatment system and occasional contravention of POTW pretreatment standards. Consequently, CWCI initiated an effort to expand the on-site wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). O'Brien and Gere Engineers were retained to evaluate expansion alternatives. Given the high strength nature of the waste (1987 average COD of about 15,700 mg/L), the relatively high power and sludge disposal costs associated with aerobic biological treatment, along with site expansion limitations, it was determined that anaerobic treatment might prove cost-effective for pretreatment of winery wastewaters. In order to evaluate the feasibility and operating conditions associated with anaerobic treatment of winery wastewaters, an on-site pilot plant study was undertaken. The pilot plant study was conducted with an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor followed by an aerobic polishing reactor. The UASB process was selected based on several factors, including the ability to treat high organic loading rates, the successful operation of numerous full- scale UASB systems, reported resistance to upset, and economic considerations. Prior to initiating design, further evaluations of other proprietary anaerobic treatment processes were conducted. This paper contains a description of the overall selection process, including the pilot plant study, and economic and process comparisons of alternative biological treatment systems for treatment of winery wastewaters. EXISTING FACILITIES CWCI produces several products at its Canandaigua facility, including sparkling wines, still wines, and wine coolers. Waste sources include tank and floor washdowns, bottling lines, grape crushing wastes and filter aids, spills, leaks, and cooling tower blowdown. The WWTP receives these wastewaters, plus limited quantities of non-contact cooling water, along with contaminated stormwater runoff from bermed tank storage areas. Sanitary wastes are discharged separately to the POTW and most cooling waters are recycled. The on-site WWTP (Figure 1) comprises influent pumping, equalization, neutralization, nutrient addition, extended aeration activated sludge, aerated polishing and clarification prior to discharge to the POTW. Waste activated sludge is dewatered via vacuum filtration and residuals are handled off- site. Table 1 provides WWTP design features. The WWTP influent loading is highly variable, ranging from less than 1,000 kg COD/d to greater than 30,000 kg COD/d. Typically, 80 to 90% of the total influent COD is soluble. The POTW's discharge limits for COD, BOD5, and TSS are 600 mg/L, 300 mg/L, and 350 mg/L, respectively. 43rd Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1989 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 525
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198861 |
Title | Anaerobic treatment of winery wastewaters |
Author |
Farmer, J. Kevin Friedman, A. A. (Alexander A.) Hazen, Wallace C. |
Date of Original | 1988 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 43rd Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,39828 |
Extent of Original | p. 525-534 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-08-14 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 525 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 61 ANAEROBIC TREATMENT OF WINERY WASTEWATERS J. Kevin Farmer, Managing Engineer O'Brien & Gere Engineers, Inc. Syracuse, New York 13221 A. A. Friedman, Professor Department of Civil Engineering Syracuse University Syracuse, New York 13244-1190 Wallace C. Hazen, Plant Engineer Canandaigua Wine Company, Inc. Canandaigua, New York 14424 INTRODUCTION Canandaigua Wine Company, Inc. (CWC1) produces a variety of wines and wine products at its Canandaigua, New York winery. Winery wastewaters are treated on-site with an extended aeration treatment system prior to discharge to the City of Canandaigua's Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW). During the last few years, expanded winery activities have resulted in overloading of the pretreatment system and occasional contravention of POTW pretreatment standards. Consequently, CWCI initiated an effort to expand the on-site wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). O'Brien and Gere Engineers were retained to evaluate expansion alternatives. Given the high strength nature of the waste (1987 average COD of about 15,700 mg/L), the relatively high power and sludge disposal costs associated with aerobic biological treatment, along with site expansion limitations, it was determined that anaerobic treatment might prove cost-effective for pretreatment of winery wastewaters. In order to evaluate the feasibility and operating conditions associated with anaerobic treatment of winery wastewaters, an on-site pilot plant study was undertaken. The pilot plant study was conducted with an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor followed by an aerobic polishing reactor. The UASB process was selected based on several factors, including the ability to treat high organic loading rates, the successful operation of numerous full- scale UASB systems, reported resistance to upset, and economic considerations. Prior to initiating design, further evaluations of other proprietary anaerobic treatment processes were conducted. This paper contains a description of the overall selection process, including the pilot plant study, and economic and process comparisons of alternative biological treatment systems for treatment of winery wastewaters. EXISTING FACILITIES CWCI produces several products at its Canandaigua facility, including sparkling wines, still wines, and wine coolers. Waste sources include tank and floor washdowns, bottling lines, grape crushing wastes and filter aids, spills, leaks, and cooling tower blowdown. The WWTP receives these wastewaters, plus limited quantities of non-contact cooling water, along with contaminated stormwater runoff from bermed tank storage areas. Sanitary wastes are discharged separately to the POTW and most cooling waters are recycled. The on-site WWTP (Figure 1) comprises influent pumping, equalization, neutralization, nutrient addition, extended aeration activated sludge, aerated polishing and clarification prior to discharge to the POTW. Waste activated sludge is dewatered via vacuum filtration and residuals are handled off- site. Table 1 provides WWTP design features. The WWTP influent loading is highly variable, ranging from less than 1,000 kg COD/d to greater than 30,000 kg COD/d. Typically, 80 to 90% of the total influent COD is soluble. The POTW's discharge limits for COD, BOD5, and TSS are 600 mg/L, 300 mg/L, and 350 mg/L, respectively. 43rd Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, © 1989 Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan 48118. Printed in U.S.A. 525 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 525