page 475 |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Section Fourteen MEATPACKING WASTES 49 START-UP AND OPERATION RESULTS FROM SBR TREATMENT OF A MEAT PROCESSING WASTEWATER Kenneth L. Norcross, III, Vice President Sam Petrie, Project Engineer Jet Tech, Inc. Industrial Airport, Kansas 66031 Rick Bair, Project Director Mid-Kansas Engineering Corporation Wichita, Kansas 67226 Gorden Beaushaw, Plant Operator Doskocil Sausage Company South Hutchison, Kansas 67505 INTRODUCTION The Doskocil Sausage Company supplies precooked pizza toppings to most of the major pizza retailers. In 1985, a total of 79 million pounds of meat were processed at the facility. Approximately 20% of the mass is lost during the cooking process. The result is a highly concentrated waste stream with the following characteristics. Flow 150,000 to 400,000 GPD BOD 10,000 mg/L TSS 150 mg/L Grease 13,000 mg/L PH 4.5 to 11 The existing pretreatment plant was an activated sludge plant with fine bubble diffused aeration. Due to the high F:M loadings, the diffusers slimed over continuously, and the plant operated for years under extreme filamentous bulking conditions. Effluent quality was extremely poor, and little BOD reduction was achieved. In June of 1984, the City of South Hutchinson, Kansas passed a sewer disposal charge ordinance which assessed the industry lie per pound of BOD, lit per pound of grease, and 10« per pound of suspended solids. This resulted in an annual cost to Doskocil of $1.34 million. It was determined that a functional wastewater treatment plant with grease recovery could be constructed for under $1.5 million. The prime consideration was that the plant be capable of eliminating the filamentous bulking problem. A substantial recovery of renderable grease was estimated to be worth as much as $0.5 million annually. Dissolved air flotation was selected for grease recovery. The sequencing batch reactor (SBR) version of the activated sludge process was selected for BOD, suspended solids, and additional grease removal. The SBR's apparent capability to control filaments, flexibility and overall simplicity were the basis of selection. SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR PROCESS DESCRIPTION The conventional, continuous flow activated sludge process is as follows: influent feeds continuously, proceeds through a sequence of separate dedicated unit process tanks, and discharges continuously. Steady state conditions are attempted, but rarely achievable. In contrast, the basic operational steps of the batch reactor process are shown in Figure 1. As is evident from the sketch, all process steps (Fill, React, Settle and Decant) are completed in a single tank. In the SBR Process, the influent still feeds continuously, but batch-wise to each SBR process tank. The unit process steps proceed through a similar sequence of dedicated process periods instead of separate tanks. The effluent 475
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198749 |
Title | Start-up and operation results from SBR treatment of a meat processing wastewater |
Author |
Norcross, Kenneth L. Petrie, Sam Blair, Rick Beaushaw, Gorden |
Date of Original | 1987 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 42nd Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,38818 |
Extent of Original | p. 475-482 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-08-03 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 475 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Section Fourteen MEATPACKING WASTES 49 START-UP AND OPERATION RESULTS FROM SBR TREATMENT OF A MEAT PROCESSING WASTEWATER Kenneth L. Norcross, III, Vice President Sam Petrie, Project Engineer Jet Tech, Inc. Industrial Airport, Kansas 66031 Rick Bair, Project Director Mid-Kansas Engineering Corporation Wichita, Kansas 67226 Gorden Beaushaw, Plant Operator Doskocil Sausage Company South Hutchison, Kansas 67505 INTRODUCTION The Doskocil Sausage Company supplies precooked pizza toppings to most of the major pizza retailers. In 1985, a total of 79 million pounds of meat were processed at the facility. Approximately 20% of the mass is lost during the cooking process. The result is a highly concentrated waste stream with the following characteristics. Flow 150,000 to 400,000 GPD BOD 10,000 mg/L TSS 150 mg/L Grease 13,000 mg/L PH 4.5 to 11 The existing pretreatment plant was an activated sludge plant with fine bubble diffused aeration. Due to the high F:M loadings, the diffusers slimed over continuously, and the plant operated for years under extreme filamentous bulking conditions. Effluent quality was extremely poor, and little BOD reduction was achieved. In June of 1984, the City of South Hutchinson, Kansas passed a sewer disposal charge ordinance which assessed the industry lie per pound of BOD, lit per pound of grease, and 10« per pound of suspended solids. This resulted in an annual cost to Doskocil of $1.34 million. It was determined that a functional wastewater treatment plant with grease recovery could be constructed for under $1.5 million. The prime consideration was that the plant be capable of eliminating the filamentous bulking problem. A substantial recovery of renderable grease was estimated to be worth as much as $0.5 million annually. Dissolved air flotation was selected for grease recovery. The sequencing batch reactor (SBR) version of the activated sludge process was selected for BOD, suspended solids, and additional grease removal. The SBR's apparent capability to control filaments, flexibility and overall simplicity were the basis of selection. SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR PROCESS DESCRIPTION The conventional, continuous flow activated sludge process is as follows: influent feeds continuously, proceeds through a sequence of separate dedicated unit process tanks, and discharges continuously. Steady state conditions are attempted, but rarely achievable. In contrast, the basic operational steps of the batch reactor process are shown in Figure 1. As is evident from the sketch, all process steps (Fill, React, Settle and Decant) are completed in a single tank. In the SBR Process, the influent still feeds continuously, but batch-wise to each SBR process tank. The unit process steps proceed through a similar sequence of dedicated process periods instead of separate tanks. The effluent 475 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 475