page 447 |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
45 PRECAST CONCRETE DESIGN FOR TERTIARY WASTE TREATMENT PLANT SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCES TIME AND PROJECT COST Michael Solomon, Senior Environmental Engineer Gary A. Rogers, Manager Architectural & Structural Section Burlington Industries, Inc. Greensboro, NC 27420 INTRODUCTION Burlington Industries, one of the world's largest textile manufacturing corporations, operates over 80 manufacturing facilities throughout the United States and the world. One of Burlington's larger facilities is a plant located in Frosinone, Italy, about 60 miles south of Rome, which produces cotton/ polyester leisure wear and uniform fabrics. The Frosinone textile plant is located in a large industrial zone, or region, known as a Consorsio. The Consorsio provides water supply needs and wastewater treatment capacity for all the member industries in the zone. The Consorsio waste treatment plant is a physical chemical facility less than 10 years old which presently cannot meet the recently enforced standards for waste treatment. Burlington Industries is by far the largest water consumer and wastewater discharger in the Consorsio, using more than 50% of the available water supply. Waste discharge limitations are very stringent as compared to United States standards. For example, the waste limitations for the Consorsio and therefore the textile plant in Frosinone, are four times stricter than those for a similar facility in South Carolina. Italian regulations require that, when a regional facility such as the Consorsio does not meet the waste discharge standards, then all industry contributing to that regional facility must cease discharge and therefore stop operating until the facility can meet waste discharge limits. In January of 1986, Burlington Industries management decided that potential disruption in business activity caused by potential shutdowns from the Consorsio waste treatment plant could have a significant impact on their future business opportunities in the Common Market. The corporation then allocated funds for the design and construction of a complete secondary waste treatment facility at the Frosinone site which would allow the plant to meet federal standard itself and bypass discharge to the Consorsio and provide for direct discharge to the Socco River. Figure 1 is a diagram of the Frosinone process. PROJECT SCHEDULE On February 17, 1986, Burlington Industries began a fast track pilot study, design and construction project to design and build a 3 MGD secondary waste treatment plant for the Frosinone operation. The fast track schedule allowed for concurrent biological pilot plant studies being conducted at the same time the preliminary design and construction scheduling were taking place. The schedule (see Table I) provided for an optimistic schedule of 18 months from the commencing of the pilot plant study through the beginning of the plant start-up, in order to minimize potential plant shutdowns from the Consorsio facility. In early April of 1986, Burlington's Italian consultant, Termokimik, informed Burlington Industries Corporate Engineering that a new precast concrete system had been developed in Europe for containment structures that could significantly decrease the construction period for the Frosinone project. After field evaluations of several existing installations and a thorough examination of the precast fabrication facilities, Burlington chose to incorporate this new technology into the Frosinone design. As indicated on the attached construction schedule, the impact of the use of precast construction was significant. The estimated completion schedule for the structural components of the system was 7 months; however, using the precast system, the entire facility including nine containment structures and two process control buildings was built in less than 6 weeks. 447
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198745 |
Title | Precast concrete design for tertiary waste treatment plant significantly reduces time and project cost |
Author |
Solomon, Michael Rogers, Gary A. |
Date of Original | 1987 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 42nd Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,38818 |
Extent of Original | p. 447-450 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-08-03 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 447 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 45 PRECAST CONCRETE DESIGN FOR TERTIARY WASTE TREATMENT PLANT SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCES TIME AND PROJECT COST Michael Solomon, Senior Environmental Engineer Gary A. Rogers, Manager Architectural & Structural Section Burlington Industries, Inc. Greensboro, NC 27420 INTRODUCTION Burlington Industries, one of the world's largest textile manufacturing corporations, operates over 80 manufacturing facilities throughout the United States and the world. One of Burlington's larger facilities is a plant located in Frosinone, Italy, about 60 miles south of Rome, which produces cotton/ polyester leisure wear and uniform fabrics. The Frosinone textile plant is located in a large industrial zone, or region, known as a Consorsio. The Consorsio provides water supply needs and wastewater treatment capacity for all the member industries in the zone. The Consorsio waste treatment plant is a physical chemical facility less than 10 years old which presently cannot meet the recently enforced standards for waste treatment. Burlington Industries is by far the largest water consumer and wastewater discharger in the Consorsio, using more than 50% of the available water supply. Waste discharge limitations are very stringent as compared to United States standards. For example, the waste limitations for the Consorsio and therefore the textile plant in Frosinone, are four times stricter than those for a similar facility in South Carolina. Italian regulations require that, when a regional facility such as the Consorsio does not meet the waste discharge standards, then all industry contributing to that regional facility must cease discharge and therefore stop operating until the facility can meet waste discharge limits. In January of 1986, Burlington Industries management decided that potential disruption in business activity caused by potential shutdowns from the Consorsio waste treatment plant could have a significant impact on their future business opportunities in the Common Market. The corporation then allocated funds for the design and construction of a complete secondary waste treatment facility at the Frosinone site which would allow the plant to meet federal standard itself and bypass discharge to the Consorsio and provide for direct discharge to the Socco River. Figure 1 is a diagram of the Frosinone process. PROJECT SCHEDULE On February 17, 1986, Burlington Industries began a fast track pilot study, design and construction project to design and build a 3 MGD secondary waste treatment plant for the Frosinone operation. The fast track schedule allowed for concurrent biological pilot plant studies being conducted at the same time the preliminary design and construction scheduling were taking place. The schedule (see Table I) provided for an optimistic schedule of 18 months from the commencing of the pilot plant study through the beginning of the plant start-up, in order to minimize potential plant shutdowns from the Consorsio facility. In early April of 1986, Burlington's Italian consultant, Termokimik, informed Burlington Industries Corporate Engineering that a new precast concrete system had been developed in Europe for containment structures that could significantly decrease the construction period for the Frosinone project. After field evaluations of several existing installations and a thorough examination of the precast fabrication facilities, Burlington chose to incorporate this new technology into the Frosinone design. As indicated on the attached construction schedule, the impact of the use of precast construction was significant. The estimated completion schedule for the structural components of the system was 7 months; however, using the precast system, the entire facility including nine containment structures and two process control buildings was built in less than 6 weeks. 447 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 447