page 29 |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
EXPERIENCES WITH NEW JERSEY'S ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP RESPONSIBILITY ACT: HEAVEN OR HELL? Gary T. Boyer, Project Manager Richard A. Jasaitis, Environmental Geologist Van Note-Harvey Associates Princeton, New Jersey 08540 INTRODUCTION An Environmental Cleanup Responsibility Act (ECRA) will be coming to your State. The idea appeals to the public because such laws try to fix responsibility for the pollution with the polluter and get the pollution cleaned up. However, it is important to note New Jersey's experience with ECRA in order to avoid copying our mistakes. WHAT? ECRA is an act unique to our State passed in late 1983 which says that before an industrial establishment is closed or transferred it must undergo a study for contamination. If the study shows contamination, then the site must be cleaned up. WHY? This law came about for two reasons. First, in several cases, the State has required buyers of land to clean up contamination that the seller caused. The buyer either didn't want to clean up or didn't have the money. So the legislature decided that it really should be the seller's responsibility to clean up the land before it gets transferred. The most famous case of this in New Jersey was the Ventron case where a company sold a piece of property to the buyer who then was asked by the State to clean up. The seller had reprocessed mercury at this plant and there was a lot of mercury that had been spilled and had gotten into the food chain. The buyer then had to sue the seller for the money they had to spend on clean up. The second reason for ECRA is that the public gets stuck with a clean up when a private party hides or goes bankrupt. For example, in the Signo Vista case, an urban warehouse was filled with chemicals, experienced fires, and was cleaned up at public expense. Only a small amount of the expense was recovered. Many Superfund cases turn out this way. WHO? The law doesn't apply to everything you might think of as an industrial establishment that would cause pollution. For example, gasoline stations, which are one of the most common sources of soil, water or air contamination, are not covered by this law. What is covered is something the State terms "industrial establishments." ECRA defines an industrial establishment as a place of business which generates or handles "hazardous substances." New Jersey's definition of hazardous substances is quite broad. It includes not only chemicals or mixtures on various State and Federal lists, but also petroleum products like heating oil. Thus, many more businesses are affected than you would normally anticipate because they heat their building with oil from an underground tank. The definition of an industrial establishment includes the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code. This is a four digit number from a classification system often used by the U.S. Census Bureau. The SIC Codes that are covered by ECRA include manufacturing such as electrical equipment, chemicals, rubber, plastics, machinery, electronics, wood treating (Table I). Also included are transportation industries and certain kinds of warehousing involving chemicals or hazardous substances. 29
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198704 |
Title | Experiences with New Jersey's Environmental Cleanup Responsibility Act : heaven or hell? |
Author |
Boyer, Gary T. Jasaitis, Richard A. |
Date of Original | 1987 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 42nd Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,38818 |
Extent of Original | p. 29-32 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-08-03 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 29 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | EXPERIENCES WITH NEW JERSEY'S ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP RESPONSIBILITY ACT: HEAVEN OR HELL? Gary T. Boyer, Project Manager Richard A. Jasaitis, Environmental Geologist Van Note-Harvey Associates Princeton, New Jersey 08540 INTRODUCTION An Environmental Cleanup Responsibility Act (ECRA) will be coming to your State. The idea appeals to the public because such laws try to fix responsibility for the pollution with the polluter and get the pollution cleaned up. However, it is important to note New Jersey's experience with ECRA in order to avoid copying our mistakes. WHAT? ECRA is an act unique to our State passed in late 1983 which says that before an industrial establishment is closed or transferred it must undergo a study for contamination. If the study shows contamination, then the site must be cleaned up. WHY? This law came about for two reasons. First, in several cases, the State has required buyers of land to clean up contamination that the seller caused. The buyer either didn't want to clean up or didn't have the money. So the legislature decided that it really should be the seller's responsibility to clean up the land before it gets transferred. The most famous case of this in New Jersey was the Ventron case where a company sold a piece of property to the buyer who then was asked by the State to clean up. The seller had reprocessed mercury at this plant and there was a lot of mercury that had been spilled and had gotten into the food chain. The buyer then had to sue the seller for the money they had to spend on clean up. The second reason for ECRA is that the public gets stuck with a clean up when a private party hides or goes bankrupt. For example, in the Signo Vista case, an urban warehouse was filled with chemicals, experienced fires, and was cleaned up at public expense. Only a small amount of the expense was recovered. Many Superfund cases turn out this way. WHO? The law doesn't apply to everything you might think of as an industrial establishment that would cause pollution. For example, gasoline stations, which are one of the most common sources of soil, water or air contamination, are not covered by this law. What is covered is something the State terms "industrial establishments." ECRA defines an industrial establishment as a place of business which generates or handles "hazardous substances." New Jersey's definition of hazardous substances is quite broad. It includes not only chemicals or mixtures on various State and Federal lists, but also petroleum products like heating oil. Thus, many more businesses are affected than you would normally anticipate because they heat their building with oil from an underground tank. The definition of an industrial establishment includes the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code. This is a four digit number from a classification system often used by the U.S. Census Bureau. The SIC Codes that are covered by ECRA include manufacturing such as electrical equipment, chemicals, rubber, plastics, machinery, electronics, wood treating (Table I). Also included are transportation industries and certain kinds of warehousing involving chemicals or hazardous substances. 29 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 29