page 351 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Section 13. DAIRY WASTES DAIRY PROCESSING WASTEWATER BIOAUGMENTATION- AN EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS John H. Martin, Jr., Research Associate Department of Agricultural Engineering Robert R. Zall, Professor Department of Food Science Cornell University Ithaca, New York 14853 INTRODUCTION As noted by Harper et al. [1], it is a common misconception that biological treatment of dairy processing wastewaters is a relatively simple task particularly in comparison to the treatment of municipal wastewaters. As industry experiences have demonstrated, it is in fact, far more difficult. In an analysis of the performance of 20 dairy processing wastewater treatment plants, Harper et al. found that the efficiency of these facilities was less than 70% for more than 25% of time. Although relatively low influent suspended solids concentrations eliminate the need for primary treatment, the highly variable nature of flows and the characteristics of dairy processing wastewaters have made the realization of consistently high levels of treatment efficiency exceedingly difficult. For the activated sludge process, the occurrence of bulking is probably the most frequently cited problem in treating these wastewaters [1,2,3], Bulking is the term that is used to describe activated sludge that settles and compacts poorly. When bulking occurs, the ability to produce a well-clarified effluent and a concentrated return sludge is impaired. Ultimately, process failure can occur due to excessive losses of activated sludge solids in secondary clarifier effluent and high recycle ratios required due to the dilute nature of secondary clarifier underflow. Sezgin et al. [4] have suggested that many of the settling, compaction, and dewatering problems associated with the activated sludge process are related to the relative numbers of filamentous and zoogleal microorganisms present. Excessive numbers of filamentous microorganisms are characteristic of bulking sludges. In contrast, the absence of filamentous organisms or their presence in low numbers result in small, weak floes that settle rapidly but produce a turbid effluent. This is due to the presence of small "pin point" floes that do not settle. This led Sezgin et al. to conclude that a balanced population of filamentous and zoogleal microorganisms is necessary to produce activated sludge floes that settle and compact readily and produce a well clarified effluent. It is the role of the filaments to provide a strong rigid structure to which the zoogleal organisms can attach. The frequent occurrence of bulking in the treatment of dairy processing wastewaters using the activated sludge process led Chambers [3] to question the validity of what was described as the "Ubiquity Principle" as applied to the biological treatment of these wastes. Citing the abundance of filamentous bacteria and fungi that are common to bulking sludges, Chambers suggested that microbial populations that develop naturally in these biological waste treatment systems are not necessarily composed of those species that will provide the most effective degree of treatment. This led to Chamber's proposal that more effective microbial populations can be established via the practice of bioaug- mentation. In support of this hypothesis, case histories of three industry-operated, full-scale dairy processing wastewater treatment systems were presented. For each treatment system involved in the study: an extended aeration system, an aerated lagoon, and an oxidation ditch, marked improvement in system performance was reported to have occurred following the implementation of a program of bioaug- mentation. Unfortunately, because information regarding waste characteristics and flows before and after bioaugmentation as well as other important details were omitted, the data presented did not conclusively demonstrate that bioaugmentation was solely responsible for the improvements noted. 351
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198536 |
Title | Dairy processing wastewater bioaugmentation : an evaluation of effectiveness |
Author |
Martin, John H. Zall, Robert R. |
Date of Original | 1985 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 40th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,36131 |
Extent of Original | p. 351-360 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-15 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 351 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Section 13. DAIRY WASTES DAIRY PROCESSING WASTEWATER BIOAUGMENTATION- AN EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS John H. Martin, Jr., Research Associate Department of Agricultural Engineering Robert R. Zall, Professor Department of Food Science Cornell University Ithaca, New York 14853 INTRODUCTION As noted by Harper et al. [1], it is a common misconception that biological treatment of dairy processing wastewaters is a relatively simple task particularly in comparison to the treatment of municipal wastewaters. As industry experiences have demonstrated, it is in fact, far more difficult. In an analysis of the performance of 20 dairy processing wastewater treatment plants, Harper et al. found that the efficiency of these facilities was less than 70% for more than 25% of time. Although relatively low influent suspended solids concentrations eliminate the need for primary treatment, the highly variable nature of flows and the characteristics of dairy processing wastewaters have made the realization of consistently high levels of treatment efficiency exceedingly difficult. For the activated sludge process, the occurrence of bulking is probably the most frequently cited problem in treating these wastewaters [1,2,3], Bulking is the term that is used to describe activated sludge that settles and compacts poorly. When bulking occurs, the ability to produce a well-clarified effluent and a concentrated return sludge is impaired. Ultimately, process failure can occur due to excessive losses of activated sludge solids in secondary clarifier effluent and high recycle ratios required due to the dilute nature of secondary clarifier underflow. Sezgin et al. [4] have suggested that many of the settling, compaction, and dewatering problems associated with the activated sludge process are related to the relative numbers of filamentous and zoogleal microorganisms present. Excessive numbers of filamentous microorganisms are characteristic of bulking sludges. In contrast, the absence of filamentous organisms or their presence in low numbers result in small, weak floes that settle rapidly but produce a turbid effluent. This is due to the presence of small "pin point" floes that do not settle. This led Sezgin et al. to conclude that a balanced population of filamentous and zoogleal microorganisms is necessary to produce activated sludge floes that settle and compact readily and produce a well clarified effluent. It is the role of the filaments to provide a strong rigid structure to which the zoogleal organisms can attach. The frequent occurrence of bulking in the treatment of dairy processing wastewaters using the activated sludge process led Chambers [3] to question the validity of what was described as the "Ubiquity Principle" as applied to the biological treatment of these wastes. Citing the abundance of filamentous bacteria and fungi that are common to bulking sludges, Chambers suggested that microbial populations that develop naturally in these biological waste treatment systems are not necessarily composed of those species that will provide the most effective degree of treatment. This led to Chamber's proposal that more effective microbial populations can be established via the practice of bioaug- mentation. In support of this hypothesis, case histories of three industry-operated, full-scale dairy processing wastewater treatment systems were presented. For each treatment system involved in the study: an extended aeration system, an aerated lagoon, and an oxidation ditch, marked improvement in system performance was reported to have occurred following the implementation of a program of bioaug- mentation. Unfortunately, because information regarding waste characteristics and flows before and after bioaugmentation as well as other important details were omitted, the data presented did not conclusively demonstrate that bioaugmentation was solely responsible for the improvements noted. 351 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 351