page 511 |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
IRON CONDITIONING OF SLUDGE FROM FOUNDRY FURNACE EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR ELIMINATION OF EP TOXICITY William A. Stephens, Manager of Engineering Thomas R. Stolzenburg, Water Chemist Residuals Management Technology, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin Robert R. Stanforth, Chemist Kota Kinabolu, Sabah East Malaysia James E. Etzel, Professor School of Civil Engineering Purdue University W. Lafayette, Indiana 47907 INTRODUCTION In a study conducted by USEPA, approximately 40% of the sludges tested from foundry emission control wastes were classified as "hazardous" using an EP Toxicity leaching test [1]. In this test, lead and/or cadmium will typically leach at concentrations near or above USEPA's hazardous waste limits. Disposal of these solids in a hazardous waste landfill can be more expensive than treating the sludge to reduce lead and cadmium leaching. Various chemical additives have been used either on the wastewater or on the sludge after settling to immobilize the lead and cadmium. Investigators at Purdue University and Residuals Management Technology have experienced success with treatment of the waste using iron. The results and discussion of some of the iron tests will be presented here. LEACH TEST PROCEDURE The data presented here are results from submitting drying bed sludge or settling basin sludge from various foundries to an EP Toxicity leach test. The sludges originate from the air emission control systems for the metal melting cupolas. The EP Toxicity leach test is a standard USEPA batch leach test at pH = 5 using acetic acid. This test is required for classifying solid waste intended for disposal in a landfill [2]. If leachable concentrations of the listed constituents exceed hazardous waste limits, the solid is classified as hazardous. The limits established for lead and cadmium are 5 mg/1 and 1 mg/1 respectively. These concentrations are based on a 100 gram sample of wet sludge subjected to 1,600 mL of pH 5 water for 24 hours with agitation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Alum (aluminum sulfate) is commonly used to coagulate and settle the solids in wastewater. Ferric sulfate is equally effective. However, ferric sulfate is far more effective in reducing lead leaching in the resulting settled sludge when subjected to an EP Toxicity test. Cadmium leaching is reduced only as a result of dilution. Figure 1 shows a sludge that leaches lead and cadmium at levels exceeding the hazardous waste limits. Treatment of the sludge with aluminum sulfate did not lower lead leaching to acceptable levels while ferric sulfate did. In the coagulation process, aluminum and ferric hydroxide colloids form. Research on the adsorption of cations to these surfaces indicates that ferric hydroxide adsorbs divalent cations far more efficiently and at lower pH values than aluminum hydroxide (Figure 2). Cadmium is adsorbed to a lesser extent than lead. These results suggest that adsorption of soluble lead cations to ferric hydroxide colloids is an important mechanism by which lead is immobilized in the EP Toxicity leaching test. 511
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198453 |
Title | Iron conditioning of sludge from foundry furnace emission control systems for elimination of EP toxicity |
Author |
Stephens, William A. Stolzenburg, Thomas R. Stanforth, Robert R. Etzel, James E. |
Date of Original | 1984 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 39th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,35769 |
Extent of Original | p. 511-514 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-21 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 511 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | IRON CONDITIONING OF SLUDGE FROM FOUNDRY FURNACE EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR ELIMINATION OF EP TOXICITY William A. Stephens, Manager of Engineering Thomas R. Stolzenburg, Water Chemist Residuals Management Technology, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin Robert R. Stanforth, Chemist Kota Kinabolu, Sabah East Malaysia James E. Etzel, Professor School of Civil Engineering Purdue University W. Lafayette, Indiana 47907 INTRODUCTION In a study conducted by USEPA, approximately 40% of the sludges tested from foundry emission control wastes were classified as "hazardous" using an EP Toxicity leaching test [1]. In this test, lead and/or cadmium will typically leach at concentrations near or above USEPA's hazardous waste limits. Disposal of these solids in a hazardous waste landfill can be more expensive than treating the sludge to reduce lead and cadmium leaching. Various chemical additives have been used either on the wastewater or on the sludge after settling to immobilize the lead and cadmium. Investigators at Purdue University and Residuals Management Technology have experienced success with treatment of the waste using iron. The results and discussion of some of the iron tests will be presented here. LEACH TEST PROCEDURE The data presented here are results from submitting drying bed sludge or settling basin sludge from various foundries to an EP Toxicity leach test. The sludges originate from the air emission control systems for the metal melting cupolas. The EP Toxicity leach test is a standard USEPA batch leach test at pH = 5 using acetic acid. This test is required for classifying solid waste intended for disposal in a landfill [2]. If leachable concentrations of the listed constituents exceed hazardous waste limits, the solid is classified as hazardous. The limits established for lead and cadmium are 5 mg/1 and 1 mg/1 respectively. These concentrations are based on a 100 gram sample of wet sludge subjected to 1,600 mL of pH 5 water for 24 hours with agitation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Alum (aluminum sulfate) is commonly used to coagulate and settle the solids in wastewater. Ferric sulfate is equally effective. However, ferric sulfate is far more effective in reducing lead leaching in the resulting settled sludge when subjected to an EP Toxicity test. Cadmium leaching is reduced only as a result of dilution. Figure 1 shows a sludge that leaches lead and cadmium at levels exceeding the hazardous waste limits. Treatment of the sludge with aluminum sulfate did not lower lead leaching to acceptable levels while ferric sulfate did. In the coagulation process, aluminum and ferric hydroxide colloids form. Research on the adsorption of cations to these surfaces indicates that ferric hydroxide adsorbs divalent cations far more efficiently and at lower pH values than aluminum hydroxide (Figure 2). Cadmium is adsorbed to a lesser extent than lead. These results suggest that adsorption of soluble lead cations to ferric hydroxide colloids is an important mechanism by which lead is immobilized in the EP Toxicity leaching test. 511 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 511