page 520 |
Previous | 1 of 10 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
62 APPLICATION OF THE TWO-PHASE ANAEROBIC FLUIDIZED BED PROCESS TO THE TREATMENT OF CORN PROCESSING WASTEWATER Dilip J. Kothari, Development Engineer Alan Y. Li, Technology Manager Dorr-Oliver, Inc. Stanford, Connecticut 06904 Thomas J. Kontol, Environmental Mgmt. Supervisor American Maize-Products Company Hammond, Indiana 46320 INTRODUCTION The corn wet milling industry processes corn to produce starch, oil, corn syrup, and animal feed. Normally, clean corn is steeped in a dilute solution of sulfuric acid to loosen the hull, soften the gluten, and dissolve minerals or organic matter in the kernel. Next, the corn is coarsely ground and cycloned to separate the germ from which oil is extracted. The kernel residue is finely ground and screened to separate the soluble starch and gluten from the fiber and hull, which are used as feed additives. Starch is centrifugally separated from the gluten and marketed either as starch, modified starch, or hydrolyzed into corn syrup or corn sugar. Gluten is also used as a feed additive. Both the feed-producing and starch-manufacturing process evolve a process wastewater containing approximately 1% of the corn in soluble form. Reuse programs, which are known as "bottling up," have reduced plant losses to less than 0.5% of the dry corn raw material. Major wastes from corn processing plants include the volatile organics entrained in the evaporator condensate resulting from the evaporation of steep water, sweet water resulting from refining of corn syrup and dextrose, starch filtrates from the preparation of modified starches, and wastes from "bottling up" processes [1]. Other in-plant liquid waste sources will vary depending on the products made and processes used in a particular plant [2]. The Hammond, Indiana corn processing plant of American Maize-Products Company manufactures modified and unmodified starches, corn syrups, corn syrup solids, dextrins, and feed co- products. Corn processing waste streams can include steep water condensates, sweet water, starch filtrates, carbon regeneration water, and gluten. These waste streams are currently disposed of in two ways: 1. A major portion of the corn processing wastewater is treated in an on-site system consisting of activated sludge and polishing lagoons, chemical treatment, and final clarification. After clarification, the effluent is discharged to Lake Michigan. Waste activated sludge (WAS) from the aerobic system is thickened and removed by centrifu- gation. 2. At times, waste streams, representing a significant organic load, are sent directly to the Hammond, Indiana publicly-owned treatment works (POTW). The Hammond POTW sewer charges, assessed on flow, 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) and total suspended solids (TSS), are very significant. American Maize has investigated various alternatives to reduce sewer charges and to reduce the load on its existing aerobic system. Among these alternatives are product recovery, hauling away raw wastewater for disposal elsewhere, expanded aerobic treatment capacity, and anaerobic pretreatment. Anaerobic pretreatment has been chosen as the most cost effective and practical option. Anaerobic pretreatment has proven to be a very attractive means of removing large quantities of organic material from highly concentrated waste streams prior to on-site aerobic treatment [3] or discharge to a local POTW. Significant reductions in aeration power costs or sewer surcharges can be achieved with anaerobic pretreatment as well as production of large quantities of methane-rich 520
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198662 |
Title | Application of the two-phase anaerobic fluidized bed process to the treatment of corn processing wastewater |
Author |
Kothari, Dilip J. Li, Alan Y. Kontol, Thomas J. |
Date of Original | 1986 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 41st Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,37786 |
Extent of Original | p. 520-529 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-13 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 520 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 62 APPLICATION OF THE TWO-PHASE ANAEROBIC FLUIDIZED BED PROCESS TO THE TREATMENT OF CORN PROCESSING WASTEWATER Dilip J. Kothari, Development Engineer Alan Y. Li, Technology Manager Dorr-Oliver, Inc. Stanford, Connecticut 06904 Thomas J. Kontol, Environmental Mgmt. Supervisor American Maize-Products Company Hammond, Indiana 46320 INTRODUCTION The corn wet milling industry processes corn to produce starch, oil, corn syrup, and animal feed. Normally, clean corn is steeped in a dilute solution of sulfuric acid to loosen the hull, soften the gluten, and dissolve minerals or organic matter in the kernel. Next, the corn is coarsely ground and cycloned to separate the germ from which oil is extracted. The kernel residue is finely ground and screened to separate the soluble starch and gluten from the fiber and hull, which are used as feed additives. Starch is centrifugally separated from the gluten and marketed either as starch, modified starch, or hydrolyzed into corn syrup or corn sugar. Gluten is also used as a feed additive. Both the feed-producing and starch-manufacturing process evolve a process wastewater containing approximately 1% of the corn in soluble form. Reuse programs, which are known as "bottling up," have reduced plant losses to less than 0.5% of the dry corn raw material. Major wastes from corn processing plants include the volatile organics entrained in the evaporator condensate resulting from the evaporation of steep water, sweet water resulting from refining of corn syrup and dextrose, starch filtrates from the preparation of modified starches, and wastes from "bottling up" processes [1]. Other in-plant liquid waste sources will vary depending on the products made and processes used in a particular plant [2]. The Hammond, Indiana corn processing plant of American Maize-Products Company manufactures modified and unmodified starches, corn syrups, corn syrup solids, dextrins, and feed co- products. Corn processing waste streams can include steep water condensates, sweet water, starch filtrates, carbon regeneration water, and gluten. These waste streams are currently disposed of in two ways: 1. A major portion of the corn processing wastewater is treated in an on-site system consisting of activated sludge and polishing lagoons, chemical treatment, and final clarification. After clarification, the effluent is discharged to Lake Michigan. Waste activated sludge (WAS) from the aerobic system is thickened and removed by centrifu- gation. 2. At times, waste streams, representing a significant organic load, are sent directly to the Hammond, Indiana publicly-owned treatment works (POTW). The Hammond POTW sewer charges, assessed on flow, 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) and total suspended solids (TSS), are very significant. American Maize has investigated various alternatives to reduce sewer charges and to reduce the load on its existing aerobic system. Among these alternatives are product recovery, hauling away raw wastewater for disposal elsewhere, expanded aerobic treatment capacity, and anaerobic pretreatment. Anaerobic pretreatment has been chosen as the most cost effective and practical option. Anaerobic pretreatment has proven to be a very attractive means of removing large quantities of organic material from highly concentrated waste streams prior to on-site aerobic treatment [3] or discharge to a local POTW. Significant reductions in aeration power costs or sewer surcharges can be achieved with anaerobic pretreatment as well as production of large quantities of methane-rich 520 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 520