page 377 |
Previous | 1 of 6 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
44 SURFACTANT SCRUBBING OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS FROM SOIL Janet Kickabaugh, Research Associate Sara Clement, Graduate Research Assistant Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio 45221 Ronald F. Lewis, Microbiologist U.S. EPA-ORD-HWERL Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 INTRODUCTION A lab scale study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of aqueous surfactant solutions for decontaminating soil from a hazardous waste site. The soil used in this study was from the Chem-dyne hazardous waste site in Hamilton, Ohio which was used to store and dispose of pesticides, chlorinated hydrocarbons, solvents, waste oils, and other hazardous wastes from 1975 to 1980. Clean up of the site was initiated in 1980 and most chemical drums were removed by 1983. Soil from the site still remains to be decontaminated. The Chem-dyne soil used in this study was analyzed by gas chromatography for 11 chlorinated hydrocarbons (hexachlorobenzene, dichlorobenzenes, trichlorobenzenes, hexachlorobutadiene, Aldrin, Endrin, Heptachlor, and Dieldrin). The soil contained a total of from 216 to 266 mg/kg of these compounds. Analysis for total chlorinated hydrocarbons (52 peaks) indicated that the total concentration of all chlorinated hydrocarbons in the soil was approximately 2078 mg/kg. Surfactants were used to promote solubilization of these chlorinated hydrocarbons from Chem- dyne soil. One end of a surfactant molecule is polar (water soluble), while the other end is non-polar (organic soluble) so that they promote aqueous solubilization of sparingly-water soluble compounds. Anionic, nonionic, cationic surfactants and blends of these types were evaluated. Anionic surfactants, the oldest group of commercial surfactants, are usually highly water soluble, but are sensitive to the total ionic strength of the media. The negatively charged polar solubilizing group on anionic surfactants is usually a sulfonate, sulfate, or phosphate functional group. Cationic surfactants are a small group of softening and coating agents with a positively charged solubilizing group which is usually an amino or quaternary nitrogen functional group. Nonionic surfactants do not have a charge on their solubilizing group. They are solubilized by hydrogen bonding at oxygen or hydroxy! groups in the surfactant molecule. Nonionic surfactants usually contain the polyoxyethylene group as their solubilizing group and are now the most commonly used group of commercial surfactants in North America. LITERATURE SURVEY Literature on using surfactants for secondary and tertiary oil recovery indicates that a blend of two surfactants, a surfactant and a co-surfactant, is more effective than a single surfactant used alone. Therefore, it was decided to investigate blends of surfactants (nonionic-anionic and nonionic- cationic) as well as anionic, nonionic, and cationic surfactants used alone. Only a few references to using surfactants for scrubbing soils from hazardous waste sites or spills are available. The concept is still in the lab stage of development. Huibregste et al. [1] developed a mobile soil scrubber to wash contaminated soil. They used 0.1-1% solutions of nonionic surfactants in laboratory shake jar tests to determine the effectiveness of different types of solutions in scrubbing various contaminants (PCB, phenol) out of soils. Initial contaminant concentrations were quite high (61-850 mg/L PCB and 1,000-20,000 mg/L phenol). Removal of phenol by surfactant solutions ranged from 67-97%, while removal of PCB ranged from 20-37%. 377
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198644 |
Title | Surfactant scrubbing of hazardous chemicals from soil |
Author |
Rickabaugh, Janet Clement, Sara Lewis, Ronald F. |
Date of Original | 1986 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 41st Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,37786 |
Extent of Original | p. 377-382 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-13 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 377 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | 44 SURFACTANT SCRUBBING OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS FROM SOIL Janet Kickabaugh, Research Associate Sara Clement, Graduate Research Assistant Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio 45221 Ronald F. Lewis, Microbiologist U.S. EPA-ORD-HWERL Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 INTRODUCTION A lab scale study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of aqueous surfactant solutions for decontaminating soil from a hazardous waste site. The soil used in this study was from the Chem-dyne hazardous waste site in Hamilton, Ohio which was used to store and dispose of pesticides, chlorinated hydrocarbons, solvents, waste oils, and other hazardous wastes from 1975 to 1980. Clean up of the site was initiated in 1980 and most chemical drums were removed by 1983. Soil from the site still remains to be decontaminated. The Chem-dyne soil used in this study was analyzed by gas chromatography for 11 chlorinated hydrocarbons (hexachlorobenzene, dichlorobenzenes, trichlorobenzenes, hexachlorobutadiene, Aldrin, Endrin, Heptachlor, and Dieldrin). The soil contained a total of from 216 to 266 mg/kg of these compounds. Analysis for total chlorinated hydrocarbons (52 peaks) indicated that the total concentration of all chlorinated hydrocarbons in the soil was approximately 2078 mg/kg. Surfactants were used to promote solubilization of these chlorinated hydrocarbons from Chem- dyne soil. One end of a surfactant molecule is polar (water soluble), while the other end is non-polar (organic soluble) so that they promote aqueous solubilization of sparingly-water soluble compounds. Anionic, nonionic, cationic surfactants and blends of these types were evaluated. Anionic surfactants, the oldest group of commercial surfactants, are usually highly water soluble, but are sensitive to the total ionic strength of the media. The negatively charged polar solubilizing group on anionic surfactants is usually a sulfonate, sulfate, or phosphate functional group. Cationic surfactants are a small group of softening and coating agents with a positively charged solubilizing group which is usually an amino or quaternary nitrogen functional group. Nonionic surfactants do not have a charge on their solubilizing group. They are solubilized by hydrogen bonding at oxygen or hydroxy! groups in the surfactant molecule. Nonionic surfactants usually contain the polyoxyethylene group as their solubilizing group and are now the most commonly used group of commercial surfactants in North America. LITERATURE SURVEY Literature on using surfactants for secondary and tertiary oil recovery indicates that a blend of two surfactants, a surfactant and a co-surfactant, is more effective than a single surfactant used alone. Therefore, it was decided to investigate blends of surfactants (nonionic-anionic and nonionic- cationic) as well as anionic, nonionic, and cationic surfactants used alone. Only a few references to using surfactants for scrubbing soils from hazardous waste sites or spills are available. The concept is still in the lab stage of development. Huibregste et al. [1] developed a mobile soil scrubber to wash contaminated soil. They used 0.1-1% solutions of nonionic surfactants in laboratory shake jar tests to determine the effectiveness of different types of solutions in scrubbing various contaminants (PCB, phenol) out of soils. Initial contaminant concentrations were quite high (61-850 mg/L PCB and 1,000-20,000 mg/L phenol). Removal of phenol by surfactant solutions ranged from 67-97%, while removal of PCB ranged from 20-37%. 377 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 377